Since I seem to be one of the very few people who can remember things from more than a week ago, and since I've noticed Hillary's Democratic Machine surrogate attack dogs beginning to be let loose on Bernie Sanders in the media, I'd like to remind everyone with short attention spans, and especially the media, of Hillary Clinton's "Brian Williams Moment".
Here it is: Hillary totally LIED and got SNAGGED by no less than CBS news. She said she landed in Bosnia under heavy sniper fire. Problem is, IT NEVER HAPPENED!!! And this also introduced the phrase: "MISSPOKE".
This was also the introduction of the word "MISSPOKE", which is now in widespread use by rich, powerful elites like Hillary. People like Hillary and other powerful elites don't "LIE", they "MISSPOKE". Us 99% commoners still "LIE". Elites "MISSPOKE". The word "MISSPOKE" is reserved for the 1% like when Jeb Bush "MISSPOKE". Roger Clemens "MISSPOKE" when he LIED about using steroids. Brian Williams "MISSPOKE" when he LIED. The rest of us 99%ers still "LIE". I told my wife I was going out for groceries, but instead I went out for a few drinks with the boys. Can I say to my wife, "I MISSPOKE when I said I went for groceries."??? Absolutely not!!!
So thank you, Hillary, for paving the way for rich elites never to "LIE" again...then now "MISSPOKE".
Attack #2: some goofball says he never saw Bernie Sanders marching with MLK, as Bernie claims. There's so much to point out about this ridiculous attack. Should an unknown-at-the-time young Bernie Sanders hope people 50 years later remember every protest he was at? That would mean this guy would've had to have to memorized EVERYONE at the protest...50 years ago...in case they became famous 50 years later so he could say he did or did not remember them there. Even if this goofball John Lewis looked directly in Bernie Sanders face at the MLK march, he would not remember Bernie there because Bernie was not yet famous, he was just like any other unknown college student marching. This has all the signs of a partisan Hillary attack throwing anything at a wall and hoping something sticks. And CNN should be ashamed for doing a story with this character John Lewis with such an outlandish claim. We all know the mainstream media is siding for Hillary and against Bernie. That's all they got?
And here's a sidenote: who the hell is John Lewis???
AN OPEN LETTER BY DONALD TRUMP TO SARAH PALIN PUBLISHED IN THE NYTIMES "news"PAPER:
This is an open letter PLEA for you to please switch your endorsement to Ted Cruz.
Dear Sarah, they finally found a way to have my poll numbers drop: having YOU endorse me. I don't know who on my staff thought it was a good idea for me to stand next to you while you babbled a BIZARRE, INCOHERENT "endorsement" of me, but when I find out who they are, they are FIRED!!! I think it was an inside job, because anyone doing any kind of due diligence could google how NUTTY you and your family are. Your daughter preaches abstinence, yet had two kids out of wedlock. And your son was just arrested for beating his girlfriend . I did not know this because I am above researching anything, I pay people a lot of money to do that for me. I thought I could trust my campaign staff, that is why I stood beside you with a dazed look on my face as your incoherent "endorsement" unfolded. That is the look of slowly realizing how SCREWED I was.
Looking back, the only way I could've saved my campaign would've been to grab the microphone off you and said, "GET THE F*CK OUT OF HERE YOU IDIOT!!!". But as it turned out, I did the worst thing possible: I stood next to you and pretended it wasn't happening and occasionally smiled and pretended I knew what you were saying, but in reality you were giving me a good SCHLONGING. This whole thing destroyed my authoritative image, so I had to change the headlines asap by saying that even if I shot someone, my poll numbers wouldn't go down. Originally, I said "I SHOULD'VE SHOT SARAH PALIN", but my new campaign staffers said it was a better idea to say I would shoot "someone".
Thanks in advance for switching your endorsement from me to Ted Cruz.
Below: the two most widely disseminated pictures of the woman "shooter" in the San Bernardino FALSE FLAG: Tashfeen Malik. Her and her husband Syed Farook we are told are the San Bernardino "shooters". But why does the one on the left look like a CROOKED FACE PHOTO-SHOPPED OVER A BURKA and why does the one on the right look like a PORTRAIT or DRAWING rather than a photo? Aren't there any photos of her they could put in the mainstream media? I mean, besides the crooked photo-shop looking one? The face looks like it's FLOATING CROOKED in front of the HIJAB!!!
Do these look "odd" to you:
Who is this a picture of below? Some say it's Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik and some say it's his brother of the same name and his wife that were mistaken for them. I even found in a post somewhere that his FATHER's name is also Syed Farook! The picture below BETTER be his brother and his wife, because it certainly doesn't look like the strange "pictures" above of Malik:
And who are THESE two:
All of those picture above are in articles claiming they are Syed Farook and his wife Tashfeen Malik. And why are these the only pictures I could find on the internet having to do with this? Are you telling me the mainstream media, family, friends, etc...cannot furnish ANY clear PHOTOS (not bizarre drawings/photoshops) of Tashfeen Malik? Or clarify who these other people are? In this day and age when everyone has a cellphone and takes pictures of everything? What's going on here???
The mainstream media will NEVER question the "official story" of a mass shooting, even when the first question should always be: WAS IT A FALSE FLAG BY THE GOVERNMENT? No matter how many questions there are about the "official story" that people have, they will NEVER ask or explore them. In fact, they will go out of the way to push the "official story" and ignore or ridicule those asking questions about the "official story". The mainstream media's job is to push the "official story". They are controlled by the government. It does not matter which party is in power, which implies there is really no difference between the parties.
Did you notice there are two distinct types of FALSE FLAGS by the government? Rightwing FALSE FLAGS in which the shooter is a rightwinger in order to push gun control in America, and Muslim FALSE FLAGS in which the shooter is a Muslim in order to push the "war on terror" and feed the military industrial complex and keep the endless wars going.
When they do a rightwinger FALSE FLAG and a Muslim FALSE FLAG right in a row, you know they're desperate. This past week or two, the government pulled off a rightwinger FALSE FLAG shooting of a Planned Parenthood, followed up quickly by the FALSE FLAG of a Muslim couple shooting in San Bernardino.
Somehow, the people perpetrating these dueling rightwinger & Muslim FALSE FLAGS have gotten rightwingers to hate Muslims...when in reality, they need to be on the same side exposing these government FALSE FLAGS perpetrated on both of them. That is genius by the perpetrators getting rightwingers and Muslims to hate each other so they wouldn't band together against them. That makes them the perfect targets.
The first question that should be asked about a "mass shooting" is: WAS IT A FALSE FLAG? This question is off-limits to ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, FOX, PBS, NYTIMES, Washington Post, Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage, Levin, etc...every major corporate mass media entity. OFF LIMITS!!! You cannot question their "official story" they are telling, no matter how many things make zero sense and no matter if the "official story" has zero evidence proving their assertions. You must BLINDLY BELIEVE the mainstream media's "official story" like a religion.
And when they're really REALLY REALLY desperate, they will do an additional storyline pusing WOMEN TERRORISTS. Did you ever notice that? In the San Bernardino "shooting", they are saying the WOMAN was the main "terrorist". Does this ring a bell with any of you, the sub-storyline of WOMEN TERRORISTS? That's because they want you to think ANYONE, even a WOMAN, can be a terrorist. Be afraid of everyone!
The elites do these FALSE FLAGS to control their populations with FEAR so they can keep endless wars going and take away citizens' liberties with laws from the government they control and keep the money flowing to them. RULE BY FEAR against a BOOGEYMAN they create with FALSE FLAGS. Rightwingers & Muslims are the BOOGEYMEN. And the elites are genius enough to get rightwingers to hate Muslims when they should be joining together against them.
When you stop blindly believing and not questioning the "official story" narrative of the mainstream media, all of these "mass shootings" easily fall apart.
OH!!! Witnesses say the "shooters" in San Bernardino were THREE WHITE GUYS:
Do YOU think this is how a daughter would act the next day after her mother was slaughtered by ISIS terrorists in San Bernardino? Or is this how someone would act if it was a FALSE FLAG/HOAX?
UPDATE:
Now, a third prominent eye-witness, Chirs Nwadike, has stepped up to challenge the mainstream narrative. He recently told reporters he received a phone call from an unknown person around 7 p.m., on the evening of the shooting, who told him that he must say that Sayd Farook was the shooter.
You read that right, he says that he was called and told to change his story and say that Farook carried out the attacks with his wife, even though that is very different than what he witnessed.
