Saturday, August 18, 2012

I'm An Idiotic "MORAN" Dittohead Who Thinks That If I Need Photo ID To Buy A Beer, Then Everyone Needs Photo ID To Vote

I'M A "MORAN": Pennsylvania is a LAUGHINGSTOCK under Republican partisan "leadership". The Republican Party across the nation has a full-court press on "keeping the vote down" (as well as keeping WOMEN down), not just the Voter ID law in Pennsylvania (where I live), just look at all the links I've provided in this post! The party and their media that continually cry and whine that everyone else hates America, are in reality the ones who hate America and the Constitution.  THE GOP "WAR ON VOTING"!!!



Rush: when's my next Chick Fil A or Death Panels or Ground Zero Mosque protest? What should I say or do now? Shall I call in about FOOD STAMPS again?  Oh, you want me to say that if I need photo ID to buy a beer, then I should need photo ID for ALL my Constitutional rights? What? Oh, only the Constitutional right to vote? Not the other ones like gun control?  Oh, OK, Rush. I'm a "MORAN", MEGADITTO'S!!!!!!!!

A major part of the destruction of America is rightwing talk radio.

Check if you are on GOVERNOR CORBETT'S "DENY LEGAL VOTERS LIST"

First of all, let's get some definitions straight right up front. I categorize people in 4 separate groups: liberals, Democrats, libertarians, and Republicans. I'm talking about Republicans in this post, not liberals/Democrats/libertarians. Republicans are "establishment Republicans", not to be confused with libertarians. Libertarians like Ron Paul, liberty, and the Constitution. This post is NOT about libertarians. It's about establishment Republicans, Dittoheads, rightwing radio listeners, the people who protested FOR the Chick Fil A owners' homophobic hate speech, the people who protested AGAINST the Muslims Constitutional rights of free speech and right to put a Mosque at Ground Zero, the people who are whipped into one frenzy after another by Rush Limbaugh.

These people are TOTAL HYPOCRITES across the board on ALL ISSUES. Two recent example are they protested AGAINST the same rights of Muslims at the Ground Zero Mosque but FOR the exact same rights for THEIR GUYS at Chick Fil A. They protest AGAINST so-called "big government" control over Constitutional rights THEY like, like gun control, but FOR "big government" control over Constitutional rights of voters that they don't like who they vote for. Total hypocrites on one issue after another. This is why they hate their brothers on the right - libertarians - because libertarians are NOT hypocrites and ARE consistent across the board all the time. Libertarians are NOT rightwing radio listeners. In fact, rightwing radio HATES libertarians. Rush Limbaugh HATES libertarians and Ron Paul fans. Rightwing radio BANS libertarians, as well as Democrats and liberals.

All of these controversies all the time, like the Chick Fil A controversy and GOP Voter ID laws are all from this one group of rightwing radio listening Dittoheads that spew rightwing radio talking points such as, "PEOPLE ON FOOD STAMPS BUY LOBSTERS", "DEATH PANELS", "PEOPLE SELL THEIR FOOD STAMPS CARD FOR CASH AT GROCERY STORES", etc...etc... ALL of these talking points are put out by rightwing radio and FOX "news", and repeated by DITTOHEADS that never had a unique thought in their entire lives and wait around for the next DITTOHEAD rightwing radio talking point. Did you ever notice Republican Dittoheads only attack women, blacks, the poor, minorities, gays, college students, workers, etc...and never Wall St, the Military Industrial Complex, the CIA/FBI/Mossad, SUPER RICH MULTI-NATIONALIST GLOBALIST OWNERS, etc...???

Well, now the latest rightwing Dittohead Chick Fil A Ground Zero talking point that they repeat like the mindless Dittohead parrots that they are, is: "I NEED PHOTO ID TO BUY A BEER, SO I SHOULD NEED PHOTO ID TO VOTE." See? They ARE for "big government" after all. But we knew that all along based on their OTHER hypocritical stances on issue after issue.

These Dittohead hypocrites that need to be indentified by everyone else - liberals, Democrats, and libertarians - cannot be taken seriously on ANY issue. They love to quote "the founding fathers", "Ben Franklin", "the Constitution", etc...etc...to sound really "Patriotic", but they HATE AMERICA, they HATE OTHER AMERICANS EXCEPT THEMSELVES, they are SELFISH, and they are UNPATRIOTIC. But they wrap themselves in the flag and claim THEY are the "patriots".

What if I said we now need photo ID for free speech and EVERY Constitutional right, not just voting? We need photo ID for free speech...BECAUSE I NEED PHOTO ID TO BUY A BEER??? This is so IDIOTIC of a statement it's breathtaking. These people are MORONS and IDIOTS. They are the backwards AMERICAN TALIBAN who are taking us back to the stone age. They are DANGEROUS to liberty and the Constitution. THEY are the IDIOTS who will get us all RFID chipped, because they will say (another favorite rightwing Dittohead phrase of theirs), "IF YOU'RE NOT DOING ANYTHING WRONG, YOU SHOULDN'T MIND IF THE GOVERNMENT PUTS AN RFID CHIP IN YOU". Yep! They will definitely be the ones saying that phrase when the times comes. Because these idiotic Dittohead have already said the phrase many times about "big government" tapping their phone calls, spying on their computer, and they are the ones who are FOR the TSA feeling your genitals and your wife's genitals at airports, and your kids' and grandmothers' gentials at airports. They said: "IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE, THEN YOU HAVE NO REASON NOT TO LET TSA GRAB YOUR GENITALS."

Has anyone thought of this: what if you forget your wallet or purse at the voting precinct? I hope everyone realizes YOU CAN'T VOTE because you don't have your photo ID! Even if you HAVE photo ID!

Has anyone thought of this, too: not only is voter fraud non-existent, but it's a felony. Who would risk going to jail on a felony charge JUST FOR ONE VOTE FOR SOMEONE???

With up to one million LEGAL voters going to the polls only to be turned away, I predict this election day will be CHAOS, LONG LINES, SCREW-UPS, AND POSSIBLY PEOPLE WILL BE ARRESTED AND THERE WILL BE RIOTS AND POSSIBLY RACE RIOTS as many LEGAL BLACK and minority voters are turned away.

And PROVISIONAL BALLOTS? Over 700,000 provisional ballots in the last election WERE NOT COUNTED, so don't let them talk you into a provisional ballot, that's like saying, "HERE, FILL OUT THIS MEANINGLESS PIECE OF PAPER HERE JUST SO I CAN SHUT YOU UP, WE WON'T COUNT IT BUT WE'RE NOT GOING TO TELL YOU THAT."

MORONS, IDIOTS, MENTALLY CHALLENGED RETARDED DITTOHEADS SHOULD HAVE PHOTO ID SO WE CAN IDENTIFY THEM AS THOSE RUINING THE UNITED STATES AND THE CONSTITUTION. THAT'S THE KIND OF PHOTO ID I WOULD AGREE WITH!!!

JOHN STEWART/DAILY SHOW: REPUBLICANS AND OCCUPY JUDGE SIMPSON IN PENNSYLVANIA "COCKBLOCKING" THE VOTE:





Even New Zealand thinks Pennsylvania is a LAUGHINGSTOCK: NEW ZEALAND HERALD: Eligibility rules bar millions of voters in US

OCCUPY JUDGE SIMPSON!!!


“Big government” politicians should never be allowed to pass a law that disenfranchises Americans from one of their Constitutional rights, which includes voting, gun ownership, and ALL Constitutional rights. Not just SOME rights, or the ones YOU like. The instant Republican lawmakers in Pennsylvania passed their Voter ID law, hundreds of thousands of LEGAL Pennsylvania voters were disenfranchised. These LEGAL voters will remain disenfranchised from voting until they jump through some hoops that Big Government Republicans created to make their Constitutional right to vote unnecessarily more difficult. No ILLEGAL voters were disenfranchised, because it was recently brought up in court that there hasn’t been any Voter Fraud in Pennsylvania since 2000. It is important to not forget that only LEGAL voters were disenfranchised.

One definition of TREASON is: using your political power to harm citizens’ rights. The Republican Voter ID act fits the definition of TREASON. They are most definitely and absolutely beyond a doubt, harming hundreds of thousands of LEGAL voters’ rights. (not ILLEGAL voters, because there are none) Every single disenfranchised voter is a LEGAL voter. You may not like who they vote for, but it’s their Constitutional right you should be fighting for. Like Freedom of Speech or Gun Ownership.

Here are the TREASONOUS Pennsylvania state SENATORS who voted to disenfranchise almost a million LEGAL Pennsylvania voters, they have a "Y" near their name.

Here are the TREASONOUS Pennsylvania state HOUSE CONGRESSMEN/WOMEN who voted to disenfranchise almost a million LEGAL Pennsylvania voters, they have a "Y" near their name.

UNPATRIOTIC PARTISAN HACK REPUBLICAN JUDGE WHO HATES THE CONSTITUTION UPHOLDS PENNSYLVANIA REPUBLICANS' UNCONSTITUTIONAL VOTER ID LAW: MEET JUDGE ROBERT SIMPSON:


EVEN THOUGH in court in front of Judge Robert Simpson, the ACLU PROVED there IS NO VOTER FRAUD...EVEN THOUGH in court in front of Judge Robert Simpson the ACLU SHOWED that UNPATRIOTIC PENNSYLVANIA REPUBLICANS WHO HATE THE CONTITUTION like state Rep. Mike Turzai (R) SAID (QUOTE):
"Voter ID, which is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania, done"


...EVEN THOUGH all of this was presented in court to JUDGE ROBERT SIMPSON, he upheld the UNCONSTITUTIONAL GOP Voter ID law to DISENFRANCHISE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF LEGAL PENNSYLVANIA VOTERS. Judge Robert Simpson needs to step down from being a judge or needs to be forcefully removed from being a judge by those who care about the basic American rights in this country, such as the right to vote. How can NO ONE be talking about the removal of Judge Robert Simpson? Not anyone? His actions are OK with you? We need to stop judges that rule against the Constitution, don't you think? Or are you a mindless "MORAN" idiotic Dittohead that has zero integrity and flows with the winds of the latest rightwing radio orders from Rush Limbaugh?

Judge Upholds Penn. Voter ID Law; GOP Admits Law Designed to "Allow" Mitt Romney to "Win the State"

On Wednesday, a Pennsylvania judge upheld a controversial voter ID law that critics say could disqualify hundreds of thousands of voters. Republican lawmakers have openly admitted the law was designed to impact the result of the November election. In June, Pennsylvania House Majority Leader Mike Turzai listed off a number of legislative accomplishments. "Voter ID, which is going to allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania: Done," Turzai said. Meanwhile, Florida, New Mexico and other states are being accused of purging voters ahead of the election. "Whenever states determine that they want to purge their rolls or clean up their rolls, it takes time. It has to be done efficiently and effectively. And waiting to do so so very close up to an election always raises concerns about why a state is doing it so close to an election," said Nicole Austin-Hillery of the Brennan Center for Justice. "We’re always concerned about errors and the fact that innocent people, individuals who are indeed eligible registered voters, we’re always worried about whether those people may be erroneously kicked off the rolls."




13 key points on PA Court ruling upholding Voter ID law

Here are 13 key take-aways from the 68-page Simpson ruling:

  1. Simpson describes the requirement to show state-approved identification to vote as a “minor change” to the state Election Code. (disenfranchising hundreds of thousands of LEGAL voters is a "minor change")
  2. He said any voter rejected for lack of an ID can still cast a provision ballot and then produce an approved ID within six days to have their vote counted. (experts say that provisional ballots are the WORST thing to do. They're often lost or not counted. in 2008, over 700,000 provisional ballots were NOT COUNTED!)
  3. “Importantly,” Simpson said, the Voter ID law, “contains no references to any class or group. Rather, its provisions are neutral and nondiscriminatory and apply uniformly to all voters.” (Brennan Research Center did a study that showed those being disenfranchised are: blacks, latinos, elderly, young)
  4. Simpson rejected a claim that voters could be harmed by being “erroneously charged a fee for a photo ID for voting.” They can get a refund later, he explained. (Now come on: everyone knows how THAT will work out. Try and get a refund for ANYTHING, let alone this!)
  5. Gov. Corbett and the Department of State initially said about 1 percent of voters did not have an approved state ID. The Department of State later said that number was closer to 9 percent. Simpson guesses the number is “somewhat more than 1 percent and significantly less than 9 percent,” Based on testimony of the Department of State’s director of policy. Simpson also said he rejected “attempts to inflate the numbers in various ways.” (Judge Simpson "guesses"...how nice! Do we "hope" he guessed right? What kind of a statement is that: he "guessed"? If ONE goddamn person can't vote, it should be thrown out, let alone hundreds of thousands!)
  6. Simpson compared objections to the Voter ID law to a legal action taken in 2008 by the Republican Party of Pennsylvania, which sought to curtail the voter registration efforts of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, also known as ACORN. Simpson ruled in October 2008 that the Republican Party would not be able to prove that ACORN was engaged in voter fraud. (ACORN? Do we want to go there? As in MORE rightwing radio deception: ACORN was NEVER EVER charged with, let along convicted of, VOTER FRAUD. That is a FACT anyone can look up, contrary to rightwing folklore)
  7. Simpson, in the ACORN comparison, said he is convinced the Voter ID law “will be implemented by Commonwealth agencies in a non-partisan, even-handed manner.” (It's just that it affects mostly blacks, latinos, the elderly, and the young voters. What a ridiculous statement in the face of facts presented at trial.)
  8. Simpson said a Department of State plan for a special identification for voting, still being developed, will prevent voters from being disenfranchised. (Baloney! On the one hand Republicans and rightwing radio listeners say that government is "inefficient" and needs to be cut down...but on the other hand it's going to efficiently prevent voters from being disenfranchised? What a HUGE CONTRADICTION no one is pointing out!)
  9. Simpson took into account the “alarm, concern and anxiety” shown by the state’s commissioner of the Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation of the impact a preliminary injunction on the Voter ID law would have on preparing for the Nov. 6 general election. “His demeanor tells the story,” Simpson wrote. (Judge Simpson took NOTHING into account, he ruled in favor of the GOP vote disenfranchisers. ANOTHER ridiculous statement.)
  10. Simpson cites an April 2008 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, rejecting a constitutional challenge to a Voter ID law in Indiana. 
  11. In citing that case, Simpson notes that Department of State here acknowledged having no proof of in-person voter fraud occurring in Pennsylvania. “Nevertheless…The United States Supreme Court upheld a nearly identical Indiana voter ID law despite the absence of any evidence of in-person voter fraud occurring in that state.” (So...EVEN THOUGH it was proven that there is NO VOTER FRAUD IN PENNSYLVANIA, and that is the BASIS OF THE ENTIRE GOP VOTER ID LAW CASE...Judge Simpson still ruled in favor of the GOP!!! Judge Simpson is a BIASED POLITICAL HACK who should be removed from office.)
  12. Simpson denounced “disturbing, tendentious statements by House Majority Leader Michael Turzai to a Republican Party gathering” – In June Turzai said the law would help former Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney defeat President Obama in the presidential election – but declared that a legislator’s partisan interest in voting for a law does not make that law discriminatory. “Factually, I decline to infer that other members of the General Assembly shared the boastful views of Rep. Turzai without proof that other members were present at the time the statements were made,” (Like point #9 above, Judge Simpson took NOTHING into account, as he ruled in favor of the GOP Vote Disenfranchisers)
  13. Simpson wrote. Simpson wrote that the Voter ID law challengers “did an excellent job of ‘putting a face” to those burdened by the law but that he does not have the “luxury of deciding the issue based on my sympathy for the witnesses.”   (Like pointS #9 & #12: he did NOTHING to take into account the "excellent job" by the plantiffs. But he did give them a thumbs up!!! So, he ruled AGAINST the side that did an "excellent job". Does that make any sense to YOU?)
So Judge Robert Simpson ADMITS the plaintiffs had a better case, but he just should've been honest and said: "YOU DID A GREAT JOB. YOU ACTUALLY WON. BUT I AM A POLITICAL PARTISAN GOP HACK WHO DOESN'T CARE ABOUT JUSTICE OR THE CONSTITUTION. I'LL GIVE YOU A 'THUMBS UP', THOUGH, FOR EFFORT. IF YOU GOT A REAL JUDGE, YOU WOULD'VE WON HANDS DOWN/SLAM DUNK." I'll say it again: Judge Robert Simpson needs to step down or be removed from being a judge, like so many other "judges". The judicial system in this country is totally corrupt.

The Republican Party has become the party of "BIG GOVERNMENT" when they can disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of LEGAL voters with the stroke of a pen, like KINGS & QUEENS who think they "GRANT" Constitutional rights to the PEASANTS (or the COLOREDS in this case). And DITTOHEADS go right along with this BIG GOVERNMENT, and falsely claim to be the opposite, like painting over rust.

Pennsylvania Voter ID Decision: Emotional Plaintiff Speaks To HuffPost Live

Based on these linear regression models, it appears that Pennsylvania’s new strict photo ID requirement may be in effect a racially discriminatory voting procedure.

Actually, state Rep. Mike Turzai (R) was not the first elected official to commit embarrassing truth when discussing voter ID laws. In New Hampshire, the Republican state Speaker told a tea party gathering that he supported the state’s voter ID law because it would decrease student voting, and: “They’re foolish. Voting as a liberal, that’s what kids do.” What a surprise that in Texas, a concealed weapon permit is acceptable for voting, but a state university-issued student ID is not.

Inalienable Rights and the Bureaucrats Who Control 'Em:
What bothers the hell out of me is that the debate has now moved onto the ground of whether or not a state has to be fair about making sure people have the proper photo ID to vote — not that the people lined up behind these laws give a rat's hindquarters about that problem, either — and away from the simple fact that you should not have to show your government-sanctioned papers in this country to vote. Period. Yes, it is a tactic to suppress Democratic voters, and, yes, the whole thing's a sham because the problem it allegedly addresses doesn't exist. But the real damage this does to the country is that it inculcates in the citizenry a sense that its franchise depends completely on the whims of government bureaucrats — and, come to think of it, aren't Republicans really opposed to that as regards to imaginary bureaucrats in the new health-care system? These are real government bureaucrats mucking with the one inalienable right that protects all the others. These laws create in a free people the habits of subordinate behavior.
Goodbye to All That: Reflections of a GOP Operative Who Left the Cult



Now here is the elephant in the room: ELECTION FRAUD. Election fraud is different than Voter Fraud. There's NO VOTER FRAUD. Election fraud is stealing an entire election on the total vote level, not on the individual "voter fraud" level. Election fraud is FLIPPING THE TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES in electronic voting machines. Watch these videos, they explain ELECTION FRAUD (not non-existent VOTER FRAUD):







OTHER WAYS THE GOP IS SUPPRESSING THE VOTE:

Federal Court Blocks FL GOP's Early Voting Limits in Counties Protected by U.S. Voting Rights Act

UFO Blasts Pinellas County Elections Office with anti-technology-ray

Cause of Pinellas voting glitch still a mystery

Federal Court Rules Florida’s Shortening Of Early Voting Discriminates Against Blacks

Ohio Secretary of State Removes Democratic Members of Election Board for Supporting Weekend Voting

Arizona Election Fraud: "In the Spirit of Cooperation, Let's Not Look Into the Past"

Recall Hand Count Audit suggests a Flip. Freedom of Information Act open record orders were filed by citizens in most Wisconsin Counties to hold the ballots of the June 5 Recall Election

Federal Judge Dismisses Right-Wing Challenge to Election Day Registration in Minnesota. But Election Day Registration still at risk because of proposed Photo ID ballot measure...

Federal Court Blocks FL GOP's Early Voting Limits in Counties Protected by U.S. Voting Rights Act

New Nationwide Study of Election Fraud Since 2000 Finds Just 10 Cases of In-Person Voter Fraud. Exhaustive analysis finds fraud that might be deterred by polling place Photo ID restrictions 'virtually non-existent'...

JUDGE UPHOLDS STATE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF GOP PHOTO ID VOTING RESTRICTIONS IN PA. Plaintiffs vow to appeal ruling by Republican judge as 1.6 million legal votes said to be imperiled by new law this November...UPDATED: Plaintiffs filed formal notice of appeal...

UPDATE: Gubernatorial Recall Ballots Saved from Destruction in Waukesha County, WI - For Now...State and local officials confirm the public records have been moved to off-site storage, though they remain in the custody of County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus...

EXCLUSIVE: Infamous Waukesha, WI Election Clerk Threatens to 'Destroy' Historic Walker Recall Ballots Amid Statewide Public Hand Count Effort. Bi-partisan citizen effort to oversee completely unverified June 5th results 'illegally' blocked by Kathy Nickolaus...[LATE UPDATE:The recall ballots from Waukesha County have been saved from destruction, for now. Full details posted in our follow-up now here...]

The Myth of Verified Voting: How GOP strategists & J. Abramoff transformed America's elections & the reform movement

INDIANA'S REPUBLICAN VOTER FRAUD FELONY-CHARGED SEC. OF STATE ORDERED REMOVED FROM OFFICE, REPLACED WITH DEMOCRAT

Republican U.S. House Staffers Indicted for Felony Election Fraud as GOP Fraud Epidemic Continues. MI prosecutors: 'Blatant', 'disgraceful' aides 'lost moral compass', were 'completely indifferent to requirements of law'. ALSO: 10+ recent cases of voter fraud by very high-profile GOPers...

GOP SCREWING RON PAUL, AS WELL AS BLACKS, LATINOS, THE ELDERLY, AND THE YOUNG VOTERS: Ron Paul campaign files second appeal for Louisiana delegates

ANTHONY ANTONELLO AND LOU JASIKOFF: REPUBLICAN PARTY IN PENNSYLVANIA CHALLENGING TO KEEP LIBERTARIAN GARY JOHNSON OFF THE PENNSYLVANIA BALLOT:

LOU JASIKOFF: REPUBLICAN PARTY IS "UN-AMERICAN"



REPUBLICAN OPERATIVE: "I DON'T WANT EVERYBODY TO VOTE" -



CONFIRMED: Fake followers cause of Romney’s Twitter spike, tech firm says

Let me run this theory by you: we KNOW (it's PROVEN) that there's ELECTION FRAUD. In fact, we just saw it. I believe Ron Paul CRUSHED Mitt Romney in the GOP primary, as evidenced by the huge crowds at Ron Paul events, contrasted with the lackluster non-existent "crowds" at Mitt Romney events. Remember that football stadium at a Romney event that was COMPLETELY EMPTY? What if all these CRACKPOTS that are the heads of the Gop, like Michele Bachmann and Steve King just to name two, REALLY AREN'T WINNING THEIR ELECTIONS and it's ELECTION FRAUD? And the whole sham is being pushed like an infomercial by Rush Limbaugh (and rightwing radio in general) with FAKE CALLERS to make it seem legit?

HI RUSH, I'M A BLACK GUY AND I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING YOU SAY: (there's somehow a PICTURE of "the black guy"...even though it's a call in radio show. I BIN BAMBOOZLED RUSH! INNERSTRUCTURE, SIR! THE RAGGLY NEIGHBORHOODS, RUSH, SIR! MASTER! BLACK FOLK BETTER WAKE UP! THE CHINAS ARE DOIN' BETTER THAN THE BLACK FOLK! I'M A BLACK GUY, RUSH! I'M SO SORRY, SIR! RUSH, THESE TERRORISTS WANNA KILL US! WE BIN KNOWIN' DAT, RUSH! MCCAIN SOLD SARAH OUT! I'M A BLACK GUY AND I KNOW ALL ABOUT SARAH PALIN! I'M SICK OF THESE FINE-DRESSIN' MEN! I'M "AJ" FROM HOUSTON, I'M A BLACK GUY, RUSH! ......REALLY, I'M A FAKE CALLER, FOLKS! AND TOTALLY GOING OVERBOARD ON TRYING TO SOUND "VERY BLACK"! BUT DITTOHEADS WILL BUY IT, THAT'S ALL THAT COUNTS!)



Interesting subject: SOVEREIGNS or FREEMEN, check out this video suggest by friend of BDBB "Youtube/Xendrius 1-13" -



blog comments powered by Disqus