Wednesday, June 27, 2012

The 1% Behind The Curtain


Below is a VERY GOOD video I'd like you to watch (hat tip to plunger). It's a great overview of all the deceptions going on by the 1% world elites in their "secret societies" like the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), the deception of having a choice between the Republicans and Democrats when they are IN AGREEMENT on the most important points like BOMBING (euphemistically called "foreign policy" or "defense", isn't that laughable?), how the 1% create their OWN OPPOSITION (FAKE opposition, so you don't follow the REAL opposition or so one doesn't get started), and many MANY other important deceptions everyone should know about. Basically, if you think we have a country like you learn about in "history" books...THINK AGAIN:



Even Gerald Celente is starting to talk about FALSE FLAGS by the U.S. government. Gerald Celente: START THE 2ND REVOLUTION -



Once upon a time, a president of the United States spoke openly about these "secret societies" of the 1%. Now he would be called a "conspiracy nut" or a "truther". He was shot by the 1%:



DECEPTIONS BY THE 1%: After you watch the above video about deceptions by the 1%, relate it to the 9/11 psychological deception explained by this array of accredited psychologists. What they say in this video can be applied to ALL deceptions by the 1%, not just 9/11. COGNITIVE DISSONANCE and DENIAL:



RIDICULE (speech or action intended to cause contemptuous laughter at a person or thing; derision) is a tactic used to dismiss uncomfortable facts. Ridicule is used in two ways: by those who know the truth but want to cover it up so they RIDICULE those exposing the truth, and by those in DENIAL as a defense mechanism to justify not looking at the uncomfortable facts. Here is a playlist I'm starting of the FORMER, in this particular case media characters from both the "left" and the "right" using RIDICULE to dismiss legitimate discussion of 9/11. The RIDICULERS, in this case, give NO FACTS for their side of the argument, but simply RIDICULE the other side. Why does ridicule work? It's almost like a survival instinct: YOU don't want to be the one ridiculed/ostracized from "the pack" or "the herd", you feel you might be in some sort of danger. RIDICULE by Big Media personalities or famous 1% people is especially effective, because you think, "I don't want to be ridiculed like THAT guy, by these big, powerful famous people! I'm going to SHUT UP about this!"

The video below shows Bill O'Reilly RIDICULING professor Jim Fetzer, notice the "script" or "playbook": mention aliens, tin foil hat, etc...but give no facts yourself because you HAVE NO FACTS on your side, only RIDICULE and BELIEFS. A BELIEF is not a FACT or EVIDENCE. An example of BELIEF is blurting out the statement for your side: "OUR GOVERNMENT WOULD NEVER DO THAT!!!" That statement is a BELIEF and MEANS NOTHING. This Bill O'Reilly video is, in my opinion, THE video script or playbook used by the mainstream media on both "left" and "right" using the technique of RIDICULE. O'Reilly actually sets up Fetzer BEFORE he comes on with an array of non-facts and ridicule, as well as employing these techniques WHILE Fetzer is actually on. O'Reilly provides NO FACTS for his side, RIDICULES Fetzer, and spouts out BELIEFS such as "OUR GOVERNMENT WOULD NEVER DO THAT". I have yet to see the murder trial where a murderer gets off the hook simply because a witness says, "HE WOULD NEVER DO THAT!!!" while providing no facts or evidence:

NOTE: This video is up on youtube many times, but I picked this one to point out some youtube deceptions to look out for. The video is titles "Fetzer pwned by O'Reily", misspelling 2 of 4 words in the title. The channel that uploaded this version wants you to believe "O'Reily" (misspelled) "won" this debate. Comments for the video were disabled. I can tell you why from experience: this video got HAMMERED BY FACTS pointing out what I am pointing out to you and the person doesn't want you to read them, so they deleted all the comments and want you to just think "O'Reily" "pwned" Fetzer:



But don't think the 1% crimes are only covered up by the Bill O'Reilly's on the right! Just like the top video in this post explains how the Democrats and Republicans are really in agreement on all major important issues, so are the Bill Maher's/Michael Moore's(left) and Bill O'Reilly's (right).

Bill Maher using RIDICULE and NO FACTS (non-scientific BELIEFS) about 9/11:



Michael Moore never heard of Bilderberg! Riiiiiiight........ This video also serves as an example of the techniques explained in the first video of a "controlled opposition": put Michael Moore out there to try and co-opt and control the OCCUPY MOVEMENT, just like the the first video explains how the GOP co-opted and got the Tea Party under control. Let me interpret Michael Moore pretending he never heard of "Bilderberg": "HI, I'M PART OF THE CONTROLLED LEFT, AND LIKE THE CONTROLLED RIGHT, WE'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO TALK ABOUT BILDERBERG":



Bookmark and watch this video playlist, it's a montage of 9/11 raw footage of the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7 impossibly falling at free fall speed, lectures by experts, 9/11 movies, etc...I've expertly collected over the years and continually update in an ongoing basis. The above psychologists video is contained in this playlist:



RECENT 9/11 NEWS THEY'RE NOT TELLING YOU ABOUT:

9/11 Vancouver Tribunal expected to issue Indictments in 9/11 events around Labor Day 2012

Former Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect

Flight data recorder expert Dennis Cimino, commercial pilot with more than 2000 hours, reveals government's claims about a flight data recorder found at the Pentagon from Flight 77 are totally fraudulent, with zeros instead of the plane's identification number and flight number! The recorder did not come from an airliner but was apparently created at a workbench and was also missing data that an actual flight would have, such as mandatory barometric adjustments and even any record of the cockpit door opening. The talk was given June 17, 2012 at the Vancouver 911 Hearing. Please visit http://pilotsfor911truth.org for more information. (bd: keep in mind, experts like this would NEVER be put on major "news" networks because the mainstream media runs cover for the 1%. If they DID put him on TV, they'd hand the above O'Reilly script to whomever was interviewing him, to RIDICULE him. That's if they even let him ON network "news". Check out the professional 9/11 truth organizations in the right column of this blog. Remember: TRUTH is now a bad word, as in "TRUTHERS". What's the opposite of TRUTH, btw? The 1% have now demonized the word "TRUTH". TRUTH is their ENEMY, that's why! And RIDICULE is behind demonizing the word TRUTH. The 1% RIDICULE people saying the truth by calling them "TRUTHERS".)





Random important news the mainstream media purposely isn't telling you about:

U.S. Department of Defense Contract Awards for June 26, 2012

“Don’t Be Alarmed”: Army Trains MPs To Drive Tanks On U.S. Streets. Sightings of vehicles provo

The 1% thrown out of Iceland: GLOBAL ELITES THROWN OUT OF ICELAND; Iceland Dismantles Corrupt Gov’t Then Arrests All Rothschild Bankers

BIG ENERGY
Get your geiger counters out: Fukushima seafood went on sale Monday...it's "safe"
Don't touch blue or black "dirt" in japan!!!
Three northeastern Pennsylvania families have reached a $1.6 million settlement with a gas drilling company over contaminated water wells.
FRACKING: One dead in explosion at BP compression station


PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE 1% BEHIND THE CURTAIN:



92 comments:

  1. Just now on WILK radio 7:30AM: Wall St Journal has Romney/Obama in a "DEAD HEAT".

    ReplyDelete
  2.  Could have written that headline a year ago.  Oh, that's right, David Rockefeller's Goebbels, Karl Rove, did precisely that - likely more than one year ago.

    ///

     


    Explore the concept of "discernible reality." 


     


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality-based_community


     


    Focus on that concept like a laser beam, because it is the key to
    ALL understanding - a layer beyond what is readily apparent, or even
    predictable.


     


    Reporter Ron Suskind nailed it to the wall when he got Karl Rove
    to blurt this out:


     


    ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality.
    And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act
    again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how
    things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be
    left to just study what we do.''


     


    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/17BUSH.html?ex=1255665600&en=890a96189e162076&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland



     


    Of these men whom you perceive as mortal and flawed, their own
    self-perception is that they are in fact the masters of the universe.


     


    They work for David Rockefeller, his CFR, his IMF, His World Bank,
    His IRS, His FED, His Exxon, His JP Morgan Chase. All of them. Where will the
    "money" come from to create the new system from the ashes of the old,
    and who will be in possession of this new money, and through what means?


     


    Here's a respected business man...Bett Midler's former Manager,
    the Producer of Trading Places and other successful films...listen to every
    word:


     


    http://youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA


     


    Then read all of this:


     


    http://plungerspeaks.blogspot.com


     


    There are no coincidences. Nothing is as it appears. Nothing.


     


     


     

    ReplyDelete
  3. Conspiracy to Defraud the United States


    923 18 U.S.C. § 371


     


    Hass, 216 U.S. at 479-480. In Hammerschmidt, Chief Justice Taft,
    defined “defraud” as follows:


     


    To conspire to defraud the United States means primarily to cheat
    the Government out of property or money, but it also means to interfere with or
    obstruct one of its lawful governmental functions by deceit, craft or trickery,
    or at least by means that are dishonest. It is not necessary that the Government
    shall be subjected to property or pecuniary loss by the fraud, but only that
    its legitimate official action and purpose shall be defeated by
    misrepresentation, chicane or the overreaching of those charged with carrying
    out the governmental intention.


     


    http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room
    usam/ title9/crm00923.htm


     



     

    ReplyDelete
  4.  It is the PEOPLE
    that want peace…not the leaders.

     


    The leaders work for the oligarchs, and the oligarchs want
    territory, resources and control of the masses.

    FLASHBACK...


     


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_oligarch


     


    Cheney and Rumsfeld are following Ledeen’s advice…which calls for
    nothing less than “TOTAL WAR.” Ledeen is the biggest war monger on the planet.


     


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ledeen


     


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_war


     


    Cheney and Rumsfeld are not working for you and me. They have an
    agenda which you cannot even fathom, which helps to explain your lack of
    understanding of the path that they are on.


     


    Picture Cheney and Rumsfeld as the heads of a crime syndicate, and
    assume that all of their goals contradict those of the American people. Study
    where they have come from and what they have done together in the past. Only
    then can you see them for what they are.


     


    http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200403/mann


     


    http://www.buzzflash.com/farrell/04/05/far04017.html


     


    http://www.frankolsonproject.org/ Articulations/
    Script-CodeNameArtichoke.html


     


    Rumsfeld had an Israeli Operative named Dov Zakheim positioned as
    comptroller inside the Pentagon. Rummy announced to the world on the day prior
    to 9/11 that $2.3 TRILLION was missing from the Pentagon’s budget…enough to
    fund an entire military coup.


     


    http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/trillions.html


     


    Reality has been stood on its head by Karl Rove. Your prior
    writing states emphatically that Bin Laden attacked us on 9/11. You have no
    evidence of that, because there is none. You accept what you’ve been told.


     


    If you really hope to understand what is going on, you need to
    listen to what the media tells you is true, then assume that in fact the
    opposite is where the truth resides.


     


    One need only look at the titles Rove adopts for various
    initiatives and programs to comprehend the game.


     


    “Homeland Security” isn’t about your security.


     


    “Patriot Act” isn’t about Constitutional laws.


     


    “No Child Left Behind” left children behind.


     


    “Prescription Drug Benefit” wasn’t.


     


    and so on…


     


    This is OPPOSITE WORLD.


     


    It’s time to see with new eyes.


     


    Cheney and Rumsfeld masterminded 9/11 as a False Flag Operation,
    with elements of Mossad and others. Any good False Flag operation has at its
    core, the essential element to STRIKE ONE’S SELF in order to divert all
    attention away from the true culprits.


     


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag



     

    ReplyDelete
  5. BEFORE 9/11 – CHENEY CREATED A PLAN TO SELL OFF IRAQ’S OIL.


     


    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/4354269.stm


     


     


    BUT HOW COULD THAT BE – WHY PLAN SOMETHING YOU DON’T CONTROL?


     


    STOP.


     


    THINK.


     


    REMEMBER THE ENERGY MEETINGS WITH KEN LAY AND OTHERS?


     


    WHAT WAS THE BIG SECRET THEY WERE KEEPING?


     


    THE INVASION OF IRAQ WAS THE BIG SECRET THEY WERE KEEPING.


     


    THE OTHER SECRET WAS THE PRETEXT.


     


    THE PRETEXT FOR THE INVASION OF IRAQ.


     


    THE PRETEXT.


     


    THE PRETEXT.


     


    9/11.


     


    CHENEY DID IT.


     


    PNAC members became deeply entrenched in many powerful and
    strategic positions once George Bush was installed as President. Clearly, the
    plan could now become a reality. But, how?


     


    Here’s how: The PNAC plan openly called for a “transformation” of
    the U.S. military into an imperialistic force of global domination. That was
    more easily said than done. The American people would have to go along with the
    idea, and that was a problem, but not an insurmountable one. Read the next line
    very, very carefully:


     


    “The process of transformation,” the plan said, “is likely to be a
    long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event–like a new Pearl
    Harbor.”


     


    Let that sink in: like a new Pearl Harbor…like a new Pearl
    Harbor….like 9/11. Is there any question that 9/11 constituted a catastrophic
    and catalyzing event very similar to Pearl Harbor? Is there any question that
    the PNAC plan for war against Iraq became feasible only because of 9/11? Is
    there any question at all that PNAC got its new Pearl Harbor exactly at the
    right moment in history?


     


    They effectively pulled off a coup d’Etat, by passing
    Congressional scrutiny, installing the military industrial fascist government
    they have today. Allied with the globalist elite they are destroying America
    and the Constitution.


     


    ROLL THEM BACK!

    ReplyDelete
  6. CHENEY’S PARTNERSHIP WITH ROCKEFELLER / ISRAEL, INC. LEADS TO
    “TOTAL INFORMATION AWARENESS”



     


    It turns out that Israel has had a potential wiretap on every
    phone in America for years, along with the ability to monitor and record who
    any person is calling, anywhere in America; information of great value even if
    one does not listen to the calls themselves. Amdocs, Inc., the company which
    subcontracts billing and directory services for phone companies around the
    world, including 90 percent of American phone companies, is owned by Israeli
    interests. Yet another company, Comverse Infosys, is suspected of having built
    a “back door” into the equipment permanently installed into the phone system
    that allows instant eavesdropping by law enforcement agencies on any phone in
    America. This includes yours.


     


    http://100777.com/node/354


     


    KOBI ALEXANDER RAN THE WIRETAP OPERATION FOR CHENEY.


     


    A COMPANY THAT ALEXANDER ACQUIRED IN THE AFTERMATH OF 9/11, ODIGO,
    WAS THE PAGING COMPANY THAT FOREWARNED ISRAELI NATIONALS NOT GO GO NEAR THE WTC
    TWO HOURS PRIOR TO IT BEING STRUCK.


     


    NOW CHENEY IS PROTECTING ALEXANDER, WHO IS WANTED FOR SECURITIES
    FRAUD IN THE US. IS KOBI IN THE WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM, DICK?



     

    ReplyDelete
  7. GHW BUSH, CHENEY & KEN LAY.


     


    CO-CONSPIRATORS IN A COUP, WITH A FAKE ENERGY SHORTAGE AS THE
    PRETEXT:


     


    A couple of weeks before Lay met with Schwarzenegger in May 2001,
    the PBS news program “Frontline” interviewed Vice President Dick Cheney, whom
    Lay met with privately a month earlier. Cheney was asked by a correspondent
    from Frontline whether energy companies were acting like a cartel and using
    manipulative tactics to cause electricity prices to spike in California.


     


    “No,” Cheney said during the Frontline interview. “The problem you
    had in California was caused by a combination of things–an unwise regulatory
    scheme, because they didn’t really deregulate. Now they’re trapped from unwise
    regulatory schemes, plus not having addressed the supply side of the issue.
    They’ve obviously created major problems for themselves and bankrupted PG&E
    in the process.”


     


    A month before the Frontline interview and Bush’s meeting with
    Davis, Cheney, who chairs Bush’s energy task force, met with Lay to discuss
    Bush’s National Energy Policy. Lay, whose company was the largest contributor
    to Bush’s presidential campaign, made some recommendations that would
    financially benefit his company. Lay gave Cheney a memo that included eight
    recommendations for the energy policy. Of the eight, seven were included in the
    final draft. The energy policy was released in late May 2001, after
    Schwarzenegger, Riordan and Milken met with Lay and after the meeting between
    Bush and Davis and Cheney’s Frontline interview.


     


    A week before the meeting, Davis signed legislation to create a
    state power authority that would buy, operate and build power plants in lieu of
    out-of-state energy companies, such as Enron, that the governor alleged was
    ripping off the state.


     


    For Enron’s Lay, the timing of the meeting was crucial. His
    company was just five months away from disintegrating and he was doing
    everything in his power to keep his company afloat and the profits rolling in.


     


    It wasn’t until Enron collapsed in October 2001 and evidence of
    the company’s manipulative trading tactics emerged that FERC began to take a
    look at the company’s role in California’s electricity crisis. Since then,
    memos written by former Enron traders were uncovered, with colorful names like
    “Fat Boy” and “Death Star,” that contained the blueprint for ripping off
    California.


     


    Enron’s top trader on the West Coast, Timothy Belden, the
    mastermind behind the scheme, pleaded guilty in December to conspiracy to
    commit wire fraud and has agreed to cooperate with federal investigators who
    are still trying to get to the bottom of the crisis.


     


    California is still demanding that FERC order the energy companies
    to refund the state $8.9 billion for overcharging the state for electricity
    during its yearlong energy crisis. But FERC says California is due no more than
    $1.2 billion in refunds because the state still owes the energy companies $1.8
    billion in unpaid power bills.


     


    Davis, who refused to cave in to the demands of companies like
    Enron even while Democrats, Republicans and the public criticized him, was
    right all along. Maybe Californians ought to cut Davis some slack.


     


    http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0817-07.htm


     


    GOT CONSPIRACY?


     

    ReplyDelete
  8. Read everything written by Christopher Bollyn: He’s so
    hot on their trail, Chertoff had him beaten up by an ICE team in his own
    driveway:

     


    Israeli 9/11 Crook Flees with $57 Million to Israel


     


    http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=91721


     


    Jacob “Kobi” Alexander, the Israeli founder of Comverse
    Technology, one of the leading Mossad companies involved in the terror attacks
    has fled justice in the United States and escaped to Israel with at least $57
    million of ill-gotten gains.


     


    Kobi Alexander should be arrested and interrogated about his
    knowledge of the events of 9/11. His company acquired the other Mossad firm,
    Odigo, shortly after it was revealed that Odigo employees had been forewarned
    of the attacks on the World Trade Center.


     


    This is the tip of the Israeli criminal mafia who is behind the
    terror attacks on 9/11.


     


    Here is a relevant section from one of my articles about Mossad’s
    involvement in 9/11, which I posted on RMN on April 7, 2005:


     


    At least two Israel-based employees of Odigo received warnings of
    an imminent attack in New York City more than two hours before the first plane
    hit the WTC. Odigo had its U.S. headquarters two blocks from the WTC. The Odigo
    employees, however, did not pass the warning on to the authorities in New York
    City, a move that could have saved thousands of lives.


     


    Odigo has a feature called People Finder that allows users to seek
    out and contact others based on certain demographics, such as Israeli
    nationality.


     


    Two weeks after 9/11, Alex Diamandis, Odigo’s vice president,
    reportedly said, “It was possible that the attack warning was broadcast to
    other Odigo members, but the company has not received reports of other
    recipients of the message


     


    Odigo, like many Israeli software companies, is based and has its
    Research and Development (R&D) center in Herzliya, Israel, the small town
    north of Tel Aviv, which happens to be where Mossad’s headquarters are located.


     


    BOLLYN - 9/11 Investigative Journalist Harassed and Beaten by
    Undercover Cops


     


    http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=91920


     


    READ ALL OF IT

    ReplyDelete
  9.  Then insiders all know that Netanyahu is blackmailing the CFR

    ReplyDelete
  10. Picture people standing at busy intersections in ever city across this country for one week that simply say:




    SEARCH:  9/11  +  CHENEY

    ReplyDelete
  11. WILK interviewed 2 bums on public square. One said Romney, the other Obama. It's a dead heat.

    ReplyDelete
  12. EVERY "election" is a: DEAD HEAT, NECK AND NECK, TOSS UP, 50/50, etc...so they can more easily steal it. Fake polls. It's IMPOSSIBLE that all important elections are "toss ups" in the pre-election polls. Bush/Gore: TOSS UP, Bush/Kerry: TOSS UP, etc...the media will say every presidential election FOREVER is a "toss up". 

    Barletta/Kanjorski: TOSS UP 2010.

    "Election handicappers have either rated the district a toss-up"Read more: http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2019138_2019132_2026296,00.html #ixzz1z37hJ900

    Marino/Carney: TOSS UP

    Carney, Marino race toss-up in Pa.'s 10th District

    http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20101031/NEWS/10310335

    ReplyDelete
  13. LOOK: WISCONSIN RECALL OF WALKER A "TOSS UP" (bullshit!!!):

    http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/06/poll-wisconsin-recall-tossup

    ReplyDelete
  14. Now your common sense tells you, every important election can NOT be a "toss up", that's impossible! How stupid are we?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Now do you REALLY think Rush Limbaugh wrote that? Or had it handed to him?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Rush Limbaugh has a moment of complete honesty, describing HIMSELF in that link:

    QUOTE:

    "Anyway, "To the sociopath..." And you know what a sociopath is? The primary identifier of a sociopath is nothing is ever his fault. And not only is it not his fault, it's yours. The sociopath never does anything wrong. The sociopath never makes a mistake. The sociopath is the greatest person on earth; everybody else is making the mistakes. "So too the modern liberal sees the world as a place on which to force his own sense of internal identity. He reacts to the 'otherness' of those who don't share his political identity by trying to stamp them out.

    "If he can't physically destroy them, then he retreats to physical and mental enclaves where he destroys them intellectually over and over again, fighting battles against legions of ghosts and shadows, mocking and ridiculing them out of existence, until he is forced to face them in real life and attempts to treat real people the way that he treated the imaginary obstacles to his ego. With The Newsroom, the cycle continues as, anticipating defeat, liberals retreat to a safe place in an imaginary version of the past, in which they can line up all their enemies and knock them down like rows of toy soldiers, in which everything seems clear and certain, and their side always wins.""

    ReplyDelete
  17. Does this come under the last post:

    "Our Government (and mainstream media) is controlled by enemies of the 99%, both foreign and domestic"

    ReplyDelete
  18. Satellite TV channel attacked by armed men in Syria

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxhsGtHq1J4

    ReplyDelete
  19. IF 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHY ISN'T ANYONE IN JAIL FOR IT??? The BELIEF (not FACT or EVIDENCE) argument, which ASSUMES COURTS AREN'T CORRUPT.

    I give weekly, if not daily, proof of corrupt courts. Here's the latest reason why no one's in jail for 9/11, because courts are corrupt. We need to OCCUPY THE COURTS:

    Dow Chemical Co. (DOW)’s Union Carbide won dismissal of a lawsuit alleging polluted soil and water produced by its former chemical plant in Bhopal, India, injured area residents, one of at least two pending cases tied to the installation known for the 1984 disaster that killed thousands.U.S. District Judge John Keenan in Manhattan yesterday ruled Union Carbide and its former chairman, Warren Anderson, weren’t liable for environmental remediation or pollution- related claims made by residents near the plant, which had been owned and operated by a former Union Carbide unit in India.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-27/union-carbide-wins-dismissal-of-suit-over-bhopal-plant.html

    ReplyDelete
  20. We need to investigate and occupy JUDGE JOHN KEENAN.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Let's do a little research on "judge" keenan:

    On August 30, 2011 U.S. District Judge John Keenan dismissed plaintiff Linda Secrest's claims for failure to warn, breach of warranty, fraudulent concealment, and punitive damages, allowing only a design defect claim to stand for trial.See: "Judge Again Trims Claims for Trial in Fosamax Suit", New York Law Journal (9/1/11)

    http://www.drug-injury.com/druginjurycom/2011/08/fosamax-mdl-onj-secrest-merck-trial-federal-court-judge-keenan.html

    (note: many of the fosomax articles came up and immediately redirected to another link that had nothing to do with it, click on this 

    http://pharmacyblogbuy.com/tag/judge-keenan/

    Is that link quickly in a second deleting and putting a different link in the address bar??? For me it is.)

    ReplyDelete
  22. QUESTION: WHY DOES THIS JUDGE GET DRUG AND POISON LIABILITY CASES? Do I just not know enough about courts?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Apparently the Zombie ruse wasn't frightening enough.  Now the wealthy family behind National Geographic is legitimizing a threat from ALIENS!

    http://www.cinemablend.com/pop/More-Americans-Think-Obama-Would-Better-Deal-With-Aliens-Than-Romney-44060.html

    ReplyDelete
  24. Actually judges are ONLY supposed to receive cases at random.  When there is evidence that a particular judge's case load is not random, it is also evidence that there is "judge-shopping" by the defense council in collusion with the clerk of the court who assigns cases to judges - which is only supposed to happen on a rotating basis as cases arrive at the Clerk's office to be stamped.  By letting the attorney know precisely when to submit his/her case in the rotation, the appearance of coincidental assignment of the case to the BOUGHT JUDGE is maintained.

    ReplyDelete
  25. This happened around here. Judge Toole, they realized, was getting all the auto insurance cases, and he got put in the slammer for being in collusion in auto insurance cases.

    http://bigdanblogger.blogspot.com/2009/12/big-dans-big-news-dec-3-2009.html

    Luzerne judge recuses himself from huge auto insurance case

    http://thetimes-tribune.com/news/luzerne-judge-recuses-himself-from-huge-auto-insurance-case-1.266707

    ReplyDelete
  26. Max Blumenthal: 

    "The Sugar Mama of Anti-Muslim Hate"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-xGLCjRcjw

    ReplyDelete
  27. CNN covers AVTM cursing in Middleboro

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poe0oBw7rx8

    ReplyDelete
  28. I can't even comment on this........

    Flying Mosquito vaccines by Bill Gates

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbSHOmtob_w

    ReplyDelete
  29. Between flying mosquito vaccines and drones, well I just don't know........wtf???

    ReplyDelete
  30. FOX NEWS: KARL ROVE OUTRAGED AT SCOTUS DECISION ON OBAMACARE!!!!!!

    This is going to be FUCKING GREAT, watching rightwing reaction to the scotus decision, how they spin it.

    ReplyDelete
  31. FOX: KARL ROVE "OUTRAGED" AT SCOTUS DECISION, LET'S GO TO KARL ROVE"

    KARL ROVE: I'M OUTRAGED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  32.  Please , oh Please, Karl... call out Chief Justice Roberts as your #1 enemy...call him a traitor and every other name you can think of.  Let's hear you call him an "Activist Judge."  Come on Karl, piss of the Supreme Court justice you were positive you "owned."  Let's see how that works out when your crimes finally catch up with you.

    ReplyDelete
  33.  Michelle Bachmann (Turner)'s head is in OVERDRIVE.  Effectively calling the Chief Justice a Constitutional Outlaw.  It's basically the end of the world.

    ReplyDelete
  34.  Her talking point is that the ONLY way to save America and reverse this ruling is to defeat Obama.  Here comes the "ACTIVIST COURT" meme. 

    ReplyDelete
  35. How long will it take for the NRA to put a bounty on judges?

    THIS IS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW...CARE WINS, INSURANCE LOSES.  Insurance never saved a life...care does.

    http://www.boston.com/business/healthcare/2012/06/28/hospital-stocks-jump-after-health-care-ruling/iXoyKrafMLm5wIhGCONeeL/story.html

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Stocks of hospital companies rose sharply and
    insurance companies fell Thursday after the Supreme Court upheld a
    requirement that almost all Americans carry health insurance.


    The stock of Hospital Corp. of America, the largest private hospital
    chain in the United States, rose a little more than 7 percent. Quest
    Diagnostics, which runs laboratories, rose almost 3 percent.


    Insurance companies were down sharply as analysts rushed to sort out
    the ruling. UnitedHealth Group stock fell almost 3 percent, WellPoint 6
    percent and Aetna 3.6 percent.

    ReplyDelete
  36.  HOW ABOUT IF WE JUST ELIMINATE THE ENTIRE PRIVATE-SECTOR HEALTH INSURANCE LAYER, AND SPEND ALL THE MONEY EXCLUSIVELY ON PREVENTATIVE AND ACTUAL CARE - WHEN IT'S NEEDED.

    YACHT AND JET SALES WOULD SUFFER.

    ReplyDelete
  37.  IN RELATED NEWS, GOP LEADERS WILL SUGGEST THE PUBLIC LYNCHING OF THE "UPPITY NEGRO" RUNNING THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT WHEN THEY CONVENE THIS AFTERNOON

    Romney just heard himself say that the Supreme Court has determined that "ObamaCare does not violate the Constitution."

    How many times in how many ways did GOP spokesman say just the opposite?  How many times did Mitt sat it himself?  He's stuck now with saying "it's bad law."

    ReplyDelete
  38. The MASTERBATION news, fox news:

    No one's outraged, people are happy they're covered, and it may be a stepping stone to even better health coverage.

    BUT............

    FOX: OUTRAGE OVER THE SCOTUS DECISION, LET'S GO TO KARL ROVE

    ROVE: I'M OUTRAGED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  39. HOW'S THIS FOR A HEADLINE INTENTIONALLY BURIED BETWEEN THE SCOTUS ANNOUNCEMENT AND THE PENDING FAST/FURIOUS HOLDER CONTEMPT VOTE?

    "JP MORGAN LOSS LIKELY TO BE LESS THAN $9 BILLION"

    This headline being intentionally buried for a one-time release - then intentionally buried by the complicit media, flies in the face of the THOUSANDS of prior headlines and quotes professing a "$2 Billion loss" - JAMIE DIMON LIED

    Note that today's headline actually should be view as a loss likely to be GREATER THAN $9 billion - more than quadruple the admitted loss ever since the scandal broke.

    All this deception - a direct violation of SEC rules, yet NOBODY WILL GO TO PRISON.

    JPM shareholders were duped into holding their shares based on a reported $2B loss, while the insiders dumped theirs on the certain knowledge that it's closer to $10 BILLION

    JPM Morgan = David Rockefeller = ABOVE THE LAW.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Why is this topic "off limits": a CONSERVATIVE supreme court sided with Obama on the "obamacare". The SCOTUS was 7-2 GOP appointed for a decade, but it's STILL 5-4 GOP/conservative, with the most powerful chief justice Roberts is a conservative. Why is no one mentioning this?

    ReplyDelete
  41. The other day I heard on "radio news briefs": NORWAY AL QUEDA STOPPED, ALMOST READY TO ATTACK". DEFINITELY heard that, in fact, called my friend Anthony Antonello and said, "Did you just hear that???" NEVER heard of that again. 

    About a month or two ago, he called me and said, "Did you just hear on the radio news briefs, SUBMARINE INTERCEPTS OBAMA TELLING RUSSIA'S MEDVEDEV WAIT UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTION (for something, forget what)."??? Never heard of it again.

    ReplyDelete
  42. POSTITIVE it said "NORWAY AL QAEDA", because I was thinking that's where that Zionist mass shooting was.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Well, I'm getting into it with some rightwingers on facebook, they said all our $$$ is spent on "entitlements", so I posted the pie chart saying over HALF is bombing. Then they posted some Canada video where a guy had to wait so long, the "long lines" canard I call it, he had to go to the United States for surgery.

    I said: "OF COURSE THERE'S LONGER LINES, BECAUSE EVERYONE IS GETTING HEATHCARE, YOU SELFISH IDIOT" (paraphrased)

    THE PROBLEM IS NOT ENOUGH DOCTORS, NOT THE SYSTEM!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  44. "Stand With Us" = "Megaphone"


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StandWithUs

    ReplyDelete
  45. "LIKE" button isn't working on your posts for some reason

    ReplyDelete
  46.  "Israel Project"


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Project

    ReplyDelete
  47. Did you watch this from above?

    Max mentions all that here:

    Max Blumenthal: "The Sugar Mama of Anti-Muslim Hate"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-xGLCjRcjw

    ReplyDelete
  48. Rightwingers on FB are saying (and ALWAYS say) auto insurance is different...even though in both cases, it's the govt making you buy insurance...because driving is a "privilege".

    ReplyDelete
  49. BOO HOO!!!!!!! WE'RE ALL GOING TO HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE!!!!!!!!

    I'M OUTRAGED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  50. Rush Limbaugh is leaving the U.S.

    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=428251027215761&set=a.367249613315903.85664.354522044588660&type=1&ref=nf

    ReplyDelete
  51. That's funny, because the same people making that argument refuse to call health care a right, which must mean it's a privilege - like driving...no wait!

    ReplyDelete
  52. Rushing out the wrong story? What's going on here? This is proof they are handed a script, but by whom? And by a "left" channel and a "right" channel? 

    CNN, Fox Botch Supreme Court Health Reform Decision, Falsely Report Individual Mandate Struck Down (Video)

    The cable news networks rushed to report on the high court's ruling on the Affordable Care Act, but initially got the news wrong; UPDATE: CNN then issues a formal correction.

    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/cnn-fox-botch-supreme-court-health-care-ruling-342970?google_editors_picks=true

    ReplyDelete
  53. Seriously, what does this tell us? CNN and FOX initially report the WRONG thing? There's something more to this than we think.

    ReplyDelete
  54. OK, now look at THIS...this is the SAME THING, only in writing and not on TV:

    So this is weird. Above is an excerpt from the dissent in Thursday's Obamacare decision. Justice John Roberts joined with the liberals on the court to uphold the law. But did Roberts switch sides? The dissent (read it here, starting on page 127) repeatedly refers to the "dissent," not a majority opinion. Here's law professor David Bernstein, writing at The Volokh Conspiracy, a conservative legal blog:

    http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/06/obamacare-supreme-court-regular-americans

    ReplyDelete
  55. My gut instinct tell me: Roberts originally voted against the health care act, then changed his mind. Or someone TOLD HIM to change his mind or else.

    ReplyDelete
  56.  Actually he read his prepared remarks on two issues.  He began with their main argument, which was the Individual Mandate's Constitutionality under the Commerce Clause.  Because he read his opinion on that first - the CNN producer in the court room forwarded what was in fact accurate information, that Roberts struck down the first of TWO parts of the decision.  He later went on to describe how the law as written was legal under the Government's authority to impose a tax.  By then, the mistakes had already hit the airwaves, and the retractions commenced.  The problem stemmed from having a producer in the room rather than an attorney who would have knows to phrase the initial half of the ruling as such.

    ReplyDelete
  57.  The Repugs will tag Obama as a tax raiser who attempted to enact a law that was proven unconstitutional under the Commerce clause.  Here's the problem...

    The EXACT SAME ARGUMENT can be made against Romney for having done the exact same thing years earlier.  THAT is the description Romney is stuck with for his earlier plan, which Obama copied on a national basis, for the most part.

      Whereas Romney could be claiming HUGE credit for having created the template that was so forward thinking and effective, it became the model to solve the national health care problem, he has instead painted himself into this absurd corner where he is left to vilify anyone who would enact a plan such as his - like him.

    Karma's a bitch, and she has a sense of irony and humor.

    ReplyDelete
  58. http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-obama-campaign-seeking-to-box-romney-in-with-healthcare-ruling-20120628,0,5339219.story


    WELCOME TO THE THEATER OF THE ABSURD!


    Romney's own healthcare reform law in Massachusetts "became the
    model" for Obama's law, and achieved universal coverage through the same
    "individual mandate and tax penalty."

    "Now, as he is running for
    president, Romney has run away from his accomplishment in Massachusetts,
    callously promising to repeal national reform and 'kill it dead,'"
    Messina said. "He owes the American people a clear, non-parsed
    explanation of why he believes his decisions in Massachusetts are wrong
    for the country, and exactly what he would do to help the American
    people get the healthcare they need."


    Some Republicans
    have reacted to the ruling by pointing out the justice's majority view
    that the mandate was valid as a tax provision, not under the commerce
    clause. In the GOP's view, that opens the door for a case against Obama
    based on the idea that "Obamacare" is a tax increase on the middle
    class.

    The pro-Obama "super PAC" Priorities USA quickly sought to turn that argument against Romney as well.

    "In
    Massachusetts, Romney imposed a penalty for not purchasing insurance
    that is twice as large as the federal law that he now attacks," the
    group argues.
     

    ReplyDelete
  59. Even Utah.......I mean, even Gerald Celente is starting to talk about false flags. He FINALLY mentions the Team 6 false flag:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK1EhI1dYuY

    ReplyDelete
  60. I noticed when I argue with "rightwingers" on FB, they'll do something like post a video like this to poo poo single payer. This video, a Canadian says he had such "long lines" (the "long lines" canard), he would've died...but he went to AMERICA and got surgery. He, of course, paid cash (?) for this surgery. Therefore he is RICH, that is one point. Secondly, long lines means EVERYONE IS GETTING HEALTH CARE (not like HERE, he says himself he immediately got surgery HERE, therefore, there are SHORT LINES because tens of millions of Americans DON'T have health care AND MONEY TALKS here in America: if you are RICH or HAVE CASH, you go to the front of the line. Third: they have a DOCTOR SHORTAGE, the problem isn't with the SYSTEM, it's a DOCTOR SHORTAGE. Keep in mind, he WANTED TO HAVE SURGERY IN CANADA FIRST. THEREFORE, he was totally satisfied with the doctors in Canada, IF HE DIDN'T HAVE TO WAIT. He didn't say "DOCTORS STINK IN CANADA. I CAN EITHER, RIGHT NOW, GET SURGERY IN CANADA OR THE U.S., BUT I PICK THE U.S.". That is NOT what happened. What happened is, due to longer wait due to MORE PEOPLE GETTING HEALTH CARE AND A DOCTORS SHORTAGE, he went elsewhere.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_Rf42zNl9U&feature=youtu.be

    ReplyDelete
  61. And don't forget the canard: CANADIANS COME HERE FOR HEALTH CARE. Which I always point out:

    1. They have to be rich to do that, because they must pay cash, right?

    2. If they DON'T pay cash and the Canadian system covers it, they're even better than I thought, if they pay for Canadians to seek health care in another country.

    3. WHERE ARE ALL THESE CANADIANS that come to America for health care? This video is the first time I saw a real person saying he came to America for health care! So there's ONE GUY so far. Wouldn't you think they'd be all over rightwing talk shows, etc...if there were so many CANADIANS COMING TO THE U.S. FOR HEALTH CARE??? 99% of the time, "some guy" is just "saying" that Canadians come here for health care. You never see THE ACTUAL CANADIANS saying it.

    ReplyDelete
  62. I'm going to do a special post soon: "THE SELFISH 'LONGER LINES' CANARD RIGHTWINGERS USE TO ARGUE AGAINST EVERYONE BEING COVERED BY HEALTH CARE". That is the most often used, most selfish argument imaginable!!!!!!

    I WILL HAVE A "LONGER LINE", IF OTHERS GET HEALTH CARE.

    ReplyDelete
  63. LOOK:

    GOOGLE: "HEALTH CARE LONGER LINES"

    https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en&tab=ww#hl=en&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=health+care+longer+lines&oq=health+care+longer+lines&gs_l=hp.12...2647.2647.1.3984.1.1.0.0.0.0.90.90.1.1.0...0.0.uLXAwHgMZ98&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=a2e370afc0354df8&biw=1024&bih=679

    ReplyDelete
  64. So how about THIS: next time a rightwinger says "longer lines", what if we say: "IF WE HAD MORE DOCTORS AND THE LINES WOULDN'T BE LONG, THEN WOULD YOU BE FOR UNIVERSAL CARE?"

    ReplyDelete
  65. Does chief justice scotus have a LIBERAL wife???

    Thoughts on Jane Roberts and Feminists for Life -- UPDATED

    http://hugoboy.typepad.com/hugo_schwyzer/2005/07/thoughts_on_jan.html

    ReplyDelete
  66. Hooray! We Won Something ... Maybe

      Before the Affordable Care Act came to pass almost 50 million Americans were uninsured. Now that the Supreme Court has upheld President Obama's signature health care law ... 26 Million Americans will remain uninsured. But how many more millions of Americans can barely afford the coverage they now have?

    Depending on your personal outlook on life ... the glass is half full or half empty. But who wants a sip?

    Where I live, it is unimaginable that people can't afford health coverage. it is unthinkable that a person can't get health care. 

    From all-knowing Wikipedia:

    http://www.opednews.com/articles/Hooray-We-Won-Something--by-Bob-Alexander-120629-84.html

    ReplyDelete
  67. The truth about the Fast and Furious scandal
    June 27, 2012: 5:00 AM ET

     
    Email Print
    A Fortune investigation reveals that the ATF never intentionally allowed guns to fall into the hands of Mexican drug cartels. How the world came to believe just the opposite is a tale of rivalry, murder, and political bloodlust.

    http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2012/06/27/fast-and-furious-truth/

    ReplyDelete
  68. And btw...did you notice NO ONE is mentioning that Eric Holder's first job ever was the cover up of the Oklahoma City false flag?

    http://theintelhub.com/2012/01/14/did-eric-holder-cover-up-fbi%E2%80%99s-role-in-%E2%80%9995-okc-bomb-plot/

    That's why I don't give credence to these limited hangout people who are all "patriotic" and quoting the constitution, etc...saying we need to oust Holder. Talk about how he COVERED UP OKC, then I'll take you seriously!!!

    ReplyDelete
  69. Scranton Times: Study: Airborne methane plume found near Bradford County gas migration site

    http://m.thetimes-tribune.com/news/study-airborne-methane-plume-found-near-bradford-county-gas-migration-site-1.1335347

    ReplyDelete
  70. Iraq War vet faces 10 years in prison after photographing police

    http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/iraq-war-vet-faces-10-years-in-prison-after-photographing-police/16789/

    ReplyDelete
  71. Israel subjecting Palestinian children to 'spiral of injustice'
    Foreign Office-backed delegation of UK lawyers says treatment may stem from belief every Palestinian child is potential terrorist

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/26/israel-palestinian-children-injustice

    ReplyDelete
  72. AGAIN: this is why I don't take guys like this serious. If he said ARMED REBELLION for 9/11, yeah. But this is totally for political purposes. You KNOW this guy doesn't give a shit about anything but getting someone from the other party, limited hangout armed rebellions. Let's not have an armed rebellion for 9/11, OKC, wall st, the wars, etc...just health care because he's against health care. That's such BULLSHIT:

    Matt Davis, Former GOP Spokesman, Suggests 'Armed Rebellion' After Supreme Court Ruling
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/28/matt-davis-is-armed-rebellion-now-justified_n_1635721.html

    ReplyDelete
  73. John Roberts Outrages Conservatives In Health Care Ruling

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/28/john-roberts-conservatives-health-care-ruling_n_1634512.html

    ReplyDelete
  74. This REALLY went under the radar. Remember this? It was front page when he got arrested...back page/ignored when found "not guilty":

    Raid on Megaupload's Kim Dotcom illegal, search warrants unlawful - NZ Judge
    http://www.rt.com/news/megaupload-raid-unlawful-dorcom-938/

    ReplyDelete
  75. Once again, the 1% get a slap on the wrist:

    Barclays Execs Get No Criminal Charges for International Manipulation of Interest Rates, But You Can Go to Jail for Smoking Pot

    http://blog.buzzflash.com/node/13572

    ReplyDelete
  76. Is this the guy who runs Washington's Blog?

    Secret Govt Slush Funds Right Under Our Noses: Carl Herman Reports
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEnLy-HNBLU&feature=player_embedded

    ReplyDelete
  77. Excellent commentary, as usual, plunger.

    ReplyDelete
  78. I want to point out about the "OUTRAGED" shit: ONLY RIGHWINGERS get "OUTRAGED" headlines. Why is this? I pointed this out before.

    Karl Rove OUTRAGED

    Romney OUTRAGED over Obama statements

    etc.....etc.....etc......

    ONLY REPUBLICANS or people on the right, get the "OUTRAGED" headlines. I pointed this out over the YEARS, not just recently.

    I had a post about FAKE OUTRAGE and "OUTRAGED" headlines all the time, previously.

    ReplyDelete
  79. PALIN + OUTRAGED, HOLY SHIT, A WHOLE BOOK COMES UP:

    http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=outraged+PALIN&oq=outraged+PALIN&gs_l=hp.3..0i30j0i8i30.569276.571155.2.571671.6.6.0.0.0.0.146.587.5j1.6.0...0.0.kFKV07_Ylu4&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=e757a35b73c411c2&biw=1024&bih=679

    ReplyDelete
  80. NEWT + OUTRAGED:

    http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=outraged+newt&oq=outraged+newt&gs_l=serp.3..0i8j0i8i30l6j0i8i10i30j0i8i30l2.49614.53946.1.54892.6.6.0.0.0.0.100.575.5j1.6.0...0.0.ofUABkz42ew&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=e757a35b73c411c2&biw=1024&bih=679

    ReplyDelete
  81. I guess the word "OUTRAGED" gives them a hard-on, I don't know.

    ReplyDelete
  82. BLOCKBUSTER ALERT: 

    BACHMANN + OUTRAGED THROUGH THE ROOF, OVER 1.5 MILLION HITS:

    http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=outraged+bachmann&oq=outraged+bachmann&gs_l=serp.3...16533.24066.1.24320.40.27.12.0.0.0.180.2328.24j3.27.0...2.0.sgNFqzruHmg&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=e757a35b73c411c2&biw=1024&bih=679

    ReplyDelete
  83. My account on FB:

    Account Temporarily Unavailable
    Your account is currently unavailable due to a site issue. We expect this to be resolved shortly. Please try again in a few minutes.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Michele Bachmann OUTRAGED her husband's cock isn't this big:

    http://www.tucsonsentinel.com/files/entryimages/081611-Corndog1-384x288.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  85. tea party + outraged

    http://www.google.com/search?um=1&hl=en&q=outraged%20tea%20party&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&biw=1024&bih=679&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=iw&ei=YLHtT-2WEaTl0QG_pLD6DQ

    ReplyDelete
  86. evangelicals + outraged

    http://www.google.com/search?um=1&hl=en&q=outraged%20tea%20party&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&biw=1024&bih=679&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=iw&ei=YLHtT-2WEaTl0QG_pLD6DQ#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=outraged+evangelicals&oq=outraged+evangelicals&gs_l=serp.3...40175.42290.1.42437.12.12.0.0.0.0.125.1147.9j3.12.0...0.0.mI14L9jYvXE&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=e757a35b73c411c2&biw=1024&bih=679

    ReplyDelete
  87. how about THIS:

    "FAKE + OUTRAGE"

    http://www.google.com/search?um=1&hl=en&q=outraged%20tea%20party&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&biw=1024&bih=679&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=iw&ei=YLHtT-2WEaTl0QG_pLD6DQ#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22fake+outrage%22&oq=%22fake+outrage%22&gs_l=serp.3..0i30l3j0i5i30l6j0i8i30.94550.96869.1.97123.14.14.0.0.0.0.135.1325.13j1.14.0...0.0.GgZ3lPCjdnk&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=e757a35b73c411c2&biw=1024&bih=679

    ReplyDelete
  88. Vermont forging ahead with SINGLE PAYER, first state in the nation to do so, regardless of "obamacare" or anything else:

    Set to be implemented by 2017, Vermont’s healthcare overhaul goes well beyond the new federal law. The Vermont Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, enacted last month, will make Vermont the first state in the nation to offer single-payer healthcare. On Thursday, Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin hailed the Supreme Court decision upholding the federal Affordable Care Act, but he said Vermont would probably be least impacted by it. "We’ve had a long history of healthcare reform and a real priority of taking care of our citizens," says Robin Lunge, Vermont’s director of Health Care Reform. "We’re not interested in waiting for the nation to catch up with us."

    http://www.democracynow.org/2012/6/29/as_supreme_court_affirms_patchwork_us

    ReplyDelete
  89. I am really loving the theme/design of your site.
    Do you ever run into any browser compatibility issues? A number of my blog readers have complained about my site not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Chrome.
    Do you have any solutions to help fix this issue?

    my website: linux cccam editor

    ReplyDelete
  90. Hey! I could have sworn I've been to this website before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it's new to me.
    Anyhow, I'm definitely delighted I found it and I'll
    be book-marking and checking back often!

    Here is my homepage; auto insurance company quotes

    ReplyDelete
  91. Hey there! Do you know if they make any plugins to protect against hackers?
    I'm kinda paranoid about losing everything I've worked hard on.

    Any tips?

    My web site - click the next page

    ReplyDelete