"Liberal media" isn't calling Republican Norm Coleman a "sore loser", like they did to Al Gore in 2000.
From the New York Times to AP to MSNBC, and even Democracy Now! et al, despite all countable ballots having now been counted, and clear rulings having been issued by both the MN Supreme Court and the bipartisan three-judge panel overseeing the contest, the media seem to have developed an aversion to using the "L" word --- loser --- in their coverage of the MN contest. Perhaps it's because they're listening to only one side of the argument (Coleman's), but the facts of the case, and the many clear court decisions, leave no question that Franken is the winner, and Coleman is the loser. So why won't they say so?...
The striking difference in the corporate media coverage of the two races, where Florida 2000 was both much closer and, as it would determine the Presidency of the United States, arguably more 'important' to get right, and yet the constant media framing continuously painted Al Gore as a "sore loser" for not bowing out 'gracefully' or 'admitting defeat' in the days following the razor-thin election.
"Liberal media" isn't calling Republican Norm Coleman a "sore loser", like they did to Al Gore in 2000.
From the New York Times to AP to MSNBC, and even Democracy Now! et al, despite all countable ballots having now been counted, and clear rulings having been issued by both the MN Supreme Court and the bipartisan three-judge panel overseeing the contest, the media seem to have developed an aversion to using the "L" word --- loser --- in their coverage of the MN contest. Perhaps it's because they're listening to only one side of the argument (Coleman's), but the facts of the case, and the many clear court decisions, leave no question that Franken is the winner, and Coleman is the loser. So why won't they say so?...
The striking difference in the corporate media coverage of the two races, where Florida 2000 was both much closer and, as it would determine the Presidency of the United States, arguably more 'important' to get right, and yet the constant media framing continuously painted Al Gore as a "sore loser" for not bowing out 'gracefully' or 'admitting defeat' in the days following the razor-thin election.
Your Ideal Wayanad Getaway – Homestay Reservations Nestled in the scenic town of Kalpetta, Wayanad Empire Homestays offers a range of accommodations, from elegant premium homestays to...
Plan Your Stay – Wayanad Homestay Bookings Discover the charm of Wayanad with Wayanad Empire Homestays, located in Kalpetta. Whether you're looking for a luxurious retreat, a budget-friendly...
A criminal lawyer specializes in defending individuals and organizations charged with criminal offenses, ensuring their legal rights are protected throughout the judicial process. Whether dealing...
Website maintenance services in Dubai are essential for businesses looking to keep their online platforms secure, up-to-date, and running smoothly. These services include regular updates,...
Wow, I thought this was a 2024 article at first. His show was on the radio yesterday (and the day before). He went full shill for Israel on both day. Insane! I had to turn him off it was so bad....
"Liberal media" isn't calling Republican Norm Coleman a "sore loser", like they did to Al Gore in 2000.
