Ivins isn't the 9/11 anthrax mailer and the FBI keeps blaming people despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.If Ivins didn't do it, maybe he didn't commit suicide. Even though experts and friends said Ivins didn't do it, the FBI blamed him with no trial and the corporate (government) media promoted the FBI's claims - like an infomercial, like propaganda. It sure looks like the FBI knows who did it and is covering up something, or they wouldn't be so quick to have blamed Ivins despite flimsy evidence, and now no evidence at all. They've blamed people in the past before Ivins, that is a fact. Now, they're wrong again, but why are they continually pinning the blame on the wrong people? FBI - keep throwing shit against the wall and see what sticks as long as the real perpetrators aren't exposed. They know who did it. It doesn't take a genius to realize this.
Did you notice how even though the FBI pushed the "Ivins did it" scenario, they never addressed why a white guy working for the U.S. government wrote "DEATH TO AMERICA", "DEATH TO ISRAEL", and "ALLAH IS GREAT" on the anthrax letters? So, they never said Ivins wanted to blame Arabs. Now, who else would want to blame Arabs?
How many times is the FBI going to (ON PURPOSE!) falsely accuse someone of being the anthrax mailer with the media playing along with it, before you say there's a cover up going on?This isn't the FBI being "inept" or "crying wolf", it's the FBI trying to continually pin the anthrax mailings ON PURPOSE on the wrong people!!! Wake up!!! Listen to me!!! Use your brain!!! I sincerely believe that a majority of you are not stupid and realize what's going on here. Seriously. It's a cover up; they know who did it.
Anthrax spores don't match dead researcher's samples
Sandia National Laboratories Test Exonerates Ivins
Anthrax investigation still yielding findings. Chemical composition of spores doesn't match suspect flask.
Ivins is the Third Scientist the FBI has Tried to Pin the Anthrax Attacks On
The government is trying to bury the 2001 anthrax attack scandal (the anthrax came from a U.S. military base) by claiming that one of the key suspects - Bruce E. Ivins - was a "lone nut" who committed suicide. The government claims that the anthrax letters were an innocent mistake which was "part of an Army scientist's warped plan to test his cure for the deadly toxin". Case closed. There are just a couple of loose ends:
Former Reagan administration official Paul Craig Roberts' "The Anthrax Attacks and the Assault on Civil Liberties"
THE HIDDEN ANTHRAX LETTERS SUSPECT
World’s Top Anthrax Experts Say The Killer Anthrax was Weaponized
Ivins Could Not Have Applied High-Tech Coating to the Killer Anthrax
EXCLUSIVE: 'Not One' Reporter Bothered to Ask Brother About Political Leanings of 'Anthrax Killer'. Corporate Media Coverage of Now-Deceased U.S. Army Bio-Researcher/Suspect Fails to Note Obvious 'Liberal' Targets of Deadly Post-9/11, Pre-War Letter Campaign. ALSO: ABC News Continues to Protect 'Sources' Who Lied About Iraq Connection to Anthrax...
Vital unresolved anthrax questions and ABC News
.jpg)
Seven days prior to events which would set the world on-edge, newly-hired Pentagon spokeswoman Victoria "Torie" Clarke offered an equally startling admission to Agency France Presse wire service, but which received scant attention within U.S. media sources.Who Is ''Torie'' Clarke?: Strategic Disinformation at the Pentagon
If you are following the anthrax case, you MUST follow everything Glenn Greenwald is coming out with! If you're getting your news on TV or in the papers, it's "CASE CLOSED"! The corporate media whitewash has taken place! Fuggeddabadditt!!!!!One critical caveat to keep at the forefront of one's mind is that when one side is in exclusive possession of all documents and can pick and choose which ones to release in full or in part in order to make their case, while leaving out the parts that undercut the picture they want to paint - which is exactly what the FBI is doing here -- then it is very easy to make things look however you want.
Glenn Greenwald: The FBI's selective release of documents in the anthrax case
Anthrax widow's lawsuit blames US for death. The widow of a tabloid photo editor who died in the 2001 anthrax attacks insisted in a $50 million federal lawsuit filed years ago that the U.S. government was ultimately responsible for his death.
Bruce Ivins: The Movie. This passes muster in Hollywood, of course, since it embodies all the social prejudices so beloved by that temple of cultural corruption, yet in the real world one looks at it askance and wonders: are these guys kidding? Because this scenario has very little if anything to do with the known facts. The only connection the anthrax letters have to the Kappa Kappa Gamma sorority is the fact that the New Jersey letters were mailed from a post office box not far from where the Princeton chapter keeps a storage locker. No kidding: that is the connection, in toto.
The Department of Defense continued its controversial mandatory anthrax vaccinations program despite high ranking Bush administration officials acknowledging there were problems with the vaccine within months of the Bush administration taking office—well before the 9/11 attacks and the October 2001 anthrax letters.
US Government RATS Did The Anthrax Attacks
A closer look at the targets of the anthrax letters seems to reveal something personal...
(click on picture to enlarge in new window; white American government scientist put "Death To America", "Death to Israel", and "Allah is Great" on the anthrax letters??? Huh??? Glenn Greenwald: "By design, those attacks put the American population into a state of intense fear of Islamic terrorism, far more than the 9/11 attacks alone could have accomplished. If the now-deceased Ivins really was the culprit behind the attacks, then that means that the anthrax came from a U.S. Government lab, sent by a top U.S. Army scientist at Ft. Detrick. Without resort to any speculation or inferences at all, it is hard to overstate the significance of that fact. From the beginning, there was a clear intent on the part of the anthrax attacker to create a link between the anthrax attacks and both Islamic radicals and the 9/11 attacks." )The anthrax story now gets even more unbelievable! A therapist suddenly becomes the "quotable expert in the media" about the supposed anthrax mailer Ivins. Therapist Jean Duley had Ivins as a patient and she says (wait'll you hear this!):
"As far back as the year 2000, the respondent has actually attempted to murder several other people, either through poisoning. He is a revenge killer. When he feels that he's been slighted or has had - especially toward women - he plots and actually tries to carry out revenge killings," Duley said.
She added that Ivins "has been forensically diagnosed by several top psychiatrists as a sociopathic, homicidal killer. I have that in evidence. And through my working with him, I also believe that to be very true."
Duley told the judge she was "scared to death" of Ivins.
So! Ivins, the supposed anthrax mailer who worked for the U.S. government with anthrax, tried to murder people as far back as 2000, has been diagnosed by "several top psychiatrists" (some names, please!) as a sociopathic, homicidal killer, and Duley had a restraining order against Ivins...
...BUT THESE "EXPERTS" FELT THAT IT WAS "OK" THAT HE WORKED WITH ANTHRAX AND NEVER SUSPECTED HIM OF BEING THE ANTHRAX MAILER FROM 2001->2008!!!
*************** BULLSHIT !!!!!!!!!! ***************
Keep in mind, I'm simply posting the stories and using their own words!
No Autopsy!
The state medical examiner ``determined that an autopsy wouldn't be necessary''
After the pathetic excuse for a criminal investigation called the Hatfill saga, the FBI lurches forward with their newest whitewash of the anthrax attacks; Dr. Bruce Ivins. But this time, they are covering their bases! They have coached Ms. Jean Duley and convinced her to go on official record at the courthouse with wild stories and accusations that the MSM can run with. Leaving the FBI free from future lawsuits.
This morning Jean Duley's story is being touted, without question or further investigation mind you, by every single corporate MSM news source on the web. Every single one of them is simply regurgitating her wild claims about Dr. Bruce Ivins from her written and audio testimony as if it were the gospel.
New details are emerging from the story of the "terrorised"- counselor, Ms. Jean Duley, in every MSM source this morning. MSNBC, CBS, CNN, ABC, Fox News, etc. all are covering some part of the story of the ever deepening picture of a crazed sociopath run completely amuck; Dr. Bruce Ivins.
Based largely on the audio recording of her testimony filed just 2 days before his "-suicide"-, the MSM is trying this man in the press, post-mortem, with absolutely zero regard for the fact that these are simply allegations put out there by one person who admittedly had already been meeting with the FBI, and without any corroborating evidence.
And also, with no regard for Dr. Ivins family and friends that have to listen to this onslaught day and night, all based on the unsupported testimony of ONE SINGLE PERSON who isn't even qualified to diagnose any mental illness, much less one as serious as what she claims.
But according to the ONE "witness"- (and this is important as well. She didn't "witness"- anything; she is giving HEARSAY testimony as fact! That doesn't stand up in a court of law, but I guess it's just fine for the MSMto demonise this man and his family with) that every single MSMnews agency is running with, this guy was running around the streets looking to stab people; he hates women now apparently (might as well make it personal for that demographic); he tried to kill bunches of people in 2000; he was about to go on a rampage and shoot-up his office mates; he was a "revenge killer"- though if her story is true, the only people he killed were from the anthrax attacks and that had nothing to do with revenge in any way, so that just makes ZERO sense on EVERY level; and he was just a bad person all around, generally speaking.
(link below)
The FBI's New Patsy: Jean Duley
Lab specimens of anthrax spores, Ebola virus and other pathogens disappeared from the Army's biological-warfare research facility in the early 1990s during a turbulent period of labor complaints and recriminations among rival scientists there, documents from an internal Army inquiry show.
Strangely Silent!Hey! Mr. Bush! Ms. Rice! Mr. Cheney! Mr. Rumsfeld! Mr. Blair! What do you think of the anthrax mailer supposedly being caught right before Bush leaves office, after 7 long years? Nuthin'? No big deal?
Let me recap the anthrax story for you:
● The latest story is that someone in the U.S. government mailed the anthrax letters, Bruce Ivins.
● He mailed them to 2 top members of the Democratic party who opposed the war to shut them up.
● He mailed them to media heads to shut them up.
● No corporate news entity has mentioned that if this guy did it, he was trying to pin the blame on Islamic terrorists to get us to bomb Iraq.
● There is a coordinated effort to judge Ivins guilty in the corporate news, mostly based on therapist Jean Duley's wild hearsay accusations.
● Jean Duley said that Ivins tried to murder people as far back as 2000, but didn't EVER do anything about stopping him from working with anthrax.
● ABC news ran stories 24x7 at the time, that falsely blamed Islamic terrorists for the anthrax letters.
● We're still waiting for ABC news to be subpoenaed in front of a congressional hearing to disclose their 4 sources that supplied them with those false stories.
Guess what? There's definitely something funny going on here! Their own words and reporting don't make any sense! You don't have to be a genius to think so! Why isn't ABC news being supoenaed in front of congress to disclose their sources that told them the anthrax letters were connected to Islamic terrorists? Why didn't people who handled these anthrax letters for Daschle, Leahy, and Peter Jennings die of anthrax?
And NOW...WaPo is screwing around with their reporting of this story!
Washington Post Scrubs Friday Article That Cast Doubt on Reported 'Anthrax Killer' Case. Then Returns to Similar Questions About Ivins' Lack of Acces to 'Dry, Powdered Anthrax' in Sunday Article. New WaPo Story Begs Additional New Questions in Feds' Purported Case...
In the waning months of the Bush regime, the untimely death of civilian microbiologist Dr. Bruce Ivins, a 36-year career scientist for the US military, is surely 'convenient' closure for the administration to the case of the 'unsolved' bioterror attacks of 2001. There will be no charges and no public trial. Much too convenient.
Consider the offhand manner in which Ivins has been essentially posthumously convicted in the media without so much as waiting for an autopsy report ; incongruously and without explanation labeling a man who for years volunteered as a musician at his weekly church services as 'homicidal'.
Or more significantly, the conspicuous lack of charges against a colleague of Ivins' at Fort Detrick in Maryland, Lt. Col. Philip Zack, reported in mainstream press (Hartford Courant, Seattle Times) to have been caught on security cameras trespassing after hours at the labs-- at a time when specimens had gone missing
Ivins/Anthrax Scandal explained by Wayne Madsen
Anthrax Mystery: Questions Raised over Whether Government Is Framing Dead Army Scientist for 2001 Attacks
Larisa: Okay, well the more research I do into the now infamous Ms. Jean C. Duley - the "therapist" who filed a restraining order against the alleged anthrax attacks suspect Bruce E. Ivins - the more her story sounds like a whole load of crap. Let's rehash Ms. Duley's role in the whole saga.
The Smoking Gun: Official Jean Duley restraint order documents!US Government RATS Did The Anthrax Attacks.Yes, Dr. Bruce E. Ivins is now 'Suspect Number One' for the 2001 anthrax attacks on America. He supposedly killed himself (with relatively slow-acting tylenol-codeine) rather than face criminal indictment, trial and possible execution. Among the strangeness surrounding his 'suicide', Ivins died even before the formal complaint was finished that was to be filed against him. Case closed? Not even close.
CHILLING IF TRUE: Rumsfeld To Profit From Avian Flu Hoax
Rumsfeld's growing stake in Tamiflu. Defense Secretary, ex-chairman of flu treatment rights holder, sees portfolio value growing. NEW YORK (Fortune) - The prospect of a bird flu outbreak may be panicking people around the globe, but it's proving to be very good news for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other politically connected investors in Gilead Sciences, the California biotech company that owns the rights to Tamiflu, the influenza remedy that's now the most-sought after drug in the world.
Bird Flu: A Rumsfeld Plot
DOJ settles anthrax case !!!! So why did they bury the story as part of the Friday evening news dump? First off, because SETTLING the case is not the same as SOLVING the case. The anthrax case they settled was brought by Steven Hatfill. He's the guy Ashcroft identified as a "person of interest" when people were agitating for a real investigation. Turns out Hatfill was innocent. That means the government wasted millions of dollars harrassing him, and now they have to pay millions of dollars more to settle the lawsuit he filed for invading his privacy and ruining his life. Heckuva job Ashcroft!
Arab scientists recount hostility and harassment at military anthrax lab
Rumsfeld, Bush and the Great Anti-Bioterror Drug Scam. How the most evil, least competent and most inappropriate drug companies (including Donald Rumsfeld''s company) are ripping America off in the name of fighting terrorism - while leaving a trail of dead and disabled soldiers. Two months before 9/11, a report by an independent panel of experts on the viability of developing and using vaccines to protect soldiers from anthrax, smallpox, and other bioweapons was impractical, poorly conceived, and doomed to failure. Congress was sent a copy of this report. But, then 9/11 came and Bush() used fear - his prime cattle prod of the American people, especially of Congress - to sweep aside any second thoughts about selling out not just civil liberties, but the well being of our troops.
Deadly specimens disappeared from Army research lab in '90s
Under the guise of business as usual, consider the huge improprieties in the securities markets that went unnoticed before and immediately after 9/11/2001, contributing to the attacks’ awful success and America’s subsequent decline.
I’m talking about the insider trading behind the “put and call options” scandals that allowed certain individuals to pull in huge profits. Stated as simply as possible, put options were used on stocks that would be hurt by the attack, and call options were used on stocks that would benefit. In the put case you’re betting on a fall in the price of stocks; in the call case, you’re betting on a rise in the price of a stock.
Put options were made on the struck airlines, insurance companies and banks pre-and-through-9/11, as if someone had foreknowledge something bad was going to happen to bring down the price of the stocks. A 9-11 Research report on Insider Trading headlines the tale: “Pre-9/11 Put Options on Companies Hurt by Attack Indicates Foreknowledge.”
There were huge surges in the purchase of put options on stocks of the two airlines, specifically United and American, used and abused in the attack. In fact, American and United Airlines, each with two planes that disappeared that day, as early as September 6, were experiencing dramatic spikes in put options on days when their stock prices were stable. Bloomberg News reported put options on the airlines soared to an unbelievable high, 285 times their average.
What’s of interest is that in the time preceding 9/11 nobody noticed or bothered to connect dots in this buying/selling trend. It was “business as usual” while some group conducted a huge insider trading strike that ultimately ravaged the airlines financially, damaged America, killed 2,749 people, and proved very profitable to the perps, in the short and long run.
Who was at the controls watching? Or were those at the controls part of the problem?
Business as usual -- 9/11 and the fall of America
The breaking news is that a U.S. government scientist was the anthrax mailer. McCain said in this video in 2001 that Iraq had something to do with the anthrax mailings! What was John McCain referencing when he went on national television in October, 2001 and claimed "there is some indication, and I don't have the conclusions, but some of this anthrax may -- and I emphasize may -- have come from Iraq"?
One Month After 9/11, McCain Said Anthrax ‘May Have Come From Iraq,’ Warned Iraq Is ‘The Second Phase’
So, why isn't McCain addressing this or being asked about it by the media? And why isn't Obama hopping all over this to make McCain look bad? In fact WHAT POLITICIANS ARE ADDRESSING THIS ANTHRAX STORY??? McCain should be made to address his 2001 statements saying Iraq had something to do with the anthrax mailings! He's running for president, for Christ's sake! Doesn't anyone care about this?
After the Oct. 5, 2001, death from anthrax exposure of Sun photo editor Robert Stevens, Mueller was "beaten up" during President Bush's morning intelligence briefings for not producing proof the killer spores were the handiwork of terrorist mastermind Osama Bin Laden, according to a former aide.
"They really wanted to blame somebody in the Middle East," the retired senior FBI official told The News.
FBI was told to blame Anthrax scare on Al Qaeda by White House officials
The government is trying to bury the 2001 anthrax attack scandal (the anthrax came from a U.S. military base) by claiming that one of the key suspects - Bruce E. Ivins - was a "lone nut" who committed suicide. The government claims that the anthrax letters were an innocent mistake which was "part of an Army scientist's warped plan to test his cure for the deadly toxin". Case closed. There are just a couple of loose ends:
Ivins is the third scientist who the government has accused of being the Anthrax killer.
The Anthrax Attack Was a Classic False Flag Operation Targeting Arabs. Whether or not Bruce Ivins had a role in the anthrax attacks, trying to now blame him alone for the attacks is ignoring the elephant in the room: the anthrax attack was a classic false flag attack blamed on Arabs.
Supposed anthrax mailer, being tried in the media with only circumstantial evidence, was a registered Democrat! Remember? The anthrax letters were mailed to Democrats and media heads, and NO Republicans! So, that doesn't make sense, does it?
Exclusive: Government's Purported 'Anthrax Killer' Was a Registered Democrat. Party Affiliation of the Now-Deceased Bruce Ivins, as Confirmed by His Local County Board of Elections, Adds Yet Another Curious Question to the Increasingly Troubling Investigation into the Post-9/11 Terrorist Attacks on American Soil...
NYTimes: Evidence against supposed anthrax mailer Ivins "circumstantial".
Glenn Greenwald: "Two prominent journalism professors -- Jay Rosen of NYU and Dan Gillmor, director of the Knight Center for Digital Media Entrepreneurship at Arizona State University and a practicing journalist for 25 years -- have added their names to the list of people calling on ABC News and Brian Ross to reveal their sources for ABC's false bentonite story that was used to link the anthrax attacks to Iraq. Rosen and Gillmor both write that ABC and Ross should answer three questions which they jointly outline, and they both set forth the reasons, grounded in widely accepted principles of journalistic ethics, as to why ABC and Ross should do so."
The unresolved story of ABC News' false Saddam-anthrax reports
1. Sources who are granted confidentiality give up their rights when they lie or mislead the reporter. Were you lied to or misled by your sources when you reported several times in 2001 that anthrax found in domestic attacks came from Iraq or showed signs of Iraqi involvement?
2. It now appears that the attacks were of domestic origin and the anthrax came from within U.S. government facilities. This leads us to ask you: who were the "four well-placed and separate sources" who falsely told ABC News that tests conducted at Fort Detrick showed bentonite in the anthrax sent to Sen. Tom Daschle, causing ABC News to connect the attacks to Iraq in multiple reports over a five day period in October, 2001?
3. A substantially false story that helps make the case for war by raising fears about enemies abroad attacking the United States is released into public debate because of faulty reporting by ABC News. How that happened and who was responsible is itself a major story of public interest. What is ABC News doing to re-report these events, to figure out what went wrong and to correct the record for the American people who were misled?
Three Questions For ABC News About Its Anthrax Reporting
We're still waiting for ABC news to be subpoenaed in front of congress to disclose their sources for their false anthrax stories from 2001!
Daschle criticizes anthrax investigation, saying FBI should provide more information. WASHINGTON -- Former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, whose office was a target of the anthrax attacks in 2001, said Sunday the suicide of the government's main suspect does not mean the case is over.
"I have been a close friend of Dr. Bruce Ivins for years. The FBI needed a scapegoat, especially after Stephen Hatfill, whose foot the FBI ran over, won a $5.2 M lawsuit against them.
The new FBI director needed a capture in this case. So, they took all of the Ft. Detrick anthrax researchers and put them under intense interrogation.
Bruce was a mild, meek and sensitive scientist. The FBI showed his clinically depressed daughter, who was institutionalized in a mental hospital, photos of the anthrax victims, and said "your father did this." They offered his son $2.5 M and a sportscar if he would "rat" on his father.
Bruce could not stand stand up to the constant harrasment by the FBI. So we have lost a very talented researcher, so that the FBI can close the case..."
Posted by:Dr. Gerry Higgins August 04, 2008 at 07:02 AM
"Colleagues and friends of the vaccine specialist remained convinced that Ivins was innocent: They contended that he had neither the motive nor the means to create the fine, lethal powder that was sent by mail to news outlets and congressional offices in the late summer and fall of 2001. Mindful of previous FBI mistakes in fingering others in the case, many are deeply skeptical that the bureau has gotten it right this time.
"Therapist" Jean Duley, the quotable media darling on the Ivins/anthrax case, was a "social worker", not a "therapist", and here's all her DUI's and battery charges...quite a lot of cases, huh?
Wait a minute!!!!!!!
The guy who was going to be charged with the anthrax letters of 9/11 and "committed suicide" (wink wink) was a WHITE GUY WORKING FOR THE U.S. GOVERNMENT! But yet, the anthrax letters said, "DEATH TO ISRAEL" and "DEATH TO AMERICA" and "ALLAH IS GREAT"! And it was meant to imply that America and Israel are facing the same terrorists, Islamic terrorists. So, AT LEAST, we know this: Islamic terrorists didn't do the anthrax letters AND if this guy was the anthrax mailer he was trying to blame Islamic terrorists and pit both the United States and Israel against them! (that is called a "false flag") And ABC "news" at the time, quoted "sources" linking the anthrax letters to Sadaam and pushed this story to the American people! Who were ABC's "sources"? Because they knowingly lied to get us into the Iraq War!
Glenn Greenwald:
It was really the anthrax letters -- with the first one sent on September 18, just one week after 9/11 -- that severely ratcheted up the fear levels and created the climate that would dominate in this country for the next several years after. It was anthrax -- sent directly into the heart of the country's elite political and media institutions, to then-Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD), Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt), NBC News anchor Tom Brokaw, and other leading media outlets -- that created the impression that social order itself was genuinely threatened by Islamic radicalism.
By design, those attacks put the American population into a state of intense fear of Islamic terrorism, far more than the 9/11 attacks alone could have accomplished.
Much more important than the general attempt to link the anthrax to Islamic terrorists, there was a specific intent -- indispensably aided by ABC News -- to link the anthrax attacks to Iraq and Saddam Hussein.
In my view, and I've written about this several times and in great detail to no avail, the role played by ABC News in this episode is the single greatest, unresolved media scandal of this decade. News of Ivins' suicide, which means (presumably) that the anthrax attacks originated from Ft. Detrick, adds critical new facts and heightens how scandalous ABC News' conduct continues to be in this matter.
During the last week of October, 2001, ABC News, led by Brian Ross, continuously trumpeted the claim as their top news story that government tests conducted on the anthrax -- tests conducted at Ft. Detrick -- revealed that the anthrax sent to Daschele contained the chemical additive known as bentonite. ABC News, including Peter Jennings, repeatedly claimed that the presence of bentonite in the anthrax was compelling evidence that Iraq was responsible for the attacks, since -- as ABC variously claimed -- bentonite "is a trademark of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's biological weapons program" and "only one country, Iraq, has used bentonite to produce biological weapons."
ABC News' claim -- which they said came at first from "three well-placed but separate sources," followed by "four well-placed and separate sources" -- was completely false from the beginning.
(click below for the EXCELLENT ENTIRE Glenn Greewald article!)
Vital unresolved anthrax questions and ABC News
We need a government hearing with ABC representatives! To ask them their government sources from 2001 who said Sadaam had something to do with the anthrax letters!
Did you notice? That all the reporting on TV doesn't mention that the anthrax letters were sent to the two biggest anti-war Democrats at the time: Tom Daschle & Patrick Leahy? And the heads of media? Was that to shut up the opposing party and the news media? Watch the news carefully!
EXCLUSIVE: 'Not One' Reporter Bothered to Ask Brother About Political Leanings of 'Anthrax Killer'. Corporate Media Coverage of Now-Deceased U.S. Army Bio-Researcher/Suspect Fails to Note Obvious 'Liberal' Targets of Deadly Post-9/11, Pre-War Letter Campaign. ALSO: ABC News Continues to Protect 'Sources' Who Lied About Iraq Connection to Anthrax...
Seven years on, no answer from White House on anthrax attacks
FBI was told to blame Anthrax scare on Al Qaeda by White House officials.
Hair Samples in Anthrax Case Don't Match. Strands From Mailbox in Princeton Are Not From Ivins, Investigators Say
FBI said to have stalked Ivins' family
TOTAL HEALTH TYRANNY; The Year’s Biggest Story No One is Talking About . Forced vaccinations and forced drugging already legal when “state of emergency” called. New legislation would leave no accountability if forced administration kills. Deadly AIG anthrax vaccine may already be stockpiled for emergency use. Jerome Hauer leaves HHS: Oh where, oh where will he turn up? Bird flu scare – But has the virus been isolated? Regardless, Rumsfeld set to profit
Watch this, and then tell me "Case Closed" on the anthrax mailings:
Special commentary by Big Dan: "Doesn't there have to be some kind of official case in court proving that Ivins was the anthrax mailer? Can you just pin something like this in the media on a dead guy after all these years, without some formal trial PROVING it? Have we all gone nuts? Since when did the media become the judicial branch of government? When did our country get like this? I didn't know you could convict a dead guy in the media, issue a bunch of documents, and say "CASE CLOSED", especially after they falsely accused 2 other guys first! Is that how we try people now? What if he wasn't dead, would they just throw him in jail without a trial?"
Folks! This anthrax story the corporate media is shoving down our throats (like WMD's) is BULLSHIT!!! Read a little more about it, than the corporate controlled media is telling you, please!!!
Glenn Greenwald:
"If the Post's reporting about Ivins' September 17 activities is accurate -- that he "return[ed to Fort Detrick] for an appointment in the early evening, about 4 or 5 p.m." -- then that would constitute an alibi, not, as the Post breathlessly described it, "a key clue into how he could have pulled off an elaborate crime," since any letter he mailed that way would have a September 17 -- not a September 18 -- postmark. Just compare the FBI's own definition of "window of opportunity" to its September 17 timeline for Ivins to see how glaring that contradiction is.
In theory (and there is no evidence for this at all), Ivins could have left Fort Detrick that night after work and driven to New Jersey, but then the leaked information reported by the Post about Ivins' September 17 morning "administrative leave" would be completely irrelevant, and according to the Post, that isn't what the FBI believes occurred ("Authorities assume that he drove to Princeton immediately after" he took administrative leave in the morning). The FBI's theory as to how and when Ivins traveled to New Jersey on September 17 and mailed the letters is simply impossible, given the statement in their own Probable Cause Affidavit as to "the window of opportunity" the anthrax attacker had to mail the letters in order to have them bear a September 18 postmark."
(Glenn Greenwald continued...) What's the answer to this?
It seems pretty impossible for Ivins to have mailed the anthrax letters from Princeton, according to reality.
CNN welcome to ABC's funny sourcing...A blogger over at DU has found something interesting regarding the FBI timeline, which after she posted it, was apparently changed in the original CNN report:
Cycorp & the Anthrax Prediction
While cable news dutifully devotes nonstop coverage to the latest random criminal cases -- kidnappings, shootouts, murderous love triangles, car chases -- it's telling when a supposed break in one of the biggest manhunts in FBI history, for a terrorist who murdered and poisoned multiple American citizens with anthrax, takes a backseat to nearly every other story. That is, if it's mentioned at all.
Special Report: Ivins Anthrax Case Another Black Eye for Network News
Bruce Ivins is the THIRD guy being accused as being the anthrax mailer! Here's one of the OTHER guys they accused! Everyone forgets this! What makes you think Bruce Ivins is the anthrax mailer? Just because they said it? They said it before! TWICE BEFORE!
Do you believe everything you're told because it's in print? Do you think a news story is a reference manual not to be questioned like a dictionary? Just like the DC Madam "killed herself" (wink wink) as she was ready to sign a book deal outing prominent politicians and Bush/Cheney's Enron buddy Ken Lay had a convenient heart attack, 9/11 anthrax suspect "commits suicide" (wink wink...AGAIN!). They always kill themselves? Whenever they're about to "spill the beans"? Come on! When you start listing all these supposed suicides in important controversial cases, the odds go down that they all committed suicide, don't they? The BULLSHIT flag is raised on this on for me! Funny there was no reporting on this story until the suicide! So they are really breaking TWO stories at once here: charges were being brought against this guy AND he committed suicide! So, they waited until he committed suicide to tell us there was an impending arrest in the 9/11 anthrax mailings? Did YOU know there was an impending arrest in the 9/11 anthrax mailings until this guy "committed suicide"? This suicide doesn't pass the litmus test for me! In light of the rate of "suicides" in anything 9/11 related or related to outing politicians such as the DC Madam "suicide"!
A top U.S. biodefense researcher apparently committed suicide just as the Justice Department was about to file criminal charges against him in the anthrax mailings that traumatized the nation in the weeks following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, according to a published report.
How do you explain the deaths of all these top microbiologists since the 9/11 anthrax???
It all began with Don Wiley.
On November 15th, Harvard Professor Don Wiley left a gathering of friends and colleagues some time after 10:30 PM. The next morning, Memphis police found his rental car stopped on a bridge, with a full tank of gas and keys still in the ignition. There was no financial or family trouble. Indeed Wiley was supposed to meet his family at the Memphis airport to continue on to an Icelandic vacation. Neither was there any history of depression or mental illness.....(read more in link below)........
The mysterious deaths of top microbiologists
Colleagues Doubt Wiley Suicide Theory
The Very Mysterious Deaths Of Five Microbiologists
Microbiologist Death Toll Mounts. As Connections To Dyncorp, Hadron, Promis Software & Disease Research Emerge. A Career In Microbiology Can Be Harmful To Your Health(Revised/Updated)
Dead Microbiologists
(probably from plunger, I'm guessing:)
WHAT INCIDENT SILENCED THE OPPOSITION PARTY AND THE MEDIA SHORTLY AFTER 9/11?
THE ANTHRAX ATTACKS – THE ONES THE PRESS SEEMS TO HAVE FORGOTTEN EVER OCCURRED.
THE ANTHRAX ATTACKS – THE ONES THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION FAILS TO REMEMBER WHEN PROCLAIMING THAT AMERICA HAS NOT BEEN STRUCK BY DOMESTIC TERROR SINCE 9/11.
CBS News ran a story recently on the ANTHRAX ATTACKS of five years ago. Their newscast stated that there are no leads, and the FBI is considering designating the attacks a "COLD CASE."
That is a lie.
The anthrax came from a Rumsfeld-controlled DOD facility.
The Anthrax attacks were against the most prominent media talking heads, and against one member of the media who published photos of the Bush Twins drunk.
The Anthrax Attacks were also against Tom Daschle and other Democrats who opposed the invasion of Iraq and Warrantless Domestic Wire Tapping
Bird Flu: A Rumsfeld Plot
Rumsfeld's growing stake in Tamiflu
CHILLING IF TRUE: Rumsfeld To Profit From Avian Flu Hoax
US Government RATS Did The Anthrax Attacks
DOJ settles anthrax case !!!!
