Gallop's attorney even paid to put out a press release, yet no news organization has touched it:
Bush cousin presides over 9/11 suit against Cheney, Rumsfeld, Myers
Extraordinary Conflict of Interest: Bush Cousin Presides Over Federal Court Case Against Former Bush Administration Officials
Kevin Barrett speaks with attorney William Veale immediately after Veale’s appearance in court with April Gallop
April Gallop, Military Officer, Pentagon 911 Victim, Sued Cheney, Was In Court Today~News BLACKOUT; the judge is George W. Bush's cousin!
Wikipedia: Bush's cousin is the judge.
Tuesday, April 05, 2011 - 911 Appeal case, 2nd Circuit Court in New Haven
This is what REAL AMERICAN HERO'S look like:
Our government and courts are so taken over, just forget about any justice anywhere. It's all a big joke. The mainstream media is taken over, it's a joke, too. How can they not cover this? I know how: because they're in bed with our corrupt government. There are no fair trials, it's all rigged. And idiots wonder how 9/11 can be covered up? THIS IS HOW!!!!!! RIG THE COURTS! RIG THE MEDIA! The mainstream media "happens to" parade the FALSE perpetrator of 9/11 Khalid Sheikh Mohammed THE SAME DAY AS THIS to distract from their non-coverage of this! It's no accident! This is soooooooo easy to see what's going on here! And btw, why isn't "DEMOCRACY NOW!" covering this? Is "judge" Napolitano covering this? Is ANBCBSNNX covering this? Rush Limbaugh? NOBODY except in other countries like France....because they want to keep you DUMB & STUPID! And not question 9/11. The SAME people who did 9/11 (and it ain't "the muslims") took over our government years ago and also took over the mainstream media. The mainstream media "news" speaks for them.
Here's how "news psy-ops" works: don't cover a story, so those who mention the FACT that this court case is going on, are appear "nuts"! Now you know one of the elements to covering up the 9/11 inside job: the mainstream media is in on it (they were from the very beginning and still are) and they won't cover any stories like this, so then people who talk about it are "nuts". And create some SHILL websites like "Screw Loose Change" and put some stories out there on the internet that April Gallop is "nuts" simply for telling the truth about what she saw firsthand. But don't DARE discredit her in the mainstream media, because that would draw attention to the FACT that this court case is even going on! Step one is to TOTALLY IGNORE THIS! That's STEP 2, to discredit her in the mainstream media. It hasn't advanced that far yet. Step 2 will occur if this gets enough attention. That's how it works. Ghandi said: First they ignore you, then they make fun of you, then they fight you, and then they lose (or something like that...lol...hey! I do a lot of this stuff by memory, I'm not looking up the exact quote!). But I know this: Step 1, the most powerful step, is to totally ignore something is happening, so it appears "nuts" to talk about it. And that's the step we're in. NO ONE is covering this! This is how it works! I'm wondering myself if this is actually going on! But I posted Kevin Barrett's interview about the court case. Yes, it's really going on! April 5, there was a court case about April Gallop suing the Bush administration about 9/11 at the Pentagon!
The mainstream "news": STILL doing their job covering up 9/11: they parade THIS story around with this picture they have ingrained in our minds of a guy they waterboarded 180+ times to get a "confession" - the "mastermind of 9/11" (I thought it was Bin Laden!):
9/11 Mastermind, 4 Alleged Henchmen to Face Military Tribunal
...to cover up THIS story (the timing couldn't be any better):
Amidst Growing World Doubts About 9/11, Career Army Officer Takes Bush Administration Officials to Court April 5th Represented by the Center for 9/11 Justice
You can see the mainstream media at work today...there will be NO COVERAGE of April Gallop today. She was IN the Pentagon on 9/11 and says there WAS NO PLANE and the story was FABRICATED. The most powerful thing they can do to discredit her (the people who did 9/11) is to have their mainstream media not cover her and put out stories like the "screw loose change" story calling her "nuts", same playbook for almost everything. Look at this video, does she look "nuts" to YOU? She looks like a very intelligent EYEWITNESS telling the TRUTH to me! Yeah, I did something they don't want us to do: I ACTUALLY WATCHED HER SPEAK FOR MYSELF!
NO MAJOR "NEWS" OUTLETS when you do this, and notice an article from "screw loose change" discrediting her happens to come up first:
Google ""april gallop" april 2011"
Now this, you see major "news" outlets:
Google "Khalid Sheikh Mohammed april 2011"
911 Appeal case, 2nd Circuit Court in New Haven
Thursday, July 13, 2006 - Interview with April Gallop
plunger [Moderator] 3 hours ago
Man, it sure is easy to spot the govt. psyop operatives in that GW thread. When you get "stupid, idiotic and UFO" in the same sentence, attacking the messenger, that's pretty much the "tell" that the Air Force CyberSecurity hit squad is In-The-House!
All other arguments aside re: how it came to pass that Rumsfeld left his office (without a pager or a cell phone) for 40 minutes - serving to guarantee that the ONLY person authorized to respond to an attack from the air was incommunicado - the most compelling evidence of a government coverup is this:
No satellite imagery of the Pentagon on 9/11 depicting the aircraft striking the building. It's not like they don't have the images from their satellites on that day. They clearly do. Clear skies, no obstruction by clouds, a bright and sunny day.
The overhead view of a perfectly-lit bright silver aircraft contrasted against the dark green lawn just prior to impact would be the compelling visual proof of their story.
That's the dog that didn't bark. The images not released.
It didn't happen. - plunger
It's not a REAL court case - it's a rigged fake "hearing."
Will there even be a record that it existed? Will there be a record of a ruling on a motion during this fiasco?
The attorney should have walked out on the lot of them when they denied his motion to have Judge Walker recuse himself - and then went on to deny the attorney a continuance for an opinion on said denial.
It's over. This will never be heard in a court. The three judge panel attacked the attorney - and that's it.
You know exactly how they're going to rule. - plunger
April Gallop is saying EXACTLY what's in this article below: THERE'S NO BOEING!!! WHERE ARE THE PICTURES? WHERE IS THE VIDEO? SURELY SOME PICTURES AND VIDEO OF A BOEING AT THE PENTAGON ON 9/11 EXIST!
9/11 Pentagon: Hunt the Boeing! And test your perceptions!
People connected to the U.S. and Israeli governments did 9/11 and blamed Muslims, then we tortured them to get "confessions":
torturing Democracy
