For the 10th anniversary of 9/11, keep in mind the videos in this post and contrast them with what you see on TV. You will see NOTHING that's here on TV. You will see THE SAME LIARS who LIED to you 10 years ago and all the years since on TV. They CONTROL the TV. You will see 10 year celebrations on TV with troops and 9/11 victims' families...BUT ONLY WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF PUSHING THE BIG 10 YEAR LIE! TV, newspapers, and radio will censor any coverage of those telling the truth about 9/11 or the blockbuster release of the 2-hour Architects & Engineers for 9/11 truth film. The mainstream coverage will make it seem that if you question The Big 10 Year Lie, then you're disrespecting the troops and 9/11 victims' families because "everyone believes the official story". They will tug at your heartstrings to push The Big 10 Year Lie with big Hollywood-like productions. You will see DICK CHENEY on JAY LENO and football and baseball players waving flags, not REAL EXPERTS (architects, engineers, scientists, professors, firemen, etc...) who have scientifically destroyed the official story told to us by the SAME LIARS as 10 years ago and the SAME LIARS in charge of the ONLY coverage you will see on TV. For those speaking the truth out loud on the 10 year anniversary of The Big Lie, they will say, "This isn't the time for 9/11 truth", which is the same as saying, "This isn't the time for truth", which is the same as saying, "Please keep believing the LIE, or we will imply that you're against the troops and the 9/11 victims' families and hate America and love the terrorists". Do you see how the game is played by politicians and the media? Isn't there ALWAYS time for TRUTH? I say "YES"! The FACT that nothing I post here is on TV is proof that the media is in on the cover up because they're ignoring MILLIONS of people and ALL REAL EXPERTS - architects, engineers, scientists, professors, firemen, etc... Instead they want to watch DICK CHENEY on JAY LENO and football and baseball players waving flags. We're in trouble, folks, because our own government in conjunction with the Israeli Mossad did 9/11 and "blamed the Muslims" and there's all the proof in the world of it, but you won't see it on TV or hear it from politicians and that is exactly why we are in deep trouble. The Emperor has no clothes...but he is still the Emperor. Everyone I know who has researched 9/11 comes to the same conclusion I did: the official story is bullshit. Everyone I know who believes the official story hasn't really looked into it. What I am most ashamed of are the intelligent people I know who really have not looked into it but yet loudly proclaim the official story is true AND those who won't look into it because they're afraid they'll find out it's not true AND the ones who know it's not true and remain silent. I don't think there's a bigger LIE in history with every bit of evidence that exists disproving it. This leads to the conclusion that the government, law enforcement, courts, and mainstream media are corrupt especially at the highest levels and that they have conditioned Americans to accept their lies as truth instead of looking at evidence and listening to real experts.
The jig is up on these criminals with the release of this full 2 hour video released by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth, it's time to listen to REAL EXPERTS, we don't believe the BULLSHIT of politicians & TV anymore:
Hot off the Press! AE911Truth Experts Speak Out FULL FILM (2 HRS):
Here's the shorter 15 minute version for those of you with a short attention span (like me!):
Here's the "official" 9/11 evidence-free BULLSHIT story told to us by who we all know are the most honest people: politicians & the media -
The NIGHTMARE of the last 10 years based on the LIES on TV:
This video exposes how the "news" LIARS are PRESSTITUTES for those in power doing things like this and how they function as their coverup artists:
And here's our cover up buddies, the media & government, with a FAKE "terror alert" right on schedule for the 9/11 10 year anniversary:
Here's the official "We killed Osama Bin Laden" story, I kid you not: The CIA/FBI/Mossad couldn't find him for 10 years, yet found everyone else they ever wanted to find, they found Osama 10 years later watching TV and he had porn, shot him in the head, and threw him in the sea..."according to Islamic law". We were told all of this AFTER he was thrown in the sea. They have video and pictures of this, but won't show us. Team 6 caught him, but later died in an unrelated helicopter crash. Bin Laden was with his wive(s) and 13 children at the time he was "killed", so they also must've been evading the CIA/FBI/Mossad for the past 10 years. There is NO EVIDENCE OF ANY OF THIS, just like the official 9/11 story.
ARE WE SO BRAINWASHED THAT WE NOW BELIEVE POLITICIANS & TV INSTEAD OF SCIENTISTS AND EVIDENCE? WHEN DID EVIDENCE-FREE STORIES THAT MAKE NO SENSE TOLD BY POLITICIANS & TV BECOME "TRUTH", AND THE TRUTH BECOME "CONSPIRACY"?
Why has no one been prosecuted for the 9/11 inside job? Because the courts and law enforcement and government at the highest levels are all rigged by both parties and all the "investigations" are rigged:
The Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) says questioning 9/11 is "anti-semetic". I have a rule, a very simple time-tested rule: ANYONE WHO SAYS "CONSPIRACY" or "ANTI-SEMETIC" is covering something up or lying or trying to stop the truth about something:
Veterans Today challenges Abe Foxman/ADL's statement that questioning 9/11 is "anti-semetic":
Veterans Today: "Mr. Foxman, your assertion that criticism of Israel is by definition a manifestation of anti-Semitism, is Zionist propaganda nonsense for a blackmail purpose, the purpose being to silence criticism and prevent informed and honest debate about Israel’s policies and actions."
The original list of alleged hijackers was one of the first "tells" that this was a bullshit story:
Start from the fact that NONE of their names were found on any actual flight manifest of passengers who flew that day. There were no Arab Hijackers - and in fact - there were no hijackers at all. So where did the list of names originate if not from a flight manifest? Logic would dictate the impossibility of the story from this point forward. If you're not on the plane- it's pretty tough to hijack it - and you can't be on a plane without your name appearing on the flight manifest. PERIOD.
Just use your logical mind and think of how difficult it would be to track down photos of EVERY individual listed as a hijacker in time to put out the entire completed list with those pictures - depicted as they were. You'd have to contact family members and get them to provide you with photos, right? Unless of course you had the photos in advance. Would you really hold back the release of such a list until you had EVERY photo, or would you release the list of names as soon as you had it - and begin adding photos to the list as they became available to you?
There is NO WAY - they would have withheld the complete list of alleged hijackers names until such time as they had tracked down every perfectly framed and in-focus head shot of every alleged hijacker. It's simply illogical...evidence of the lie.
(no media coverage of this, naturally, because the mainstream media is in on the 9/11 cover up)
If controllers were working with military liaisons - just like the "land bridge" between the White House, Pentagon, and FAA - then the claim of the DoD that they were informed too late is a lie:
Henry Kissinger Resigns From 9/11 Commission Because Of Taliban And Bin Laden Ties:
The ENTIRE government is in on the coverup over administrations of BOTH parties, so it makes sense that presidents from BOTH parties WARN YOU NOT TO QUESTION 9/11 because it will lead right to THEM:
Think about it: why would ANY government official, let alone PRESIDENTS FROM BOTH PARTIES, WARN YOU not to dig too deep into 9/11? BECAUSE YOU'LL FIND OUT THEY'RE COVERING IT UP, YOU IDIOTS!!! If they have nothing to hide, they'd say NOTHING or say, "Go ahead, we have nothing to hide, dig in!", right? They're ALMOST saying, "Don't dig into 9/11, or we'll kill you and blame the Muslims like we did on 9/11"!!!!!!!!!!
Now WHO can argue with THIS - Gabby Johnson: "I wash born here, an I wash raished here, and dad gum it, I am gonna die here, an no sidewindin' bushwackin', hornswagglin' cracker croaker is gonna rouin me bishen cutter."
The Bee Gees: 9/11 was an inside job -
9/11 music video by Martin Noakes:
Big Bank consolidation:
In less than twenty years 37 independent banks consolidated into the too big to fail - four humongous/big banks. This is not free market capitalism this is monopoly/predatory capitalism where government regulation and controls are tossed out the window so bankers can become the fascist pigs they've always wanted, desired, and rabidly lust to be.
Exactly the same monopolistic consolidations apply to,..
The media companies
The cable companies
The phone and cell phone companies
The pharmaceutical companies
The insurance companies
etc, etc, etc.
Big companies detest and deplore competition, they gobble their competition up, monopolize the markets, then induce bought politicos to deregulate government safeguards to the advantage of big industry. Profits and rents soar - the consumer of these services get shafted.
The blind encouragement of predatory and monopolistic markets is why America and the so called free world are gasping for their last breath.
If a full blown civil war erupts on Wall Street and they are out to slash each others throats - stand back and encourage them - if they cause one another damage or harm or wipe each other out that maybe the salvation of woman and man kind.
Would they please do us the favor ! - Z
All consolidations lead to David Rockefeller, the Crown and the Rothschilds.
Goldman = Rockefeller
NY Fed = Rockefeller
Exxon = Rockefeller
etc. - plunger
Clearly, the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Kochs, Bush Cartel, etc., has called for an end to the EPA - it's complete defunding and elimination - which Obama is in the process of implementing:
Clearly 9/11 was an inside job, ALL real experts have proven it. And clearly the mainstream media is in on it. You can tell by the news and the talk shows. All they are showing are the criminals from the Bush administration as guests on the news and talk shows and portraying them as "HEROES" instead of WAR CRIMINALS who killed their own citizens as well as millions in other countries:
The talk show circuit LIARS:
During the past 10 years I have not met a single individual who, after doing research on the subject, switched from questioning the official narrative of the events of 9/11/2001 to believing the official narrative of those events.. It is always the other way around. Why do you think that is? There are good reasons for this, and I will try to explain this phenomenon right now:
How to detect a shill: notice guest #1 Richard Becker using "THE SCRIPT" of saying "conspiracy" and "anti-semite" to discredit FACTS and the other guests. Richard Becker is a REAL PRO at "THE SCRIPT", he can't even hold his horses as he spouts the word "conspiracy" in his first sentence. I've written for YEARS that is THE sign of a shill: if they say "conspiracy" and/or "anti-semite". That is SO EASY of a way to identify a shill. IT IS SIMPLE AND 100% FULL PROOF WAY TO IDENTIFY A SHILL! And if you watch the video, notice how Richard Becker SAYS NOTHING as far as real facts. CLASSIC shill, a REAL PRO (and I mean that I admire, in a way, how good of a shill he is). He SAYS NOTHING as far as facts, proof, or evidence for HIS side - which is the official story - save for calling the others "conspiracy" and "anti-semite". Watch and learn from a PRO:
Note about the above passenger list by plunger: The original list of alleged hijackers was one of the first "tells" that this was a bullshit story.
Start from the fact that NONE of their names were found on any actual flight manifest of passengers who flew that day. There were no Arab Hijackers - and in fact - there were no hijackers at all. So where did the list of names originate if not from a flight manifest? Logic would dictate the impossibility of the story from this point forward. If you're not on the plane- it's pretty tough to hijack it - and you can't be on a plane without your name appearing on the flight manifest. PERIOD.
Just use your logical mind and think of how difficult it would be to track down photos of EVERY individual listed as a hijacker in time to put out the entire completed list with those pictures - depicted as they were. You'd have to contact family members and get them to provide you with photos, right? Unless of course you had the photos in advance. Would you really hold back the release of such a list until you had EVERY photo, or would you release the list of names as soon as you had it - and begin adding photos to the list as they became available to you?
There is NO WAY - they would have withheld the complete list of alleged hijackers names until such time as they had tracked down every perfectly framed and in-focus head shot of every alleged hijacker. It's simply illogical...evidence of the lie.
Improbable Collapse - The Demolition of the American Republic
We speak with the widow of a U.S. Army Ranger who confronted former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld about her husband’s suicide on Saturday. Ashley Joppa-Hagemann introduced herself to Rumsfeld during a book signing by handing him a copy of her husband’s funeral program at a base south of Tacoma, Washington. She says Rumsfeld inspired her husband to join the Army after 9/11, but he later became disillusioned with the reasons for the war. Her husband, 25-year-old Staff Sergeant Jared Hagemann, killed himself ahead of what his wife says was his eighth deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan. His body was found on June 28, 2011, at the Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington State. More than 18,000 soldiers returned to the Joint Base Lewis-McChord from combat tours last year. And while the Army says it is trying to shore up mental health services there, Joppa-Hagemann questions its success. "I want to confront the man whose lies led my husband to join the military, and so many other soldiers," says Joppa-Hagemann. "That’s what I wanted to do, and that’s what I did."
Will a media darling put their career on the line like this NASA Scientist just did?
Biggest taxpayer boondoggle of all time: Dept of Homeland Security, created by the Bush administration, $75 BILLION taxpayer $$$ per year. Note - the actual reason for the fake terror attacks and blatant lies above are directly tied (in a straight line) to the funding of this mess:
NOTE: The term 'National Security" does not mean what you think it means. As in Orwell's 1984 - the term has been hijacked. It now means: "protect the guilty Shadow Government co-conspirators"Whenever you hear the term "national security" - just think "Cover-Up"...Ellsberg seemed hardly surprised that today’s American mainstream broadcast media has so far failed to take [former FBI translator and 9/11 whistleblower Sibel] Edmonds up on her offer, despite the blockbuster nature of her allegations [which Ellsberg calls "far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers"]. As Edmonds has also alluded, Ellsberg pointed to the New York Times, who "sat on the NSA spying story for over a year" when they "could have put it out before the 2004 election, which might have changed the outcome."
"There will be phone calls going out to the media saying ‘don’t even think of touching it, you will be prosecuted for violating national security,’" he told us.
* * *
"I am confident that there is conversation inside the Government as to ‘How do we deal with Sibel?’" contends Ellsberg. "The first line of defense is to ensure that she doesn’t get into the media. I think any outlet that thought of using her materials would go to to the government and they would be told ‘don’t touch this . . . .‘"
How ironic then that the persecuted have become the persecutors, using the tactics of their former oppressors to destroy those they wish to control and/or exterminate. 9/11 was their Reichstag Fire (a near-perfect False Flag Operation - but for the "Dancing Israelis" & WTC7), the pretext to launch their plan – rooted in revenge and greed. But they have taken it one step farther, compelling others to do the job on their behalf. US!
...and debt ridden country's "news" uses propaganda to trick its people to think otherwise, using "HUMANITARIAN REASONS" as the usual FAKE reason...the truth is: Ghadaffi sounds like a better leader than Bush or Obama (I'm serious! I'd rather have Ghadaffi than Bush & the Republicans or Obama & the Democrats! Now don't forget, we'll have to cut some social security, health care, and sell off some more public owned things to pay for attacking Libya, we need more "austerity" but keep spending TRILLIONS on the wars! I don't even think AMERICAN IDIOTS even bought this one, as I didn't hear ONE person rallying to say we should oust Ghadaffi for a BILLION DOLLARS! I think all Americans are realizing our government serves the fewest: the 1% wealthiest, the war profiteers, & corporations.):
Libya/Ghadaffi: free electricity, free great medical care, interest free loans, govt. paid 50% for purchase of a car, govt gave newly married couples $50,000 to buy a house, the lists goes on and on in how well the Libyan people have/had it. The problem was Libya had an independent state bank, not part of BIS (Rothschild's banks) and wanted to switch trading oil from dollars to gold:
"Gaddafi supplied to Libyans free college education, healthcare, housing assistance and other social benefits. NATO wants it privatized to make it costly or unaffordable henceforth, along with charging for everything formerly gotten free. Plus the 'rebels' already set-up a Rothschild-owned central bank."
~ Carla Elaine
Now let me pick one of the evening news liars, CBS, but they're all the same propaganda, and show you how they are reporting Ghadaffi & Libya. Watch how they will not report on OUR filthy rich because that's "class warfare", but watch how they report on Ghadaffi's "lavish lifestyle" with no mention of Libya's free health care, free education, etc... Ghadaffi's "jet skis & hot tubs & he even has a piano & liquor", and he has a private jet! you know, like ALL of OUR POLITICIANS & CEO's and rich here! Watch how the "news guy" holds up a plate at the end and says "the end of Ghadaffi's gilded age"...yeah, and the beginning of OURS! I wish CBS (and the rest of the evening news liars) would report like this on OUR rich & wealthy! But that's "class warfare" if they reported on OUR rich & wealthy like this, and watch for CBS reporting on Libya's FREE health care, FREE education (NOT!) and keep in mind they're all the same - ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, CNN - they only want you to "think" they're different, but they have all the same stories in the same order every night. In the following CBS "new" on Ghadaffi, just replace Ghadaffi with the Bush family, the Rockefeller family, the Koch brothers, the CEO of Exxon, the CEO of Bank of America, etc...but subtract free health care, free education, etc...:
When you contemplate the impending collapse of the dollar (indeed all paper "money"), and the need to replace fiat with real money - backed by something other than empty promises and debt, and you note that the banksters don't want that something to be gold or silver - you can picture a scenario whereby they select oil as the commodity that backs all "currency." The US actually has abundant oil reserves - including newly drilled and capped wells across west-Texas and huge discoveries (Alaska) that the oil/banking cartel simply refuse to allow to come onto the market. They limit refining capacity for one reason only - to constrain supply and keep prices high.
If you assume that the plan is to back a one-world currency with oil, then it makes perfect sense that the empire with the dying "petro-dollar" go out and acquire (at the tip of a spear), all of the oil it can - regardless of cost. It also explains why this same oil/banking cartel has kept every alternative to the internal combustion engine and alternative fuel sources out of automobiles - despite innovations that can replace gasoline to power cars. They simply require that oil remain "precious." Just like gold - OIL IS MONEY.
The end of the US fiat "currency" has been planned for thirty years. If they are replacing it with a form of money said to be backed by oil, that would explain why they chose to implement 9/11 as the pretext and the cover story for acquiring the majority of the world's oil supply. Those with the inside knowledge (and a copy of the script) are behaving just as you would expect them to, when insider trading is free to occur on a global scale without restriction or penalty.
What else explains it? - plunger
If there's a "HUMANITARIAN CRISIS", then WE caused it by an unprovoked attack on Libya:
Salon.com columnist Glenn Greenwald on Thursday blasted President Barack Obama’s mantra that the nation should “look forward, not backward” regarding alleged crimes committed by the Bush administration.
“Imagine if, for example, we decided to announce tomorrow that we were no longer going to prosecute murder or rape or child abductions because we didn’t want to ‘keep looking backwards,’” he said on MSNBC’s The Last Word. “What do you think would happen? Obviously there would be a lot more people engaging in murder, rape, and child abduction.”
Greenwald added that American political culture had “decided our highest political officials are free to break the law without consequences” and Obama had continued the “evisceration of the rule of law for political elites.”
You're watching our government and their "news" trick you about Libya in real time, now go back and take a look at how they tricked you on 9/11:
NOTE: The term 'National Security" does not mean what you think it means. As in Orwell's 1984 - the term has been hijacked. It now means: "protect the guilty Shadow Government co-conspirators"Whenever you hear the term "national security" - just think "Cover-Up"...Ellsberg seemed hardly surprised that today’s American mainstream broadcast media has so far failed to take [former FBI translator and 9/11 whistleblower Sibel] Edmonds up on her offer, despite the blockbuster nature of her allegations [which Ellsberg calls "far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers"]. As Edmonds has also alluded, Ellsberg pointed to the New York Times, who "sat on the NSA spying story for over a year" when they "could have put it out before the 2004 election, which might have changed the outcome." "There will be phone calls going out to the media saying ‘don’t even think of touching it, you will be prosecuted for violating national security,’" he told us.
* * *
"I am confident that there is conversation inside the Government as to ‘How do we deal with Sibel?’" contends Ellsberg. "The first line of defense is to ensure that she doesn’t get into the media. I think any outlet that thought of using her materials would go to to the government and they would be told ‘don’t touch this . . . .‘"
THIS MUSHY DEFINITION IS WHAT THEY WOULD HAVE YOU BELIEVE ABOUT THE CONCEPT FORMERLY KNOWN AS TRUTH:
Language and words are essentially "tools" by which humans convey information to one another. As such, "truth" must have a beneficial use in order to be retained within language. Defining this potency and applicability can be looked upon as "criteria", and the method used to recognize a "truth" is termed a criterion of truth. Since there is no single accepted criterion, they can all be considered "theories".
WITH NO ABSOLUTE, DISCERNIBLE TRUTH - ANY LIE MAY BE CALLED "TRUTH"
INDEED, THE LAST REFUGE OF THE SCOUNDREL, IS THE LIE, SWORN TO BE TRUTHFUL.
THE DEATH OF THE AMERICAN IDEAL OCCURS WHEN EACH SINGLE INDIVIDUAL THE MEDIA, KNOWING THE LIE TO BE ONE - PRESENTS IT AS THE TRUTH, NONETHELESS.
WITH THOSE IN THE MEDIA BEHOLDEN TO LIARS TO PAY THEIR BILLS, THE CONCEPT OF THE FREE PRESS HAS ENTIRELY DISAPPEARED...YET IS CALLED THAT NONETHELESS - BY THE LIARS WHO PAY, THEIR LIARS TO SAY - THAT WHICH YOU WISH WERE
TRUTH.
The coherence theory of TRUTH
The main contender to the semantic theory of Tarski is the coherence theory. In general terms, the theory says that a proposition is true if it coheres (or agrees) with other propositions we already hold to be true.
The easiest way to appreciate what this means is to consider an example: suppose a person drops an expensive vase when browsing in an antique shop and is asked to pay for it. Instead, the person offers the explanation or proposition "I dropped it because an African elephant knocked it from my grasp, since we were arguing over who should buy it".
Why might we not accept this story?
African elephants are not known to talk.African elephants are not known to be patrons of antique shops. African elephants are not found in this part of the world.No elephant was known to be within a certain number of kilometres of the shop.No-one else in the shop saw the elephant. And so on. Each item in the list is some other proposition we already hold to be true, or approximately so. Given, then, that the person's claim conflicts (or fails to cohere) with the set of propositions we have previously accepted, we reject it and call it false.
Note that this is much the same way as we usually come by knowledge,especially on a day-to-day basis. Moreover, this has nothing at all todo with Ockham's Razor or the likelihood of different explanations; indeed, it seems that when people appeal to Ockham they are usually employing a coherence theory instead.
SEE WHERE YOU CAN SPOT DONALD RUMFELD IN THIS MORASS:
Ockham’s Razor is a principle; that is, it does not tell us that the simplest explanation is true (or what there is); but instead that we ought to prefer it on methodological grounds. We are counseled to adopt theories which are minimallyefficient, insofar as they can do the same with less. Note that there is apparently no reason why we should do so: a direct route to a destination is neither better nor worse than a diversion unless we include the criterion that we wish to get there by the most direct route (and even then it may not be, so we will return to this analogy later.) Nevertheless, it seems plain enough that we are inclined to favor the simpler explanation, other things being equal. It is this assumption that we shall now examine.
So you see, as long as the likes of Rumsfeld and Rove can blind us to the true meaning of the word TRUTH itself - they need never fear that it will come to been widely accepted and agreed upon. In truth - for all you know - fully 80% of Americans may already believe that 9/11 was an inside job. As Rove is fully aware - and counts on - unless and until the media informs the citizens of a truth - it never exists - as without the media to confirm its truthfulness - we are all left to look at our neighbors, friends and loved ones - and wonder what they consider to be true...all while having been brainwashed and programmed not to ask them directly.
Behold the individuals, awaiting development of the herd - while the essential rallying cry - the truth - is left unsaid - by the only medium capable of broadcasting it with credibility - the formerly free press.
I hold this truth to be self-evident.
BILL MOYERS: Let me get to the blunt conclusion you reach in your book. You say that two years after the devastating financial crisis of '08 our country is still at the mercy of an oligarchy that is bigger, more profitable, and more resistant to regulation than ever. Correct?
SIMON JOHNSON: Absolutely correct, Bill. The big banks became stronger as a result of the bailout. That may seem extraordinary, but it's really true. They're turning that increased economic clout into more political power. And they're using that political power to go out and take the same sort of risks that got us into disaster in September 2008.
BILL MOYERS: And your definition of oligarchy is?
SIMON JOHNSON: Oligarchy is just- it's a very simple, straightforward idea from Aristotle. It's political power based on economic power. And it's the rise of the banks in economic terms, which we document at length, that it'd turn into political power. And they then feed that back into more deregulation, more opportunities to go out and take reckless risks and-- and capture huge amounts of money….The American democracy was not given to us on a platter. It is not ours for all time, irrespective of our efforts. Either people organize and they find political leadership to take this on, or we are going to be in big trouble, okay?... That's absolutely the heart of the problem. I would also say and tell you, and emphasize, these people will not come out and debate with us. The heads of these companies or their representatives, they will not come out. They're afraid. They don't have the substance. They don't have the arguments. We have the evidence. They have the lobbyists. And that's all they have.
BILL MOYERS: They've got the power, the muscle, the money.
SIMON JOHNSON: They have money.
BILL MOYERS: You just have the arguments. You just have the facts. On your side.
SIMON JOHNSON: Absolutely. That's exactly what it comes down to.
ALL WE HAVE IS THE TRUTH TAKE BACK CONTROL OF THE AIRWAVES TAKE BACK THE FCC
FOR AS LONG AS THE MEDIA CAN BE CONTROLLED - PREVENTED FROM REVEALING THE TRUTH - THE LIARS WILL REMAIN IN CHARGE OF DISCERNIBLE REALITY - THE UNTRUTH - WHICH YOU HAVE COME TO BELIEVE AS TRUTH. THE GREATEST TRAITORS IN AMERICA ARE THE TALKING HEADS IN THE MEDIA - WILLING WHORES, KNOWINGLY LYING IN RETURN FOR A PAYCHECK.
EVEN RACHEL MADDOW KNOWS SHE IS PROHIBITED FROM REVEALING THE TRUTH. SHE IS ASTUTE ENOUGH TO KNOW THE RICHARD ENGEL IS A CIA MOUTHPIECE. HOW DO YOU PRODUCE AN ENTIRE SPECIAL ON THE DECADE AFTER 9/11 - WITHOUT REVEALING THE TRUTH OF 9/11? IS SHE ONE TOO?
Reality-based community is an informal term in the United States. In the fall of 2004, the phrase "proud member of the reality-based community" was first used to suggest the commentator's opinions are based more on observation than on faith, assumption, or ideology. The term has been defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from judicious study of discernible reality." Some commentators have gone as far as to suggest that there is an overarching conflict in society between the reality-based community and the "faith-based community" as a whole. It can be seen as an example of political framing.
The source of the term is a quotation in an October 17, 2004, The New York Times Magazine article by writer Ron Suskind, quoting an unnamed aide to George W. Bush (later attributed to Karl Rove[1]):
The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." ... "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
-- William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting, 1981)
Hey Rachel:
What is the truth of 9/11?
Imagine that question going viral across the internet - everywhere - every day.
