Time to call out Bloomberg for being a terrorist by lying about a threat that was non-existent:
(CBS) Cops: NYC suspect was close to ready with bomb
But wait a second! This article say THE OPPOSITE:
New York bomb suspect Jose Pimentel not a serious terror threat: FBI sources
This IS actually TERRORISM by the very definition: TERRORIZING A NATION FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES! That is TERRORISM by our GOVERNMENT and the MEDIA who push these stories!
BLATANT, IN-YOUR-FACE, BULLSHIT
Read this actual caption of the CBS link and note how it completely contradicts the intent of the article and photos shown (intentional deception - they know that nobody will dissect the words in the caption):
"Jose Pimentel is arraigned at Manhattan criminal court, Nov. 20, 2011, in New York. Inset is a photo of a mocked up pipe bomb, similar to the one police say Pimentel was close to finishing. (CBS/AP)"
"SIMILAR TO ONE POLICE SAY PIMENTEL WAS CLOSE TO FINISHING"
THERE WAS NOT A BOMB
THIS PICTURE WAS COOKED UP BY THE NYPD PROPAGANDA DEPARTMENT
"City officials played a video showing the kind of damage Pimentel's bombs might have been capable of causing."
POLICE SAY THERE WAS MAYBE THE POSSIBILITY THAT SOME DAY THERE MIGHT POSSIBLY BE A BOMB.
NO SHOE BOMB
NO UNDERWEAR BOMB
NO CHRISTMAS DAY BOMB
NO OWS / NYC BOMB
NO FUCKING BOMB!
HEADLINE: "NEW YORK MAYOR CONFLATES AL QAEDA, TERROR AND BOMB - WHERE NONE EXIST"
SUBHEADLINE: "MAYOR BLOOMBERG, BY DEFINITION IS A TERRORIST, WITH TIES TO ISRAEL"
These articles even mention that some of the funding for the NYPD anti-terror activities comes from the Federal government. In the context of a Federally orchestrated crack down on OWS by local police departments, you can see clearly how the Feds decided they needed their radio news brief headline that people could perceive as conflating OWS protesters with Al Qaeda terror plots - and could demand that Bloomberg deploy the NYPD to hatch this scheme now as part of the federally coordinated Police State Action.
It's so transparently ridiculous, it's almost laughable.
A Homeland Security/Israel/FBI/NYPD/Rove/Fox Production.
The United States' Department of Defense defines terrorism as “The calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to inculcate fear, intended to coerce or intimidate governments or societies as to the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological”
BY DEFINITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE USA PATRIOT ACT - BLOOMBERG IS A TERRORIST
BLOOMBERG IS ABSOLUTELY GUILTY OF THIS:
“The calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to inculcate fear, intended to coerce or intimidate governments or societies as to the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological”
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEFINES THIS ACT AS "TERRORISM"
BY DEFINITION THEN - BLOOMBERG IS A "TERRORIST"
Michele Bachmann: "Suspected Terrorists Shouldn't Be Read Miranda Rights"
The calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to inculcate fear...
Was the inculcation of fear by Bloomberg calculated? By all means. He scheduled a press conference and oversaw creation of demonstration photos and videos DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY to inculcate fear - AND ENSURED THEY WERE BROADCAST GLOBALLY.
Did Bloomberg's efforts tie directly to a "threat of violence?" Actually, it was Bloomberg alone, not the alleged suspect or any FBI Agent who had previously surveilled him, who INSISTED that there was a "threat of violence" - only Bloomberg invents this claim.
Was Bloomberg's calculated inculcation of fear designed specifically to achieve an end that was "political and ideological?"
With REPUBLICAN (fascist-leaning) CAPITALISM as Bloomberg's POLITICAL IDEOLOGY -
THEREFORE THE PEOPLE SHOULD PRESSURE MICHELLE BACHMANN TO CALL FOR THE ARREST OF MICHAEL BLOOMBERG - SUSPECTED TERRORIST
ARREST MICHAEL BLOOMBERG - ACCORDING TO MICHELLE BACHMANN - HE HAS NO RIGHTS UNDER THE US CONSTITUTION - AS KEITH, BIG DAN AND I SUSPECT HIM OF BEING A TERRORIST
UPDATE: OLBERMANN CALLS BLOOMBERG ON FAKE TERROR CHARGE:
(of course, if you read this blog, YOU WOULD HAVE KNOWN THIS ALREADY!!!)
FAKE TERROR BY OUR GOVERNMENT, PUSHED BY OUR CORPORATE MEDIA:
(watch this montage of FAKE TERROR videos that I constantly update, you'll thank me for putting this together for you! these videos are constantly disappearing, but I keep finding them again and adding them back into this playlist)
The Informants: The FBI has built a massive network of spies to prevent another domestic attack. But are they busting terrorist plots—or leading them?
Fake terror plots, paid informants: the tactics of FBI 'entrapment' questioned: Critics say bureau is
running a sting operation across America, targeting vulnerable people by luring them into fake terror plots
The Colossal Deceit Known As The Underwear Bomber Case
Remember this? IRAQI WOMEN SUICIDE BOMBERS WITH DOWNS SYNDROME (I'm not making this up!!!):
(February 4, 2008, IRAQI WOMEN SUICIDE BOMBERS WITH DOWNS SYNDROME) Does Anyone Believe This Bullshit Anymore?
MASSIVE BIN LADEN BULLSHIT
Special thanks once again to contributions from PLUNGER!
btw...I just found this video. If you can't see the explosions going down the sides of one of the Twin Towers in synch, THEN YOU JUST DON'T WANNA SEE IT:
(these videos WERE NOT ON TV; they are from recent Freedom of Information Act requests)
Last 3 Posts:
FEDERALLY COORDINATED ASSAULT ON US CITIZENS BY MULTIPLE LOCAL POLICE FORCES = POLICE STATE: THEY HATE US FOR OUR FREEDOMS (plus: psychopath Karl Rove: the ARCHITECT of Terror!)
JOE PATERNO AND THE CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE
The Three Stooges Simultaneous Meltdown: orchestrated by KARL ROVE so JEB BUSH can step in at the last second????
And now for the BANK "TERRORISTS" who won't let people close their accounts. Here are some videos of people being ARRESTED for trying to close their accounts:
Today in Democracy NOW! headlines:
15 Arrested at Bank of America Anti-Foreclosure Sit-In
Fifteen people were arrested at a sit-in against home foreclosures at a Bank of America branch in Springfield, Massachusetts, on Monday. Among those arrested was Lara Shepard-Blue.
Lara Shepard-Blue: “If Bank of America would lower the principle to the actual real value of the home then we could keep families in their homes and also help spur an economic recovery in our city and across the country. So that’s why we got arrested. We’re also calling on them to stop evicting home owners after foreclosure. They should be accepting rent from home owners or agreeing to sell the house back to them. If they could afford the house at the current value Bank of America should sell it back to them."
Read this article, and it's exactly what happened to us in the transcript that follows:
Bank Of America Paying Out $410 Million For Reordering Your Transactions To Maximize Overdraft Fees
ACTUAL TRANSCRIPT OF ME & MY DAUGHTER TRYING TO SHUT DOWN HER BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT ON 11/16/2011: BANK EXTORTION
Here is an ACTUAL TRANSCRIPT of me and my daughter, in a "chat" room with Bank of America, trying to close her account down. So don't think you can close your account online, if you're afraid of being arrested when you do it in person. Unearthed here, btw, is the existence of the secret "EXTENDED NEGATIVE BALANCE FEE". This apparently is a $35 FEE you are charged every 5 days, if you have a negative balance. BUT...they won't let you shut your account down, so you will keep getting the "EXTENDED NEGATIVE BALANCE FEE" FOREVER. The background is that she got two $35 FEES for two transactions due to insufficient funds, which I thought they were told to stop doing to customers because the items are less than the $35 FEE. Furthermore, they sort the two items to be presented for payment in a manner that maximizes the fees. For example, if your balance is $10 and you buy an item for $11 and another item for $1, they will bounce the $11 item FIRST so they get another $35 bouncing the $1 item, too:
("YOU" = me and my daughter in an online chat with Bank of America, trying to shut down my daughter's account. "CLAUDIA" is the person from Bank of America in the "chat" room, probably from INDIA or some 3rd world country)
Current Transcript of the Chat Session
Welcome to an online chat session at Bank of America. Please hold while we connect you to the next available Bank of America Online Banking Specialist. Your chat may be monitored and recorded for quality purposes. Your current wait time is approximately 0 minutes. Thank you for your patience.
Thank you for choosing Bank of America. You are now being connected to a Bank of America Online Banking Specialist.
(note: it is EXTORTION that Bank of America fabricated fines and won't let us shut down our account unless we pay the fabricated and continuous fines, the fines will continue forever)
Claudia: Hello, my name is Claudia. Thank you for being a valued customer of Bank of America. I'm here to assist you with your personal accounts today. May I please have your complete name as it appears on your account and the last four digits of your account number to further assist you?
You: (edited by big dan, not to disclose account # and other personal information)
Claudia: A warm welcome to online chat, Deanna!
Claudia: Thank you for the information provided.
Claudia: How may I assist you today?
You: this account was at -5.29. please reverse the "FEES" bringing it back to -5.29, close the account, and send a bill for $5.29
Claudia: I understand that you would like to bring the account balance to $0.00 and close the account.
Claudia: I will certainly check that for you.
Claudia: Please give me a couple of minutes while I access your account.
Claudia: Thank you for your patience.
Claudia: I see that you have negative balance in your account.
You: I'm requesting the reversal of two $35 "FEES", bringing it back to the original -5.29, then I will pay $5.29 and close the account.
Claudia: Let me check what best I can do for you.
Claudia: I appreciate your patience.
Claudia: I see that we have previously spoken with you about these fees. I am unable to refund these fees in question.
You: OK, first of all, banks just had a class action lawsuit against them for sorting transactions to maximize "FEES", which you did in this case.
You: second: the transactions should've been rejected due to not enough in the account
You: third: this fabricated "EXTENDED NEGATIVE BALANCE FEE" is RIDICULOUS!
You: immediately shut down this account
Claudia: Although we are not obligated to pay an item presented if your account does not have sufficient funds, we may pay it as a courtesy. An overdraft fee or a returned item fee (NSF) will be assessed whether the item is paid or returned.
You: I didn't want that "courtesy", the "FEE" was greater than the "courtesy", does that make any sense? why would I want you to pay $5.28 transaction as a "courtesy", only to get a $35 "FEE"???
You: does that make sense to you?
You: you're not addressing my request: please shut down this account. are you going to shut down this account?
Claudia: I absolutely understand your concern, Deanna
You: are you going to shut down this account?
Claudia: Once the account balance is $0.00, I would be able to submit your request to close the account.
You: 1. reverse the $70 "FEES"
You: 2. shut down this account
You: I am not paying the $70 "FEES", they are fabricated "FEES" by BOA
Claudia: I wish I could have some some help to you. The account at this point in time fails to qualify for a refund.
You: ARE YOU SHUTTING DOWN THIS ACCOUNT???
You: YES OR NO?
You: why can't I get an answer to that question?
Claudia: Deanna, Once the account balance is $0.00, I would be able to submit your request to close the account.
Claudia: Deanna, do you see any unauthorized transactions?
You: so, you are NOT shutting down my account, even though I am telling you to shut my account?
Claudia: I wish I could, however I'm unable to close your account with negative balance.
Claudia: We do have a dedicated department who will take care of this issue for you. Let me get the contact information of them.
Claudia: May I?
You: SO...you will not shut down this account, and it will keep getting "EXTENDED NEGATIVE BALANCE" fees?
You: is that correct? BOA refuses to shut down my account, so they can keep making $35 "EXTENDED NEGATIVE BALANCE" fees?
Claudia: For each time we determine your account is overdrawn by any amount and continues to be overdrawn for five or more consecutive business days, we will charge an Extended Overdrawn Balance Charge of $35.00.
Claudia: This fee is in addition to applicable Overdraft Item Fees and NSF: Returned Item Fees.
You: also, you ADMIT you paid 2 transactions as a courtesy I DID NOT WANT, causing $70 in "FEES", then added another $35 "EXTENDED NEGATIVE BALANCE" fee. That is all FABRICATED "FEES"! by BOA
Claudia: Please do not make any transactions so that transactions will not be debited from your account.
You: There are 3 unjust "FEES" here. I did not want you to pay two items which were less than the "FEE", that's ridiculous, that's not a "courtesy". And then this extended negative balance fee will go on forever.
You: well, what about the "EXTENDED NEGATIVE BALANCE" fee?
You: I'm notifying you that I hereby want this account shut and owe you $5.29.
Last text message received
Claudia: I humbly request you to contact us at 1800.432.1000 to resolve this issue. We are available from 7:00 a.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, Local time.
You: I'm not responsible for anything else, or anything else going forward. I'm keeping this chat in case we go to court.
You: THIS is the contact: I want this account shut down, and I only owe BOA $5.29.
You: please forward this chat to your supervisors.
Here is her statement:
Statement as of 10/25/2011
10/07/2011 Extended Overdrawn Balance Charge -$35.00 -$110.29
10/03/2011 OVERDRAFT ITEM FEE FOR ACTIVITY OF 09-30 -$35.00 -$75.29
10/03/2011 OVERDRAFT ITEM FEE FOR ACTIVITY OF 09-30 -$35.00 -$40.29
(bd: note the following two transactions on 9/30 were sorted in order to maximize the penalty fees, the balance was $14.99 so they could've paid the $5.28 item and bounced only the $15.00 item, but they bounced the $15.00 item FIRST, so the $5.28 item would ALSO BOUNCE, recently there was a class action lawsuit against this)
09/30/2011 PAYPAL DES:INST XFER ID:4DT2258QHJHUW -$5.28 -$5.29
09/30/2011 PAYPAL DES:INST XFER ID:4DT2258RU5R8Y -$15.00 -$0.01
09/29/2011 PAYPAL DES:INST XFER ID:4DT2258MT6L56 -$5.28 $14.99