Let's check out the "street cred" of Julian Assange:
bd: I can't make a judgement right now, but to me it looks like Julian Assange/Wikileaks is releasing certain classified documents. Some questions I have are: why is he still alive? how can the government not catch him? how can the government not catch whoever's passing him these documents when they can read a dime from a satellite, tap our phones & computers, read our emails? where does he get the money for his lifestyle? why is the corrupt media (something we ALL agree on: the mainstream media is corrupt) releasing his leaks when they're on the side of the wealthy/corporations/military at every step? Isn't he on TV sometimes? Then why do they keep saying they can't get him? Something is fishy here, I just don't know what it is right now. But I'm not stupid!!! Furthermore, Assange doesn't question 9/11, in fact he said: "9/11 truthers annoy me". Ever hear of "limited hangout" strategy?
Limited hangout: A "limited hangout" is used by Intelligence Organization's when a clandestine operation goes bad (bd: 9/11??? they're on TV saying 9/11 was an inside job all the time, as if everyone knows it now!); or, a phoney cover story blows up. When discovered the Intelligence Organization volunteers some of the truth while still managing to withhold key and damaging facts in the case. The public is so intrigued by the new information it doesn't pursue the matter further. The new disclosures are sensational, but superficially so. Some of the lesser scoundrels are identified and publicly exposed to twist uncomfortably on network TV and in the press.
Wikileaks: Limited Hangout -
Again: I'm not sure what to believe here right now. I'm a very cautious person. I need to be overwhelmed with facts, evidence, proof, or simply something that makes a lot of sense vs everything else. I'm sure this whole thing will keep developing.
The musician became abusive, she says, and they separated. A fight ensued over the custody of Assange's half brother, and Claire felt threatened, fearing that the musician would take away her son. Assange recalled her saying, "Now we need to disappear," and he lived on the run with her from the age of eleven to sixteen. When I asked him about the experience, he told me that there was evidence that the man belonged to a powerful cult called the Family-its motto was "Unseen, Unknown, and Unheard." Some members were doctors who persuaded mothers to give up their newborn children to the cult's leader, Anne Hamilton-Byrne. The cult had moles in government, Assange suspected, who provided the musician with leads on Claire's whereabouts.
Can Israel be behind Wikileaks? Time and any mounting evidence will tell. And, it's not necessarily what Wikileaks says, it may be what Wikileaks doesn't say. (limited hangout?) Can Israel pull off something like this? You bet:
9/11 WTC South Tower 97th Floor Worker - Unusual Power Downs The Week Before
RALPH SCHOENMAN Author, political-analyst and activist Ralph Schoenman gives the concluding remarks of the grand jury strategy workshop June 3, 2006 at the 9/11: Revealing the Truth/Reclaiming Our Future conference held at the Embassy Suits Hotel/O’Hare Rosemont, in Chicago:
So, when are they going to shut down the internet? We can now bypass the corrupt mainstream media and find out the truth for ourselves!!!
Now you know the reason the controlled media hyped up pat downs/body scanners.....FIRST let Michael Chertoff make BILLIONS on body scanners...THEN push racial profiling!!! And the best of all: Muslims didn't even DO 9/11!!! Fantastic: get a Muslim for testimony to say, "even WE want to be profiled!!!" -
As you read the Wikileaks revelations, just be wary of this possibility: WIKILEAKS = AIPAC.
Israel always seems to get a pass in Wikileaks leaks. Even though USrael are twins. This could be one of those double-twists, where Israel is really trying to weaken the United States government via Wikileaks. BD: I am not making a definitive judgement here, there could be twists, double twists, and triple twists. I'm just laying it all out here for you. At this time, I don't think anyone can make a definitive judgement on any of this. I'm open to changing my mind, due to ever changing proof, evidence, or whatever makes the most sense. One thing for sure, doubt whatever the mainstream media is pushing when you make your judgement. The biggest thing I'm getting out of Wikileaks leaks is: 1. the U.S. is committing war crimes, and 2. Attack Iran. Both of which are suspicious to me. Not that the U.S. isn't committing war crimes, but why does Wikileaks always make the U.S. and only the U.S. look bad? Unless it's because of the nature of the documents Wikileaks is only able to obtain. Cui Bono: Israel...as usual.
Former Reagan official Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: "Indeed, if terrorists want to attack air travelers, they never need to board an airplane.
All they need to do is to join the throngs of passengers waiting to go through the TSA scanners and set off their bombs. The TSA has conveniently assembled the targets.
The final proof that there are no terrorists is that not a single neoconservative or government official responsible for the Bush regime’s invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and the Obama regime’s slaughters of Pakistanis, Yemenis, and Somalians has been assassinated. None of these Americans who are responsible for lies, deceptions, and invasions that have destroyed the lives of countless numbers of Muslims have any security protection. If Muslims were capable of pulling off 9/11, they are certainly capable of assassinating Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith, Libby, Condi Rice, Kristol, Bolton, Goldberg, and scores of others during the same hour of the same day."
More FBI/CIA FAKERY: many of the "terror" threats you see actually wouldn't happen if it wasn't for the FBI/CIA...
This is like the subCRIME lending crisis: the FBI gets informants who are former criminals to scour poor neighborhoods for dupes by offering them $$$$$$$, giving them bombs, giving them plans...and then arresting them and the headLIES say: "FBI STOPS TERROR ATTACK"!!!!!!! The part they don't tell you in the headLIES: the whole "terror attack" wouldn't have happened in the first place without the FBI.It's called "entrapment". And entrapment of Muslims in particular. I'm sure this would work on many patsys, not just Muslims. Then it foments anti-Muslim backlash like this. YOUR tax dollars at work! Probably to justify the FBI/CIA black hole of taxpayer money going to them.
Next: The FBI goes into poor Muslim section of cities, pays informants to create a "terrorist" situation, offers huge amounts of $$$ to poor Muslims in the community to go along with a "terror plot" the FBI themselves created, then all we see are headlines (HeadLIES): "Terror Plot in U.S. Foiled":
This illustrates how gullible FOX "news" viewers are, and they should rethink what they are watching on FOX "news" and self examine themselves. If they believe this, it goes without saying that they believe other FALSE "news":
FOX Nation believes story about Obama by the joke site The Onion; embarrassed, FOX then scrubs the site instead of admitting their error:
.....breaking......The Onion is bought out by FOX "news" and is now part of the FOX "news" team featured in a show called "Onion and Friends"............just kidding!!!!!
Is Wikileaks/Julian Assange exposing the entire FAKERY by the U.S. government and others on the Afghanistan & Iraq Wars & the "event" that led to them: 9/11???
* 3 million documents set to go online
* Bombshell leak thought to include U.S. assessments of Gordon Brown
* Secret talks on return of Lockerbie bomber to Libya may also be leaked
* Allegations 'include U.S. backing of Kurdish terrorists'
* U.S. diplomats face being kicked out of countries in backlash
* Corrupt politicians expected to be named and shamed
I suspect he has evidence of the entire globalist conspiracy, all of it. He even has a document dump prepared for release in the event of his untimely death.
These documents will potentially reveal that for the most part "US Diplomats" are trained Secret Service and/or CIA assets. Expect every country to expel our diplomats as soon as Sunday. Expect arrogance, disdain, bribery and blackmail to be a recurring theme throughout everything. Expect massive repercussions.
BTW:
This is where and how US Military technology came into the possession of China
Now sturdy this - and note the name Rothschild, and the connection to ZIM, the company that abandoned its WTC lease and moved out in the weeks prior to 9/11
If these are the types of dots that get connected by the Wikileaks dump, it could take down at least three US Presidents. I'm sure that Bill & Hillary are nervous about these revelations.
Watch for Hillary Clinton to implode in the coming days - juggling the Wikileaks disaster and North Korea:
On three occasions since the end of World War II - in 1950, 1976 and 2004 - elite citizen committees have organized to warn the United States of what they viewed as looming threats to national security.
These three Committees on the Present Danger (CPD) aimed to ratchet up the level of fear among the US public and policy community. In each case, the committees leveraged fear in attempts to increase military budgets, to mobilize the country for war, and to beat back isolationist, anti-interventionist and realist forces in US politics.
Where Was Tom Delay On September 11, 2002? Laundering Money. Plotting the destruction of his own country and the rebuilding of the MIddle East with US taxpayer dollars, and your childrens debt to China, and figuring out how to rewrite the constitution for corporate profits. Tom Delay is among the greatest criminal politicians ever to grace Washington DC. Electing Criminals to be your leader is like hiring a wolf to watch the chickens. There is a special place in hell waiting for this fake-christian liar thief loser, and a prison cell before that.
Shake those hips, Tom, and don't drop the soap in the shower, or "The Pumper" might get ya! Here' Tom "The Hammer" DeLay, hoping he doesn't get "hammered" by someone behind bars:
Tom DeLay's new partner for "Dancing Behind Bars":
What's with Republicans and dancing??? Here's Bristol Palin, the teen who got pregnant, who's against teens who get pregnant...also on Dancing With The Stars:
I have an idea!!! Bristol Palin should be partners with Tom DeLay on Dancing With The Stars!!! Thank you! Thank you!
Mounted Police charge protesters at Whitehall 24 November - I wasn't planning on uploading this, I assumed the BBC would mention it along with their coverage of all the other protests, they haven't. These protesters are not those who were kettled outside the treasury building, we weren't allowed in for that, after some kids had started fires and thrown some sticks n junk at the police lines separating us from the main protest they began to move forward. This happened about an hour and a half after police started pushing us back, they had already deployed the cavalry 3 times, although those instances were less aggressive than this one. I have decided to follow the anticuts campaign and make a documentary out of all the footage I gather, so this will eventually be in there.
WikiLeaks release to show NATO ally Turkey helped Al Qaeda in Iraq
"Al Qaeda In Iraq" (I contend) was a brand name invented by one Karl Rove - and I said so at the top of my voice all over the web the very first time I heard it.
"Al Qaeda In Iraq" is a Rove-invented brand name of something that is not what you perceive it to be.
The definition of "Al Qaeda" is in actuality:
"Operatives of the US, Israeli and British covert services who act to foment terror against both our allies and our enemies at various times in order to achieve political ends."
The attacks on mosques in Iraq and the apparent "Civil War" are all the result of these rogue covert actors - whom you know as "Al Qaeda, but that our own government has on its payroll.
So when you hear Bush say that the same group that was responsible for the 9/11 attacks is now operating in Iraq to destabilize that country and kill our troops, he is technically correct. The group in both cases was HIS GROUP, "Al Qaeda."
Nothing is as it appears.
NOTHING.
We are about to learn that it was actually run from Turkey as a false flag op - as there is no "Al Qaeda" independent from the CIA and Mossad and MI6.
"Al Qaeda is a widely known euphemism among the global elite. It is accompanied by a wink and a nod - as we will read in these soon to be released diplomatic cables.
Here was my take on it in 2006:
LOSING THE IRAQ WAR ON PURPOSE:
The following takes a few twists and turns to prove my point, but once you read through it, you will be hard pressed to conclude that Donald Rumsfeld ever had any intention to WIN & LEAVE Iraq.
It’s time to view the global strategic game with fresh eyes, and realize that our assumptions about traditional victory and success run completely contrary to those of the GLOBALISTS who have stolen our country from us – and reside in our White House.
First there is this:
September 18, 2006 at 09:49:22
U.S.-Israel-Iran Alliance: The Great Game Updated
Excerpts:
“The public leadership is put in place by power brokers with unlimited global access to high-level military, intelligence, economic, and strategic analysts, policy-makers, influence brokers, and puppet-masters. The broader objective of extending the power of the military/industrial elite without regard to national interest.
The ideology of a ruling elite both determines and reinforces favored decision-making algorithms that, despite their complexity, generally result in the same rather obvious determinations: exploitation of labor, strategic use of military force, allocation of resources for purposes of social control rather than social empowerment, and even choosing which party and candidates can best represent the elite's interests in national elections.
This kind of strategic chess game has been going on for centuries unabated. Manipulating a few dozen national entities and a few core industries simply does not require a unique brand of "smarts".
Iraq is in ruins, U.S. corporate interests have taken the U.S. taxpayer debt incurred by the war and destruction and converted it into windfall profits, the U.S. has control of Iraqi oil, the country is in the midst of a violent conflagration that creates a power vacuum that strengthens both Israel and Iran, and we're building massive military bases and the world's largest and most heavily fortified embassy as a governor's mansion for our new 51st state. Of course, 3,000 U.S. troops have died with many more severely wounded, and who knows how many Iraqis. U.S. casualties are especially tendered by Americans as proof of the catastrophic handling of the war. But this concern represents a total misreading of the mindset of military command.
Perhaps it's time to get this straight: 3,000, even 10,000, dead soldiers means nothing to the Pentagon or the Defense Department. When will Americans get that through their heads?
I was told directly by someone with intimate knowledge that the State Department had learned that Rumsfeld planned to FOMENT CHAOS in Iraq from the outset…and that literally all of the apparent failures in Iraq were part of Rumsfeld’s goal prior to the invasion of Iraq. If ETERNAL OCCUPATION and PERMANENT BASES are your ultimate goal, this strategy makes sense – as peace and stability would eliminate the justification for US boots on the ground.
The recent revelation that Rumsfeld actually threatened to fire any General who continued to work on the planning for the aftermath of the invasion (“The future Of Iraq Project”) makes total sense when you consider that the actual goal of Donald Rumsfeld was to “AVOID WINNING.”
THE FUTURE OF IRAQ PROJECT:
Washington, DC, September 1, 2006 - The National Security Archive is today posting State Department documents from 2002 tracing the inception of the "Future of Iraq Project," alongside the final, mammoth 13-volume study, previously obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. "The Future of Iraq Project" was one of the most comprehensive U.S. government planning efforts for raising that country out of the ashes of combat and establishing a functioning democracy. The new materials complement previous postings on the Archive's site relating to the United States' complex relationship with Iraq during the years leading up to the 2003 invasion:
Our troops, and the citizens of Iraq, are dying needlessly as the direct result of a dishonest strategy, intentionally designed to result in quagmire. They got the best advice the State Department had to offer, then intentionally chose to do EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE in order to guarantee failure, which in their view, meant success.
The Rumsfeld / Bush / Cheney plan from the outset, contrary to ALL LOGIC, was to both allow for the complete destruction of this civil society AND to stay there with troops in place forever.
IMPEACHABLE LIES REVEALED:
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence's newly-issued chapters showed that top Administration officials, including the President, Vice President, then-National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, repeatedly misrepresented intelligence community findings, to support the Iraq invasion with lies that Iraq was tied to al-Qaeda and the 9/11 attacks, and had advanced WMD programs.
RUMSFELD’S EVIL REVEALED…
HOW RUMSFELD STEAMROLLED THE STATE DEPARTMENT IN ORDER TO ENSURE THE UTTER DESTRUCTION OF IRAQ AND THE QUAGMIRE – WHICH WAS ALWAYS HIS GOAL:
INTERVIEW WITH RICHARD HAASS
ADVISOR TO COLIN POWELL ON IRAQ WAR PLANNING
Q.
Why did we go to war?
A.
I think the first thing to say about this war is that it was an elective war. It was a war of choice. We didn't have to go to war against Iraq; certainly not when we did, certainly not how we did it. It wasn't as though the Iraqis were poised to suddenly do something or break out. So the decision to go to war -- which obviously was the president's decision -- like everything else about this war, was an elective decision.
Q.
Did we do enough to plan for the postwar?
Q.
Is it fair to say that the Pentagon were too optimistic about the postwar situation?
A.
I’ll let you make the judgment and characterizations. I would just simply say that the aftermath has proven to be far more expensive in every sense of the word, in terms of human expense, in terms of the financial expense. I think in part, it was based upon some planning assumptions. I think part also, what made it a lot more difficult was in the immediate aftermath of the war, the degree of looting that took place. Looting doesn't really capture the degree of physical destruction that took place. [It] meant that the job suddenly grew in magnitude and some precious time was lost. So the entire undertaking became far more demanding because of what happened in the initial days and weeks afterwards. …
The question that I think is legitimate to ask is, should we have had more forces ready to deal with the so-called peace stabilization side of things? Should we perhaps have been more sober in our expectations of how the Iraqis would react once the thumb of Saddam Hussein and his henchmen was lifted? So one can argue that the coalition forces at that point, there simply weren't enough of them and they weren't involved enough to deal with it. Or to put it another way, there was too long of a lag between war fighting and then dealing with the war's aftermath.
Q.
Your view on that would be that we didn't have enough troops on the ground.
A.
In part number, in part mission; we were slow to transition from war fighting to dealing with the afterward. That either would have argued for additional forces or a more rapid transition from one mission to another. Though to be fair, it was a difficult call to make -- how fast to make that transition -- because you still had the reality or the possibility of residual resistance from the Iraqis.
Q.
You were making recommendations about the postwar period while you were in the State Department. You made recommendations to Secretary Powell. What were your recommendations as to what that situation was going to look at and what it was going to require?
A.
I'm not going to go into every detail of what sort of advice or recommendations I made. What I simply did was look at the history of these situations, really going back to Germany and Japan and looking back over the more than one dozen experiences the United States had had since the German and Japanese occupations after World War II and ask questions. What it was we could likely expect? What is it we needed to be prepared for?
My view was that we should be thinking very large; that we were talking about a situation that would be very demanding; that we should try to use local forces as much as possible; that while we should dismantle the upper level of those, say, who had been involved in the Ba'ath Party, we should try to take advantage of the lion's share of the army and police.
Interestingly enough, after World War II, the initial thinking about de-Nazification was to get rid of lots of people. But very quickly on, the United States and others realized that we really needed to work with the existing German forces and only get rid of the top level. So that was a lesson that I thought we should apply here.
But essentially, also I was arguing that we should make this as international as possible. There was no reason to hoard this to ourselves in some "victor gets the spoils" mentality, but rather that we should see this as something to be shared with others -- for two reasons.
ACTUALLY THERE WAS ONE REASON…THE PERSONAL GREED OF THE PEOPLE IN CHARGE.
“We did not want this to drain the human and financial resources of the United States.”
YOU FAILED – IT DID.
Q.
When did you hear Chalabi being flown into Nasiriyah?
A.
Pretty much when everybody else heard about it. When it became public. …
Q.
But you're in charge of policy, I mean, you're at a high level. Presumably, you would have known.
A.
I learn never to use the word "presumably" when it comes to government. All I can tell you is, I didn't know about it in advance, and I don't know who of my colleagues might have known about it. … I don't know that anyone knew about it in advance. All I can say is, in my own view, such initiatives were and are unwise, because they're an attempt to get too involved in the internal politics of Iraq. I just don't think that's the sort of thing that's wise or sustainable.
Q.
I spoke to General Garner. He told me that he was instructed by Secretary Rumsfeld to shelve the “Future of Iraq Project.”
A.
I can't speak to that. I don't know what sort of instructions or communications went on within the Pentagon. I would just simply hope it's not true, because I thought a lot of good work went into that project.
Q.
That's what he said. He said that he looked at the papers. He talked to the some of the people in the State Department. He thought it was good work. He wanted to use the work. But then he was instructed not to. Does that surprise you?
A.
Yes.
RUMSFELD & CHENEY TOOK THE BONE-HEADED INITIATIVE TO FLY IN CHALABI ON THEIR OWN, AND IN SO DOING, DESTROYED US CREDIBILITY WITHIN IRAQ.
HERE IS A POLICY EXPERT WHO FORMULATED POLICY FOR COLIN POWELL. HIS ADVICE WAS
A. TO KEEP THE POLICE AND MILITARY IN PLACE TO ENSURE LAW AND ORDER.
B. TO ALLOW THE IRAQIS TO DETERMINE THEIR OWN FORM OF GOVERNMENT AND ELECT THEIR OWN LEADERS WITH NO OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE.
C. TO BRING IN THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF FOREIGN PARTNERS TO SHARE IN THE JOB OF SECURING THE COUNTRY, AND IN SO DOING, TO SHARE IN THE “SPOILS OF WAR.”
In the words on Chalabi: “We are heroes in error.”
Dead soldiers and civilians are of virtually no consequence to Rumsfeld and the rest of the criminals in charge. Picture a chessboard, and we are all merely pawns.
THE FAILURE IN IRAQ IS THE DIRECT RESULT OF THE PERSONAL HUBRIS AND GREED OF RUMSFELD, CHENEY AND BUSH ON BEHALF OF THEIR GLOBALIST OVERLORDS.
Your leadership does not represent your interests.
This story below is not only an inside look into how the health care industry lies to average Americans to keep the present system the same, but how corporations and big money can get you to believe anything. A former big wig CEO explains how he participated in smearing Michael Moore's movie SICKO. Extrapolate what happened in this one instance into how we are being constantly bombarded with propaganda via the mainstream media via all corporations. This is proof beyond a doubt to all of you out there who trashed Michael Moore, because this former health care CEO is telling exactly how the health care industry got you to hate Michael Moore because he was right. You walked around like a parrot, repeating what the health care industry wanted you to, against Michael Moore and your own self interest. That's how powerful propaganda, power, and money is. And it's happening right now, see Mike Huckabee's video after this one.
I'm seeing this commercial on all channels and so are you: Mike Huckabee wants to repeal the health care bill. Above, you see an actual health care CEO telling you of his propaganda campaign and then you see this:
I'm going to throw a brick through my TV the next time I see Mike Huckabee shilling for the health care industry and trying to fuck you/us.
So, how stupid are you???
Are you going to go along with Mike Huckabee (of all people!), repeal health care, and then find out he's lying like Wendell Potter now admits? Mike Huckabee's plan is to do nothing. Just repeal the health care bill and do nothing else. How does that sound to you 50 million Americans with no health care? Sure, the health care bill isn't perfect, but it's doing something and it's a step in the right direction. It does some things like it ensures that all Americans have access to quality, affordable health care, it creates a new, regulated marketplace where consumers can purchase affordable health care, extends much needed relief to small businesses, improves Medicare by helping seniors and people with disabilities afford their prescription drugs, prohibits denials of coverage based on pre-existing conditions, limits out-of-pocket costs so that Americans have security and peace of mind, helps young adults by requiring insurers to allow all dependents to remain on their parents plan until age 26, expands Medicaid to millions of low-income Americans, provides sliding-scale subsidies to make insurance premiums affordable, holds insurance companies accountable for how our health care dollars are spent, clamp down on insurance company abuses, and invests in preventive care. So which of those are you against? Are you also against social security, too? If it's watered down from being great, you can thank people like Mike Huckabee, the Republican Party, and former health care CEO Wendell Potter while his job was to lie to you. He is now chirping and is one of the good guys.
And by the way, how come you don't see whistleblowers like Wendell Potter in the mainstream media? Especially on FOX "news"? Why isn't Wendell Potter on FOX "news"? This is why you must watch Free Speech TV on DISH channel 9415 and DirecTV channel 348. They're having a fund drive now, they're the only news channels with no commercials, no corporate funding, and no government funding. You can't even count PBS in that category. It's viewer driven news. Democracy NOW! is on Free Speech TV. You can watch your "news" on ABC, NBC, CBS, or FOX and never see things like this. And don't forget about all the commercials.
Just like the health care industry propaganda Wendell Potter admits to above, here's more propaganda being shoved down our throats: "tax cuts for the rich will create jobs". Congress has more millionaires per capita than any city in the country, so it is no wonder that all of the Republicans in Washington want the Bush tax cuts to be extended - they could lose a tiny amount of money! Ed Schultz blasts these Republicans for being unpatriotic, greedy millionaires who only care about themselves.
American food banks being crushed:
American Dream - Hungry In America:
I advise EVERYONE to bookmark (liberal, conservative, independent) and read daily, Washington's Blog:
Does everyone agree with this from Washington's Blog:
We Can Fix America If We Focus on What ALL Americans - Liberals AND Conservatives - Want
- Break Up the Unholy Alliance Between Big Government and Big Banks
- Throw the Criminals In Jail
- Audit the Fed
- Safe and Healthy Food and Water
- Freedom and Fair Elections
Police State: This is what happens when media tries to film a REAL protest (not the Tea Party or Stewart/Colbert). They get arrested. What does that tell you? They're protesting the military school of assassins. That's not legal, I guess.
