A false flag operation is simply an action in which the perpetrator intends for the blame (or credit) to be placed on a different party. The term originally comes from the naval concept of flying another country’s flag to deceive and confuse other ships. Here we are concerned mostly with false flag terrorism—terror by states, organizations, and agencies which is meant to be pinned on others in order to influence policy, public opinion, or military aggression.
"THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS A 'LONE GUNMAN'"
The Narrative the Global Media want us to believe: that one man singlehandedly devised and executed this hellish massacre of more than 85 defenseless teenagers – most of whom were ethnically Norwegian -- the same class he has allegedly vowed to protect from ethnic dilution -- for the sole purpose of punishing the Labor Party responsible for allowing Muslims into Norway.
From the get-go, I said it's impossible for ONE guy to shoot 85 people. Now, stories are surfacing that eyewitnesses say there was more than one shooter, so I may have been correct:
Acting police chief in Norway: "Some of the witness statements from the island (shootings) have made us unsure of whether there was one or more shooters."
VG of Oslo: “Several” Eyewitnesses Say there were Two Shooters on the Island
Witnesses Suggest Second Shooter Involved in Norway Youth Camp Rampage
Once again, as in all major "terror" attacks, the government happened to be conducting a similar "exercise" beforehand.
First of all, don't EVER believe ANY "terror" stories on major network "news", including scandal-ridden Rupert Murdoch's FOX "news". Expect this story to keep changing, btw, like the Osama Bin Laden "he had a gun, no he didn't, he used his wives as a human shield, no he didn't, etc...) We'll start with the "news" coverage of two U.S. propaganda networks: CBS & AP
(CBS) Police: Norway suspect a right-wing extremist
Odd things so far in this AP article that came out Sunday:
- ONE gunman shooting ONE gun shot 85 people (that seems impossible to me), yet only 7 people died from the MASSIVE BOMBS. Didn't they hide, or at least say, "He's going to kill us anyway, let's rush him!"???
- ONE guy, supposedly the same guy, planted all those bombs acting alone AND in a separate event shot 85 people somewhere else.
- An "anonymous Norweigan policemen" referred to the bombings as "Oklahoma City like". Sounds like it WASN'T a Norweigan police officer who said that! And that's why it's anonymous! Why would a Norweigan policeman use a U.S. bombing from over 25 years ago to refer to? And why would he care that they NOT publish his name, just for saying it was like Oklahoma City? Unless it WASN'T a Norweigan policeman.
- Police took 90 minutes to get to the scene (isn't that abnormally long? for this biggest "terror" act in the history of Norway? Do they take a WEEK to reach the scene of a lesser crime? Or a MONTH?).
- Police said they couldn't get a helicopter, yet there's TV footage of the shooter...FROM A HELICOPTER! So some JACKASS "news" crew had a helicopter, but they didn't! That's hard to believe.
- he "rented a farm" where he had 10,000lbs of fertilizer (like Oklahoma City?) - did you ever hear of someone ever "renting a farm"? I never did in my life.
- the word "Muslim" has got to be in the article...even though "Muslims" had nothing to do with it!!! There is 100% chance the word "Muslim" or "Al Qaeda" is in ANY "terror" article, even if a WHITE NON-MUSLIM GUY DID IT!
- his lawyer says "there's some things I don't want to talk about right now" - what is it his lawyer doesn't want to talk about? why would his lawyer say that?
- why was he dressed like a policeman? were there other policemen there? if he was the only (fake) policeman, why didn't someone say, "what are you doing here?"?. If there were other policemen there, why didn't they ask him, "Who are you? We don't recognize you"? Why even dress like a fake policeman, was that even necessary? Did he have a gun in plain site while dressed like a policeman, or was it hidden? Hidden on him, or somewhere on the island? Who took a fake policeman with a gun out to the island? The island was hard to get to, according to police who couldn't get there for 90 minutes.
Here's the AP article that contains all that:
AP: Norway suspect terrorized island for 90 minutes
First and foremost, ask yourself if the U.S. and/or Israel was behind it...or USrael. Also, it is possible this was an "event" to take the Murdoch scandal out of the "news" or to avoid reporting the "SUPER CONGRESS" (see the end of this post). One thing for sure: the global media is purposely ignoring the abundance of available reasons one country in particular has for being behind this bombing: Israel. NO OTHER COUNTRY IS CLOSE TO HAVING AS MANY REASONS!
Isn't it TRUE that the mainstream media is ZIONIST-CONTROLLED, when you see the reporting on the Norway "terrorism"? Right off the bat, they did the usual "blame the Muslims" and ignored the fact that Israel has ALL THE MOTIVES to be behind it?
Possible motivations for Israel being behind it and blaming someone else:
Norway is an odd choice as a Muslim terror target, but NOT an odd false flag terror target for the Israeli Mossad:
- Norway has endorsed Palestinian statehood.
- Norway has excluded Isareli investments.
- Norway’s 450 billion euro oil-riches fund has excluded two Israeli firms involved in developing settlements ... on ethical grounds, Norway’s finance ministry said on Monday.
- Senator Lieberman (I-Israel) has accused Norway of promoting anti-semitism
- Norway has also announced its plan to withdraw from the Libyan war
- The summer camp where the shootings took place had just concluded a pro-Palestinian rally the day before
Norwegian Labor Party Youth Movement (AUF) Demands that Ariel Sharon and Other Israeli Leaders be put on Trial.
Left-wing Norwegian parliamentarians to join 'Freedom Flotilla 2 - Stay Human' Gaza voyage
Norwegian lawmaker under fire for denying the Holocaust
The Vice President of the Parliament of Norway will join the next convoy of Hamas-supporters.
Israel: Norway inciting against us: Foreign Ministry says Norwegian authorities funding anti-Israel film, exhibition, and play. Norway: We support freedom of expression
Norway wanted out of Libya
Was the Norway massacre a reaction to the boycott Israel campaign?
Possible Israeli Connection to Oslo Attacks.
Media Blames Al-Qaeda Knowing Pro-Israeli Extremists Conducted Oslo Attacks
Israel attacked Norway: Media trying to create a new "terror" front besides "the Muslims": rightwing Christians or "White Al Qaeda" -
The media lied when it blamed Muslims for the terror attack in Norway (or if you prefer to be generous, they simply got it wrong.) Like the little boy that cried "wolf", we live with a media that cries "Muslim" at every opportunity. In this one case, the deception or mistake was exposed, but we need to ask just how often the media has been deceptive or wrong about terror attacks in the past. It is well known that in Israel, bombings which are actually turf wars between organized crime factions are automatically assigned to Palestinians for political reasons. Where else has the media lied, or been in error? - Mike Rivero:
Moments after the explosion that, as of Saturday night, left seven dead, pundits and analysts alike had PURPOSELY or WRONGLY assigned blame to al-Qaeda or an al-Qaeda-like group (a close approximation will do, one can suppose).
"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information." -- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring and its connections to 9-11.
INTERPRET THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE, it gives every reason in the world to blame Israel for the Norway attack...but attempts to "blame the Muslims":
Norway, which has a sordid history of feeding the anti-Semitic, anti-Israel beast, woke up this morning to the shock of the Islamist beast feeding on Norwegian blood.
It points out every motive for the attacks...and leads directly back to the accuser.
Does it get any more obvious? they point out every reason in the world for Israel to have attacked them, and for radical Islam not to have done so.
Did Israel create a PROGRAMMED anti-Muslim patsy to put the "right wing christian fundamentalists" in the "terrorist" category?
"It wasn't like he was thinking - he was just shooting"
Who is the suspect in the Norway attacks?
How come all the articles say a FAKE policeman did the shootings and "a suspect" was arrested? Was the suspect the FAKE policeman? Why don't they say? If this guy WASN'T the FAKE policeman, who is he and where is the FAKE policeman? (note: I have since seen on TV "news" CBS finally that this guy was the FAKE policeman) There was one witness directly at the base of a rock the FAKE policeman was standing on, so close she could "hear him breathing". There were witnesses all around, hiding behind rocks, trees, in the water, behind buildings, etc... Didn't THEY see what happened to the FAKE policeman?
Why? Why do all the articles say a FAKE policeman started shooting people...but then say "a suspect" was arrested? Was the "suspect the FAKE policeman???
Don't assume that the shooter also built the bomb(s) with timers to coincide with his actions miles away on an island. This points to a staged and coordinated attack with military precision - requiring technical capabilities and surveillance capabilities known to exist in organizations such as Mossad. If you program an individual to go to an island and start shooting, that's all you need to make it appear that he was responsible for the entire event including bombs with timers. He may have done the entire thing, or not. Will the truth be known, or a story invented for public consumption?
John Hinkley, Timothy McVeigh and Lee Harvey Oswald come to mind.
Both a Freemason and a Christian Fundamentalist? Was he a Zionist as well? YUP!
The gunman from Norway is a Freemason
NORWAY: SOCIALIST LEFT PARTY TO VOTE ON MOTION CALLING FOR BOMBING ISRAEL IF IT ACTS AGAINST HAMAS IN GAZA
Was this a Mossad Operation?
What was the connection of the island killing to the Oslo bombings?
What was the connection to the anti-terror drill being conducted on the same day?
Racist + Islamophobic News Manipulation by the BNP
Pictures of the SWAT Team storming the island - and claims of a shootout - yet apparently the suspect was not injured, and was taken under arrest - though no one can figure out how to write that down:
Ironically - this seems to be the best coverage:
Alex Jones: exclusive interview with an eyewitness to the Norway "terrorism":
FACT: you are 8x more likely to die from a policeman than a "terrorist".
Norweigan Wood (The Bird Has Flown)
Here's Rupert Murdoch's attempt to tug at your heat strings to get his scandal out of the news:
That above political cartoon is supposed to imply that we should be worrying about IMPORTANT things like people starving in Somalia.
Now that IS important, that's the thing. But how come Murdoch never reports on people starving in Somalia, then? But we SHOULD report on it......when the Murdoch trial is going on, though...Murdoch wishes.
Why didn't Murdoch run that exact same cartoon, while the Casey Anthony thing was going on, where that mother Casey Anthony didn't report her kid missing?
The cartoon would be the SAME - a Somalian starving to death - but instead of the caption saying, "I'VE HAD A BELLY FULL OF PHONE HACKING", it would say, "I'VE HAD A BELLY FULL OF CASEY ANTHONY", right?
Everything you want to know about the Rupert Murdoch scandal.
(special thanks to plunger for contributions to this post)
(and btw...while you were watching this, they proposed the invention of an unConstitutional "SUPER CONGRESS" in the United States! Which could bypass the congress to strip popular social programs such as social security! From the article: A Super Congress would be less accountable than the system that exists today, and would find it easier to strip the public of popular benefits." I will either add SUPER CONGRESS to this post, or that's my next post. In the meantime, read about "SUPER CONGRESS" HERE and HERE and here and HERE)
See my post: The Debt Ceiling Charade
If you're a billionaire or even a millionaire, please click on the $5000 PayPal donation bill below and donate $5000 to Big Dan's Big Blog:
ATTENTION ATTENTION - ORDER A GREAT JOHN NIEMS CD at www.johnniems.com and you get FREE 9/11 DVD and other TRUTH DVD'S! ORDER TODAY as the rapture may come again soon! YOU NEVER KNOW WHEN THE BIG CHEESE IS COMING!
btw, someone told me the Spain train bombings were 911 days after 9/11, is that true?
ReplyDeleteEvidence of Murdoch's bribery inside the US. How else can you construe his acquisition of companies in the midst of suing him, with what is obviously a demonstrably true case of corporate espionage?
ReplyDeleteWhen you buy out the company suing you - you are in effect paying to silence the individuals who can prove your criminality in court.
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/43847056/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/madrid.asp
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Madrid_train_bombings
ReplyDeleteSomeone on FB(I) said:
ReplyDeleteTracy Blevins The
weapon destroyed so much, I don't see why you say it can't have
produced squibs. Get over thermite. The paper did not burn and the
people did not burn. You can never forget that the paper didn't burn. It
might not be an energy weapon, but you can't go on saying it was
thermite.
So 9/11 happening on "911" (famous emergency number) was a coincidence...and then the Spain bombings happening 911 days afterwards was a coincidence. Right? How many coincidences?
ReplyDeleteThat always puzzled me, the way no one ever mentions the number "911" and the date 9/11. The emergency phone number "911".
ReplyDeleteThis is possibly Tracy Blevins blog:
ReplyDeletehttp://wtcdust.blogspot.com/
Here's what they're pushing: Norway's "openness" and multi-culturalism caused the "terrorism":
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2VaS54zJVE
Next up: free health care, free education in Norway causes terrorism!!!
Alex Jones on Norway bombing:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZXcGqllpYc
Oslo eyewitness calls Alex Jones:
ReplyDeletepart 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-BhqrBiix0
part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akbjlbwwAZ8
July 22, 2011
ReplyDeleteDaily Mail reports: Fortunately, it is a public holiday in Norway and the offices are less busy than a normal weekday.
Why
would "terrorists," who presumably want to kill as many people as
possible, choose to bomb the building on a day when they know it will be
almost empty?
Comment from a reader:
I'm from Norway and here are some little reported facts:
1)
Fact: A person dressed as a cop has shot and killed at least 5 members
of the youth organization of the governing labour party in their
convention at Utøya. He is now captured.
Comment: Falske cops?
These are professionals. The shootings happened at the same time as the
explosion, but far, far away from each other (several houres + you have
to take a boat to get to the island).
2) Fact: The explosion took
place downdtown in the height of the holliday, with all the surrounding
buildings (many important press, union and governmental buildings,
including the labour party) being almost empty. At a normal day
thousands would have been killed and wounded. Today, only a handful dead
and wounded.
Comment: Why would terrorists choose a timing with
less impact? Now, if this is a black-operation in order to influence
opinion, it makes sense.
3) Fact: My friend's father is a
dynamiter blaster expert by profession. He has worked with explosions
for 35 years. He noticed that the ground was raised so that the
armouring which had been below the ground now lay above the ground. For
this to happen the explosion have had to happen UNDER the ground, like
if a gas tube had exploded (there was road/sewer work in the exact area
for several days prior to this). When the ground is raised like this, as
was apparant on the news, it can not have been a car bomb like the
media speculates. People have been smelling sulphur all over downtown.
Comment: Who had the resources to get access underground? Not the fundamentalist simpleton, to be sure.
4) Fact: After less than one hour the police concluded that it was a "bomb".
Comment:
How can they have determined this so quickly? There has been complete
chaos, people are evacuated and even corpses was not removed within an
hour. How could they determine this so quickly? How could they rule out
an accident in the gas pipes? This smells fishy.
"terror with less impact" by a terrorist?
ReplyDeleteRemember the 4 "Boeings" were at abnormally low capacity?
Who you callin' "no one?"
ReplyDeleteKarl Rove is the single most destructive force in the US Government...the enabler of the entire evil scheme...THE ARCHITECT.
The
scheme includes 9/11 as the essential pretext. "9/11" ... how clever,
Karl! Only someone with American sensibilities would select the number
we have all memorized to call in the event of life threatening emergency
as the date for this evil....
KARL ROVE.
http://plungerspeaks.blogspot.com/2006/09/fake-news.html
That was posted September 8, 2006 - though written well prior to that date
ReplyDeleteThe end of the Snopes article on 911 that you posted above says it all..."If we believe al-Qaeda's responsible for everything, then once we've vanquished them we can feel safe again. But having to confront the possibility that attacks like the bombings in Madrid might continue even if al-Qaeda were wiped out is very scary indeed."Be afraid...Be very afraid!
ReplyDeleteIsrael: Norway inciting against us
ReplyDeleteForeign
Ministry says Norwegian authorities funding anti-Israel film,
exhibition, and play. Norway: We support freedom of expression
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3984621,00.html
Danny Jowenko, one of the first demolition experts to speak out that the WTC was an inside job, killed in car accident:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.prisonplanet.com/expert-who-concluded-wtc-7-was-a-controlled-demolition-killed-in-car-accident.html
I put "special thanks for contributions to this post by plunger". I couldn't find a font small enough not to see, so as it is, you can see that but you need special software to see it.
ReplyDeleteLOL
ReplyDeleteAnother in a long line of small plane and car crashes...
ReplyDeleteWhat choo talkin' bout???????????
ReplyDeleteCanada clamps down on criticism of Israel
ReplyDeleteIn an affront to free speech, Canadian committee declares that criticism of Israel should be considered anti-Semitic.
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/07/20117206368409551.html
it has focused a disproportionate amount of effort and resources on what
ReplyDeleteit calls a so-called "new anti-Semitism": criticism of Israel.
As in : "New Speak"
Straight out of the Orwell playbook.
Speaking of New Speak,: the term "Jewish State" itself represents the rebranding of a country - 20% of which is inhabited by non-Jews. "Jewish State" is akin to an advertising slogan or PR campaign. It's cynical and purposeful. In this context, those funded by US taxpayer dollars are attempting to position an entire country as 100% above the law. This concerted and directed conspiracy - designed to enact similar "hate speech" laws in other countries worldwide (branding those who criticize the policies of a country as law breakers - subject to arrest), is in fact designed to position this NATION as separate and above the entire world in terms of its ability to do literally anything it chooses...ANYTHING, without recourse or discussion.
ReplyDeleteWelcome to the END OF DISCUSSION.
THAT is how dangerous this nation is to the entire concept of freedom.
There was an article in my paper today:
ReplyDelete- The Norway killer shot 85 people (THAT, my friends, is impossible)
- "anonymous" policeman said it was an "Oklahoma like bombing" (so a Norway official referred to an Oklahoma bombing???)
- 7 people were killed by the MASSIVE BOMBS, but ONE guy with ONE gun shot 85 people???
U N C O N S T I T U T I O N A L
ReplyDeleteThe true AGENDA is now revealed - kiss the US Constitution goodbye - thanks to crisis of their own creation:
'Super Congress': Debt Ceiling Negotiators Aim To Create New Legislative Body
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/23/super-congress-debt-ceiling_n_907887.html?icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl1|sec1_lnk2|80603
WASHINGTON -- Debt ceiling negotiators think they've hit on a
solution to address the debt ceiling impasse and the public's
unwillingness to let go of benefits such as Medicare and Social Security
that have been earned over a lifetime of work: Create a new Congress.
This "Super Congress," composed of members of both chambers and both
parties, isn't mentioned anywhere in the Constitution, but would be
granted extraordinary new powers. Under a plan put forth by Senate
Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and his counterpart Majority
Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), legislation to lift the debt ceiling would
be accompanied by the creation of a 12-member panel made up of 12
lawmakers -- six from each chamber and six from each party.
Legislation approved by the Super Congress -- which some on Capitol
Hill are calling the "super committee" -- would then be fast-tracked
through both chambers, where it couldn't be amended by simple, regular
lawmakers, who'd have the ability only to cast an up or down vote. With
the weight of both leaderships behind it, a product originated by the
Super Congress would have a strong chance of moving through the little
Congress and quickly becoming law. A Super Congress would be less
accountable than the system that exists today, and would find it easier
to strip the public of popular benefits. Negotiators are currently
considering cutting the mortgage deduction and tax credits for
retirement savings, for instance, extremely popular policies that would
be difficult to slice up using the traditional legislative process.
The timing of the false flag terror event in Norway serves to keep a CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS IN THE UNITED STATES - out of the headlines.
ReplyDeleteBy Monday, the United States Constitution may well be abolished under "emergency measures," and the majority of the US public wouldn't even be aware of it.
How many died in Columbine when those kids has automatic weapons and the victims were in an enclosed school?
ReplyDeleteIs this suspicious: police took 90 minutes to get to the biggest "terrorist" attack in the history of Norway!
ReplyDeleteThis should be the headline:"FALSE FLAG "TERRORISM" in Norway: ONE gunman with ONE gun shot 85 people...THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE!!!!!!!"
ReplyDeleteIs the Financial Crisis Leading to a Constitutional Crisis?
ReplyDeleteThe framers of the United States Constitution were not oblivious to
the importance of the law of contracts, and incorporated it into the
14th Amendment. Section 4 of Article 14th of the U.S. Constitution
reads:
The validity of the public debt
of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for
payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing
insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
But
over the past few weeks, the President and multiple Congressional
leaders have questioned whether the United States might in fact default
on some of its public debt obligations if a debt ceiling deal isn't
reached in time.
And what of the myriad of Congressional leaders who have indicated
that it might be okay for the United States to default on some of its
obligations for just a little while? Are those statements tantamount to a
violation of Article 14th of the Constitution?The answer to that
question centers on the legal definition of the word “validity” in the
Constitution. If “validity” only means “legal enforceability,”
But in the context of a public debt obligation, the term “validity”
takes on a more nuanced legal meaning. In Perry v. United States, 294
U.S. 330 (1935), the Supreme Court ruled that Section 4 of Article 14th
of the Constitution prevents Congress from voiding any provision of a
United States government bond after the bond has been issued. But the
Supreme Court went well beyond that, and pointed out that the very
purpose of Section 4 of Article 14th is not simply to defend the legal
enforceability of U.S. public debt obligations, but to ensure the
“punctilious fulfillment” of the debt contract. Put simply, the Supreme
Court held that under the 14th Amendment, “validity” doesn't simply mean
"you can enforce the terms of the bond if it doesn't get paid on time
or in full"; it means something like, “it actually will get
paid on time and in full.” And that is what the 14th Amendment strictly
forbids any member of the federal government from questioning.
Any actual steps the Congress takes (or fails to take) to foment an
actual default by the United States on its obligations certainly seems
within the scope of the Perry case, and certainly appears to amount to a
violation of the Constitution.
The main issue here is that even the simple fact that such an outcome is
within the realm of possibility points to a broader risk that the rule
of law is weaker than anyone expected. And if that is in fact the case,
then the value of every single asset that trades on any exchange on
Earth is much lower than we think
http://seekingalpha.com/article/280137-is-the-financial-crisis-leading-to-a-constitutional-crisis
So, who is positioned on the short side of the trade - knowing that Congress is intentionally about to violate the US Constitution and blow up the market - causing interest rates to blow sky high - to the delight of the banksters - who will be enriched not by lending at higher rates (they're done lending), but by not lending at all - while earning vastly more on the loans previously made (entrapment) and the interest already owed them - on the "money" given to them for free - thanks to US Taxpayers and the theft of their money from the US Treasury by the FED (Rothschilds/Crown/Rockefellers, etc.)?
Notice the willful and intentional elimination of "THE RULE OF LAW" for the oligarchs, banksters, and Israel?
ReplyDeleteI think this qualifies as "luke-warm thanks." "Special" is a vast overreach.
ReplyDeleteNote that the ONLY place this story broke is on Huffington Post (Aol)
ReplyDeleteNow how can that be? Search "Super Congress" on google news. How did Ryan Grim receive this information when no one else did?
http://theintelhub.com/2011/07/23/super-congress-congress-may-attempt-to-create-legislative-body-as-rumors-of-super-congress-begin/
The plan, reportedly put forth by Mitch McConnell and Majority Leader
Harry Reid, would create a new government body with six members from
each party and would be used to pass unpopular debt ceiling legislation.
This plan would essentially create a national high council of
liberal and conservative elites who could completely circumvent
Congress!
What would stop Congress from using this new governing body to pass other even more unpopular laws and regulations?
As of the writing of this article(11:35pm PST) no other mainstream news is directly reporting this 100% illegal plan.
With that being said, as an independent journalist I honestly do not
believe that The Huffington Post would stoop so low as to make something
this serious up.
Actually - the island is tiny, and they had to assemble a SWAT Team and arrive by boat.
ReplyDeleteIf the guy brought plenty of extra clips, and he was the only one on the island with a gun, the body count is quite plausible considering how much time he had.
What is 100% implausible is that he acted alone with respect to the bombings in Oslo - which emanated from underground.
From the article linked above:
ReplyDeleteIf this plan is actually in the works it may be a direct psy-op to
incite the American people into open revolution.(Which would have
disastrous implications)
It is important that we gather all the facts regarding this situation
in order to find out if it is actually happening and if it is, who is
and isn’t supporting the creation of a completely new, unconstitutional
legislative body.
http://theintelhub.com/2011/07/24/%E2%80%9Cwhite-alqaeda%E2%80%9D-targeted-as-western-governments-turn-terror-apparatus-inward/
ReplyDelete“White al-Qaeda” Targeted As Western Governments Turn Terror Apparatus Inward
Before the crash of 2008 the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defense foresaw a middle class revolution in its 2007 DCDC Global Strategic Trends report. “The middle classes could become a revolutionary class…,” the report states.
“The growing gap between themselves and a small number of highly
visible super-rich individuals might fuel disillusion with meritocracy,
while the growing urban under-classes are likely to pose an increasing
threat to social order and stability, as the burden of acquired debt and
the failure of pension provision begins to bite.”
In November of 2008 the United States Army War College released the report Known Unknowns: Unconventional “Strategic Shocks” in Defense Strategy Development. The report identifies economic collapse as a reason for the defense establishment to conduct domestic operations.
The geopolitical ramifications of this event will pan out in the next week as the government codifies its official narrative.
Oslo False Flag: Now Everyone’s A Suspect!
ReplyDeletehttp://theintelhub.com/2011/07/23/oslo-false-flag-now-everyones-a-suspect/
Without being too melodramatic, it seems to me that Israel is at
war with the world. Not just with Islam, but with Europe and America
too. But Israel is the one that is starting all the fights and killing
innocent people. It is clear that Israel is suffering from a collective
psychosis. This fact has been stated by other people as well.
The
Israeli people have been brainwashed by the criminal Israeli state into
thinking they are the greatest victims of the world. I feel for them.
This is a tragic situation because the Israeli people are victims, but
they are victims of their own government, not of Islamic terrorism or
the racist outside world.
If you criticise
Israel in any way you automatically get called racist and anti-Semitic,
and if you're a country that criticizes Israel then you get bombed. This
is madness. Yesterday, innocent Norwegians were killed.
Can
we all agree on the fact that Zionist terrorists are not nice people?
Can we all agree on the fact that the people of Israel and the people of
the world are being misled and deceived by the madmen who control the
Israeli government? Can we all agree on the fact that violence is not
the answer to political problems?http://www.opednews.com/Diary/Mossad-Was-Behind-2011-Osl-by-Saman-Mohammadi-110723-218.html?show=votes
NORWAY + ISRAEL = Unfavourable Relations
With the devestating attacks that have rocked Norway's Oslo and the peacefull little Utoya, a tiny holiday island ..
Firstly we must give our thoughts and prayers to those who are suffering..
Then we turn our minds to those who would have the MEANS and THE MOTIVE and PAST FORM, to carry out such a DECEPTIVE ATTACK.
http://thirteenthmonkey.blogspot.com/2011/07/norway-isreal-unfavourable-relations.html
http://my.firedoglake.com/teddysanfran/2011/07/23/shock-doctrine-next-phase-the-super-congress/
ReplyDeleteShock Doctrine, Next Phase: The Super Congress!
Stripping the people’s elected representatives of their
constitutional right to legislate is a crucial step in ensuring that
messy democratic principles no longer interfere in the upward escalator
of wealth.
This is nothing new, of course: when Caesar crossed the Rubicon he effectively implemented imperium
within Rome, something previously prohibited for generals serving in
the territories and provinces ruled by the imperium but outside Rome. A
general ‘crossing the Rubicon’ was seen to be subverting the people’s
elected representatives with military might under his command. It
hadn’t happened until Caesar did it.
But things were going so badly in Rome on January 10th, 49BC! No one
remembers exactly what was going quite so wrong, anymore; we only
remember that representative Roman democracy ended that day.
Only one question remains for our current Old Congress: will they
flee in fear and with their dignity intact as the people’s
representatives, as did Pompey and the elected Roman pro-consuls and
Senators? Because it seems, observers, that if Ryan Grim’s Super
Congress reporting is true, ālea iacta est : the die is cast.
Who Holds Most of America’s Debt ? Hint…it ain’t China.
ReplyDeletehttp://my.firedoglake.com/cmaukonen/2011/07/23/who-holds-most-of-americas-debt-hint-it-aint-china/
Imagine the size of Rove's ego, knowing that he is truly the master of your perceived reality. "We're History's Actors"
ReplyDeleteLiterally EVERYTHING that you read in the news is known in advance by Karl Rove. His connection to Murdoch and GHW is the evidence that he is THE reality creation architect.
That quote of his to Suskind was the bragging of a guy who is trapped in his own reality - whereby he truly is the most masterful strategist of our time, and can't take credit for it publicly.
Reality-based community is an informal term in the United
States. In the fall of 2004, the phrase "proud member of the
reality-based community" was first used to suggest the commentator's
opinions are based more on observation
than on faith, assumption, or ideology. The term has been defined as
people who "believe that solutions emerge from judicious study of
discernible reality." Some commentators have gone as far as to suggest
that there is an overarching conflict in society between the
reality-based community and the "faith-based community" as a whole. It can be seen as an example of political framing.
The source of the term is a quotation in an October 17, 2004, The New York Times Magazine article by writer Ron Suskind, quoting an unnamed aide to George W. Bush (later attributed to Karl Rove[1]):
The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the
reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that
solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." ...
"That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued.
"We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And
while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act
again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's
how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you,
will be left to just study what we do."[2]
Culling the herd - to David Rockefeller's great delight...
ReplyDeletehttp://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/07/23/276728/states-cut-programs-heatwave/
Your a machine Danno, nice post.
ReplyDeleteThanks! ;-)
ReplyDeleteBut how can people just stand around while he's shooting? No one said, "Hey, he's going to kill us anyway, let's rush him"?
ReplyDeleteDressed as a policeman:
1. Why did he dress as a policeman?
2. Were there other policemen there?
3. If there were other policemen there, why didn't they ask him who he was, that they didn't recognize him?
4. If there weren't policemen there, why didn't anyone walk up to him and ask, "What are you doing here?"
5. Where did he get the fake police uniform or dress?
Actually I rented a farm years ago back in Wisconsin. I had the 2 story four bedroom house, the barn and 10 acres to call my own. The owner grew corn and alfalfa on the other 140 acres. The house was built in 1850 and the barn shortly after. No bolts or spikes in the barn - all pinioned joints in the main framing. held together with wooden dowels. The only nails were the ones holding the siding on. That was in the early 1970's. The rent was $65 per month.
ReplyDeleteIm just staying true to the rules of the Blog Plunger. No credit where credit is due rule number 1!
ReplyDeleteLOL!!!
ReplyDeleteWord!
I wrote this in 2009, it's pretty funny, I was going to write a song called:
ReplyDelete"The Battery's Dead In My Head" (I AM a musician, you know!):
I turned on my A/C with my TV clicker.
I turned on my TV with my telephone.
I brought my IPOD to work cuz I thought it was my cellphone.
The battery’s dead in my head.
There’s 30 remotes in my living room,
I’m not sure what they all are for.
But I turned on my PC,
To watch my TV.
The battery’s dead in my head.
I was drinking a cup of coffee, and now it’s gone.
I answered the phone with a clicker of mine.
We have a dozen scissors, ‘n I can’t find a one.
My cup ‘o coffee’s M-I-A,
I’m lookin’ fer muh keys all day,
The battery’s dead in muh head.
Maybe I’m gittin’ old,
Maybe it’s just stress,
But the battery’s dead in muh head.
Oh, the battery’s dead in my head.
The battery’s dead in my head.
Before too long, I’ll forget this song
Oh, the battery’s dead in my head.
The last line: "Before too long, I'll forget this song".............AND I DID FORGET IT! I just found it looking for something else just now!
ReplyDeleteWar by Deception Director's Cut (911 and Iraq lies from the same cabal)
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d33-Lk5Zbw&feature=share
CIA Funding and Manipulation of the U.S. News Media
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=i8_FckHV3T8
Mossad Was Behind 2011 Oslo Attacks
ReplyDelete“By way of deception, thou shall do war."http://disquietreservations.blogspot.com/2011/07/mossad-was-behind-2011-oslo-attacks.html
Three held in Norway 'al-Qaeda bomb plot'
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10554523
Norway is an odd choice as a Muslim terror target:- Norway has endorsed Palestinian statehood. See this, this and this- Norway has excluded Isareli investments. As Haaertz reported last year:-
ReplyDeleteNorway’s 450 billion euro oil-riches fund has excluded two
Israeli firms involved in developing settlements ... on ethical grounds,
Norway’s finance ministry said on Monday.- Indeed, Senator Lieberman has accused Norway of promoting anti-semitism- Norway has also announced its plan to withdraw from the Libyan war- The summer camp where the shootings took place had just concluded a pro-Palestinian rally the day beforehttp://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/07/terrorist-bomb-attack-in-oslo-norway.html
Viet Dinh, chief architect of the USA Patriot Act; assistant to Michael Chertoff, on board of Murdoch's News Corp:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1531392
There's an internet rumor that the Norway shooter spent 2 months in St Elmo MN last year, possible connection with Michele Bachmann.
ReplyDeleteThere are reports the Norway shooter visited a Christian
ReplyDeletecounseling center in the US state of Minnesota last year called Bachmann
& Associates in Lake Elmo. What is VERY interesting is that this
'resort' center is owned by SENATOR MICHELE BACHMANN's HUSBAND and claims to turn gay people straight!
MISSING POLICE GUARD ON ISLAND WAS SHOT AND KILLED DURING ATTACK (can we get an English translation for this???)
ReplyDeletehttp://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/oslobomben/artikkel.php?artid=10080712
A police guard had been due to be on the Norwegian island where a gunman
ReplyDeletemassacred at least 86 people but detectives do not know where he was,
they have revealed.
http://www.iwradio.co.uk/news/world/norway-suspect-confesses-to-twin-attacks-16036361/
The Narrative the Global Media want us to believe: that one man singlehandedly devised and executed this hellish massacre of more than 85 defenseless teenagers – most of whom were ethnically Norwegian -- the same class he has allegedly vowed to protect from ethnic dilution -- for the sole purpose of punishing the Labor Party responsible for allowing Muslims into Norway.
ReplyDeletehttp://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/blog/qrswave/norway-we-will-not-be-naive-watershed-moment
NO! I actually gave plunger some (miniscule microscopic) credit! Somewhere!
ReplyDeleteAs we all know, I have a rule that I get to steal anything I want if the victim doesn't claim credit within 24 hours.
A side rule to that is: even if the victim claims credit within 24 hours AND I DON'T HAPPEN TO SEE IT, it has the same result: STOLEN WITH NO CREDIT!!! You have to prove I saw it within 24 hours.
ReplyDeleteEven after right-wing pro-Israeli extremists have been arrested for the
ReplyDeleteOslo, Norway terror attacks the corporate media still runs stories
blaming Al-Qaeda which is a lie that originated from the CIA.
Mind you, both Mussolini and Hitler ran a war-time economy
ReplyDeleteinside their corporate fascist states- all too familiar to the
structures of leading ‘democratic’ western super states.
http://21stcenturywire.com/2011/07/24/falling-false-flags-the-norway-massacre/
"Some of the witness statements from the island (shootings) have made us unsure of whether there was one or more shooters." - acting police chief in Norway:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.iwradio.co.uk/news/world/norway-suspect-confesses-to-twin-attacks-16036361/
Hey, is THAT one HUGE, or what? That's what I've been saying: I don't believe ONE guy shot 85 people!!!
ReplyDeleteIsrael has attacked Norway
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPLxdRPUr2M&feature=player_embedded
Thought: the media is quickly comparing the Norway shooting/bombing to Oklahoma City - another known false flag!!! That's your proof right there that this is a false flag!
ReplyDeleteevidence of suspicious activities at the World Trade Center
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3p7LylOk424&feature=share
On FB(I):
ReplyDeleteKurt Richard Haskell spent my day furthering my plans to exit stage right out of the U.S.
He's the guy who saw the agents with the underwear bomber.
ReplyDeleteKurt Richard Haskell Kenny,
ReplyDeleteit is impossible to know exactly when the SHTF. What I do know is that
it is for sure going to happen. I pay very close attention to the
economy and global events and it is obvious that time is getting short.
In my opinion, World War 3 is very near and will start with a major
false flag terrorist attack in the U.S. I suspect that at least 100k
will die and this event will be used to take away the few rights
Americans still have left. It is obvious that a distraction such as this
will be needed. It will be necessary to distract Americans from the
irreparable economy (and the politicians that caused it) and to continue
outrageous Department of Defense spending during a time of fiscal
crisis. We are preparing to leave on a moment's notice, but are hoping
to have 2- 2 1/2 years left. In any event, we will not be stuck in the
U.S. when things go down and we won't be stuck holding worthless
dollars.
Kurt Richard Haskell This
ReplyDeletecountry in its current state is finished. It has become increasingy
obvious to me over the last few days as I follow the discussions
regarding the debt ceiling. Neither party will even consider any
reasonable plan whatsoever to balance the budget and pay down the
national debt. Both parties will only consider raising the debt ceiling
and/or tying it to modest cuts that don't pay the debt down. Because of
this, the devaluation of the dollar will continue indefinitely.
Further, any talk of cuts only concerns medicare and social security.
These discussions should be off of the table as the funding for these
programs was stolen by your representatives instead of locked away.
Hello, where are the cuts to foreign aid, closing our 120 overseas
military bases, stopping illegal wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and
ending needless government agencies like the TSA? This country is so far
gone it is pathetic. Everybody, please make plans to take care of
yourself because the end will come without much notice. Also, don't hold
dollars because their value is going to continue to drop until our
government takes this issue seriously. With or without a false falg
terrorist attack, this country is finished.
Norway Terror Attacks a False Flag: More Than One Shooter on Island;
ReplyDeleteOslo Police Drilled Bomb Blasts; Was It NATO’s Revenge for Norway’s
Decision to Stop Bombing Libya?
http://tarpley.net/2011/07/24/norway-terror-attacks-a-false-flag/
In the Norwegian case, the evidence that Breivik was not alone in
ReplyDeleteclaiming his fearful toll of victims is clear and convincing. Here are
some excerpts from a report published by the Oslo newspaper VG:
“Several of the youths who were at the Utøya the shooting
drama, told VG that they are convinced that there must have been more
than one perpetrator. Marius Helander Røset believes the same thing: – I
am sure that there was shooting from two different places on the island
at the same time, he said.
Witnesses: – There were two people
Police believe Anders Behring Breivik (32) is the perpetrator who was
dressed as a policeman , and have charged him for two terrorist
attacks. Young people interviewed by VG describe an additional
perpetrator – who was not wearing a police uniform. The person was
following them around was 180 centimeters tall, had thick dark hair and a
Nordic appearance. He had a pistol in his right hand and a rifle on his
back. – I believe that there were two people who were shooting, says
Alexander Stavdal (23)….
At the press conference Saturday morning opened the police said that
there could have been several perpetrators and emphasized that there is
an ongoing investigation.”2
Fox News Op-Ed Says Nuclear Power Safe, Proven by Fukushima
ReplyDelete"Fukushima has affirmed that nuclear is the safest form of power in existence."
"...it is extremely unlikely that the radiation levels will be high
enough to cause radiation sickness or cancer--and radiation in modest
quantities is a normal, perfectly healthy feature of life."
"The Fukushima nuclear plants, with their incredible resilience, almost certainly saved many, many lives."http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/07/23/nuclear-power-is-extremely-safe-thats-truth-about-what-learned-from-japan/
Personally, anyone could have shot that many people himself with enough ammo. The island is so small you can circumnavigate it on foot in ten minutes. There was no where to hide - for the victims, or for any second shooter who would have been hunted down by the Swat Team. I would assume there were two - despite eyewitness accounts - all of whom were totally panicked. It's not logical that a second shooter would not have been apprehended or killed. Just my take.
ReplyDeleteMeant to say "I would NOT assume" above
ReplyDeleteWhere's my keys?
ReplyDeleteIf there was a guard on the island, dressing as a policemen would "disarm" the guard, allowing the shooter to gain his confidence prior to shooting him first.
ReplyDeleteThe author is Alex Epstien - a paid corporate shill in the footsteps of Ayn Rand
ReplyDeleteAlex Epstein Archive
http://www.foxnews.com/archive/author/alex-epstein/index.html
Alex Epstein is a fellow at the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights
http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=media_AlexEpstein
http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=about_arc
https://www.facebook.com/thepursuitofenergy#!/thepursuitofenergy?sk=wall
Article not found
ReplyDeleteFrom that article:
ReplyDelete"In the confusion, no one was sure, but the possibility is real, given
the implausibility that one person killed over 90 people singlehanded."
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/146056
ReplyDeleteAnother site that pointed to the Mossad, and which Atzmon quoted, was the American Veterans Today,
which is fervently anti-Israel. The website carried a post that said
the “car bombing carries the signature of an intelligence agency. Nobody
else bothers with such things.”
Atzmon cautioned, “I am not in a position at present to firmly point a
finger at Israel... but assembling the information together, and
considering all possibilities may suggest that Anders Behring Breivik
might indeed, have been a Sabbath Goy."
“Within its Judaic mundane-societal context, the Sabbath Goy is
simply there to accomplish some minor tasks the Jews cannot undertake
during the Sabbath. But within the Zion-ised reality we tragically
enough live in, the Sabbath Goy kills for the Jewish state. He may even
do it voluntarily.”
He continued his own logic linking the Mossad with the murders by
relying on talkbacks in a Hebrew article, where some readers allegedly
praised Breivik and one stated, “It's stupidity and evil not to desire
death for those who call to boycott Israel."
Atzmon’s concluded, “The full facts of the Norwegian tragedy are, as
yet, unknown, but the message should by now be transparently and
urgently clear to all of us: Western intelligence agencies must
immediately crackdown on Israeli and Zionist operators in our midst,
and regarding the terrible events of the weekend, it must be made
absolutely clear who it was that spread such hate and promoted such
terror, and for what exact reasons.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shabbos_goy
In certain households and synagogues
a particular non-Jew (invariably not a member of the home/synagogue)
may be designated as the Shabbos goy for that place. This individual is
usually one who would be present regardless of this role, such as a
babysitter or a synagogue maintenance crew member, and is typically paid
for the work. Before the 20th century Shabbos goys most commonly lit
(or re-lit) stoves in Jewish homes in the winter. In the 20th century, Colin Powell, Mario Cuomo, Martin Scorsese, and the adolescent Elvis Presley assisted their Jewish neighbors in this way
United
States Presidents
and The Illuminati / Masonic Power Structurehttp://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/uspresidentasmasonspt4.htm
BECK, HAGEE: FALSE PROPHETS FOR ISRAEL
ReplyDeleteBy Rev. Ted Pike
25 July 11
The Guardian reports
that during a dinner with British Prime Minister Tony Blair in 2002
Rupert Murdoch said “he didn’t see what the Palestinian’s problem was.”
Yet his son James (now head of Murdoch’s News Corp.) replied it was
because “they were kicked out of their f---ing homes and had nowhere to
f---ing live.”
Amid Murdoch scandal, Israel backers worry about muting of pro-Israel media voice
http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/07/18/3088599/pro-israel-leaders-watch-warily-as-murdoch-defends-empire
James
Murdoch’s speech reveals a spiritually darkened soul. Yet his mind was
capable of clearly understanding the thorn that has made the Mideast
bleed: the 1948 expulsion by Israel of 800,000 Palestinians into
concentration camps.
Last
week 5,000 evangelicals gathered in Washington D.C. at the Christians
United for Israel (CUFI) conference to agree with televised Prime
Minister Netanyahu who said, “When you support Israel, you don’t have
to choose between your interests and your values; you get both.” He
encouraged the attendees to think of Israel as “indistinguishable” from
America. Also, Haaretz says:
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/christian-zionists-unite-in-d-c-to-express-support-for-israel-1.374161
“News
commentator Glenn Beck worked the audience into a frenzy, decrying the
historical persecution of Jews, insisting that Israel cannot cede
control over territories it controls, and calling upon the conference
attendees to declare that they, too, are Jewish… Beck repeated a
refrain that Netanyahu had introduced earlier, appealing to audience
members to self-identify as Israelis and Jews themselves. He exhorted,
"When we see Israelis not as part of us, but as us, we can move to the
next level as human beings," adding, "Let us declare 'I am a Jew,' they
cannot kill all of us."
I see that - I just don't find it implausible at all that you could hit 100 targets over a two hour period.
ReplyDeleteBut then again, if the police were "in on it", then it WOULD be plausible a 2nd shooter got away. Don't forget the absurd unexplainable 90 minute police response to the biggest terrorism in the history of Norway, reminiscent of the non-response to the "Boeings" on 9/11, the "stand down" and non-compliance to NORAD protocol.
ReplyDeleteNow how can a brand new article be "not found" already???
ReplyDeleteJewish leaders said that Murdoch’s view of Israel’s dealings with the
ReplyDeletePalestinians and with its Arab neighbors seemed both knowledgeable and
sensitive to the Jewish state’s self-perception as beleaguered and
isolated.
“My own perspective is simple: We live in a world where there is an
ongoing war against the Jews,” Murdoch said last October at an
Anti-Defamation League dinner in his honor. “When Americans think of
anti-Semitism, we tend to think of the vulgar caricatures and attacks of
the first part of the 20th century. Now it seems that the most virulent
strains come from the left. Often this new anti-Semitism dresses itself
up as legitimate disagreement with Israel."
FLIPPING THAT AROUND:
Legitimate disagreement with Israel ALWAYS is dressed
up as new anti-Semitism .
Right in your hand!!!
ReplyDeleteI can't tell you how many times I've looked for things, and I've had them in my hand. I've actually had my keys in my hand and said to my wife, "Where are my keys?" "Right in your hand!"
Once, and I posted this before, I was looking for a hoody jacket with my wife. We were looking all over for it for a long time. I took off the hoody jacket I had on AND UNDER IT I WAS WEARING THE HOODY JACKET I WAS LOOKING FOR!!!!!!!!!!
FINALLY! plunger admits there were TWO SHOOTERS! THANK YOU!!!
ReplyDeleteMOO HOO HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
ReplyDeleteSUPPRESSED DETAILS OF CRIMINAL INSIDER TRADINGLEAD DIRECTLY INTO THE
ReplyDeleteCIA'S HIGHEST RANKS
CIA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR "BUZZY" KRONGARDMANAGED FIRM THAT HANDLED "PUT" OPTIONS
ON UAL
by Michael C. Ruppert
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/illegaltades.html
Well I don't find it NOT implausible! Wait a second...I don't even know what I just said!!!!!
ReplyDeleteHere's another good question no one's asking about the Norway thing:
ReplyDeleteWhen he was dressed as a policeman, was his gun in plain view and no one questioned him having a gun because they thought it was normal for a policeman to have a gun?
If he DIDN'T have a gun in plain view, where was the gun hidden- where did he get the gun?
Yeah - Krongard = "Dancing Israelis" in the stupid category - blatantly obvious advance knowledge of the attacks in both cases.
ReplyDeleteWhen two people are being chased by a bear, you needn't outrun the bear, just the other person being chased along side you. I suspect each individual was doing their damndest not to draw his attention, while running/swimming for their lives.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't conflate the bombing with the shooting where logistics are concerned. Look how remote that Island is, and think where the nearest SWAT Team is located. Think about getting them suited-up, to a boat - and across a body of water to the island. Could you do it more quickly? Really? This is not anywhere near the city.
ReplyDeleteBy wearing a trusted police uniform, he was able to draw his victims to him to make them easy targets. Necessary? No. Effective? VERY!
You are a geek.
ReplyDelete"We didn't do it" - by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu
ReplyDeleteI wonder, if there was nowhere to hide, if anyone hid behind a dead body?
ReplyDeleteAssuming the bear would stop, if he caught the first guy, that's logical. But if the bear had a gun, the distance from the bear or the amount of people running wouldn't matter. And of course, I know a bear can't shoot a gun, you know what I mean.
Breaking Story:
ReplyDeleteThe Second Tragedy is the Lies
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
(another one of those far out coincidences like the Spain bombings being exactly 911 days after 9/11, btw)
“The attack in Oslo also came 65 years to the very day after the
Israeli Irgun blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem”…Eileen Fleming
Remembering my manners and
putting aside cheap journalism for humanity, the staff at Veterans Today
offers its condolences and best to the families of the dead and the
people of Norway. Every life is precious.
To those who profit from such things, the talking heads filling our
TV screens with wild and self serving conjecture, Mr. Bolton, I am
talking about you in particular, I wish you my absolute worst. As it
turns out, the killer’s political views and maniacal rhetoric are
identical to yours.
There have been so many of “you” out there, running your fat little
mouths that we and our relatively unlimited resources are going to be
taking a long hard look. We are now suspicious as hell.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/23/norway-notes/
TWO of Britain’s leading former police officers
ReplyDeleteare wanted for questioning over allegations that they withheld crucial
evidence about the car crash which killed Princess Diana.
A French judge wants to ask ex-Yard chief Lord
Condon and Sir David Veness why they failed to disclose the existence of
a note in which she predicted her assassination.
They
could face international arrest warrants as suspects should they refuse
to attend interviews in Paris, sources close to the investigation
indicated last night.
The
note, taken by Diana’s lawyer Lord Mishcon, was handed to the officers a
few months after the 1997 Paris tunnel crash which also claimed the
lives of Diana’s boyfriend Dodi Fayed, son of tycoon Mohamed Al Fayed,
and the pair’s chauffeur Henri Paul.
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/260394/Princess-Diana-police-face-arrest-
Pentagon To Deploy 20,000 Troops In CONUS For Civil Unrest – Possible Threats To Populace
ReplyDeletehttp://theintelhub.com/2011/07/24/20000-troops-to-deploy-in-conus-for-civil-unrest-possible-threats/
Did Murdoch's son create an enemy in Netanyahu? Did he become a target to be removed, and that effort just went too far?
ReplyDeleteFrom the article above:
The question now circulating in pro-Israel circles is whether the empire’s pro-Israel stance will survive Murdoch.
“Is this curtains for pro-Israel Murdoch?” the London Jewish Chronicle asked in a column last week.
An account of a clash over Israel between Murdoch and his son and
heir apparent was first published in the diaries of Labour Party
publicist Alastair Campbell and has splashed through pro- and
anti-Israel blogs in recent days.
Campbell, in an account republished last week in The Guardian, which
has led the coverage of the phone-hacking charges, described a dinner at
10 Downing St., the British prime minister’s residence, in 2002, when
Tony Blair -- also seen as pro-Israel -- was its occupant.
“Murdoch said he didn't see what the Palestinians' problem was and
James said it was that they were kicked out of their f---ing homes and
had nowhere to f---ing live,” the account in The Guardian said. Murdoch
chided his son for using foul language in the prime minister’s home.
Liebler said that from what he understood, the incident was an
anomaly and one that emerged during one of the most intense periods of
Israeli-Palestinian clashes.
“He's had differences with his son on many issues, and this happened
once and it went off the map,” Liebler said. “I don't think it was
anything fundamental.”
I said at the time they sent our NATIONAL Guard to Iraq that they were literally being sent there to be destroyed - so as to ensure that they would not be available to stand up against a new military force positioned here at home to implement martial law.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/07/24/3088679/norway-killer-espoused-new-right-wing-pro-israel-philosophy
ReplyDeleteNorway killer espoused right-wing philosophy claiming to be Zionist
By Toby Axelrod · July 24, 2011
BERLIN (JTA) -- The confessed perpetrator in the attack
in Norway that killed as many as 98 people espoused a right-wing
philosophy against Islam that also purports to be pro-Zionist.
Anders Behring Breivik is charged with detonating a car bomb outside
Oslo’s government headquarters, which houses the office of Norwegian
Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, and of shooting and killing at least 85
mostly young people at a political summer camp on nearby Utoya Island.
The July 22 massacre reportedly was the the worst attack in Norway
since the end of World War II.
In numerous online postings, including a manifesto published on the
day of the attacks, Breivik promoted the Vienna School or Crusader
Nationalism philosophy, a mishmash of anti-modern principles that also
calls for "the deportation of all Muslims from Europe" as well as from
"the West Bank and the Gaza Strip."
According to the manifesto, titled "2083: A European Declaration of
Independence" and published under the pseudonym Andrew Berwick, the
Vienna School supports "pro-Zionism/Israeli nationalism."
Criticism of the police response grew on Monday as survivors from Utøya
ReplyDeletetold of their wait for help. Police swat teams took an hour to get to
Utøya after the first alert was issued, hampered in part by a lack of
helicopters. It emerged that a boat heading for Utøya had to turn back
after it began to take on water due to its heavy load of police officers
and equipment.
No recent stories on the death of Hoare. Probably just a coincidence, right?
ReplyDeleteLOL!!! NIce song BTW. Reminds me of when I lost my pouch that I carried wirenuts etc at work. It was a cheap cloth bag I would tie around my waste Me and the guy I was working with looked all over for it. When break time came he took his pouch off and mine was underneath!! He was wearing to pouches! Needless to say he heard about it for a while.
ReplyDeleteScotland Yard seizes all the evidence...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/260750/Dead-newsman-s-computer-seized
Cover-up? http://www.presstv.com/detail/190531.html
FB: it looks like Sibel Edmonds on boiling frogs is going to go heavy into 9/11, and she's getting slack for it:
ReplyDeleteSibel Edmonds:
For
those who have been sending me angry messages and spitting out
'conspiracy theorist' labels today due to my latest post: 'It ain't
gonna work.' Starting on August 10, until Sep 11, BFP will be covering
9/11 & Wars related topics and interview guests. The tactic you are
using may work for little mise and MSM-tied cowards, but won't work
here. Bye.
Wouldn't you love to know what makes up this "20,000"? Are the "private" army? Exactly what is it?
ReplyDeleteYET............there was news footage of the shooting on TV........FROM A HELICOPTER!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteIsn't that reminiscent of when Ann Coulter was on FOX "news" saying, "Radiation is GOOD for you"! Remember that?
ReplyDeleteAnn Coulter Says Radiation Is Good For You
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXFUUGeV1DI
Watch that, first of all don't laugh when you see the FOX logo, I laugh out loud. Then, think of how the zealots watch it. Watch it as a rightwing zealot would watch it. Try and think what they're thinking. It's scary. They're thinking, "She makes sense! She's quoting scientists!"
ReplyDeleteOH MY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I need to wash my brain!!!
Holy shit! You can clearly see (best ever!) the bombs going off floor by floor:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ma13I76Sb10
I'm out of my MIND after seeing that video! It's so clear! Play it over and over!
ReplyDeleteSomething just struck me: I believe there's a crystal clear video of what hit the 2nd tower that hasn't surfaced yet. Think of all the cameras trained on the towers after the first hit. There has to be a crystal clear video of the 2nd hit.
ReplyDeleteThe first hit and the Pentagon could be explainable there not being an amateur crystal clear video, because both of them were a "surprise" at least to the average amateur. But the 2nd hit of the twin towers, there had to be many amateur cameras trained on the towers at the time of the 2nd hit. Where are those videos?
Check this guy's youtube channel out with enhanced videos of the WTC buildings falling, it's great:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/user/Xenomorph911WTC#p/u/11/p99IeIKSqnM
This one's good: the top of one of them begins to
ReplyDeletetip, but instead of it continuing to tip, it starts going straight down
because the part below the tipping part that WASN'T HIT BY A PLANE
begins to disintegrate below it, so the tipping part has nothing below
it so it goes straight down:http://youtu.be/ZysjM2uBa6w
That would be flak, not slack!
ReplyDeleteDefinition of FLAK
1
: antiaircraft guns 2
: the bursting shells fired from flak 3
also flack : criticism, opposition
How come no one thought of this:
ReplyDeleteNORWEIGAN WOOD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3cUejOltsA
Glenn Beck clearly exposes Israel's motive. He is also clearly on the HASBARA payroll. His job seems to be to promote Zionism and anti-Semitism simultaneously (which - believe it or not - aligns perfectly with Likud's victimization strategy):
ReplyDeletehttp://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2011/07/glenn-beck-hits-a-new-low-compares-norway-victims-to-hitler-youth.html
This may be a dumb question, but who took a fake policeman with a gun out to a hard-to-get-to island which police couldn't get to for 90 minutes?
ReplyDelete"I'm out of my MIND"
ReplyDeleteBig Dan
For a Non-Suspicious blogger, you sure seem suspicious.
ReplyDeleteMATTHEWS: Okay, in ten days you want to change the United States Constitution by two-thirds vote in both houses? That’s what you’re demanding.
ReplyDeleteLEE: Yes. If possible we can’t change the Constitution just in Congress but we can submit it to the states. Let the states fight it out.
MATTHEWS: And you think you’re being reasonable by saying you want a
two-thirds vote in the House, which is Republican, and in the Senate
which is Democrat. You want the Democratic Senate, by a two-thirds vote, to pass a constitutional amendment or you want the house to come down?
LEE: Yes. That’s exactly what I’m saying and I’ve been saying this for six months.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2011/07/25/278811/lee-admits-he-is-an-extortionist/
Here ya go:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUT7yup-YIg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XELamUnF0EU&feature=related
ReplyDeleteCenk Uygur: “I Gotta Tell People The Truth! Which Is That the Democrats & the Republicans Are Here To SCREW YOU!”
ReplyDeletehttp://my.firedoglake.com/metamars/2011/07/25/cenk-uyghur-i-gotta-tell-people-the-truth-which-is-that-the-democrats-the-republicans-are-here-to-screw-you/
That's not clear. That's purposely not clear. That's my point. In my opinion, that is purposely made not clear.
ReplyDeleteThat isn't clear either, on purpose. How can the buildings be fuzzy gray boxes?
ReplyDeleteThe hiring of Cenk in the first place was a classic example of "keep your friends close and your enemies closer."
ReplyDeleteThey saw a voice of the people gaining a following and sought to own him to control him.
THEY are the oligarchs, whom in this case includes the owners of Comcast, the Roberts family.
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/07/21/uygur/index.html
Barack Obama is gutting the core principles of the Democratic party
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/jul/21/barack-obama-social-security-cuts
Aaaaaaaaaaah! Now CENK can speak freely!
ReplyDeleteCENK should join Olbermann, and then get Ratigan all over to Current TV, wouldn't that frost their asses??????????
ReplyDeleteGuarantee Ratigan's days are numbered, unless he has pictures of ownership with sheep.
ReplyDeleteDude - it's likely a low-res hand held amateur camera - not panning with the object that enters the frame at something like 400 mph - then the entire thing is compressed to suit the youtube format. It's not going to be "clear" on youtube, regardless.
ReplyDeleteThe image you linked to that you think it ought to look like is shot by a professional, panning with the subject - full frame, with a high quality telephoto lens. There are few things I'm and expert on - this happens to be one of them. It is physically impossible for a jet entering a stationary video camera frame to look "sharp" - when compared to a high-res still photo where the lens and the plane are panning at the same rate of speed.
ReplyDeleteEver see this:
ReplyDelete9-11 crash victim Barbara Olson arrested in Europehttp://web.archive.org/web/20060829130120/http://www.tomflocco.com/fs/OlsenArrested.htmRemember, the term "boxcutters" as in "the hijackers used boxcutters" came from only ONE SOURCE: Ted Olson (bush's lawyer) saying his wife CNN reporter Barbara Olson said she called him on a cell phone from one of the "boeings" and said the hijackers had "boxcutters" That is the ONLY source of "boxcutter": a call that was proven in court never to have been made.
Flocco has a tendency to make stuff up - me thinks.
ReplyDeleteyour link is not working - I tried taking the period out of the middle of "you.tube" but it still gets a 404 - not found message
ReplyDeleteI do know the video you are probably talking about. It defies the laws of physics. Once the top starts rotating it should continue to do so, instead it disinigrates into the falling mass of what is below it. That chunk of building should have fallen off to the side landing in one big piece. That did not happen.
ReplyDeleteI got that impression several years ago when numerous things he posted did not pan out or to which I could find no other supporting evidence. I stopped wasting my time at his place back then.
ReplyDeleteutario esna putra to me show details 8:41 AM (9 hours ago) Big
ReplyDeleteDan, I appreciate your work. Especially for murdoch and norwegian case.
you elaborated all possibilities to unveil what lies beneath. peace be
upon with you brother. We pray for your health and safety. Let people
know the truth! - Indonesia
So that's a big thanks to EVERYONE who gives me tips on this blog and on facebook, it's a team effort as far as I'm concerned!
And yet they call MSNBC the "FOX news of the left". Do you see FOX "news" firing Bill O'Reilly? Firing Sean Hannity? Bill Kristol?
ReplyDeleteYeah, I thought that too about Flocco.
ReplyDeleteOH! I forgots tuh tell ya:
ReplyDeletethey caught on to that we know about the "Super Congress"...
...so they're referring to it as "The Blue Ribbon" team or "the subcommittee". Did you notice that?
They should call it "Team 6".
ReplyDeleteINTENTIONAL INCOMPETENCE IS ALWAYS AT THE HEART OF THE CIA'S AGENDA
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/26/fast-and-furious-gun-atf_n_910383.html
7000 Calif. prisoners' hunger strike to end their torture, a historical event (with ZERO mainstream media coverage btw)
ReplyDeletehttp://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/calif-prison-mass-hunger-strike?CID=examiner_alerts_article
From BAE to Iran-Contra, 9/11 & Beyondhttp://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2011/07/26/brushfire-with-julia-the-saudi-states-of-america/
ReplyDeleteIt's probably "gone", remember I posted something and the same day it was gone?
ReplyDeleteNo, but I mean, with all those cameras - by amateur & professional alike - trained on the WTC's after the first hit, the ONLY videos that were caught were from the angle that the 2nd one was a "surprise" and came in sideways across the video?
ReplyDeleteNO ONE caught a video of the 2nd "boeing" coming in from the angle of far off to close, IE: coming AT THEM from wherever it came from? NO videos like that?
Yeah, I AGREE with you, shots of a "boeing" coming ACROSS the video like they weren't expecting it, will be fuzzy/not clear.
But I'm saying, the ONLY shots of the 2nd "boeing" in existence are the "surprise" ones of it coming across a camera fixed on the 2nd tower that wasn't hit yet? NO ONE SAW THE 2ND PLANE COMING IN OR EXPECTED IT??? And had a clear shot of it coming in FOR A WHILE? For a "while", I mean even several seconds. Not these "split second surprise" ones.
Is that kind of hard to believe, there's no videos like that? Like SOMEONE, with all those cameras trained on the FIRST hit, NO ONE saw the 2nd "boeing" coming in from a distance??? And clearly filmed it coming in for a while?
Do you buy that? NO ONE?
For example, plunger, the two videos you posted were exactly what I said they all are: someone had a camera already on the 2nd building and the "boeing" comes into it.
ReplyDeleteNO ONE SAW/HEARD the 2nd one coming in? And quickly turned their camera to film it coming in at least for a couple seconds?
Here's an easy way to put it:
IS THERE A VIDEO OF THE 2ND "BOEING" COMING IN, NOT ALREADY FIXED ON THE 2ND TOWER WITH THE "BOEING" SPLIT SECOND ZIPPING INTO THE SHOT??? Are all the existing videos from that exact perspective?
If yes, I find that extremely hard to believe!
NO ONE said, "Hey! There's another one coming in! Quick! Film it coming in!"
ReplyDeleteThe only shot I've ever seen of that was the weird one from TV with a black shadowy thing that looks like a plane coming in, which gets back to my first point of all the videos with the weird fuzzy dark shadowy plane.
And here's a good question: the professional one that was on TV, why isn't that clear? It's from a distance and IS filming it coming in. Why is that not clear? And it's from a major TV channel? Why can't you CLEARLY see it's "boeing" logos, etc??? It's this dark, shadowy, fuzzy thing coming in.
Personally, I think a lot of these 9/11 videos, the clarity was purposely taken out of them before FOIA's. You can see the WTC's CLEAR DETAIL, and then when the plane hits......SUDDENLY THE PARTS OF THE VIDEO THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY CLEAR IN THE SAME VIDEO AREN'T CLEAR.
In fact, look at the one you posted:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUT7yup-YIg
FORGET THE "BOEING"...how come in the FIRST PART OF THE SAME VIDEO, the TOWER is crystal clear...THEN, when the "boeing" come in...THE TOWER IS FUZZY! And therefore, the "boeing" is naturally going to be fuzzy IF THE SAME TOWER IN THE SAME VIDEO WENT FROM CLEAR TO FUZZY RIGHT WHEN THE "BOEING" CAME IN THE PICTURE!!!
Am I explaining this right? Maybe I'm not explaining it clearly.
Here is an indisputable fact:
ReplyDeleteIn all the videos I've seen of the towers where the towers are crystal clear, they're not "boeing hit" videos.
In all the videos I've seen that are "boeing hit" videos, the TOWERS THEMSELVES ARE NOW MYSTERIOUSLY FUZZY AND NOT CLEAR.
That implies the "boeing hit" videos have purposely had the clarity taken out of them so the "boeing" isn't clear. That's my opinion and observation of watching many 9/11 videos.
How come in all the "boeing hit" videos, the towers aren't clear anymore? they are gray, fuzzy rectangles that you can no longer make out the windows, etc... That, to me, implies the "boeing hit" videos were all tampered with before being released.
I hear what you're saying, I just don't have any answers for you. Everyone's focus was the towers themselves - either necessitating a wide shot to take in the entire scene (making any approaching plane small in the frame) or tight on the buildings make the plane impossible to spot. Given all of the distractions, noise and mayhem down there that day, and the fact that it came in too low to be spotted by anyone in the vicinity at ground level until it was on top of them, it's not surprising to me that most videos look just the way they do...as it was a huge surprise when the next plane hit - as intended by Rumsfeld, live on TV - for maximum "shock & awe!"
ReplyDeleteThe most suspicious video would have been one where someone focused full-frame on the approaching aircraft and panned with it until impact. Context dictates a wider shot to show both the towers and the plane - unless there were foreknowledge - and a cameraman assigned to follow the tight shot all the way in.
Is this true or false:
ReplyDeleteTHERE EXISTS NO PICTURE OR VIDEO CLEARLY SHOWING ANY OF THE SAID BOEINGS AS PROOF THAT THEY WERE THE SAID BOEINGS.
Is that statement true or false? I believe that is FALSE.
Now is that hard to believe - with all the pictures and video, all the cameras on everything, etc... Is that hard to believe NOT ONE PICTURE OR VIDEO EXISTS THAT SHOWS BEYOND A DOUBT ONE OR MORE OF THE SAID BOEINGS OR EVEN PARTS OF THEM?
That's very hard to believe.
The perfectly clear shots of the towers are locked-down on tripods - stationary - no camera movement - effectively still photos. That leads to crystal clear images.
ReplyDeleteAny images including planes include the concept of surprise and movement of the camera (tilting, panning, zooming in or out, etc.) - which will absolutely make everything in the scene appear MUCH blurrier. Surprise + adrenaline + camera movement all lead to shots that are less clear.
My research tells me that the aircraft that struck the towers were in fact Boeings - though not commercial aircraft with the tail numbers claimed. The planes were swapped out over Stewart Airport - the latter flown by Sysplan Flight Termination technology. These were aircraft retrofitted to become flying fuel bombs, as order by Dov Zakheim - for retrofit in Florida, in the weeks months prior to 9/11. The size of the fireball exiting the building following the second strike = a quantifiable volume of fuel - which in my opinion far exceeds the wing and tank capacity of a normal commercial airliner not so retrofitted.
I'm surprised that no fluids experts have spoken as to the size of the fireball - with nearly ALL of the fuel from the second plane exploding outside the tower - and quantified what the liquid volume was that was represented by the observable/measurable ball of fire. That has to correlate to some quantity of gallons of Jet A fuel. How many gallons did we see explode?
With passengers aboard?
ReplyDeleteAnd if there WAS such a video, it would've clearly shown they were NOT the "boeings" in question.
ReplyDeleteMy friend said he posted on FB(I) a link to the Smithsonian putting out a 10 year anniversary 9/11 film, with Cheney, Rumsfeld, Giuliani, etc... My friend posted it and then it disappeared.
ReplyDeleteNot that I feel the press is doing its job, but in this case the prison officials wouldn't let them in to see what was going on...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinionla/la-ed-prisons-20110720,0,4720973.story
But then that fact should have been all over the headlines to begin with!
15 capcha reloads before I got one I could read!
ReplyDeleteWithout passengers aboard. No passengers or pilots (no humans) were aboard either of the two planes that hit the towers. They were remotely controlled flying fuel bombs.
ReplyDeleteCheck this video out:
ReplyDeleteTraitors
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJfff5I__WU&feature=youtu.be
Right, the point of that Jesse Richards video is what they choose to SYNCIDATE across ALL local newspapers and ANBCBSNNX. Richards says all the news IS reported, but important stories are stopped dead in their tracks from being syndicated throughout the nation.
ReplyDeleteHow many newspapers was this hunger strike in? Not in MY two, I can tell you that.
Smart meters:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JNFr_j6kdI&feature=share
The Looting Of America: The Federal Reserve Made $16 Trillion In
ReplyDeleteSecret Loans To Their Bankster Friends And The Media Is Ignoring The
Eye-Popping Corruption That Has Been Uncovered
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/the-looting-of-america-the-federal-reserve-made-16-trillion-in-secret-loans-to-their-bankster-friends-and-the-media-is-ignoring-the-eye-popping-corruption-that-has-been-uncovered
Looks like there's a lot of trees to hide behind from ONE gunman, look at the pictures. Me thinks that if you're on the OTHER SIDE of a tree, you're safe from ONE guy shooting, but not TWO, if the other one is on the other side:
ReplyDeleteAt least two terrorists behind Norwegian youth camp massacre - witnesses
http://en.rian.ru/world/20110723/165350450.html
Gunman Conspired With “Business and Political Leaders” Before Massacre
http://www.infowars.com/gunman-conspired-with-business-and-political-leaders-before-massacre/
Ratigan next to be fired by MSNBC:
ReplyDeleteOn Ratigan, Ratigan/Ron Paul discuss erasing the debt:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oN4awY7RqU&feature=player_embedded
ReplyDeleteVan Winkle says:
July 26, 2011 at 10:09 pm
By claiming its Al Qaeda he ADMITS the CIA is behind it as Qaeda
are 100% CIA’s created attack dogs. What is really interesting is that
the special ops military base Camp Rena is located adjacent to the
Norway shooter’s “farm”. Guess who paid a visit there on May 20, 2011?
US Ambassador to Norway.
http://norway.usembassy.gov/hedemarktrip.html
Samenleving says:
July 26, 2011 at 3:33 pm
The EDL is not a right-wing movement – it is a wholly manufactured
Zionist front organisation, created so that its provocations against
peaceful Muslim-majority neighbourhoods will be false-flagged as
(non-antisemitic) British nationalism.
Zionism is based on the fundamental tenet that the nationalism of
European countries is always tainted with antisemitism to some degree or
another – so Jews should forget assimilation and go to Israel….yada,
yada…..
Thus the idea of philo-semitic nationalism is a deliberate construct,
and Zionists know it to be fake. But it serves their purpose of
polarising the nations of Europe along the “Clash of Civilizations”
faultline.
The EDL is also much more of a propaganda operation, than an actual functioning organisation – a Mossad Flash Mob, if you will.
Like Britain’s political parties, it is concerned with column inches
rather than ideology. The ideology comes ready-made, courtesy of Israeli
intelligence, and is adapted to suit each European country by its
Jewish Zionist chapter members who are first and foremost sayanim.
The mainstream media loves the EDL – even the Trots can’t avoid
writing about it. Liberal journalists can make a meal of writing nasty
stuff, and mad Zionist correspondents like Melanie Philips can deplore
the EDL’s uncouth behaviour while endorsing its anti-Muslim ideology.
Now, you American alternative media outlets are stupidly playing the
same game. EDL is Zionism for Goys. Anyone (like Breivik) who treats it
as an expression of genuine nationalism – or even, like the author here,
as an MI5-infiltrated expression of genuine nationalism – is wrong.
EDL is a Mossad front.
"Bush says slow reaction on 9/11 was deliberate decision"
ReplyDeleteCough, cough, hack, bleh......
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/07/29/bush-says-slow-reaction-on-911-was-deliberate-decision/
That much is true - his slow reaction was a deliberate decision - just not for any of the reasons he stated.
ReplyDeleteListen to this at the 31 minute mark
ReplyDeletehttp://www.c-span.org/Events/Washington-Journal-for-Friday-July-29/10737423162-1/
If your are talking about Peter Coy stumbling all over himself on Social Security, it starts at just before 29 minutes.
ReplyDeleteYup.
ReplyDeleteWhatever the end game is - it's totally scripted. Wolf Blitzer has a two- hour special scheduled for Sunday night on CNN. You think that timing is coincidental? The banksters wrote this script months ago, and the politicians are playing their part
ReplyDelete