Saturday, December 15, 2012

Questions About The Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting, Gun Control, Operation Gladio, MK-ULTRA, & The Shock Doctrine

I can't say it any better than this guy, just some guy on youtube telling the truth:

...just like 911, just like Team 6, etc...etc...

(You are watching a false flag and cover up in real time. This is what it looks like. I added some strange videos up front here, I keep updating this post. There's some weird shit going on here! I'm just posting real interviews and footage, and they're weird. Like some cover up is going on. Does anyone find it odd, with all this government spying on your phones & computers, how all this government spying did NOT prevent all these recent tragedies such as the Connecticut shooting, Batman shooting, etc...? So why don't we save a lot of $$$$$$$ and get rid of the Department of Homeland Security and all state DHS's and SAVE SAVE it is not preventing anything and costing a lot of money and breaking a lot of the Constitution. Where's the footage from school security cameras from Sandy Hook school? Seriously, if you aren't questioning this, you have mentally unhealthy blind faith in media & politicians. And then add to it, we have "officials" saying they will arrest people if they don't believe the "officials story". This one's rather easy: the "official story" is total bullshit. Their sloppiness is arrogant. This was an easy one to see quickly. Since this is a FALSE FLAG, therefore I'm NOT for the reaction of GUN CONTROL. Even though I'm a liberal-type person. I'm ultimately for the TRUTH above all.)

The jury is in with me, folks: the "official story" is BULLSHIT:

There were ONLY pistols brought in by Adam Lanza. THEN the coroner said the victims were killed by a LONG RIFLE. THEREFORE, you can only conclude there were OTHER SHOOTERS WITH LONG RIFLES:

The medical examiner uncut:

Tell me THIS isn't suspicious:

Now look for the father in the above video @ around 2:40, the finished product:

...and THAT GUY's daughter above, of all people, HAPPENS to be the featured "poster boy" picture of all the kids, and appears NOT to be dead (it gets weirder & weirder):

If you have a problem with what I'm posting, talk to the father, not me. I'm not the one laughing and yukking it up like he was in the uncut video. I'm asking LEGIT QUESTIONS. People who don't want you to ask questions use the age-old cliche, just like 911 or any other staged event, "YOU'RE DISRESPECTING THE VICTIMS' FAMILIES". Don't you love that one? So don't point out a staged terrorism event...because you're "disrespecting the victims' families"??? LOL

Another anomaly: heroic teacher's RIP FaceBook site was put up BEFORE the shooting. Note some of the comments of people saying DECEMBER 10TH THIS PAGE WAS PUT UP???

Dec 10 RIP Victoria Soto Facebook Webpage Cache

NOTE: the above linke to Victoria Soto's PRE-SHOOTING RIP facebook page is now GONE, but I saw it, I'm a witness, that link used to work. This was pointed out to me in my comments that the link is now gone. Check this out:

Anyone got a problem with that?

Anyone got a problem with "reporters" not asking ANY of these questions? This next link is EXCELLENT, I could've written it myself:

How the Newtown Massacre Became a Mind-Control Television Event


As usual, I have questions for any big "terrorist" event.

First of all, look up MK-ULTRA. It's for real. The CIA in court decades ago admitted it. There were court proceedings and witness/victim testimony:


Next, look up OPERATION GLADIO. Here's ANOTHER LINK for Operation Gladio.

Operation Gladio, a decades-long covert campaign of terrorism and deceit directed by the intelligence services of the West -- against their own populations. Hundreds of innocent people were killed or maimed in terrorist attacks -- on train stations, supermarkets, cafes and offices -- which were then blamed on "leftist subversives" or other political opponents. The purpose, as stated above in sworn testimony by Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra, was to demonize designated enemies and frighten the public into supporting ever-increasing powers for government leaders -- and their elitist cronies.


"'You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security."



Don't just read what I linked you to above, REALLY RESEARCH THOSE TWO THINGS YOURSELF! These things ARE FOR REAL, and other things like them are for real.

Then think of how much more advanced the CIA is than decades ago with MK-ULTRA and Operation Gladio. And WHAT ELSE have they come up with that we don't know about? It's clear the unelected CIA operates outside the law, outside any political "parties".

THEN think of this Connecticut shooting and all the other "LONE GUNMAN" shootings.

You have to consider the Connecticut shooter was NOT a "LONE GUNMAN" in the context of what I said above.

My opinion? I'm not buyin' that this 20 year old autistic kid, WITHOUT ANY THIRD PARTY EITHER MENTALLY OR PHYSICALLY TAMPERING WITH HIM, thought of and did this completely on his own.

"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth" ~ Sherlock Holmes

All I'm saying is that there's two possibilities here and with all these shootings: "LONE GUNMAN" or we're having Operation Gladio & MK-ULTRA performed on US!!! By intelligence services working outside of democracy. The latter HAS NOT BEEN ELIMINATED AS A POSSIBILITY.

And don't expect the "news" to tell you the truth. Who do you think OWNS the "news"?

Some questions I have about the Connecticut school shooting:

- Reports said a MASKED GUNMAN entered the school: when exactly did he have the MASK on and did they FIND the mask when it was all over? Why aren't reporters asking this? Did he enter the school with the mask on? Did he put on the mask AFTER he got in the school? Before he spoke with and shot the principal? Did he still have the mask on when they found him dead? Was it in his pocket? Did he leave it in a room? Where was it? This is important because, if he was on a suicide mission, WHY DID HE NEED A MASK?

- There were initial reports (many) that said there was a SECOND SHOOTER. What happened to this story?

- Why would he kill his mother? That makes no sense.

- Initial reports said he had 2 pistols and a rifle, and he left his rifle in the car. There's even news video of the police taking the rifle out of the trunk of his car. The rifle was supposed to be what shot everyone! How could he shoot everyone with a rifle THAT WAS IN THE TRUNK OF HIS CAR???

- The pistols: he got off 100 rounds according to witnesses. If each pistol had 15-16 round clips, that's 8 total clips or 6 clip changes (the initial two full clips were in the gun at first). So he reloaded SIX TIMES???

- Why did he have I.D. on him? I BETTER BRING MY I.D. WITH ME FOR THE MASS SHOOTING! But wait: not only that, it was his BROTHER's I.D.!!! I BETTER BRING MY BROTHER's I.D. WITH ME FOR THE BIG MASS SHOOTING!!!


You have to consider this, when you see all these perfectly spaced "terrorist" acts by "lone gunmen" in the U.S. -
Why would such “rogue networks” want to send brainwashed Manchurian Candidates into schools to massacre children?
Let’s allow one of the terrorists themselves to answer that question.

Remember Operation Gladio? The Pentagon, through NATO, organized bombings and shootings in the streets of Europe. When one of the terrorists got caught, he explained at his trial: “You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public to turn to the State to ask for greater security.” He later explained the “strategy of tension” to the BBC: “To create tension within the country to promote conservative, reactionary social and political tendencies.” (I'm highlighting the work ***CONSERVATIVE***)

Google “Brabant massacre” for more gory details.

So the answer to the question, WHY? is really very simple: When you terrorize the population, you open the door for fascist, authoritarian politicians.

Operation Gladio never ended. It’s still happening, right here in America.

VETERANS TODAY: Who really killed the Connecticut children? When something unbelievably evil happens in one of our schools, like the recent murder of 27 children and teachers at the Newtown School in Connecticut, the media always tells us the same thing: blame the lone nut(s).

The first reports said there was a SECOND SHOOTER, before more recent reports said "LONE GUNMAN", which they ALWAYS seem to change every shooting to "LONE GUNMAN" eventually:

Two Gunmen at Elementary School Shooting

A former school board official in Newtown called into question earlier reports that Nancy Lanza had been connected to Sandy Hook Elementary School, possibly as part of the teaching staff.

“No one has heard of her,” said Lillian Bittman, who served on the local school board until 2011. “Teachers don’t know her.”

Originally, The Bee newspaper said they interviewed the principle Dawn Hochsprung (see picture below). Then reports said the principle was shot dead:

Is the shooter's mother REALLY a former teacher at the school???


Reporter broke news to father of suspect

Father of Alleged Connecticut Shooter is VP of GE Capital According to Reports

1) As yet, we have not seen any concrete evidence that any child died.
2) As yet, parents have not been allowed to see their children. (Photoshopped pictures do not count.)
3) As of now, I have seen only one un
ambiguous statement from a grieving parent (Robbie Parker).
4) According to the official story, Adam Lanza was found with his older brother's ID, and it was not stolen. However, older brother Ryan--who officials say is very cooperative--claims not to have even seen his brother since 2010. Where would Adam get this ID? And why does such use not qualify as a theft?
5) According to the official story, Adam Lanza was wearing a black outfit with a mask and bulletproof vest. Why would he want to hide his identity, and why would he wear a bulletproof vest, if he planned to kill himself?
6) The medical examiner asserts that all wounds were caused by a rifle or other long weapon, and police/FBI say that the school was littered with .223 (rifle) casings. But Adam Lanza was found dead in the school with only handguns--a rifle was found in the trunk of his car. But then he could not possibly have been firing the rifle, and could not have committed the murders. Who did?
7) According to the official story, the killing was tightly confined to two classrooms. But then why were so many children told to close their eyes while leaving the building?
8 ) Joanne Didonato, the principal's secretary, called in sick on Friday--something she rarely does. So presumably, she must have been awfully ill. Yet she then felt well enough to give an interview. "Of all days," she said, emphasizing the strange coincidence.
9) The hospital went into lockdown and cleared four trauma rooms, but received only three patients, two of them dead children (according to the official story) and one mildly wounded adult.
10) Why were there such persistent reports that Mrs. Lanza was a kindergarten teacher, and that she died at the school, when the new official story is that she was not connected to the school and was killed at home?
11) What happened to the report that Adam Lanza's girlfriend and another friend were missing in New Jersey?
12) What happened to the woodsman in a black jacket and camo pants who was arrested and handcuffed outside the school? He actually shouted to parents, "It wasn't me." Who was he and what was he doing there?
13) What happened to the dark van or SUV that the police surrounded in the parking lot, or the maroon sedan with a blown-out back window they were on the lookout for?
14) The official story is that Nancy Lanza was a gun collector who obeyed the law. But since 20-year-olds are not permitted to buy guns or ammo or carry guns in Connecticut, why would she give her "autistic" son access to both guns and ammo?
15) Why were parents told on Friday that "if you haven't been reunited with your child by now it's already over"? Does anyone imagine that real parents of real children would simply say, "Okay, the show's over, let's go home now"?
16) Would real parents of real children really be satisfied with (possibly photoshopped) pictures of their children? Wouldn't they demand to see their children one last time firsthand?
17) According to the official story, 28 people died but only 1 was wounded. The dead included 20 small, squirmy children--difficult targets even for professionals. How could Adam Lanza achieve such amazingly deadly accuracy, in such a short length of time?
18 ) A child asserts that he/she heard someone say, "Put your hands up," followed by the reply, "Don't shoot." This indicates that the police took a suspect into custody inside the school. But if that was Adam Lanza, how did he kill himself after that point?
19) Another child asserts that he/she saw a man pinned down to the ground with handcuffs on. Again, this indicates that the police took a suspect into custody. If that was Adam Lanza, how did he then kill himself?
20) When Ryan Lanza was falsely identified as the shooter, who deleted his Facebook profile and created many others in his name?
21) Is it reasonable for a geeky 20-year-old to carry two pistols and hundreds of rounds of ammunition while wearing a bulletproof vest and a mask?
22) Why did the police say on Friday that they were going to leave the bodies rotting in the school until Sunday, then Saturday morning announce that they had spirited the bodies away in the middle of the night? Perhaps to ensure that the transport, if any, would go unrecorded on photos or video?
23) Why won't police tell us where they found the Henry repeating rifle, the Enfield rifle, and the shotgun?
24) Did the school have one or more security cameras? What do they show?
25) Why did a police officer specifically mention, on radio, that "they're coming at me through this wood," followed by a fellow officer saying, "This is it"?
26) One officer in the school said, "We've got one suspect down." Who was that? Down in this situation generally means in custody (on the ground and cuffed), not dead.
27) Why didn't Adam's uncle see anything out of the ordinary in Adam when the two saw each other in June?
28 ) Why is Adam Lanza reported to be a loner when a teenager said (oxymoronically), "[Lanza and his friends] always gathered alone in a corner in school"?
29) Why did police assign an individual state trooper to every grieving family, whether the family wants such "protection" or not?
30) Why are Ryan Lanza and his roommates still in custody, and why are the police pretending that it's for their own benefit?
31) Is it a coincidence that Nancy Lanza's brother is Kingston Police Officer James Champion, who lives next door to the former Lanza home?


Facebook now threatening to shut down accounts of users who question official narrative on Sandy Hook shooting


Days later, the Sandy Hook Massacre, the iconic slaughter of twenty small children, is now looking like a terrorist attack, not a “murder suicide.” Was “lone gunman” Adam Lanza a “patsy,” the same word Lee Harvey Oswald used to describe himself before being “silenced” in November 1963?

Today, Michael Harris, former Republican candidate for governor of Arizona and GOP campaign finance chairman, in an internationally televised news broadcast, cited “Israeli revenge” in, what he called, “the terrorist attack in Connecticut.”

“This is exactly what Israel did in Norway; the political party that voted sanctions against Israel was retaliated against by a “lone gunman” who killed 77 children.
This is what Israel always does, they go after the children. It is what they do in Gaza every day. It is what was done in Norway. It is what happened at Sandy Hook. Nobody buys the “lone gunman” story anymore, not with the Gabby Giffords’ shooting, not with the Aurora “Batman” shooting, certainly not with Breveik, and certainly not in Connecticut.”

Super Viral: Israeli death squads involved in Sandy Hook bloodbath: Intelligence analyst

Sandy Hook massacre: Official story spins out of control

Sandy Hook massacre: Evidence of official foreknowledge?

Israel activates American 5th column for Sandy Hook damage control

Who Were the Other Shooters?

Did Mossad death squads slaughter American children at Sandy Hook?

Sandy Hook: Huge Hoax and Anti-Gun “Psy Op”

5-part series on Sandy Hook anomalies by Brendan Hunt:

Sandy Hook Shooting Part 1

Sandy Hook Shooting Part 2

Sandy Hook Shooting Part 3

Sandy Hook Shooting Part 4

Sandy Hook Shooting Part 5

This is a very good video, look at the role PRESCRIPTION DRUGS play in all of these "LONE GUNMAN" and other violent acts through history:


Here's some other mainstream reports:

Huffington Post: Adam Lanza School Shooter Suspect Had Personality Disorder, Report Says

Officials release names of victims in Connecticut elementary school shooting

CBS: now there's FOUR guns and the fourth gun was the MAIN gun used. Do you find it strange that the FOUR AND MAIN GUN wasn't mentioned until now? Do you think they made it up because the original story was that he had 2 pistols and left the rifle in the car, and it would be a stretch that he shot 100 rounds with 2 pistols instead of a higher powered gun? And now the mother was a "gun enthusiast" and a "prepper". The LOCAL LANDSCAPER has the lowdown on everything:

Sorry, but gun control isn't the answer:

GUN CONTROL has immediately been brought up, as it always is whenever something like this happens. My opinion on this is gun control is IRRELEVANT to this shooting. The kid STOLE the guns from his mother (at least we're told that by the "news"). So what new law would've prevented this? Maybe "THOU SHALT NOT STEAL"?

I think that when there's places where groups of innocent people/children gather, especially on a regular basis, they are SITTING DUCKS for a NUT with a gun, or "LONE GUNMAN". There should be gun experts with guns on the premises, maybe even the teachers or other school staff should be trained and have guns, and they could've shot this guy. They were all unarmed sitting ducks and any gun control law would not have stopped this and maybe would make it WORSE, having LESS armed experts to defend gatherings of innocent people.

I'm with these guys on this issue, the OathKeepers:

The Federal Government is Guilty Accomplice in School Shooting in Newtown Connecticut


Remember the recent Sikh Temple shooting? Eyewitnesses said they saw FOUR (4) white shooters, then SLOWLY the "news" changed it to "LONE GUNMAN":

CIA creating real life Manchurian candidates?

So do you have blind faith in what you see on the "news"? The SAME GUYS who I think are behind a lot of "terrorism" we are now witnessing on a regular basis have their hooks in the "news". Watch this, and it's from a LONG TIME AGO, so imagine NOW how advanced they have become at controlling the "news":

Yes, it's sad that 20 children died in Ct. But we also regularly kill MILLIONS of children on the other side of the earth with wars and drone bombings and sanctions. They are now running heart-tugging stories on the "news" about individual children who died in Ct. The MILLIONS we kill on the other side of the earth are dehumanized "collateral damage". They, too, are children who have mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, and friends. They're not "collateral damage" non-children.

I never see any heart-tugging stories in our "news" about THOSE children. They are children, too:



Friday, December 7, 2012

Tea Party Jim DeMint stepping down as Senator to work for The Heritage Foundation proves rightwing media whistleblower David Brock of Media Matters RIGHT once again

David Brock of Media Matters years ago said The Heritage Foundation is part of the "vast rightwing media conspiracy", and Tea Party Jim DeMint steps down as senator to work for - you guessed it - THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION:

(my famous rightwing media hollywood squares is appropriate for this post. i talk about michelle malkin upper left, sean hannity upper right rush limbaugh upper cente, - that gives me TIC TAC TOE across the top btw - laura ingraham center this post)

Former rightwing "news" figure David Brock, who turned whistleblower on rightwing media and started the rightwing media watchdog group, wrote a book years ago that greatly influenced me. In fact, I can point to a "perfect storm" of events around 2000 that caused me to pay attention to media and politics to the extent that I do now. Those events were: reading the book THE REPUBLICAN NOISE MACHINE by David Brock, reading the book LIES & THE LYING LIARS WHO TELL THEM by Al Franken, reading the book "DUDE, WHERE'S MY COUNTRY?" by Michael Moore, and...hmmm...what else was going on in 2000? Oh, yeah: the Bush/Gore extended election fight.

I'm not going to get into specifics of each of these events, but the overall theme of these events was that I woke up to the fact that the mainstream media is NOT "liberal" like I (and everyone else) was told my entire life.

In David Brock's book THE REPUBLICAN NOISE MACHINE, he puts forward the idea of the, for lack of a better term, VAST RIGHTWING MEDIA CONSPIRACY, and that the mainstream "liberal" media is NOT "liberal". An idea that I followed up on with Noam Chomsky's "MANUFACTURING CONSENT" and "MYTH OF THE LIBERAL MEDIA" (which I put later in this post). David Brock mentions that an entire "system" of alternate media was formed to push Republican ideas. Not the TRUTH or truth in news, just Republican ideas. Among those entities are: FOX news, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Washington Times, New York Post, Wall Street Journal (editorial page), Mike well as an effort to buy up practically all the radio talk show airwaves, which they have done. They pass off their REPUBLICAN MEDIA as "fair and balanced" (IE: NOT Republican) and then claim the mainstream media is "liberal" over and over and over again. They NEVER STOP doing it. And keep in mind, the mainstream media is NOT "liberal", that's what's REALLY ironic.

In David Brock's book, he says that this "rightwing media" is financed by Republican millionaires and billionaires such as the Scaife family, the Coors family (among others). But more importantly, they created so-called "THINK TANKS" such as The Heritage Foundation & Cato Institute. These think tanks are passed off as unbiased "experts" in research and as guests on news programs. Of course, when these "experts" are on some TV news program, they never introduce them as "REPUBLICAN PROMOTING FAKE EXPERTS". They say, "For an opinion on this, we have a fellow from The Heritage Foundation for his unbiased, intellectual opinion". Right.

Now remember I said THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION and remember I said how long ago David Brock wrote the book The Republican Noise Machine.


Tea Party senator JIM DEMINT quits his senatorial position to join - WAIT FOR IT...WAIT FOR IT...WAIT FOR IT... - THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION!!!!!!!!!

My point is that David Brock, the rightwing media whistleblower who says rightwing media MAKES UP SHIT (those are MY words, but that's what he's saying), has written a book exposing the entire rightwing media sham or bubble, the fact-free Republican zone, and it still holds true today (Jim DeMint joining The Heritage Foundation) and it did when it was written almost 10 years ago. Somethings have changed, of course. People get old, new people come in (Laura Ingraham), but the slick rightwing media REPUBLICAN NOISE MACHINE just replaces the cogs in the wheels, replaces old personalities with new ones, creates new "experts", takes over more radio stations, etc...etc... Kind of like RUST or CANCER.

This created what is known as a "BUBBLE". The BUBBLE is the alternate world of DITTOHEADS, FOX "news" viewers, rightwing radio listeners & callers, etc... They live in their own fact-free world, but once in a while are shocked by reality. This happens when they are FORCED to interact outside THE BUBBLE, like with the election. That is why DITTOHEADS were so shocked that Obama won, because in THE BUBBLE, Romney was predicted to win by a landslide. THE BUBBLE was forced to view ACTUAL ELECTION RESULTS OUTSIDE OF THE BUBBLE, that is where elections exist. Many other things exist outside THE BUBBLE. Benghazi exists outside the bubble. IN the bubble, Obama did Benghazi. OUTSIDE the bubble, it appears Benghazi was a CIA front for shipping weapons to "Syrian rebels" and possibly had nothing to do with "ambassadors" at all. In fact, there's evidence that Benghazi may have been a Republican "October Surprise". MORE evidence of THAT, than what's inside THE BUBBLE. And notice that AFTER the election, Benghazi, which was SOOO important in THE BUBBLE, seemed to have went away! How do you like that? Right after the election. What a coincidence! Just another one of those rightwing media coincidences!

Anyway, here's "Tea PartY" JIM DEMINT stepping down as senator of South Carolina to ENRICH himself by taking a position in none other that: THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION!!! What a shocker (sarcastic):

UPDATE: Here's exactly what I'm talking about, FAKE "grassroots" group which is really funded by billionaire Koch Brothers, AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY, says in Michigan to TAKE OUT UNIONS AT THE KNEES, and also the FAKE non-partisan "think tank" which is really rightwing billionaire funded, THE MAKINAC this video, it's exactly what this post was about when I first put it up:

Here is a current example of THE BUBBLE: 49% of Republican voters think ACORN stole the election for Obama. Funny thing is that ACORN disbanded several years ago:

Almost Half of GOP Voters: ACORN Stole It Again! (Never mind they don't even exist anymore! They stole it anyway!) UPDATE: Even Glenn Beck's 'news' site calling out Repubs for ACORN fantasies...

Steven Colbert touches upon TWO subject here: ACORN & Republicans vote against DISABLED (later in this post):

Oh...and just an fyi: ACORN never did ANYTHING the rightwing media said they did, it was all a HOAX:

ACORN lawsuits now rolling in over O'Keefe hoax "pimp" video.

Republican opposition downs UN disability treaty

Why do rightwing media and their dittohead followers remind me of this Monty Python skit?

Another example of THE BUBBLE: rightwing freak-o Laura Ingraham of FOX "news" doesn't like that progressive media figures met with Obama in the White House. Funny thing is that when Bush was president, LAURA INGRAHAM (and other rightwing media figures) DID meet with Bush in the White House, here's the picture and guess who's in it: LAURA INGRAHAM!!! This is exactly what I mean by THE BUBBLE: middle left is LAURA INGRAHAM meeting with George W. Bush (along with Sean Hannity on the right and other rightwing media figures):

UPDATED: Laura Ingraham's Newsletter Doesn't Remember When Laura Ingraham Met With George W. Bush. Newsletter Hypocritically Lashes Out At Obama Progressive Media Meeting

The Republican Noise Machine

David Brock, the reformed conservative noise-maker, on how the Right has sabotaged journalism, democracy, and truth.

As a young journalist in the 1990s, David Brock was a key cog the Republican noise machine. Writing for the American Spectator, a conservative magazine funded by billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife, Brock gained fame for his attack pieces on Anita Hill and President Bill Clinton. Then, in 2002, Brock came clean. In his memoir, Blinded by the Right, Brock admitted that his work was based on lies and distortion, and part of a coordinated smear campaign funded by wealthy right wing groups to discredit Clinton and confuse the public.

Since then, Brock has continued to expose the conservative media onslaught. In his newest book, The Republican Noise Machine, Brock documents how right-wing groups pressure the media and spread misinformation to the public. It's easy to see how this is done.

Fringe conspiracies and stories will be kept alive by outlets like Rush Limbaugh, the Washington Times, and the Drudge Report, until they finally break into the mainstream media.

Media groups like Brent Bozell's Media Research Center have spent 30 years convincing the public that the media is, in fact, liberal. As Brock says, it's all a sham: "I have seen, and I know firsthand, indeed from my own pen, how the organized Right has sabotaged not only journalism but also democracy and truth."

The Republican Noise Machine

David Brock's

Noam Chomsky: "The Myth of the 'Liberal Media' - Manufacturing Consent" -

Republicans are getting WEIRDER & WEIRDER: Mitch "I'm Senile" McConnell objects to and filibusters HIS OWN BILL!!!


Mitch McConnell raises objections to bill he thinks is terrible...HIS OWN BILL!!! He must be SENILE. This is our "GOVERNMENT". Fucked up, senile, rich old white men who don't have their wits about them. Take your prune juice and go to bed, Mitch! Get the defibrillators out to give him a jump-start! Maybe he doesn't even know where he's at! Maybe he's schizophrenic and thinks there's a Democrat also named Mitch McConnell. I'VE GOT TO OBJECT TO THIS BILL. I'M FILIBUSTERING IT. THIS MITCH MCCONNELL GUY WHO PROPOSED IT IS OUT OF HIS MIND! OH, WAIT A SECOND...I'M MITCH MCCONNELL...I THINK.....SOMEONE THROW ME A BONE, AM I MITCH MCCONNELL???

Ed Asner's Anti 'Trickle Down' Video - Fox News Fury

FOX "news" OUTRAGED!!!!!!! As usual, another case of FAKE OUTRAGE of the right:

Ed Asner also narrarates "Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 -"

Ya gotta love Ed Asner for PISSING OFF FOX "news", Sean Hannity, & Michelle Malkin all in one fell swoop! Great job, Ed:

Blast from the Past: Michelle Malkin FUCKY SUCKY FIVE DOLLAH


A 16 year old freshman or sophomore in high school calls Rush Limbaugh during his lunch break. First of all, I'm not buyin' that a 16 year old listens to Rush Limbaugh SINCE HE'S ON DURING SCHOOL!!! Second, IF Rush Limbaugh actually has REAL callers, you'd be on hold for HOURS, if you got on at all. So I'm not buyin' that this kid just casually calls Rush Limbaugh during his half hour lunch at school AND GETS RIGHT ON! Third: Rush Limbaugh has FAKE CALLERS! Who say things like, "HI RUSH, I'M A BLACK GUY AND I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING YOU SAY", and ridiculous things like that. Who says "HI I'M A BLACK GUY"??? Fourth: are kids allowed to use cell phones in school? COME ON!!!

HI RUSH, I'M A BLACK GUY AND I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING YOU SAY, US BLACK FOLK BIN BAMBOOZLED BY OBAMA (funny they have a PICTURE of the "black guy" on a radio call in show):

Rush Limbaugh's audience is now down to single/divorced white male LOSERS who hate women and have no children

See my last post:

"FISCAL CLIFF" Is Another Hoax By The 1% To Dismantle Social Security, Medicare, & Medicaid, Pushed By the MAINSTREAM MEDIA TERRORISTS

Friday, November 30, 2012

"FISCAL CLIFF" Is Another Hoax By The 1% To Dismantle Social Security, Medicare, & Medicaid, Pushed By the MAINSTREAM MEDIA TERRORISTS

The rigged corrupt corporate mainstream media and radio news briefs (MEDIA TERRORISTS) will chant FISCAL CLIFF FISCAL CLIFF FISCAL CLIFF over and over and over again (BRAINWASHING) on behalf of the 1% to SCARE the 99% of Americans in an attempt once again to dismantle social security, medicare, & medicaid.


WAKE UP AMERICA! - The Real U.S. Budget Problem: Defense & War Spending Equal 94% Of All Federal Income Tax Revenues

When the media keeps repeating a phrase like "FISCAL CLIFF" over and over and over again, BEWARE! Think: "DEATH PANELS", "GROUND ZERO MOSQUE", "CHICK FIL A", "AL QAEDA", "TERRORISTS", "INSURGENTS", etc... etc... BEWARE!!! They wouldn't do it IF THEY WEREN'T SCREWING US!!!

In fact, they did this TWICE! I remember they were bombarding us with "FISCAL CLIFF" before the "election", then it died out, now it's starting up again! So they are REALLY trying to BAMBOOZLE us!

I've been gathering some great info from the BEST economists and they all agree: WE ARE GETTING SCREWED AGAIN. We spend a TRILLION dollars a year on BOMBING countries on the other side of the earth. Here's what they will do IMO: they will cut social safety nets A LOT, and the bombing budget A LITTLE, so they can say they cut EVERYTHING, but the implication will be that they cut BOMBING in ration...but it won't be. Kind of like the Bush tax cuts: cut the rich A LOT and the middle class A LITTLE and then say they cut EVERYONE'S taxes.

btw: guess who came up with the term "FISCAL CLIFF"? None other than financial terrorist BEN BERNANKE of THE FED!

MICHAEL HUDSON says we're getting SCREWED:

BILL BLACK says we're getting SCREWED:


James Galbraith again:

ROBERT REICH says we're getting SCREWED:

PAUL KRUGMAN says we're getting SCREWED:

Paul Krugman: Fiscal Cliff Actually An 'Austerity Bomb'

Daily Show: congress concocted the catastrophic "fiscal cliff"


The rightwing FOOD STAMPS sham: one thing you can count on is that no matter how subject come and go on FOX "news" and rightwing radio (Rush Limbaugh, etc...), their whining about FOOD STAMPS never goes away. Whining about food stamps is the FLAGSHIP ISSUE, the FOUNDATION of rightwing radio. It weathers all storms and never goes away. They are OBSESSED with poor people getting food, for some reason. It's what JESUS would do. And just like Reagan MADE UP the CADILLAC-DRIVING WELFARE QUEEN MOMMA folklore, the rightwing has their fact-free FOOD STAMPS folklore they talk about and callers call in about: "I SAW THEM BUYING LOBSTERS ON FOOD STAMPS", "I SAW SOMEONE BUY SOMETHING ON FOOD STAMPS THEN GET INTO A CADILLAC/SUV/(fill in the blank)", etc...etc... This is a tactic of rightwing callers: they call in radio shows and MAKE SHIT UP that can't be proven. THEY'RE LYING. The reason they're lying, if you use logic, is that instead of REPORTING THIS ABUSE, they call in radio shows? Why does the host never ask them, "DID YOU REPORT THEM?" The answer would be, "NO". And that's not even addressing the FACT that it's IMPOSSIBLE to simply LOOK AT SOMEONE and know their income, IE: if they QUALIFY for food stamps or not. These people are just PARANOID, SELFISH people OR they're FAKE CALLERS whose mission is to get rid of a social safety net.

Let's take a look at how much we spend on food stamps, and especially in relation to how much we spend on BOMBING PEOPLE. Dittoheads hate numbers & facts, so they're not going to like this below. They hate charts and graphs, too. Here is the government budget website:

It says in 2011 we spent $878.5 BILLION on "Defense" which is bombing and murdering people on the other side of the earth. How much did we spend on feeding Americans? It says we spent $103.2 billion, or around 1% of the budget. Also keep in mind, historically we spend MORE on food stamps during financial and unemployment crises. That's NORMAL. So: $878.5 for MURDERING PEOPLE and $103.2 for FEEDING AMERICANS. Do you think that's a sign of an advanced country? Or a barbaric country? Below, I highlight in yellow 2011 "Defense" (OFFENSIVE BOMBING) vs FOOD STAMPS:

Food Stamps Are An Antipoverty Program, But Fox Won't Tell You That

CHARTS: Why U.S. Military Spending Is Totally Out Of Control And Can't Last

MORE truthtelling reality-based conservatives is drummed out of the establishment Republican Party (like Ron Paul, David Frum, Andrew Sullivan, and more...:

Revenge of the Reality-Based Community. My life on the Republican right—and how I saw it all go wrong. By BRUCE BARTLETT

It seems the Republicans have run out of squishy moderates to purge. Now they’re starting to run conservatives out of town for being insufficiently doctrinaire. Exhibit A: The defenestration of Tom Cole.


Iceland's economy recovered from the financial crisis better than most because the government bailed out the people and jailed the bank criminals. The lack of coverage of ICELAND once again proves the U.S. mainstream media speaks for the 1% and is corrupt and rigged and is NOT "liberal":

Top Economists: Iceland Did It Right … And Everyone Else Is Doing It Wrong

Thursday, November 22, 2012

An Open Letter To Big Dan From The Guy Who's BETTER Than Nate Silver: RICHARD CHARNIN - TRUTH IS ALL


I met Richard Charnin on THE BRAD BLOG. His comments under the username "TRUTH IS ALL" about his election and voting analysis were and are impressive to everyone. I called him THE ULTIMATE NUMBERS CRUNCHER. Anyone who researches and is hip to electronic voting machine fraud, election fraud, follows Bev Harris', etc... knows of Richard Charnin. He has written several BOOKS on these subjects. He wrote me the following on Facebook, and I feel fortunate to have friends like him write to me, and I'd like to share this with everyone. Here is Richard Charnin in his own words.

I saw your POST about Nate Silver.Let me tell you about Nate.

Nate Silver DID NOT GET IT RIGHT. He predicted 313 EV for Obama.

My final prediction had 332 EV for Obama. That was exactly right.

Getting it right is not that big a deal. There were 10 states that were "competitive" if you believe the Likely Voter Polls. I got them all. I WAS JUST LUCKY. I used the LV polls just like everyone else. Obama's expected EV was 321:the sum of the expected values (state win probability * electoral vote). The snapshot was 332 (the actual summation of the winning electoral votes, not the expected value). The LV polls understate Obama's true vote, which I calculated to be 371 expected and 380 snapshot.

In 2008, I also had Obama's bogus 365 EV exactly right in 2008 (the expected value, not the snapshot).

I produce several measures for calculating EV: theoretical, snapshot, and simulation mean value. Obama had 420 True EV.

My model is an open book. Can't say the same about Nate's. But I can understand why. His model is junk.

The purpose of a Monte Carlo Electoral Vote Simulation is to calculate the PROBABILITY OF winning the electoral vote. The probability is the number of winning election trials divided by the total number of trials. I used 500 election trials. That is all that is necessary. The Law of Large Numbers takes effect quickly in the rapid convergence to the mean. Nate does 100,000 trials - overkill. Prof. Sam Wang does nearly a million combinations - laughable.

Nate Silver is not a pollster. He is an aggregator of polls. A lot of sheeple think he is. I also aggregate, using the pollster's numbers. Oh, this will tell you ll you need to knowabout Nate: He ranked Zogby dead last among 100 pollsters a few years ago. So I had to set him straight with this:

He also wrote about "10 reasons to Ignore Exit Polls". I had to set him straight with this:

Nate Silver’s Final Prediction - Truthdig

Now Dan, why don't you write this about me. After all, you did call me the ULTIMATE NUMBER CRUNCHER. Here is the proof that you are right. Nate Silver is a an overrated corporate NY Times shill - who never says squat abut election fraud and who libels John Zogby ( a great pollster). Silver had the nerve to say that if Romney won, it would mean that the polls were BIASED against him Silver never considered that if Romney won, maybe it was becuase he STOLE it. Nate believes Bush won in 2004. What more do you need to know. Take it from this lifetine Quant, Nate doesn't know SQUAT about building mathematical models. His simulations are bullshit. But only I have the knowledge to see through his models and his character .Maybe you will now. too. LIKE YOU, DAN, I AM ALL ABOUT TRUTH. I AM ALL ABOUT FACTS. TRUTH IS ALL. NO BS. So when I saw that post you did on Silver I had to respond. It's 440am. I have to get some sleep.

The Election Model and True Vote Model track record. Nate Silver, eat your heart out. Election Model Forecast; Post-election True Vote Model

2004 (2-party vote shares)
Model: Kerry 51.8%, 337 EV (snapshot)
State exit poll aggregate: 51.7%, 337 EV
Recorded Vote: 48.3%, 255 EV
True Vote Model: 53.6%, 364 EV

Model: Obama 53.1%, 365.3 EV (simulation mean);
Recorded: 52.9%, 365 EV
State exit poll aggregate: 58.0%, 420 EV
True Vote Model: 58.0%, 420 EV

2012 (2-party LV Poll shares)
Model: Obama 51.6%, 332 EV (Snapshot)
Recorded : 51.6%, 332 EV
True Vote 55.2%, 380 EV

I asked Richard about this article about "anonymous" stopping Karl Rove from stealing the election electronically like he stole Ohio in 2004 in Bush v Kerry:

Karl Rove Loses Election After Being Checkmated By Cyber Sleuths?

Here is "anonymous"s WARNING to Karl Rove before the election:

Here is the explanation by Thom Hartmann of what may have went on between "anonymous" & Karl Rove on election night:

...which would explain this famous bizarre Karl Rove clip on FOX "news" on election night:

(btw...why isn't Karl Rove in Jail???)

...and this was Richard's reply to the above "anonymous/Karl Rove" electronic internet rigging attempt of Ohio like 2004:
I cannot say. It's possible. I don't know the facts. Check out Bob Fitrakis and Cliff Arnebeck. I speak via phone at the 29 minute mark: The DC press conference video is up:

The description text below (on the youtube page) contains several key links and explanations, so the main youtube link above is "primary". However, if you embed the video into some other site you'll want to provide links to the same material, either via links to files you host or to the copies I have on google docs. Those files are attached to this message.

This press release covers issues related to election fraud and the political misuse of our so-called "justice" system. The issues are intertwined! In the Don Siegelman case, he was subjected to election fraud by Rove's operation and when that wasn't enough to make him quit politics they falsely jailed him.

This presentation includes a complete guide to the internetworked companies, people and organizations that make up Karl Rove's empire of election fraud.

The "road map" to Rove's empire is a PDF file available here:

The press release for this event is a one-page technical introduction to the core issues:

The link to the petition to free Don Seigelman via a pardon by Obama is located at:

There is also a selection of exit-poll related statistics at:

NOTE: the main camera had issues. This was recorded with a head-mounted Looxie2 camera from the audience that we used as backup. There are brief audio glitches caused by unknown interference at the press club, probably a sat uplink somewhere.

National Press Club main press conference

There you have it, from the BEST: "Truth Is All" Richard Charnin.

Fascinating presentation and discussion with RICHARD CHARNIN, author of "PROVING ELECTION FRAUD" at Palm Beach County PDA.

Richard's new book provides compelling evidence the recorded vote has deviated from the true vote in all elections since 1968. Why does this continue to happen and what can be done about it?




The famous Clint Curtis rigged electronic voting machines testimony, the Movie "Murder, Spies, & Voting Lies", & the HBO movie "Hacking Democracy":

It can take a lawyer, like Cliff Arnebeck, to sometimes set the techies straight.


Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis are the two Ohio attorneys who deposed Mike Connell, and who have otherwise been working to expose Karl Rove’s election thievery since 2004.

From Cliff:

Some hackers/spooks hacked Romney’s computers, which crippled his election day get out the vote activity. However I fail to see how this relates to Rove’s meltdown on Fox News that night.

A successful hack of the Romney campaign computers would have affected all of the operation, would have been illegal, and would have been known to Rove early on election day. So, it does not explain Rove’s dramatic disconnect over Fox’s calling Ohio for Obama at the 11 PM (EST) news hour.

The hack we discovered was limited to Ohio. Its use was coming from Bob Urosevich the same guy who personally delivered a malicious patch in Georgia 2002 which flipped the votes and outcome in their governor and US Senate races. Our exposure of the problem in court through one of the top cyber security experts in the world (so certified by NSA) occurred at about 3:15 PM on election day.

Urosevich would have been informed that the fix had been exposed and that an Ohio judge with jurisdiction had expressed willingness to adopt the corrective action recommended by our expert. He and the one operative who would have been positioned pull the trigger, instead nixed the operation. Neither of them would have been so foolish as to contact Rove to inform him that the Ohio fix was off. Rove’s communications were surely being monitored by law enforcement authorities.

Thus, Rove’s mistaken rant over Ohio being prematurely called for Obama.

Cliff Arnebeck

Bev Harris has some VERY PROFOUND COMMENTS in this video that go far beyond just the subject of electronic voting machines:

Latest video from my buddy Tony, just came out:

As you know, at the end of posts I usually post music or comedy or something along those lines. I came across this prank, and it has to be the funniest/scariest prank ever! Get ready to laugh and/or be scared:

Sunday, November 18, 2012

Questions About "Rockets From Gaza"

Start with this interesting short video, just to setup how there's more than meets the eye with this whole Hamas/Israel situation: you know those "terrorists" called Hamas you hear about all the time? Ron Paul (and many others) state that ISRAEL CREATED HAMAS! You never see THAT in the "news":

(Note: these are just questions I have. I never fully believe any major news story anymore, at least immediately, when it is reported in real time by the western/U.S. mainstream media. We have been DUPED too many times to believe them, without major personal research from varying sources. Usually we find out the REAL STORY much later. The more initial questions I have, the more I think the "official story" may not be true. Now we get into "OFFICIAL STORY", which is the story told by officials to protect officials. OFFICIALS are Big Media and politicians. We KNOW "officials" are the biggest liars in the history of mankind. As you will see in the videos below, the world is turning against Israel. It's the 99% vs 1% in Israel, too: Israel 1% government & military are psychopaths just like the U.S. and just about every other government and organization. Psychopaths rise to the top of every government & organization. But most people are, of course, in the 99% and they are protesting human rights violations around the world. Israel is becoming more and more hated around the world...except for Islamophobic Dittoheads inflamed by the likes of Rush Limbaugh & rightwing radio, Mike Savage, Pam Geller, FOX "news", and scum like that.)

Note: there is a great collection of videos in this post well-worth watching!

Israel Attack On Gaza, video the gatekeeper media will not let you see (graphic)

I don't believe that for days now, rag-tag starving "gaza militants" have been firing off thousands of rockets at Israel from the largest open air prison, totally controlled and surrounded by the country they're firing them at. There's got to be more to it than just that. I would sooner believe that Israel is LETTING them do this for justification to attack Gaza, Israel themselves are doing it as a false flag to blame them as justification for attacking them, or it isn't even happening (at least on the scale the "news" is telling us) but they're saying it is for justification to attack them. "Poor little Israel" is always the story in the mainstream "news". I have the following common sense questions about what is going on there right now that no one is asking. "Gaza militants" tricking and outsmarting Israelis by smuggling in thousands of rockets and firing them off for days and "poor little Israel" must defend itself is not possible for me to believe, it's way too far fetched.

1. Gaza is the LARGEST OPEN AIR PRISON ever, likened to the Nazi concentration camps. Gaza is not very big and is under total control of Israel. They can't get proper food, water, & medicine in Gaza for the Palestinians. How can "Gaza militants" somehow get THOUSANDS of giant rockets & missiles into Gaza under the Israelis' noses? They're "tricking" and "outsmarting" them? Are Israelis great at stopping food from getting into Gaza, but STINK and are LOUSY at stopping thousands of giant rockets & missiles from getting in? It's a huge stretch for me to believe this.

2. If "gaza militants" can smuggle in thousands of CRAPPY INEFFECTIVE rockets all the time, then they can smuggle in GOOD, EFFECTIVE ones. Why would they ALWAYS smuggle in only crappy ineffective rockets? So that then they can get SMASHED by the far superior NUCLEAR ARMED ISRAEL with sophisticated weapons made in the U.S.A.? NO ONE can be this stupid, including "gaza militants". And to do this over and over periodically with the same results? Does that make any sense whatsoever?

3. If "Gaza militants" are shooting off rockets & missiles into Israel, does anyone see them doing this? It's pretty easy to see giant rockets & missiles taking off into the air for days. Then why aren't the Israelis who have been occupying Gaza stopping them? I would think you'd see a giant rocket take off, say THERE THEY ARE, and go to that spot and stop them. How can it be going on for days, then? How can the news have their cameras trained on super-secret spots they're launching the rockets from BEFORE they shoot them? And then why aren't the news camera people saying to the Israelis: HERE THEY ARE! THEY'RE OVER HERE! Look at this ABC video. Obviously, the cameraman had his camera focused on the spot that rockets were launching, then they knew of this "secret" spot beforehand. First you see some kind of satellite photo of a vehicle Israel blows up. So they can't see thousands of rockets smuggled in and launching from these same satellites? Then you see a camera showing rockets taking off from Gaza. How did the cameraman have his camera focused on this "secret" spot before the rockets launched:

4. SATELLITES: Advanced countries like the U.S. and Israel can see EVERYTHING on satellite. WE are probably HELPING Israel with OUR satellites. Did no one see "Gaza militants" bringing in thousands of rockets on satellite? Does no one see on the satellites all the spots rockets are launching from? How come we all say that satellites can see everything going on everywhere all the time...but except for GAZA??? I thought they could read the back of a dime from a satellite. I thought Israelis were ALREADY IN GAZA for decades, to boot.

5. Is it possible Israel IS PURPOSELY LETTING "Gaza militants" smuggle rockets & missiles into Gaza, and LETTING them fire them off - at least for a short while - to have JUSTIFICATION to collectively bomb the hell (collective punishment) out of the Palestinians? You know, like many people have proven that the Bush administration KNEW about 911 in advance and LET IT HAPPEN for justification for "The War On Terror", the Afghanistan War, and the Iraq War? Remember the non-existent WMD's (Weapons of Mass Destruction)? LETTING this happen on purpose makes a hell of a lot more sense than ragamuffin poor starving cavemen are "tricking" and "outsmarting" one of the top military & spy forces in the history of the planet! Just like 911, we were expected to believe that 19 hijackers commanded by a guy in a cave on dialysis halfway around the world "tricked" and "outsmarted" the #1 military & spy force in the history of the planet with boxcutters!

6. Is ISRAEL or Israeli operatives launching the rockets & missiles and "BLAMING THE PALESTINIANS"? IE: FALSE FLAG or INSIDE JOB. Israel & the Mossad are famous for that. The creed of the Mossad is: "WAGE WAR BY DECEPTION". And we already KNOW most of the mainstream media is pro-Israel Zionists, that's an uncomfortable fact for many. Doing something and blaming someone else is called a "FALSE FLAG". Governments throughout history have done FALSE FLAGS to justify to their people going to wars they don't want to get into.

7. Are we to believe that Israel can sneak Mossad into Iran (or ANYWHERE for that matter) and kill Iranian nuclear scientists BUT CAN'T SNEAK IN AND INFILTRATE THE "GAZA MILITANTS" WHICH THEY ALREADY SURROUND AND CONTROL?

8. IRON DOME: We, the U.S. citizens, while having AUSTERITY imposed upon us by our government, have given BILLIONS of our taxpayer money to Israel to build "IRON DOME", which is a missile defense system. How convenient that the stories that are coming out mention how great IRON DOME is working! And why are WE paying for some foreign country's "IRON DOME" defense system anyway, while having AUSTERITY imposed on US? Who does our congress & president work for, Israel? Where are all the fiscal conservatives and Tea Partiers on this one?

9. BLAME IRAN FALSE FLAG: More and more stories are coming out that - WAIT FOR IT - the missiles the "Gaza militants" are shooting are - WAIT FOR IT AGAIN - FROM IRAN!!! Oh, how convenient once again that somehow this can be spun into attacking Iran, which we KNOW there have been non-stop false stories for YEARS by our mainstream media trying to get us to bomb Iran. And here we go again. Did you notice that when "Israeli officials" are on TV "news" they mention IRAN in almost every first sentence they utter? Or at the very least, they can't be on TV commenting about "rockets from Gaza" without mentioning IRAN. That reeks of the same old same old: either letting this happen or it's a false flag to justify bombing Iran. Or they wouldn't keep mention Iran, would they? EVERY story like this sooner or later gets spun in the "news" to be connected to IRAN, which happens to be the next country Israel wants to bomb or wants US to bomb. HELLO, IRAN? IT IS US, THE "GAZA MILITANTS". GOT ANYMORE OF THOSE CRAPPY INEFFECTIVE ROCKETS THAT DON'T DO SHIT AND THEN GIVE ISRAEL AN EXCUSE TO LEVEL US AGAIN? YEAH, GIVE US A COUPLE THOUSAND OF THEM. WE'LL SMUGGLE THEM THROUGH THE SECRET TUNNELS EVERYONE KNOWS ABOUT AND ISRAEL IS GUARDING. NO, WE DON'T WANT THE GOOD ONES, WE SAID THE LOUSY ONES!!!

10. QUI BONO? WHO BENEFITS from this? Certainly not GAZA & the Palestinians! It would be BEYOND INSANE for them to secretly smuggle thousands of rockets into Gaza and shoot them into Israel knowing full well based on every instance in the past that it DOES NOTHING TO ISRAEL and GIVES JUSTIFICATION to Israel to do an all-out attack with super-sophisticated weaponry, as sophisticated as the U.S., paid for by you-know-who: YOU the U.S. TAXPAYER! Because "they're our friend", "they're the only democracy in the Middle East", "they're totally surrounded", "Israel has a right to defend itself", and every other cliche we've been brainwashed with by the media they control since we were born. WHO BENEFITS THE LEAST? The Palestinians.

11. THE TIMING: Has anyone noticed that this happened right after the election and while this Petraeus scandal is going on?

Why isn't anyone in the media asking these questions, or practically anyone period? Why do we continually BLINDLY believe the "news" when we've caught them lying to us time and time again?

Remember this famous CNN/Charles Jaco FAKE PERSIAN GULF WAR BROADCAST? Why is this not talked about 24x7 as an example of FAKE NEWS by the major networks? This was done YEARS ago while Poppy Bush the war criminal was president. IMAGINE how much BETTER and MORE SOPHISTICATED they are now at LYING:

Why did our congress rush out H.R. 813 bipartisan, which they unanimously back Israel as having a right to defend themselves? But never rush out anything saying the Palestinians can defend themselves? The Republicans and Democrats are supposedly fighting all the time...EXCEPT for things having to do with WAR, THE POLICE STATE, THE BANKSTERS, & ISRAEL! They're in GRIDLOCK 24x7, but somehow rush out H.R. 813 unanimously at the speed of light to remind the world that they are being blackmailed by Israel. Don't you wish they'd bipartisan kiss OUR asses like they do the foreign country of Israel?

Look at the conduct of our congress towards Israel. It's disgusting:

Protests Erupt Worldwide Against Israel's Bombing Campaign in Gaza:

Israeli air strikes level Hamas HQ:

Ominous message from anonymous to Israel:

FINKELSTEIN on "rockets from gaza":

CrossTalk on Israel-Gaza conflict: Gates of Hell (ft. Norman Finkelstein)

UK Jewish MP: Israel acting like Nazis in Gaza:

Chris Hedges: Assault on Gaza is Murder, Not War:

Webster Tarpley: Netanyahu is a DESPERATE DEMAGOGUE

Noam Chomsky - US/ Israeli Crimes Against Palestine:

911 GOOD FOR ISRAEL - Netanyahu

911 Israel video montage:

11-month-old son of BBC picture editor is killed in Gaza air strike

GLENN GREENWALD: Stop pretending the US is an uninvolved, helpless party in the Israeli assault on Gaza. The Obama administration's unstinting financial, military and diplomatic support for Israel is a key enabling force in the conflict

Continued US Support For Israeli Bombing Of Gaza Bodes Ill For Obama’s Second Term

Zionist Lobby Gets Drubbed in US Elections. AIPAC Takes a Big Hit

Zionist activist Jonathan Sacerdoti appeared four times as a guest on different BBC television news programs during the first two days of the Israeli assault. The BBC allowed him to pose as an independent expert, neglecting to mention his past work for the Zionist Federation and current role at the Board of Deputies of British Jews

As Israel assaults Gaza, BBC reporting assaults the truth

Media Cover for Israeli Crimes: "blame the victim" pattern ensues as usual in the mainstream media.

Gilad Sharon, Son Of Former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, Writes Op-Ed: 'We Need To Flatten Entire Neighborhoods In Gaza'

Armed with US Weapons, Israeli Firepower Threatens to Overwhelm Palestinians

Bombing press: Israeli strike on Gaza media center injures at least 6 (VIDEO, PHOTOS)

The below article is FANTASTIC, I'm putting it in RED and making the font bigger, a MUST-READ:

Zionism, anti-Zionist Jews, Is Israel a democratic state? — Interview with Mauro Manno