The results of the activist fascist conservative Supreme Court Citizens United decision is in which stated corporations are people and their free speech is $$$$$$ so they could spend unlimited $$$$$ on political ads (7-to-1 for Republicans, if you take out a calculator: that's $3.5 BILLION for Republicans and $0.5 billion for Democrats, anyone find that odd???). The elephant in the room that the media NEVER points out, when they say 4 BILLION was spent, is that $3.5 BILLION of it was for one party: the Republicans -
$3.5 BILLION spent on campaign ads for Republicans, of the $4 BILLION spent? That's what I got, when I use a calculator and apply the 7:1 spending ratio of outside groups on political advertising that I've seen in news reports. You are free to correct my math, but if you take a calculator and multiply $4 BILLION by 7/8ths that means groups backing Republicans approximately outspent groups backing Democrats $3.5 BILLION vs $0.5 BILLION. If TV advertising (commercials) works, which we know it does or BILLIONS & BILLIONS wouldn't be spent on TV commercials for cereal, McDonalds, Best Buy, etc...then the Citizens United decision by the "conservative" activist fascist Supreme Court has a LOT to do with Republicans winning so many elections. Does anyone notice that a Supreme Court full of Republican-nominated judges made a decision that benefits Republicans? Oh, I forgot, half the country doesn't care about this, because "their guys" are benefiting from it. Same old story, and that's exactly why we have all the problems we do. Everyone can't get together and do the right thing, because half the country feels corruption is "OK"...when "their guys" are doing it. The other half will change their minds when "their guys" are outspent 7-to-1 by secret undisclosed donors, many from foreign countries swaying our U.S. elections. Again, that's "OK"...as long as "your guys" are benefiting, and you'll change your mind once they don't and cry that foreign countries are influencing our U.S. elections. And news reports saying that $4 BILLION was spent on political ads but not mentioning that an extreme amount went to one party, is like when a bill is shot down and one entire party voted one way and one entire party voted the other way...but the news says "CONGRESS" just shot down a bill. Anyone can chime in with my math: I took news reports that said groups that backed Republicans outspent groups that backed Democrats 7:1. Chime in, in my comments, if you don't like the math. I will correct it. But that's what I come up with, give or take a BILLION. I expect 4 BILLION will seem like a drop in the bucket compared to what will be spent in the 2012 presidential election. How many BILLIONS do you think will be spent in 2012? And in a time of financial crisis, when talking heads are saying to cut spending on social programs, and not cut the biggest spending of all: the war profiteer spending? Corporations are now picking our congress and will soon pick our president. The Supreme Court said that corporations are people, and their speech is money, so their "free speech" is being able to give unlimited money for political ads. We don't stand a chance. I know, personally, that I do not have several BILLION dollars, so I'm out of the game...the game of democracy. I don't have as much "free speech" as corporations, because I don't have enough money. Remember when Republicans kept blocking the unemployment extension saying it's too much money? They should take the BILLIONS that will be spent on the 2012 elections and extend unemployment with it, then it will be paid for.
Over 4 BILLION spent on campaign ads
Undisclosed Campaign Spending Up Five-Fold From 2006; Dems Outgunned 7 to 1 With Secret Money
Groups with no official ties to the Republican Party spent more than $17 million to help Republican candidates, according to reports they filed with the FEC. That compares with $2.6 million spent by groups allied with Democrats.
Shocker: the party that benefited the most ($3.5 BILLION to $0.5 BILLION) from the activist "conservative" Supreme Court's Citizens United decision, kept blocking legislation to DISCLOSE SECRET DONORS:
Senate Republicans Again Block DISCLOSE Act, Designed to Reveal Special Interest Spending
Election Postmortem: A Picture of Dorian Gray
Karl Rove and 51%-49% e-vote siting in Pennsylvania:
You know where Karl Rove spent the day after the all-important mid-term election? Here in the state of Pennsylvania -- Pittsburgh to be exact -- gnawing on steak and potatoes and running a political victory lap with the fracking polluters who can now befowl our state's water supply with impugnity for the next couple of years, aided in no small part by the $38 million in mostly secret donations from large corporations that was donated to Rove's American Crossroads outfit that ran attack ads smearing congressional candidates who support sensible environmental laws. In celebrating Tueaday's GOP win with the Marcellus Shale frackers, Rove showed himself a man who not only knows where his cow flesh is seared but where his bread is buttered.
Here's what Rove told them:
Fracking Karl Rove to Pa.: "Climate is gone"
Here's my solution: BAN ALL POLITICAL ADS - on TV/radio/newspapers. NO MORE POLITICAL ADS! You have to go see the candidates speak in person to find out what they stand for!
Oh, and btw, in Pennsylvania Pat Toomey-R beat Joe Sestak-D 51%-49%, now watch this: computer programmer testifies that he wrote software to rig elections 51%-49% on electronic voting machines -
This is no bullshit! In Pennsylvania: FAKE judges, FAKE courts:
A debt collector in Erie, Pennsylvania, is accused of running a fake courtroom, complete with fake court documents and people dressed up like j...udges, to intimidate consumers into paying debts, according to the Erie Times-News.
The scam allegedly involved people impersonating sheriff’s deputies appearing at consumers’ doors to issue fake subpoenas, ordering people to appear immediately. The company, Unicredit America Inc., allegedly turned its offices into a courtroom, complete with a raised bench for the “judge,” a fake witness stand, a gallery for spectators and law books on bookshelves.
Debt Collectors in Court Scam Meet Real Judge
Erie debt collection company sued; accused of using bogus "hearings" and fake "courtroom" to collect from consumers
This is incredible: Keiser Report №92: Fake Markets! Fake Finance!
The Government Doesn't Want 9/11 Public Trial
The US government does not want to have public 9/11 trials in a civilian court. Officials are doing their best to bring Khalid Sheik Mohammed to military tribunal. Manny Badillo had an uncle who was murdered by the 9/11 terrorist attack and now works for we are change. Badillo believes that the trial should be public because he says it is the only way to get the evidence out there for the public to see.
New 9/11 Photos 'Prove WTC Exploded From Inside',
New picture releases are shedding light on September 11th, some say they prove that the assault on America proves a homegrown attack. The new photos are provided by US national institute of standards and technology. There are over 2,000 new photos that have been made public. Manny Badillo says that you see an explosion from the inside, not what it has seemed to be, he says there has never been a building taken down by a plane.
Big Dan's Big 9/11 LINKS: Do your OWN research, because the mainstream media was in on it, you won't find help there!
There was NO PLANE in the hole at Shanksville. If you saw a hole with nothing in it, would you think a jumbo jet crashed there? No. Then why did you think that? Because the newsman said it:
Guess what? The hole in Shanksville where Flight 93 crashed was already there since at least 1994. I government satellite picture proves it:
ALL real experts (architects, engineers, physics professors, etc...) do NOT believe the "official" 9/11 story. Here's just one of the REAL experts (not politicians or media) explaining that 47 story building 7 (WTC-7), which was NOT hit by ...a plane on 9/11 but mysteriously fell free fall controlled demolition style, explains that ONLY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION could have caused WTC-7 to fall like it did. He uses simple software to illustrate this:
Physics teacher David Chandler uses simple scientific software to understand and show the freefall demolition of WTC bldg. 7
BBC reporter fucks up, probably because of the time difference in the UK, proving the media was in on it: this reporter reports that WTC-7 has just fell, yet it stands in the background live while she's reporting it. Then, you guessed it, w...hen they realize this, they have "technical difficulties" and lose her live feed report:
Here's several videos of WTC-7 falling with controlled demolition. It wasn't hit by a plane. If you believe this building "just fell" like this for no reason, I really don't know what to say about you. If I had to say something, I'd say you're either stupid, retarded, an idiot...I don't know what else I can say. And you should reexamine your life, because you're in DEEP SHIT:
Above: My guess is that this shows media complacency pushing the fake story, and they were too stupid to take into account the time difference as they were disseminating the WTC-7 collapsing report around the globe. That's my personal take on it. But one thing for sure, this clip shows the BBC reporting that WTC-7 fell and it didn't, which shows FOREKNOWLEDGE. No one can deny this. How can you report that a 47 story building fell.....and it didn't? That means someone told them to report it ahead of time. Then, the building did eventually "fall", but it was controlled demolition because it wasn't hit by a plane and it fell free fall. Free Fall could only be achieved by controlled demolition, as shown in professor David Chandler's video above.
Why is it essential for YOU to realize 9/11 was an inside job by the U.S. and Israeli governments? For many reasons. For one, it means the U.S. mainstream media is also corrupt to the core. If the U.S. mainstream media is corrupt to the core, then what else are they lying about or ignoring in the news like they ignore that American in the first video who has to go on Russian television in order to get an interview? Another point is that if the U.S. mainstream media is corrupt to the core on 9/11, then all of these "terrorist" stories in the news are only to keep the false 9/11 myth alive that "Muslims did 9/11". Stories such as "The Ground Zero Mosque", the Juan Williams story, and now the Yemen/FEDEX story. I realized all these stories are perfectly lined up one after another, all of them to keep alive the 9/11 official myth. And guess who's getting the BILLION(S) dollar contract to "shore up cargo plane security"? None other than Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff, the first head of Homeland Security. Why are Israelis or people with Israeli citizenship always popping up? In Pennsylvania, the company ITRR (an Israeli company) was caught spying on Pa. activists from all sides of the spectrum: Tea Party activists, as well as environmentalists protesting the Marcellus Shale drilling. ITRR was used by the Bush administration for those FAKE color coded "terror alerts" and happens to be the SAME company spying on Pennsylvanians. More proof of a corrupted U.S. media, is that fact that this story, and especially the part about ITRR being an Israeli company, died out of the news so quickly for so important of a story. ITRR was used by the federal Homeland Security, and now it was used on the Pa. state level Homeland Security. Which leads to another conclusion: the Department of Homeland Security, which is the biggest taxpayer boondoggle of all time btw, is corrupt to the core, too (as well as the U.S. government and U.S. mainstream media). And if 9/11 was an inside job, the U.S. media is corrupt, and Israel and well as the U.S. government was in on 9/11 to "blame the Muslims", then all subsequent "terror" stories have to be viewed with wide skepticism...like this Yemen/FEDEX story (see yesterday's post about the Yemen/FEDEX story). What is crazy: believing politicians and the media, or believing ALL REAL EXPERTS like architects, engineers, physics professors, firemen, family member victims of 9/11? Which is crazy? I think you know the answer. Use your brain, look at the FACTS, not what politicians and the media say. So, is that important? That 9/11 was an inside job and the U.S. and Israeli governments were complicit? And the U.S. mainstream media is complicit and corrupt? And the entire U.S. policy of the wars was based on this? And we're spending $2.5 BILLION a week based on lies from a corrupt government and media? Is that pretty important that these FAKE terror stories and $$$ expenditure will continue endlessly until the truth of 9/11 is exposed? Is that pretty important?
Glenn Beck is a Neocon (Not Libertarian)
