Sunday, March 3, 2013

Conspiracy Theory: Intelligent People Researching "OFFICIAL STORY"s Told By "OFFICIALS" That Appear To Be LIES; I HAVE NO LEGAL REPRESENTATION...I'M JUST A PATSY ~ Lee Harvey Oswald


After a lot of research, the following "OFFICIAL STORY"s are NOT true: 911, JFK, RFK, MLK, George Wallace, the Gerald Ford assassination attempts (Nelson ROCKEFELLER would've been president, if the Ford assassinations were successful), the Port Arthur Massacre in Australia which led to gun control, the Team 6/Bin Laden story, Sandy Hook, the Batman shooting, Princess Diana, John Lennon, Columbine, Marilyn Monroe, Charles Manson, George Wallace shooting, Reagan shooting, Son of Sam, Malcolm X, Kent St shootings. And they all have a pattern and a formula. They all have intelligence agency fingerprints all over them. Intelligence agencies have ruined this country. They run the country and are UNELECTED by the people and shouldn't exist. Their goals are several: kill good influential people who would ruin and out their corruption, cause general non-stop chaos and fear (Operation Gladio, look it up), and get "their guys" in office. And to keep their control over everything and make $$$. They are: the CIA, MI6, & Mossad, and extreme wealthy families like the Rothschild's & Rockefellers. They are in league with world banksters & multi-national corporations. If you put time in and do any sort of research beyond the "mainstream media", which exists to push their messages, you can only come to this conclusion, if you're any sort of a rational human being. The "mainstream media" is the integral part of their "propaganda".

RICHARD CHARNIN: Oswald never fired a shot. He was just a "patsy" as he said. If the WARREN COMMISSION claimed there was just one shooter (a lie), and rejected eyewitness evidence of firing from the Grassy Knoll and medical evidence of exit wounds and acoustic evidence presented at the HSCA of at least FOUR shots which caused the HSCA to conclude a conspiracy in 1979, why would the WC and the corporate media not lie about Oswald shooting from the TSBD? Why do you think he was eliminated? WHY WERE THERE NO TRANSCRIPTS OF HIS INTERROGATION KEPT BY THE DALLAS POLICE? Could it be that if he was brought to trial, he would be found INNOCENT of all charges, including the killing Tippet. The so-called evidence against him was all contrived: nitrate tests proved he didn't fire a shot; a Mauser was first announced as the murder weapon found in the TBSD and then changed to an inferior Mannlicher-Carcano in order to tie it to Oswald who was a poor marksman; three shots in 6 seconds? that dog won't hunt; an impossible feat that has never been duplicated by experts; ONE magic bullet causing SEVEN wounds and emerging PRISTINE condition on a stretcher at Parkland Hospital; fake photos of Oswald standing with a rifle; he was a CIA/FBI informant. Watch Jack Ruby admit that it was a conspiracy at this press conference:

'Better Than Doyle': Camouflage In The JFK Assassination Would Have Fooled Sherlock

Executive Action: JFK Witness Deaths and the London Times Actuary

The Magic Bullet: Even More Magical Than We Knew?

The JFK History Forum

CBS: By 74 percent to 13 percent, the public thinks there was an official cover-up to keep the public from learning the truth about the assassination.

There's a lot MORE evidence that Oswald DIDN'T do it. Oswald was a PATSY. Who did it were the Nixon & Bush "plumbers" & the CIA, and LBJ was involved. And Texas oilman Hunt. And those SAME GUYS did Watergate, btw...the same guys that did the JFK killing. Oswald was beaten up while in custody, had NO LAWYER, and yelled that he was a PATSY to the cameras while walking by, and yelled that he had NO LEGAL REPRESENTATION.

Here's what a PATSY is: the PATSY is just supposed to be there to be BLAMED. The PATSY doesn't even do the killing, the PATSY doesn't even KNOW he's going to be blamed. The PATSY's function is to take the fall and distract from the REAL KILLERS. Then the "news" goes full tilt with the myth of the PATSY, he'll likely have a "legend" or history, like a MANIFESTO, a book like Catcher In The Rye, be obsessed with an actor (Jodie Foster), and entire story is built around the PATSY. For your CONSUMPTION & DISTRACTION from the REAL KILLERS. There's MULTIPLE patsies. They wouldn't do the deal without backups, and they WOULDN'T TRUST THE PATSY to do the actual killing.

The PATSY is just there TO BE BLAMED, and the "news" runs with stories on THE PATSY. Adam Lanza, Sandy Hook. THE "LONE NUT GUNMAN". It's a FORMULA. Sirhan Sirhan: PATSY. Sometimes THE PATSY's dead body is thrown at the scene, then the story is the patsy "SUICIDED".

There's always original stories of MULTIPLE SHOOTERS in all these stories, because there ARE multiple shooters. THEN THE "NEWS" AND FEDS SWOOP IN AND THE STORY ALWAYS BECOMES: "LONE NUT GUNMAN". With a MANIFESTO, diary, Catcher in the Rye book, etc...a whole LEGEND built for your consumption and distraction from THE REAL KILLERS. Some PATSY's AREN'T EVEN THERE at the shooting.

Reagan was shot in an attempt for GWH Bush to move into the presidency. The Hinckley's were friends with the Bush's. Neil Bush DINED with John Hinckley's brother shortly before the Reagan assassination attempt by John Hinckley, it was even in the newspapers at the time. GHW Bush was head of the CIA in the 1970's, and is also connected to the JFK assassination. And Zionists are part of all of this to a high degree. And a lot are connected to Satanic rituals. I don't believe in Satan, but THEY do. The "mainstream media" pushing the "official story" is essential. And the essential part of THAT, is then if someone questions the "official story", they are a "conspiracy theorist nut". That's the formula. "OFFICIALS" drag an example on TV and call them a "nut". "OFFICIALS" are: government politicians and top media pundits.

I'll show you two examples of "the formula": dragging someone on TV and calling them a "conspiracy theorists" and "nut" when the person is actually right and outing the false "official story", this is the mainstream media's job:

Vancouver-bound author James Douglass on JFK and the Unspeakable

Can Anderson Cooper and Bill O'Reilly say "conspiracy theory" enough in those videos??????????? And one from the FAKE LEFT, and one from the FAKE RIGHT. One of the biggest brainwashing phrases that everyone has grown up with is: THE LIBERAL MEDIA. Totally false.

Brainwashing phrase, and anyone who says it, like Rush Limbaugh, is in on all this brainwashing, too. Rush Limbaugh is PART of the mainstream media, and he always bashes "the mainstream media". LOL

You're a "conspiracy theory nut", if you question "official story"s that make ZERO sense. But WHO says you're a "nut"? The mainstream media. ALWAYS. That's their job. The REAL NEWS, you have to put time and effort into, and research, and be smart.

So they invented the phrase: "YOU CAN'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING ON THE INTERNET".

Notice they don't say: "YOU CAN'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING ON TV"??? You're a "nut", if you say that.

JUST BELIEVE US ~ the mainstream media

And if you DON'T, you're a "conspiracy theory nut". MENTAL STIGMA is powerful -> "nut". Call someone a "nut", and you immediately win the argument.

The biggest propaganda that no one point out is, btw: THE RADIO NEWS BRIEFS, you hear in your car at the top & bottom of the hour. There's no record of them anywhere, I tried to find out more about THE RADIO NEWS BRIEFS, try and find out anything about them. You can't. THE RADIO NEWS BRIEFS is where you hear the latest phrase over and over and over: SEQUESTER, GUN CONTROL, FISCAL CLIFF, GROUND ZERO MOSQUE, CHICK FIL A, etc...etc...whatever the latest phrase is. INSURGENTS (that's going back a ways), WMD's, etc...etc... The latest 3, in order, are: FISCAL CLIFF, GUN CONTROL, & SEQUESTER. There will be one after SEQUESTER, I'll point it out when SEQUESTER dies down. They already have the phrases ready an waiting. DEBT CEILING , yes good one. TOO BIG TO FAIL. DEATH PANELS. Brainwashing. WE ARE FIGHTING THEM OVER THERE, SO WE DON'T HAVE TO FIGHT THEM OVER HERE. IF YOU'RE NOT WITH US, YOU'RE WITH THE TERRORISTS (that's some political phrases).


Police at Sandy Hook:

1996 Port Arthur (Australia) Massacre, another "OFFICIAL STORY" that's not true:

Sound familiar? A person with no gun experience & 66 IQ (retarded) shot with precision accuracy killing 19 of the first victims instantly with the first 20 shots, one of the best shots probably in the history of the world, which led to gun control in Australia. The "shooter" was never ID'd, and a PATSY was pinned with it. The "shooter" was from New Town. NOW...we have patsy Adam Lanza from NEWTOWN, shooting with the same fraction of 1% top accuracy possible in Sandy Hook, which led to gun control debate. What do we know about Adam Lanza? Both stories are identical, both stories you have to have 100% blind faith greater than religious faith to believe the "official story". Both stories have holes so huge in them you can drive several humvees through them. I just don't blindly believe "officials" and their "official story"s without examining and questioning them, especially when they appear to be LIES bases on evidence and logic, and especially when they lead to a POLITICAL DISCUSSION such as gun control. The funny thing is I DON'T EVEN OWN A GUN, and never did! I just can see what's going on here.

The Sandy Hook "official story" has many holes in it. That doesn't imply that I'm saying Obama himself had anything to do with it. But the "official story" of Sandy Hook falls in line with all the "official story"s in the original part of this post. There's HOLES GALORE in the "official story" of Sandy Hook, and it fits the time-tested formula of all of those "official story"s. They have a formula & a pattern. "LONE NUT GUNMAN" patsy. What do we really know about Adam Lanza? There's so many questions and anomalies about the "official story" of Sandy Hook, it's off the charts, and if you believe it, then you have BLIND BELIEF in the "news". FAITH, 100% bordering on religious faith in the "news". Why would we believe ONE SINGLE WORD the "news" says? They broke our TRUST a long time ago.

Australia's Port Arthur Massacre
Government and Media Lies Exposed

The Sandy Hook shooting and subsequent "GUN CONTROL" debate is so strikingly similar to the Port Arthur massacre, I'm posting a link below to my post in which I immediately called out and had questions about the "OFFICIAL STORY" of Sandy Hook:

Questions About The Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting, Gun Control, Operation Gladio, MK-ULTRA, & The Shock Doctrine

Lots Of High-Profile And "LONE NUT GUNMAN" Shootings Conveniently Coincide With Government/Media Pushing "GUN CONTROL"

"OFFICIALS" and their "OFFICIAL STORY"s are crumbling left and right because of the internet



Origins of the Bilderberg meetings

Operation Mockingbird was a secret Central Intelligence Agency campaign to influence media beginning in the 1950s.

Gee, right around the time of Project Paperclip (putting Nazi's in our government under new identities), the CIA came into being:

Operation Paperclip was the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) program used to recruit the scientists of Nazi Germany for employment by the United States in the aftermath of World War II (1939–45). It was conducted by the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (JIOA), and in the context of the burgeoning Soviet–American Cold War (1945–91), one purpose of Operation Paperclip was to deny German scientific knowledge and expertise to the USSR,[1] the UK,[2] and (divided) Germany itself.

Operation Paperclip

Central Intelligence Agency

Project MKUltra was the code name of a U.S. government covert research operation experimenting in the behavioral engineering of humans (mind control) through the CIA's Scientific Intelligence Division.


National Security Act of 1947

Project ARTICHOKE (also referred to as Operation ARTICHOKE) was a CIA project that researched interrogation methods and arose from Project BLUEBIRD on August 20, 1951, run by the CIA's Office of Scientific Intelligence.

Project BLUEBIRD: Deliberate Creation of Multiple Personality by Psychiatrists

The Big Lie (German: Große Lüge) is a propaganda technique. The expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, about the use of a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously."

READ AND LEARN, FOLKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's NOT ON TV!!!!!!!!!!! Or the "history channel"!

Federal Reserve Bank (Inc.) A Murderous History? Banksters, the Worlds Worst Gangsters

Americans – Like Nazi Germans – Don’t Notice that All of Our Rights Are Slipping Away

Big Dan on friend Anthony Antonello's podcast:

John Niems on same radio show host's show about 911:

blog comments powered by Disqus