Monday, December 15, 2014

Why Do You Think Dick Cheney Is In The "news" So Much Speaking FOR Torture? Because He Directed 911 From A Bunker Under The White House And Needed FALSE CONFESSIONS By Muslims Via Torture

Dick Cheney, neo-cons, and the Mossad did 911, and then the CIA tortured Muslims into false confessions (that's all that torture is for: FALSE CONFESSIONS) knowing they didn't do 911. False Flags like 911 blaming the Muslims persist to this day. See: ISIS.

When you talk about torture, you must keep in mind the CIA tortured Muslims and fully knew Muslims didn't do 911.

Timeline Of Dick Cheney's Actions On 911

CHENEY, HALLIBURTON, THE BUSH FAMILY, AND ASBESTOS - On 9/11: Was the Asbestos-Laced World Trade Center "Disposable"?

CIA tortured innocents to hide 9/11 false flag. Senate Report "Limited Hangout"

Norm Mineta was in the bunker with Cheney:

And here is the DEVIL HIMSELF about the recent torture report released. Think about how he was in on 911 while you watch his LIES here:

Fox Banned News 9-11 The Israeli Connection, Mossad, AIPAC, Art Students Spy Ring

The Magical Passport: the day I began to listen to REAL INDEPENDENT EXPERTS about 9/11, and not to politicized government agencies paid by the government (NIST), Magazine hucksters (Popular Mechanics, Michael Shermer/Skeptics Magazine), TV & radio characters, and slick anonymous websites (debunking 9/11)


They Just Won't Stop The Team 6 Bullshit: We're not talking about Team 1, Team 2, Team 3, Team 4, Team 5, Team 7, Team 8, Team 9, or Team 10...we're talking TEAM 6!!!!!!

Playlist of every important 911 video on youtube:

Torture news:

Big Dan was writing about TORTURE long before the media suddenly wanted everyone to talk about it:

BIG DAN'S BIG BLOG March 23, 2013 - U.S.A.: 10 Years After Installing Bush/Cheney Policy Of Torturing People

BIG DAN'S BIG BLOG April 18, 2009 - I'm the Torturer (Bush) Sadistic, Un-American FUCKS!

BIG DAN'S BIG BLOG April 3, 2008 - Bush-Cheney Torture Lawyer: John Yoo

BIG DAN'S BIG BLOG April 23, 2009 - Americans Don't Torture, Republicans Do!!!

BIG DAN'S BIG BLOG November 7, 2007 - The Vote To Condone Waterboarding Torture

BIG DAN'S BIG BLOG November 3, 2007 - Torture-Condoning Democrats Schumer & Feinstein Will Vote To Approve Robert Mukasey (Alberto Gonzales II)

Report on CIA details 'brutal' post-9/11 interrogations

Code Name: Artichoke - The CIA’s Secret Experiments on Humans

The Nazis Used the Same “Enchanced Interrogation” Techniques the U.S. Did .. and Even CALLED IT the Same Thing. Nazis Called Their Torture “Enhanced Interrogation” Too

Guantanamo is being kept open – and innocent detainees imprisoned forever – in order to try to cover up the torture of innocents.

BUSH WAR CRIMES: Tortured at Abu Ghraib for being anti-Zionist: “The Man Behind the Hood”. Full Transcript of Ali Shalal's Testimony

On Feb. 7, 2002, Mr. Bush declared that the laws of war did not apply to Qaeda suspects. That decision opened the door for the C.I.A. to interrogate prisoners in previously unthinkable ways.

Thursday, December 4, 2014

FOX "news" and the "SEATBELT HOLD"


(when do we start pointing out that FOX "news"/Limbaugh/Hannity fans are all AGAINST black Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner, and Michael Brown, and all FOR white Clive Bundy??? Do ANY of you FOX "news"/Limbaugh/Hannity guys ever have an EPIPHANY and say to yourself, in a private moment, "Gee, if I was AGAINST Trayvon Martin-Eric Garner-Michael Brown, and they are all black, but I was FOR Cliven Bundy and he was WHITE...maybe it appears, just a smidge, racist"???)

FOX "news" is really news for scared white folks. They have been experts at walking a fine line of being blatantly racist since their inception. Lately, they have walked over the line and out of the closet.

If there is a white guy being harassed by law enforcement, especially a millionaire white guy like Clive Bundy of the Bundy Ranch debacle, FOX "news" came down squarely on the side of Bundy and against law enforcement. Between saying "MUSLIMS" 100 times per hour, FOX rammed the legend of poor old Clive Bundy down our throats 24x7 as well.

(above: Cliven Bundy)

But when it comes to law enforcement not only harrassing, but MURDERING blacks, FOX "news" is sure to be squarely 100% on the side of law enforcement, as in the cases of the cops murdering black Michael Brown and black Eric Garner.

We all know about the Michael Brown case and the protests it caused in Ferguson, Missouri, and then subsequently all around the United States and the world, but now comes the case of Eric Garner.

What's similar about the Michael Brown and Eric Garner cases, as in a lot of other cases, is the cops murdering unarmed black men and the cops getting off scott-free for murder. (a side note: are cops immune to getting any type of penalty for murdering people? from what I see, I don't think so, and the media is saying ZERO about this important subject)

What's NOT similar about the Michael Brown and Eric Garner cases is: when cops murdered Eric Garner, IT WAS ON VIDEOTAPE FROM BEGINNING TO END FOR EVERYONE TO SEE.

So, if you thought that cops are immune to any penalty for murdering someone, now you know EVEN IF IT'S ON VIDEO FROM COMPLETE BEGINNING TO COMPLETE ENDING COPS STILL RECEIVE NO PENALTY FOR MURDERING SOMEONE.


Getting back to FOX "news" racism, Eric Garner was murdered by a cop using the CHOKEHOLD. I was aware of this for a LOOOOOOONG time, because I've been following this even though the news has not. The term CHOKEHOLD has been used since DAY ONE.

What did the RACISTS at FOX "news" come up with, to side with law enforcement vs a black guy (as opposed to their tripping over their tongues backing RICH WHITE Clive Bundy)?

The RACISTS at FOX "news" came up with the term "SEATBELT HOLD" to replace CHOKEHOLD.

A warm, friendly, safe, SEATBELT HOLD (that killed him).


How long did it take the writers at FOX "news" to come up with "SEATBELT HOLD"?

"SEATBELT HOLD" comes from ONE SOURCE, make no mistake about it: FOX "news".

And anyone who uses the term "SEATBELT HOLD" can be identified as a FOX "news" watcher.

The reverse is: no one ever heard of "SEATBELT HOLD" who doesn't watch FOX "news".

Just like only FOX "news" viewers think a MOOZLUM is going to behead them, and law enforcement harassed Cliven Bundy, but law enforcement was right to murder Mike Brown and Eric Garner (and let's not forget they were all for George Zimmerman murdering Trayvon Martin), and they love CHICK-FIL-A, and they're against THE GROUND ZERO MOSQUE, and DEATH PANELS are gonna git 'em.......they're the only ones that think cops held Eric Garner in the "SEATBELT HOLD".

Here's another question: You know the MILITIA's who rushed to the aid of Cliven Bundy? Where are they in Ferguson?

I've given this some deep thought, and I sincerely believe no racist thinks they're a racist. Racists don't even know they're racists when they begin every sentence about Ferguson/Mike Brown or Eric Garner with: "I DON'T CARE IF YOU'RE BLACK OR WHITE, BUT......." or "I'M NOT RACIST, BUT.......".

There's a 100% way to identify a RACIST: they begin sentences with "I DON'T CARE IF YOU'RE BLACK OR WHITE, BUT......." or "I'M NOT RACIST, BUT.......".

I'll tell you a personal story. I was at Thanksgiving in New Jersey, and one of the people there said, "I DON'T CARE IF YOU'RE BLACK OR WHITE, BUT IF YOU WERE LOOTING MY STORE, I'D SHOOT YOU". Let me translate that through my RACISM LANGUAGE DECODER: "I'D SHOOT NIGGERS".

Let me put this into a formula for you:
You know you're a racist when you begin sentences with "I DON'T CARE IF YOU'RE BLACK OR WHITE, BUT......."

You know you're a racist when you begin sentences with "I'M NOT A RACIST, BUT......."

You know you're a racist if you sided with Clive Bundy over law enforcement, but law enforcement over Mike Brown and Eric Garner.

You know you're a racist if you say that cops used the SEATBELT HOLD on Eric Garner, when in REALITY it was a CHOKEHOLD.

You know you're a racist when someone points out that there is still racism in America, you say they're "RACEBAITING". (hint: it used to be PLAYING THE RACE CARD, and REVERSE RACISM, just replace RACEBAITING with THE RACE CARD and REVERSE RACISM)

Here's another formula: if you're a RACIST and you watch news, you watch FOX "news". Not everyone who watches FOX "news" is a racist, but all racists watch FOX "news". PERIOD. CASE CLOSED.E IT'S NOT UP FOR DEBATE.

UPDATE: You know you're a racist if you spend time researching whether a cop was ever thrown in jail for murder, and all you can come up with is a 2011 case where a cop was INDICTED and FACED 30 years (note: INDICTED and CONVICTED AND SENT TO JAIL are two different things, look it up), and then pass it all around FaceBook and parade it on rightwing talk radio shows and "news" to make white people feel better:

S.C. Police Chief Charged With Murder in 2011 Shooting of Unarmed Man

I'm still waiting for you RACISTS to come up with an ACTUAL COP WHO WAS CHARGED WITH MURDER WHILE ON DUTY, CONVICTED, AND SENT TO JAIL. So of the THOUSANDS of citizens cops have killed, and the average of 3 per day, all you can come up with is the above? From 3 years ago? Not "INDICTED" (learn what INDICTED means) and "FACED" 30 years in prison (how much ACTUAL time in prison did the above get? NOT ONE SECOND!). That's all you can come up with? And you have the BALLS to BROADCAST this as if it's evidence of "EQUALITY" and even -handedness? The cop in the Garner case was ALSO INDICTED. What happened in the ACTUAL TRIAL? NOT GUILTY. Learn the difference. Nice try, racists. END UPDATE

Watch this great video by Jon Stewart of the Daily Show:

Here's a video of a WHITE man carrying an automatic weapon acting IRRATIONALLY. Ask yourself: if this man was BLACK or had on a TURBAN, would the result be the same:

This is what happens when you call the cops:
10 Key Points for a Broad Understanding of the Ferguson Movement, Using the world's most massive imprisonment/torture/labor system, the US in some ways disproportionately targets its ethnic minority citizens. Twitter users share heartbreaking, terrifying examples of being #AliveWhileBlack ‘Criming While White’: Twitter reacts to Garner decision with tales of white privilege ‘F*ck! F*ck!’: Cop reacts to fatally shooting drug suspect after mistaking pill bottle for gun Autopsy: Milwaukee cop shot mentally-ill black man from above and behind, 14 times Cop who killed Tamir Rice was fired from old job after ‘emotional meltdown’ on gun range
Other news: Remember this PATRIOTIC PRO-GUN RIGHTWING NUTJOB HERO? Well guess what? He FAKED IT. It was an INSIDE JOB, a HOAX, a FALSE FLAG, he LIED, etc...whatever you want to call it. My question is: why don't more people realize these HOAXES, INSIDE JOBS, FALSE FLAGS, etc...ARE GOING ON ALL THE TIME? Will THIS wake you up? IN HIS OWN WORDS: ‘Libtard’-hating ex-cop claims feds paid him to lure right-wing nutjobs with profane videos

Wednesday, November 26, 2014

Ferguson: When Is Everyone Going To Wake Up To The Government and Police Protest Tactic Of AGENT PROVOCATEUR and LOOTING?

Our Top Story: Government and Police Agent Provocateurs are at it again...WHOOPS! I mean...LOOTING AND MOLOTOV COCKTAILS BY PROTESTERS IN FERGUSON

The first thing you will hear in the "news" about every major protest is: "LOOTING" (and to some extent "MOLOTOV COCKTAILS"). 

Here's why:

First, you need to realize that for every major protest since the 1960's, the government has employed the AGENT PROVOCATEUR/LOOTING strategy. That is a strategy where the government sends in people who work for them to mingle with the protesters and "LOOT" so the media can then discredit the protest by focusing on stories of LOOTING instead of what the protest is about.


When are we all going to wake up and realize the government does this AGENT PROVOCATEUR/LOOTING routine for every major protest?

I'm sure there were "agent provocateurs" connected with the government inciting and actually doing a lot of the "looting". This has been going on since the 1960's. It's sad more people are not aware of this. Then the "news" is part of this agent provocateuring by publicizing the "looting" of the agent provocateurs and saying they were the protesters. Governments ADMIT doing this, it's been going on for a LOOOOONG time.

There will never be a HUGE "peaceful protest" because the government will MAKE SURE they send in agent provocateurs to "loot" and the media will publicize this as the protesters doing the looting, thereby discrediting the protest and making the focus the LOOTING instead of what the protest is about.

And the thing is, it's guaranteed to work every time.

And often times they wear masks and no one knows them.

And they're often times off to the side "doing their thing" away from the main action.

And the police are aware of the agent provocateurs. In fact, the police WAIT for the agent provocateurs to "do their thing" so they have a REASON to brutalize the protesters.

The M.O. of agent provocateurs is: LOOTING. Part I is the agent provocateurs looting, Part II is the media saying there's looting 24x7 to discredit the protest.

What is the first thing you hear on the "news" for every huge important protest: not what the protest is about, you hear LOOOOOOOOOOOOTING all over the "news". That's all you hear. It's a PLAN. It happens EVERY HUGE IMPORTANT PROTEST.

Your and my entire life, haven't we heard "LOOTING" and "MOLOTOV COCKTAILS" for every single major protest? What are the odds that every single major protest has massive LOOTING in it and none of them are every peaceful?

One of the counter-strategies to combat this that I can think of is for the REAL protesters to surround the agent provocateur, subdue them, and start chanting, "AGENT PROVOCATEUR, AGENT PROVOCATEUR, AGENT PROVOCATEUR", and hold down the agent provocateur and start questioning them, find out who they are, take pictures and video of them.

Here is a government/police agent provocateur being caught in Ferguson:

Here is an interesting video with almost half-a-million hits. A note in the description of the video says, "DISCLAIMER: Lots of hate directed towards me for this video. I provide critical analysis of observing the actions of police. I hope to incite conversation, examination of the evidence, and critical discussion, and that is all."

My comments on this video are not about if the cops threw a flash grenade in an old abandoned El Camino car parked on the side of the Advanced Auto Parts store, my questions are: 1) with all the problems going on there, why were a dozen cops all around an old abandoned car? 2) the Advanced Auto Parts store was obviously not on fire when the cops were there in the video. How did the store, surrounded by a huge police presence, catch on fire and burn to the ground? 3) Why did most of the fires occur in a small area where the militarized police presence was the greatest? Shouldn't that area have the LEAST fires?

For the August Ferguson protest, I wrote this:

BIG DAN'S BIG BLOG August 17, 2014: You Can Be Assured That Agent Provocateurs Are "LOOTING" And Throwing "MOLOTOV COCKTAILS" In Ferguson

Here is the best example of protesters catching and outing agent provocateurs:

AGENT PROVOCATEURS from August Ferguson protest:

Another AGENT PROVOCATEUR from the previous Ferguson protest:

Police Tactics Exposed - Provocateur Inciting Agents At Protests - Ferguson - Oakland - Canada

Tariq Nasheed Ferguson/ST. Louis Lecture and Suspected Agent Provocateur Tries To Disrupt The Show

California Highway Patrol Officers Retreat to Vehicles as Ferguson Protesters Ascend

Live Stream VIDEO: Protesters Shut Down Three New York City Bridges In Reaction To #Ferguson

Flares and protest moving outside U.S. Embassy in #London #Ferguson

London to Ferguson: Crowd protesting police racism tears down Parliament Square barriers

Cleveland Highway Shut Down By Mike Brown Protesters, Police Afraid to Make Arrests

Video: Cops Didn’t Seem to Hesitate for One Second Before Gunning Down 12-Yr-Old Boy - See more at:

QUESTION: Why is FOX/Limbaugh/Hannity/rightwing media/militias AGAINST the police in the Cliven Bundy case, but FOR the police in the Michael Brown case?