The aftereffects of the BP oil spill 2 years later.........
Remember when corporate shill who doesn't care if you die Rush Limbaugh said this about the BP oil spill?
The worst Environmental disaster in US history- and no criminal charges were filed.
The worst Terror attack in US history - and no criminal charges were filed.
The worst Financial disaster in US history - and no criminal charges were filed.
At the head of each - David Rockefeller and The Crown.
Clearly above the law.
Treason is legal. ***
Investigation by Greg Palast:
Two years before the Deepwater Horizon blow-out in the Gulf of Mexico, another BP off-shore rig suffered a nearly identical blow-out, but BP concealed the first one from the U.S. regulators and Congress.Greg Palast: BP Cover-up 'They Knew.'
Greg Palast: BP Cover-up
Part 2: Bribery, George Bush and WikiLeaks
Greg Palast: BP Blow-out Cover-Up - EcoWatch.org
Gulf Oil Spill: BP Execs Escape Punishment as Fallout from Disaster Continues to Impact Sea Life:
Gulf seafood deformities alarm scientists. Eyeless shrimp and fish with lesions are becoming common, with BP oil pollution believed to be the likely cause. These are the shocking images of the long term damage last year's BP oil spill has done to the Gulf coastline.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1378679/BP-oil-spill-Day-scientists-hail-recovery-Gulf-Coast-pictures-real-damage.html#ixzz1sm8lV73q
Gulf seafood deformities alarm scientists. Eyeless shrimp and fish with lesions are becoming common, with BP oil pollution believed to be the likely cause.
Gulf seafood deformities alarm scientists.
Gulf fisheries in decline after oil disaster
"BUILT FOR REASONS STILL UNKNOWN........"
(who would build a nuclear power plant on an island that, if it failed, would leave the island uninhabitable???)
Russia Stunned After Japanese Plan to Evacuate 40 Million Revealed
In reference to the above article:
"BUILT FOR REASONS STILL UNKNOWN?"
I STATED MONTHS AGO THAT TOKYO WOULD NEED TO BE COMPLETELY EVACUATED...
There are NO COINCIDENCES. David Rockefeller knows precisely why ghost cities were built in China in advance of the displacement of the majority of the population of Japan. ***
Important to note, this report continues, are that Japanese diplomats told their Russian counterparts that they were, also, “seriously considering” an offer by China to relocate tens of millions of their citizens to the Chinese mainland to inhabit what are called the “ghost cities,” built for reasons still unknown and described, in part, by London’s Daily Mail News Service in their 18 December 2010 article titled: “The Ghost Towns Of China: Amazing Satellite Images Show Cities Meant To Be Home To Millions Lying Deserted” that says:
“These amazing satellite images show sprawling cities built in remote parts of China that have been left completely abandoned, sometimes years after their construction. Elaborate public buildings and open spaces are completely unused, with the exception of a few government vehicles near communist authority offices. Some estimates put the number of empty homes at as many as 64 million, with up to 20 new cities being built every year in the country's vast swathes of free
land.”
Foreign Ministry experts in this report note that should Japan accept China’s offer, the combined power of these two Asian peoples would make them the largest super-power in human history with an economy larger than that of the United States and European Union combined and able to field a combined military force of over 200 million.
ROCKEFELLER ALIGNED HIMSELF WITH CHINA DECADES AGO. HE'S DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR EVERYTHING YOU CAN'T MAKE SENSE OF.
(what did I say in my opening commentary about CORRUPT MAINSTREAM MEDIA???)
Rupert Murdoch's grip on his media empire was dramatically challenged yesterday after his company was labelled a "toxic shadow state" which launched a dirty tricks campaign against MPs and now faces a salvo of phone-hacking claims in the United States.
"Parliament was, in effect, intimidated. News International thought they could do this, that they could get away with it, that no one could touch them; and they actually did it, and it worked."
Labelling News Corp a "toxic institution", he added: "We conclude that the web of influence which News Corporation spun in Britain, which effectively bent politicians, police and many others in public life to its will, amounted to a shadow state."
NOW IMAGINE THE SAME SHADOW STATE ON A GLOBAL BASIS, WHEREBY THE ILLUMINATTI CONTROLS ALL MEDIA - BANKS - POLITICIANS - INSTITUTIONS - MARKETS AND COURTS.
MURDOCH'S BUSINESS MODEL IS ALSO THAT OF THE CROWN, THE ROTHSCHILDS AND THE ROCKEFELLERS.
THE GAME IS FULLY REVEALED - JUST THINK GLOBALLY ***
Evidence of illegal nationwide Federal Conspiracy to move against all Occupy camps simultaneously - highly fucking illegal in the former USA- which they obviously know, as evidenced by the documents they continue to hide***:
U.S. Park Police were communicating step by step, as they took action in regard to Occupy DC, with the Secret Service, DHS, and other police agencies as well as personnel affiliated with LEO.gov, the FBI's nationally integrated network and alert system involving all aspects of civilian law enforcement, intelligence agencies and the military. As its website states, "LEO supports the FBI's ten priorities by providing cost-effective, time-critical national alerts and information sharing to public safety, law enforcement, antiterrorism and intelligence agencies in support of the Global War on Terrorism."More FOIA records requested via the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund that indicate that Occupy evictions were coordinated with federal agencies.
Have you noticed that you're a "NUT" if you quote the Constitution? Do you wonder WHY this new meme has occurred by the mainstream media and politicians? Why would BOTH PARTIES consistently vote to install un-Constitutional legislation and why would the courts consistently not overturn it? It's no accident that the media labels you a "NUT', if you correctly point out that legislation is un-Constitutional. Why did BOTH parties overwhelmingly bi-partisan pass un-Constitutional laws like: NDAA, HR347, The Patriot Act, and why are they constantly passing so many laws anyway all the time?
Anybody that calls the war on terror a failure should first understand what the main objectives of the war really are.
Getting Bin Laden, destroying Al-Qaeda, and stopping the spread of international terrorist networks were all fake security objectives. Here is a short list of the war on terror's real objectives:
1. The destruction of the United States of America as a single economic and political unit, and the destruction of its Constitution.
2. The destruction of all remaining sovereign nation states.
3. The spreading of international terrorism and managed chaos in the West, which will ultimately lead to the breakdown of Western civilization and the creation of an authoritarian global government controlled by the most powerful and wealthy families, banks, and corporations.
4. The depopulation of many nations under the facade of a global war between the West and the Islamic world.
5. The expansion of the global drug trade by turning Afghanistan into a massive heroin factory, in order to fund the CIA's covert operations and shore up the Western banking system.
6. The expansion of Israel's borders and the creation of a Greater Israel.
A Collapsing Mythology: The Death of The 9/11 Myth And War on Terror Consensus: A war based on myth does not end on the battlefield, but in the mind.
Austerity for US; but give hundreds of millions of OUR dollars to ISRAEL for war-related reasons.
In this episode, Max Keiser and co-host, Stacy Herbert discuss huddles and cuddles with the Goombahs of Wall Street and the technical violations that cannot be called by name. In the second half of the show Max talks to Rolling Stone journalist, Matt Taibbi, about the Wall Street mafia, their small and big time rackets and the process of writing these crime stories for a wide audience:
Digging into 9/11 beyond what the TV and politicians said: Jeb Bush and the whole PNAC-9/11 gang back in the White House?
(don't forget: Michael Chertoff & Dov Zakheim are listed as foreign policy advisors on Mitt Romney's campaign website......who did 9/11: the guys on the left with boxcutters who live in caves and ride around on donkeys, or the TRILLIONAIRES on the right who control everything in the entire world? why would you think all these guys lied about everything...except 9/11???)
Here comes GHW's CIA with the the Jeb Bush card... allowing daddy once again to drive the bus from the back seat, just as he did when Cheney was his surrogate:
Jeb Bush: “I’d consider” the vice presidential job
LISTEN:
Bush Implicates Bush: FOIA request elicits a non-denial denial that points to a White House cover-up...
GUILTY KNOWLEDGE:
Bush Flubs it Again: Details and Confirmation of Prior Knowledge - The Theory of the Private TV Link
Andy Card on GOP: Jeb Bush the perfect candidate (starting at 7:10)
Andy Card on GOP: Jeb Bush the perfect candidate
Jeb Bush was a PNAC signatory and he signed Executive Order 01-261 September 7, 2001
JEB BUSH'S EXECUTIVE ORDER AND 9-11 (PART 1 of 2)
IRAN CONTRA INSIDER AND 9/11 INSIDER, ANDREW CARD:
Note that GHW Bush rewards his minions for their loyal service. He appointed Andrew Card, GW's Chief Liar Of Staff, as Dean of the Bush School of Government - pure payola:
Andrew Card: Acting Dean
9/11 insider Andrew Card reading a teleprompter script to rewrite history (note that this script is written in an effort to explain away GW's comments that he had seen the first plane hit the first tower - which had to have happened in his limo on closed-circuit TV)
Bush said not once, but on two separate occasions that he SAW the first plane strike the first tower ON TV prior to entering the classroom at the school - "the TV was obviously on"
You can hear him catch himself in his own lie mid-sentence...
If Bush really did see an airplane on TV hitting the World Trade Center then he saw that the aircraft was under control at the time, and he saw it before arriving at Booker Elementary because he was en route to the school when the first plane struck WTC 1 - a closed-circuit live feed to his limo is the only way he could have seen this impact on TV.
Each of us will ... remember the moment the news came -- where we were and what we were doing. [G.W. Bush, September 20, 2001]
It must also be remembered that even after Andrew Card informed Bush of the second impact, by his own admission Bush knew America was being attacked, but he continued listening to the reading skills of a classroom full of children.
Just think about that for a while.
Iran Contra:
Bush II, Iran Contra II?
Arch-conservative columnist William Buckley wrote that the leaders of the joint select committee Daniel Inouye and Warren Rudman "were determined going in not to impeach Ronald Reagan." The independent counsel Walsh also exhibited restraint in not accusing Reagan of perjury, though his report stated that "President Reagan, Vice President Bush, Regan, Meese and other senior Administration officials in November 1986 undertook to ``rearrange the record,'' as Secretary of State George P. Shultz put it in a conversation with his senior advisers, in an effort to protect the President and themselves from accusations of possible violations of law."
Buckley also wrote that "Walsh makes mincemeat of Bush's claim of being 'out of the loop' -- assisted by large helpings from Weinberger's copious, handwritten notes, the existence of which the secretary of defense vigorously denied."
HOW DID BUSH "WITNESS" THE SURPRISE ATTACK? ONLY ON CLOSED CIRCUIT TV IN HIS LIMO - WITH HIS CHIEF OF STAFF, ANDREW CARD
Bush Caught in a Lie About the WTC Attacks
Bush was in his Presidential Limousine when the first plane hit WTC 1. He has twice remarked
about how he saw the first impact on TV, but there was no live TV coverage of the impact.
Also the Principal of Booker Elementary has stated that there was no TV in either the corridor Bush came through or anywhere near the classroom he visited. This means that one of two things:
Bush is lying about how he learned of the first impact.
There was a closed-circuit TV feed, not in the school, but in his Presidential Limousine on which he received a progress report.
President Bush's 9/11 Visit To Booker Elementary The Full Story
The Booker Elementary video shows the Secret Service did not rush in to remove the President to a secure location, or at least to the safety of the armored Presidential Limousine. That's their job. That's what they do in the case of a real surprise attack with many unknowns. They don't do anything else.
But the Secret Service did nothing. The dog did not bark.
The Secret Service at Booker Elementary: The Dog That Did Not Bark
Bush’s own recollection of the first crash only complicates the picture. Less than two months after the attacks, Bush made the preposterous claim that he had watched the first attack as it happened on live television. This is the seventh different account of how Bush learned about the first crash (in his limousine, from Loewer, from Card, from Rove, from Gottesman, from Rice, from television). On December 4, 2001, Bush was asked: “How did you feel when you heard about
the terrorist attack?” Bush replied, “I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower—the TV was obviously on. And I used to fly, myself, and I said, well, there’s one terrible pilot. I said, it must have been a horrible accident. But I was whisked off there, I didn’t have much time to think about it.” [White House, 12/4/01]
There was no film footage of the first attack until at least the following day, and Bush didn’t have access to a television until 15 or so minutes later. [Washington Times, 10/7/02] The Boston Herald later noted, “Think about that. Bush’s remark implies he saw the first plane hit the tower. But we all know that video of the first plane hitting did not surface until the next day. Could Bush have meant he saw the second plane hit—which many Americans witnessed? No, because
he said that he was in the classroom when Card whispered in his ear that a second plane hit.” [Boston Herald, 10/22/02] Bush’s recollection has many precise details. Is he simply confused?
It’s doubly strange why his advisors didn’t correct him or—at the very least—stop him from repeating the same story only four weeks later. [White House, 1/5/02, CBS, 9/11/02] On January 5, 2002, Bush stated: “Well, I was sitting in a schoolhouse in Florida… and my Chief of Staff – well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on. And you know, I thought it was pilot error and I was amazed that anybody could make such a terrible mistake. And something was wrong with
the plane…” [White House, 1/5/02]
An Interesting Day: President Bush's Movements and Actions on 9/11 ***
70+ great 9/11 videos I've collected in a playlist:
*** many contributions in this post from comments by PLUNGER
Created by: MedicalBillingAndCodingCertification.net
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_tNDfjdP6gel4Zxy45RptImJfm6ToCTuWRtv79LLmvMYJNn2iiliVI0lbcIA3MXbFUnPjiRRADh0RJOyaGfratkQgNksU_VmTks6RWsJq4qekuA6YZ6xeTJA0yARqgr054S3IMD0zjhWu/s640/big+dan.jpg)
Wow, this is very good: Stewart Rhodes is great (from the Oathkeepers):
ReplyDeleteThe Injustice System in America with Stewart Rhodes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVEu_cGGHdI&feature=player_embedded
How about THIS going on: Catholic Church banning Jon Stewart:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HX3AQgZpdU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqvpRm3xcds
What???
“I think people need to be educated to the fact that marijuana is not a drug. Marijuana is a flower. God put it here…” – Willie Nelson
ReplyDeleteLook very closely at this guy's comments around the internet:
ReplyDeletehttp://disqus.com/HoaiPX/
Great Posting. The greatest danger to the Rockefeller Conspirators is all the dots connected, in context - in one place...with real names of real criminals attached.
ReplyDeleteSo what does this tell you about "the right":
ReplyDeleteALEC Begs Right Wing Bloggers For Help
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yt9GpittX4U
ANN COULTER ON FOX NEWS (you know this ain't gonna be good):
ReplyDelete‘Negroes’ need more guns because of ‘Democratic KKK’
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/04/20/coulter-negroes-need-more-guns-because-of-democratic-kkk/
The total opposite would have to be: THE BEATLES ON THE ED SULLIVAN SHOW.
ReplyDeleteYou know how the new thing in rightwing media is that Obama ate dog meat?
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, it's from a 1995 book. Why are they bringing it up now?
2nd: Islam forbids eating dog meat. Right?
Therefore, Obama isn't a "muslim".
I have to find a video of a rightwing hick's head blowing up so I can post it on occasions like this!
Washington's Blog has a lot of what I have in this post. And I didn't even go over there until just now, well after I made this post.
ReplyDeleteThis was in the last post's comments by plunger:
Pentagon Smears USA Today Reporters Investigating … Wait for It … Illegal Pentagon PropagandaPosted on April 20, 2012 by WashingtonsBlogGovernment Smears Journalists Who Investigate Government Corruption
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/04/pentagon-smears-usa-today-reporters-for-wait-for-it-investigating-illegal-pentagon-propaganda.html
BP oil spill:
“What Is Missing Is the Accountability that Comes From Real Consequences: A Criminal Prosecution that Holds Responsible the Individuals Who Gambled with the Lives of BP’s Contractors and the Ecosystem of the Gulf of Mexico”
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/04/what-is-missing-is-the-accountability-that-comes-from-real-consequences-a-criminal-prosecution-that-holds-responsible-the-individuals-who-gambled-with-the-lives-of-bps-contractors-a.html
I was GOING to put this somewhere, but from Democracy NOW! Almost their entire show on Friday was about NSA spying:
Influential Senator Warned in 1975: “Th[e National Security Agency's] Capability At Any Time Could Be Turned Around On The American People, And No American Would Have Any Privacy Left …There Would Be No Place To Hide. [If A Dictator Ever Took Over, The N.S.A.] Could Enable It To Impose Total Tyranny, And There Would Be No Way To Fight Back”
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/04/influential-senator-warned-in-1975-the-national-security-agencys-capability-at-any-time-could-be-turned-around-on-the-american-people-and-no-american-would-have-any-privacy-left.html
Palast/BP:
The Second Anniversary of BP’s Gulf Oil Spill: Nothing Has Changed
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/04/the-bp-cover-up-2-years-later.html
I have a pretty good eye for what's important, so if Washington's Blog figures the same things are important as I do, that verifies it to me! I have Washington's Blog listed as one of the 3 best news sites on the internet at the top right corner of my links.
I DO have a problem with intelligent guys like Moyers, Taibbi, & Palast being 911 truth DENIERS, though. So, what is their bag? They can expose huge things, obviously not afraid of going against the grain, obviously don't fear reprisal, HAVE outed things along the lines of 911...so what's going on with them and 911?
Moyers did Iran/Contra, so he wasn't afraid of government reprisal, popular opinion, threats, etc...Same with Taibbi & Wall St corruption, same with Palast and Big Oil and rigging elections and evote machines.
So, as I have said in that one post, OTHERWISE INTELLIGENT PEOPLE believe BULLSHIT when it comes to 911??? Why am I not buyin' that?
Those guys I mention above, either:
ReplyDelete1. believe the official story because they never examined the evidence (highly unlikely)
2. they're LYING...because:
2a. they fear for their life and/or job
2b. they're limited hangout shills
2c. they're STUPID (highly unlikely in light of the other intelligent reporting they've done)
So, which is it?
Alex Jones: GREG, WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THE MOST OBVIOUS BULLSHIT STORY OF ALL TIME? JUST WONDERIN'......
ReplyDelete(he really didn't ask him that, but here's Palast on Alex Jones show very recently)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpeBNdZYVVU&feature=player_embedded
The International Translation Team of AE911Truth Speaks Out
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcDRb7MGBgg
Case Against Intellectual Property
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6_ZqPcNemI
I FURTHER said that THEY should have to STOP YOU from downloading, if they don't want you to download anything. The onus is on THEM, and anything that I can download is free game. THEY should have to spend money to stop you, although you should be able to anyway for what Adam says, including it's moral to share ideas and not hoard them. But even if they DIDN'T want you to download something, THEY should figure out a way to stop you, and if they CAN'T, that's THEIR problem. No one should be thrown in jail for it!
ReplyDeleteFor example: I'm in my own house downloading something. I'm not breaking into THEIR building and stealing something. I think I can sit in MY OWN LIVING ROOM and if I can download something, THEY should have to figure out a way to stop me. They save $$$ by not figuring out this way to stop you, and instead throwing you in jail.
Take this other example: what if I put a box of steaks in YOUR yard, and said YOU couldn't touch them. It's ENTRAPMENT to boot! Right? Or what if you put your steaks in MY freezer and said, "Now don't you dare touch them!!!"
It's MY computer, I'm in MY house, how dare they tell ME what I can and can't download? They should have to try and stop me, and if they can't, tough luck for them. But they have the GOVERNMENT step in to stop me!
I used to hate Cheryl Crow crusading against downloading. (Brian Eno was FOR downloading, btw...) She'd say things like I'M NOT GETTING ANYTHING FOR MY SONG. That implies she's writing a song not because she's an artist, but strictly to make money. And it shows in her music. She STINKS!
Have you heard about this Russian punk band "PUSSY RIOT", they have charges against them for "blasphemy" or something like that, sounds like the U.S. with the Occupiers:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRu3r4xoSKo&feature=related
Check out the Ron Paul in Philadelphia videos being uploaded. My friend was there today with Adam Kokesh and Danny Panzella:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=videos&search_query=ron+paul+philadelphia&search_sort=video_date_uploaded
He said there was 4,300 hard core Ron Paul fans IN THE DRIVING COLD RAIN! Mitt Romney was just up here in Tunkhannock on a beautiful sunny day and couldn't get 100 "fans".
I bet this Ron Paul driving rain thing isn't in the "news" at all.
$60??? Where did they get a DEAL like THAT??? Sixty bucks???
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EucvuMc2pP8
Here's the pimp who set them up with those DISCOUNT PRICES:
ReplyDeleteJoe "DOLLAR TREE WHORES" Pimp -
http://static1.consumerist.com/images/resources/2007/04/usedcarsalesman.jpg
Not covered by the media yesterday in Philadelphia:
ReplyDeleteIt was a nasty day as far as the weather was concerned, but that didn't stop 4,300 Patriots from joining together for an awesome rally. Tatiana Moroz, Jordan Page, Michael Scheuer, Mike Folmer, Mike Doherty, and another I can't remember were all awesome to listen to...what a great day!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vu3s_JEIkiA
RON PAUL 4,300+ in Philly 4/22/12
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBVLuCunn4E
Epic! Adam Kokesh Shows Us What "Real Money" Is
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIW8hHx5poc
My friend Anthony Antonello on WILK our local radio station:
ReplyDeleteInterviewed by WILK about the Delegate Process
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orQI5HzSh84&context=C41d2e2cADvjVQa1PpcFN6dRCOUci2OQMNIIOY7vJNmTGrwxDGRTc=
My OTHER friend from Vegas on WILK while he was at a stopover at my house on the way to Ground Zero:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NP9HdU959rY
The TOR PROJECT: project to stop the government from spying on you on your computer.........MUST SEE!!!
ReplyDelete(Bush's TOTAL INFORMATION AWARENESS is talked about)
http://www.democracynow.org/2012/4/23/more_secrets_on_growing_state_surveillance
Former Israeli officials in the U.S. government
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvDHaJiDUek&feature=player_embedded
Zionist Scumbag-Michael Chertoff Gets Pounded With 9/11 Questions
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgXCsTaQ-2Q
"It's a Trick, We Always Use It." (calling people "anti-Semitic")
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgXCsTaQ-2Q
"Those coloreds...they love them guns." LOL!!!
ReplyDeleteIs this dirtbag still living in the US? Or did he go home to the "motherland."
ReplyDeleteScientists on Fukushima: we are in BIG TROUBLE.
ReplyDeletehttp://theintelhub.com/2012/04/22/fukushima-is-falling-apart-are-you-ready/
9/11 Airplane Affidavit By John Lear, Son Of Learjet Inventor
ReplyDeletehttp://www.pakalertpress.com/2012/03/27/911-airplane-affidavit-by-john-lear-son-of-learjet-inventor/
E. The piece of alleged external fuselage containing 3 or 4 window cutouts is inconsistent with an airplane that hit 14 inch steel box columns, placed 39 inches in center, at over 500 mph. This
ReplyDelete4
fuselage section would be telescopically crumpled had it actually penetrated the building as depicted in the CNN video. It is impossible for it to have then re-emerged from the building and then fallen intact and unburned as depicted.
10. No Boeing 767 airliner(s) exceeded 500 mph in level flight at approximately 1000 feet on 9/11 as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors because they are incapable of such speeds at low altitude.
ReplyDelete2nd crash:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gySS-us_DQk
I FULLY believe that's not what a plane hitting the WTC should look like.
ReplyDeleteHe's an "advisor" on the Romney campaign website.
ReplyDeleteIf you take a hollow cylinder and fill it with concrete - is that what it would have looked like? It's not a hallow cylinder - it filled with fuel - completely filled with fuel. It would not crumple on impact, it would do what it did.
ReplyDeleteNot a passenger plane - a reinforced fuel tanker.
ReplyDeleteDon't let the distraction team recruit you.
ReplyDeleteThe cylinder was not hallow. It was not filled with air and seats. It was filled as a solid fuel bomb. There is no way a filled full tanker would crumple. Physically impossible
ReplyDeleteConfirmed: Feds Coordinating Brutal Crackdown on Occupy Protests
ReplyDeleteNewly-Released Documents Confirm that the Department of Homeland Security and Other Federal Agencies Coordinated Violent Crackdown on Protesters
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/04/confirmed-feds-coordinating-brutal-crackdown-on-occupy-protests.html
Ron Paul’s Minnesota delegate blowout prompts Romney ‘panic,’ says Paul adviser
ReplyDeleteMinnesota will send 40 delegates to the Republican National Convention. Twenty of the 24 delegates based on congressional districts were awarded to Texas Rep. Ron Paul in selection processes that concluded this weekend.Thirteen Minnesota delegates will be allocated based on the results of a statewide convention in May, according to Paul campaign senior adviser Doug Wead.Wead wrote on his blog that GOP presidential front-runner Mitt Romney is an a “panic” after the Paul landslide. Similar efforts to bolster the Texas congressman’s delegate count are underway in Iowa, Colorado, Maine and other states.“[A] number of Romney Hawks are now deeply concerned that Ron Paul has already laid the groundwork for similar success in six more caucus states,” Wead wrote.Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul declined to comment on the record about whether or not Romney is indeed in a panic.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/23/ron-pauls-minnesota-delegate-blowout-prompts-romney-panic-says-paul-adviser/#ixzz1sz4Pdk23
911 widow questions why MSNBC host silenced her
ReplyDeletehttp://www.stewwebb.com/911_widow_questions_why_msnbc_host_silenced_her.htm
http://www.stewwebb.com/breaking_news.htm
Bush Addresses the U.N. - tells the world no 911 discussions
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K5M0xtxQVQ
9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious Eutectic Steel
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw&feature=player_embedded
I just heard on the radio, Mitt Romney is SOOOOOOOOOOOOO liberal, he needs to pick a VP that is ULTRA-CONSERVATIVE to offset how liberal he is!
ReplyDeleteLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I just realized, I hear this EVERY ELECTION by Republicans. Remember "THE MAVERICK" McCain who "goes against his own party"? Does this sound familiar every election? How about GW Bush: the "COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATIVE"!!!
WE INVENTED THE PAIN RAY TO SAVE LIVES! INSTEAD OF SHOOTING PROTESTERS, WE SAVE THEIR LIVES BY SHOOTING THEM WITH THE "PAIN RAY":
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=UL99K_EE3uA
Right Wing Billionaires Push Israel's Agenda in 2012 Elections
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Z3eLAR4KltM
My son loves this Marc Maron podcast, check it out:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.wtfpod.com/podcast/episodes/episode_269_-_david_cross
Josh Blakeney:
ReplyDeleteNorth Americans dumbed down by government putting fluoride in drinking water
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/235141.html
Scott Walker hopes you won't notice he repealed Wisconsin's equal pay law
ReplyDeletehttp://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/06/1081265/-Scott-Walker-hopes-you-won-t-notice-he-repealed-Wisconsin-s-equal-pay-law?detail=hide
My friend Anthony Antonello just won an election, being a delegate!
ReplyDeleteI THINK RON PAUL JUST WON IOWA & MINNESOTA - Rachel Maddow
ReplyDeletehttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#47151825
Ron Paul Winning: MSM Decides its Safe to Announce Delegate Wins
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5T6yP6ySSO0
Once again, as usual, "liberal media bias" claims has NO FACTS backing it, but somehow gets traction:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTpdLFrWiFc
Rush Limbaugh's JIHAD against his advertisers continues:
ReplyDeleteSandra Fluke Responds To Rush Limbaugh's Latest Personal Attackhttp://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201204250001
OK...BUT...a point I have is: IS THE VIDEO DOCTORED ANYWAY? It looks doctored to me. Does it to you? Let's say it's a drone tanker, which I still believe (as I stated above). Don't you think the footage is doctored ANYWAY? They wouldn't want CLEAR footage of exactly what happened. That's my main point.
ReplyDeletebtw, I made a separate post out of your Judy Wood's analysis, and I've been posting it under threads on the 9/11 truth movement about Judy Wood:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bigdanblogger.blogspot.com/2011/05/dr-judy-woods-911-work-analysis-by.html
Was Extra Equipment Attached To Flight 175? (The plane that struck the south Twin Tower on 9/11)
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huK0MAb0Xa4&feature=related
That came out effed up, I'll fix it.
ReplyDeleteDan Spak
ReplyDeleteWhy do you keep saying my question is a NO PLANES question?
The question is: IS THE FOOTAGE DOCTORED?
4 hours agoCharlie Cox
I said Sept. Clues + No-planes = start your own group!!!
4 hours agoDan Spak
UNDER the thread, which I ask the question: WAS THE FOOTAGE FAKE, ALTHOUGH IT WAS A DRONE.
I say EXPLICITLY: I believe a drone hit the WTC...but is the footage fake anyway?
It is NOT a NO PLANES theory or question.
but YOU keep saying "NO PLANES", not ME
I also wonder why, after about a year of great contributions to the site, I am SWIFTLY BANNED in like ONE SECOND for asking "is the footage fake"?
that is VERY SUSPICIOUS to me
and to a LOT of other people
4 hours agoCharlie Cox
Sorry we do not do TV Fakery either to be more clear. Any other problems take them up with KenDoc.
3 hours agoDan Spak
So we ASSUME all videos are not fake?
is that what you are saying?
3 hours agoCharlie Cox
Have a nice day, as I can see you already have your mind made up, but I suggest you go with the evidence and not grainy TV images of the day!
3 hours agoDan Spak
exactly my point: the footage is grainy
I am very disenchanted with all of this.
I am now suspicious of both YOU and Ken Doc, and I just told Ken that. And you MAY AS WELL ban me now from this site.
3 hours agoCharlie Cox
Already did.
NO JEW BASHING - Ken Doc
ReplyDeleteWAS THE WTC FOOTAGE OF THE PLANE HITTING THE 2ND TOWER DOCTORED IN ANY WAY? = 5 ALARM EMERGENCY AT 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT SITE ON FACEBOOK
ReplyDeleteI had some conversations with some knowledgeable people, and asking "where did the footage come from?" and "is it doctored?" always causes a HUGE EMERGENCY. Ken Doc and Charlie Cox are both from Toronto, Canada btw...
ReplyDeleteMy vote for stupidest thing of all time: the "NEXT BLOG" button at the top of all blog. As if you're going to hit "NEXT BLOG" and just start reading the next blogs on blogger.
ReplyDeleteDan - you have to admit - that's how a troll would begin to steer a conversation away from the truth and toward a no-planes theory. I agree with their position. I've seen hundreds of examples of a troll purporting to ask a benign question as a prelude to a conversation that they subsequently direct into a rabbit hole of BS. Every time you ask if "the footage" is doctored - it's a non-starter. There is no such thing as "the footage." Dozens of cameras captured the impact of the second plane - so there is dozens of footage to chose from, therefor your question is non-specific and appears to be troll-like. I personally don't understand what you are seeing in the footage that I cannot see.
ReplyDeleteVeгy shоrtlу this ωeb sitе wіll bе famouѕ among аll blοg peoplе, due to іt's nice articles or reviews
ReplyDeleteHere is my blog post just click the up coming internet page
With dοzеnѕ οf radiο apps for i -
ReplyDeleteРhone avаilable in i - Tunes, therе is аn apρ fοr evеry categoгy of
music lover to love. Many people will be happy with reρlaceablе battеries for home use and
occasional оutings. Even if yοu havе
a gooԁ two way radіо, it іsn't bad to have some kind of receive only radio to get information on.
Take a look at my site wikislon.net
And then, you'll probably see that the battery's charge won't be as durable as before. If you don't want to use Safari to navigate to pages, zoom in, and read articles, Byline may be just the app for you.
ReplyDeleteMobile computing is continuously getting better with best performance, smarter processors, light weight and handy designs, but as we all know,
the main power of the mobile computing device (weather it is laptop,
mobile, PDA or e-book reader) resides in it's battery capacity.
Look at my blog http://inforaise.net/activity/p/414017/
Wіth ԁοzens of гadіo
ReplyDeleteapps for i - Phone аνаilable in i - Tunes, thеre is
an apρ for еνery category of music lover tο lovе.
Anοtheг thing you'll need is some strength to endure, because there'ѕ a good chаnce you'll be your own producer for the show or perhaps the best producer the show has. This not only allows listeners to listen to their favorite MP3 files along with their SIRIUS radio; it also lets them digitally record their favorite radio songs for instant playback.
my weblog ... related website