Click on the below to ENLARGE in another window:
Let me lay the groundwork for what I am about to post. I'm going to post two REAL chat room conversations I had with Bank of America. The first one was in November when they wouldn't let my daughter shut her account, and the second chat was today Jan 2, and was about them STEALING $75.29 from my son's unrelated account and paying off my daughter's negative account which she doesn't use anymore and they wouldn't let us shut down in November. My daughter Deanna's account was overdrawn on Sep 30 by $5.29 (YES, five bucks). She got TWO $35 overdrawn fees (due to them sorting them to their advantage, they could've paid the smaller one and only bounced the larger one. But they first bounced the larger one, so the smaller one would also bounce. They reversed ONE of these after arguing that point with them.), and a $35 "extended negative balance fee" (how do you like THAT one!!!) - that's $105 dollars in fines for going over FIVE BUCKS (now $70 in "fees" because they reversed ONE of them. Keep in mind, they didn't just reverse the ONE out of the goodness of their heart, it was after even an earlier, vicious, time-consuming argument with them.). The first chat will be of us trying to close Deanna's account in November, and they won't let us close the account. The second chat with Bank of America will be of us detecting that they UNAUTHORIZED took $75.29 from my son's account to pay my daughter's -$75.29 balance from her account she hasn't used in months, doesn't want, and Bank of America wouldn't let us close.
Note: I changed some minor things such as social security numbers or other sensitive things like that, but 99% of the chat transcripts are original.
Some notes if you care:
- I changed some of the account, social security numbers, & telephone numbers, but these 2 Bank of America "chats" are 99% cut/paste from the actual "chats".
Also, note the "chat" person's CANNED ANSWERS repeated over and over, such as:
- I UNDERSTAND HOW YOU FEEL (or frankly, any sentence with "UNDERSTAND" in it)
- THANK YOU FOR BEING A VALUED CUSTOMER (LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
- I APPRECIATE YOUR PATIENCE (or anything with "PATIENCE" in it)
- "COURTESY"
- "HUMBLY"
- "PLEASE"
- "MAY I?"
- "I TRULY APOLOGIZE" (but we're screwing you anyway!)
- "INCONVENIENCE"
- "I WILL DO MY BEST"
- "I DO NOT WANT YOU TO FEEL ANY UNSATISFACTORY EXPERIENCE" (what? WHO talks like that? I mean besides sex call lines)
- "I RESPECT YOUR OPINION"
- "WE CARE AND LISTEN TO OUR CUSTOMERS" --->>> BOA thinks "SAYING" something makes it REALITY
- "I'M SORRY" (keep in mind, as they say things like "I'M SORRY", they're not listening to anything you're complaining about, doing anything about it, etc...they're just saying "WE CARE AND LISTEN TO OUR CUSTOMERS" while totally disregarding what you're saying and requesting)
- "THANK YOU VERY MUCH"
- "I CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND YOUR POINT"
(here's my favorite one, ready?)
- "SENIOR CHAT SPECIALIST" --->>> LOL!!!!!!!!!!! "we're going to connect you with a 'SENIOR CHAT SPECIALIST' who won't care at all what you're saying, but will PRETEND to to care with canned answers like 'I RESPECT YOUR OPINION', which will be said word for word several times by this 'SENIOR CHAT SPECIALIST' and any other ones we connect you with...that is, if they even exist and aren't computers". SENIOR CHAT SPECIALIST: these people DO NOT EXIST, FOLKS! Do you personally know anyone who's a SENIOR CHAT SPECIALIST? It's like "THE DEFENSE BUDGET", "AL QAEDA", "INSURGENTS", "THE TERRORISTS", "DEATH PANELS", "AUSTERITY", etc...etc...
Let me make up a sentence from the above:
"I'm a senior chat specialist, I understand how you feel about these charges, I do not want you to feel any unsatisfactory experience, I appreciate your patience, but I humbly, courteously, please apologize for NOT GIVING YOU YOUR $70 BACK THAT WE STOLE OFF YOU!!! I hope that me telling you this, has not given you an unsatisfactory experience. Was that unsatisfactory for you? I know it was for me! I want you to know that you are a valued customer. I respect your opinion. YOU ARE AN IDIOT if you believe a word I'm saying." -> this is actually very sad, that we live in times like this.
Do you think ANY of these people I "chatted" with were in the United States of America or their American-sounding names are really their names? I don't think so! That's why they have cut/paste answers like: "I DO NOT WANT YOU TO FEEL ANY UNSATISFACTORY EXPERIENCE".
Notice all this "POLITENESS" leads to us GETTING SCREWED BY BANK OF AMERICA anyway!!! But they were "POLITE" about STEALING $70 off of us!!! So it's: "OK".
I also highlighted some key sentences in the first chat in red and blue. The second chat came out in color, I wish the first one in November did.
CHAT #1 November 11, 2011
We try and close my daughter's account and get $70 fees reversed on a negative $5.29 balance ($-75.29 balance; $70 of it "fees", $35 for being $5.29 overdrawn, and $35 "extended negative balance fee"...keep in mind, they won't let us close her account, and the "extended negative balance fee" could go on indefinitely, because they won't let us close the account)
Current Transcript of the Chat Session
Welcome to an online chat session at Bank of America. Please hold while we connect you to the next available Bank of America Online Banking Specialist. Your chat may be monitored and recorded for quality purposes. Your current wait time is approximately 0 minutes. Thank you for your patience.
Thank you for choosing Bank of America. You are now being connected to a Bank of America Online Banking Specialist.
Claudia: Hello, my name is Claudia. Thank you for being a valued customer of Bank of America. I'm here to assist you with your personal accounts today. May I please have your complete name as it appears on your account and the last four digits of your account number to further assist you?
You: deanna , 5555, 888888888888
Claudia: A warm welcome to online chat, Deanna!
Claudia: Thank you for the information provided.
Claudia: How may I assist you today?
You: this account was at -5.29. please reverse the "FEES" bringing it back to -5.29, close the account, and send a bill for $5.29
Claudia: I understand that you would like to bring the account balance to $0.00 and close the account.
You: right
Claudia: I will certainly check that for you.
Claudia: Please give me a couple of minutes while I access your account.
Claudia: Thank you for your patience.
Claudia: I see that you have negative balance in your account.
You: I'm requesting the reversal of two $35 "FEES", bringing it back to the original -5.29, then I will pay $5.29 and close the account.
Claudia: Let me check what best I can do for you.
Claudia: I appreciate your patience.
Claudia: I see that we have previously spoken with you about these fees. I am unable to refund these fees in question.
You: OK, first of all, banks just had a class action lawsuit against them for sorting transactions to maximize "FEES", which you did in this case.
You: second: the transactions should've been rejected due to not enough in the account
You: third: this fabricated "EXTENDED NEGATIVE BALANCE FEE" is RIDICULOUS!
You: immediately shut down this account
Claudia: Although we are not obligated to pay an item presented if your account does not have sufficient funds, we may pay it as a courtesy. An overdraft fee or a returned item fee (NSF) will be assessed whether the item is paid or returned.
You: I didn't want that "courtesy", the "FEE" was greater than the "courtesy", does that make any sense? why would I want you to pay $5.28 transaction as a "courtesy", only to get a $35 "FEE"???
You: does that make sense to you?
You: you're not addressing my request: please shut down this account. are you going to shut down this account?
Claudia: I absolutely understand your concern, Deanna
You: are you going to shut down this account?
Claudia: Once the account balance is $0.00, I would be able to submit your request to close the account.
You: 1. reverse the $70 "FEES"
You: 2. shut down this account
You: I am not paying the $70 "FEES", they are fabricated "FEES" by BOA
Claudia: I wish I could have some some help to you. The account at this point in time fails to qualify for a refund.
You: ARE YOU SHUTTING DOWN THIS ACCOUNT???
You: YES OR NO?
You: why can't I get an answer to that question?
Claudia: Deanna, Once the account balance is $0.00, I would be able to submit your request to close the account.
Claudia: Deanna, do you see any unauthorized transactions?
You: so, you are NOT shutting down my account, even though I am telling you to shut my account?
Claudia: I wish I could, however I'm unable to close your account with negative balance.
Claudia: We do have a dedicated department who will take care of this issue for you. Let me get the contact information of them.
Claudia: May I?
You: SO...you will not shut down this account, and it will keep getting "EXTENDED NEGATIVE BALANCE" fees?
You: is that correct? BOA refuses to shut down my account, so they can keep making $35 "EXTENDED NEGATIVE BALANCE" fees?
Claudia: For each time we determine your account is overdrawn by any amount and continues to be overdrawn for five or more consecutive business days, we will charge an Extended Overdrawn Balance Charge of $35.00.
Claudia: This fee is in addition to applicable Overdraft Item Fees and NSF: Returned Item Fees.
You: also, you ADMIT you paid 2 transactions as a courtesy I DID NOT WANT, causing $70 in "FEES", then added another $35 "EXTENDED NEGATIVE BALANCE" fee. That is all FABRICATED "FEES"! by BOA
Claudia: Please do not make any transactions so that transactions will not be debited from your account.
You: There are 3 unjust "FEES" here. I did not want you to pay two items which were less than the "FEE", that's ridiculous, that's not a "courtesy". And then this extended negative balance fee will go on forever.
You: well, what about the "EXTENDED NEGATIVE BALANCE" fee?
You: I'm notifying you that I hereby want this account shut and owe you $5.29.
Claudia: I humbly request you to contact us at 1800.432.1000 to resolve this issue. We are available from 7:00 a.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, Local time.
You: I'm not responsible for anything else, or anything else going forward. I'm keeping this chat in case we go to court.
You: THIS is the contact: I want this account shut down, and I only owe BOA $5.29.
You: please forward this chat to your supervisors.
CHAT #2 January 1, 2012
We notice $75.29 taken from my son's Bank of America account WITHOUT CONSENT OR AUTHORIZATION transferred to pay my daughter's -$75.29 Bank of America account, which she doesn't use anymore and they won't let her close down. Bank of America ADMITS my son's account and daughter's account are UNRELATED, but they took $75.29 from my son's account to pay my daughter's negative account, anyway.
If I were to TITLE this 2nd chat, the title would be:
"You: Do you think $70 is excessive on $5 overdrawn? Abegail : No."
Current Transcript of the Chat Session
Screen Reader Tips
In this window hotkeys have been activated to allow for quick navigation between the chat transcript and the chat text edit areas. Alt + Arrow Up will set focus on the last text message in the chat transcript and Alt + Arrow Down will set focus on the chat text edit. An audible alert will be played when a chat agent has posted a new response.
![Chat Information](file:///C:/Users/Dan/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image001.gif)
![Chat Information](file:///C:/Users/Dan/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image001.gif)
Katrina: Hello! My name is Katrina. Thank you for being a valued Bank of America customer!
Katrina: To begin with may I have your full name as it appears on our records and the last four digit of your account number concerned please?
You: You illegally transferred $75.29 from one account to another:
You: 12/30/2011 TRANSFER FROM RELATED ACCOUNT 000009999999999 $75.29 $0.00
You: without our consent
You: you transferred $75.29 from Deanna account to David account WITHOUT CONSENT!!!
You: THEY ARE NOT "RELATED ACCOUNTS"
Katrina: My sincere apologies for the inconvenience.
Katrina: I do understand how you feel about the unuathorized transfer on your account.
Katrina: For verification, may I have your full name as it appears on our records and the last four digit of your account number concerned please?
You: BOA did that, not the account holders, and those accounts are NOT RELATED
You: Dan
You: and don't give me some bullshit story that they are "related", please!
Katrina: Thank You Dan. May I verify as well the last four digit of your primary account number?
You: 7777
Katrina: Thank You.
Katrina: Let me go ahead and pull up your account so I can review what happened with the transfer.
You: you UNAUTHORIZED took $75.29 from David account and put it into Deanna account
You: Now, when the Deanna account had NEGATIVE BALANCE, why didn't you do the OPPOSITE and take from David account to put into Deanna account SO THERE WERE NO OVERDRAFTS???
You: I notice this "thievery" only works to Bank of America's advantage
Katrina: Dan, I can understand how you feel right now, if I would have been in your place I certainly would feel the same way as you do.
You: so when you gave Deanna account ALL THOSE PENALTY FEES, I notice you didn't take from David account to PREVENT those fees!
Katrina: Please allow me a few moment to review your account and see how we can resolve this issue today.
You: David account is going to FLIP OUT when he finds you just TOOK $75.29 from his account for another account!!!
You: without authorization on an UNRELATED account!
Katrina: Dan, I believe you have provided me your SSN. May I again verify the last four of your primary checking account.
You: 3333
You: 7777
Katrina: I apologize but I am unable to pull up an account ending in 3333 either. If you wish I will be happy to provide you the steps how to view your account number online.
You: 7777
You: I wrote it wrong
You: The point is: if the accounts are "related", and you can take money from one account to another, then at the time the Deanna account was "overdrawn" and got all those overdrawn charges, BOA should've "taken" money from the David account to PREVENT all those fees.
You: YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS!
Katrina: Dan, I understand your point and in that case you need to worry since you can file a dispute on the wrong transfer that had happened with your account.
Katrina: I still was not able to pull up account ending in 7777.
You: In fact, you should REVERSE the two $35 "fees" on the Deanna account, giving the REAL negative balance of - $5.29, then take the $5.29 from the David account, and shut down the Deanna account, like we wanted in the first place
You: Why don't you just REVERSE the two $35 fees on the Deanna account, giving the TRUE negative balance of -$5.29, then take the $5.29 from David account, and then close out the Deanna account?
Katrina: To change the display options for your account number, please follow the steps below.
Katrina: - Select the Accounts tab
Katrina: - Select an account you wish to view
Katrina: - Select the Account Details sub-tab
Katrina: - Select the Show Account Number link that is located on the left hand side of the screen. This will show the full account number.
You: Because those two $35 fees on the Deanna account should not have occured. They should've taken $5.29 from David account back then, the same way you just took money from the David account NOW for the $75.29.
You: Deanna account = 008888888888
You: David account = 009999999999
Katrina: Thank You very much.
Katrina: Please give me a few moment while I pull up your account.
You: You took $75.29 from David account on 12/30 for the Deanna account
Katrina: Thank You for the additional information.
You: on 9/30, if you did the OPPOSITE and took only $5.29 from the David account and put it in the Deanna account, Deanna account would never have had all those fines!!!
You: You need to do this:
You: 1. Put the $75.29 back into the David account that you took to put into the Deanna account
You: 2. reverse the two $35 fines in the Deanna account, giving a balance of -$5.29
You: 3. move $5.29 into the Deanna account from the David account, and close the Deanna account
You: THAT IS WHAT YOU SHOULD'VE DONE IN THE FIRST PLACE BACK ON 9/30!!!
You: BOA is getting in big trouble for doing things like this to fabricate fines!!!
Katrina: Dan, I truly apologize for the inconvenience, as I checked your account on our record, I can see that the transfer made was due to overdrawn account.
You: do you understand a word I'm saying?
Katrina: Yes Dan, I do understand that the two accounts are not related and the transfer should not be made, right.
Katrina: And as I am reviewing your account I can see that there is already a refund made on the account on 12/01 for the amount of $35.00
You: OR...why don't you put the $75.29 BACK in the 4590 account (FROM the 2482 account), then reverse the two $35 fines in the 2482 account, giving the original -$5.29 balance, then take $5.29 from 4590 to 2482, and close the 2482 account...WHICH IS WHAT WE ORIGINALLY WANTED AS FAR BACK AS SEPTEMBER???
You: then it would be "case closed"
You: I called and argued this SAME THING a long time ago
Katrina: Okay Dan, I will do my best with the refund as I do not want you to feel any unsatisfactory experience with Bank of America. However for the transfer, please be advised that While we make every effort to assist our customers who contact us by Live Chat, there are certain situations which require a conversation with a Customer Service Specialist that can further assist you with your concern on the transfer that happened on the account.
You: great, I would LOVE to talk to someone on the phone, because this is a HUGE ILLEGAL RIPOFF
You: I have a popular internet site, and I could put this up on my internet site and youtube.
You: you should have a "specialist" call me at 123.456.7890
Katrina: Dan, I am still trying my best to help you with the refund. Please bear with me.
Katrina: And for your concern today on the transfer, I humbly request you to please contact us at 1.800.432.1000. We are available from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. - Mon - Fri and from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. - Sat - Sun, Local Time
You: are you doing what I suggest, which would be: put the $75.29 BACK in the 4590 account (FROM the 2482 account), then reverse the two $35 fines in the 2482 account, giving the original -$5.29 balance, then take $5.29 from 4590 to 2482, and close the 2482 account...WHICH IS WHAT WE ORIGINALLY WANTED AS FAR BACK AS SEPTEMBER???
You: why can't someone call me right NOW? I just gave you my phone number!
You: In fact, I could be on the chat AND on the phone at the same time.
Katrina: Dan, if only I can transfer the money to the original account via this channel, I would have done that right away.
Katrina: And for your request to call you at your phone number, please be advised that we need to schedule a call back first and you can provide me today the best time to call you to immediately resolve this issue with your account.
Katrina: I hope you understand.
You: right now, any time, call me
Katrina: I understand Dan, that you can be contacted right now, but we still need to schedule the call back for you. And rest assured that our associates will call you with the schedule you can provide other than today.
You: This could end very quickly and happily, if you JUST: put the $75.29 BACK in the 4590 account (FROM the 2482 account), then reverse the two $35 fines in the 2482 account, giving the original -$5.29 balance in the 2482 account, then take $5.29 from 4590 to 2482, and close the 2482 account
You: This is exactly why thousands of people, including ME, are leaving BOA. If, back when I first suggested this, BOA listened to me, I'd still be a customer there. As it is, I shut down my 003830178109 account, and am in the process of shutting down ALL these accounts and going to a credit union.
You: People get these RIDICULOUS fines, BOA could easily listen to what customers are telling them, and they'd still have those customers. But they don't listen to a darn thing customers say, give them fines, and basically say, "too bad".
Katrina: Thank you for your patience, I will be right with you.
Katrina: Dan, as I am checking further on you account. I can see that the last overdraft fee of $35.00 that was charged on the account ending in 2482 was last 10/07.
You: the REAL balance on 2482 is negative $5.29, the rest are "fees"
You: back in Sep/Oct, BOA should've taken $5.29 from 4590 for 2482, and all those fees should not have occurred. that is why I am closing my BOA accounts.
You: instead of listening to REASON back then, BOA did not care what I had to say.
You: that is why people are leaving BOA in droves, does BOA care? apparently they don't
You: I'd like to know why, back in Sep/Oct, the accounts were "UNRELATED", when it was to OUR benefit...and now they are suddenly "RELATED" when it comes to BOA's benefit!!!
Katrina: Thank you for waiting. I'll be with you in just a moment.
You: that reeks of underhandedness
You: And I'm telling you, I have a very popular internet site where I report on things like this.
You: I have this whole conversation copied.
Katrina: I understand how you feel about the transfers that happened on your account.
You: I am a citizen journalist.
Katrina: I apologize for the delay. I'll be with you shortly.
Katrina: If you wish I can also place a note on your account regarding the issue with the transfer on your account.
You: well what exactly did you do?
Katrina: Dan, I have reviewed your account and here is what happened why the transfer comes out from your checking account ending in 4590.
You: It better involve putting $75.29 back in account 4590.
You: That person's RENT will bounce, if you don't.
Katrina: I can see that the account ending in 2482 was linked on your regular savings account ending in 2044 for Overdraft Protection Service. Wherein an automatic transfer will come out from your funding account which is the savings account ending in 2044 if the account was overdrawn.
You: I can tell this is going to be some answer where you're not going to put the money back in 4590, am I right?
You: Keep in mind, I wanted 2482 shut down, and BOA would not shut it down.
Katrina: Dan, as much as I would like to help you make the transfer for you the $75.29 that was made, I apologize but I am unable to do the transfer via this channel.
You: Account 4590 will BOUNCE RENT if you don't put that money back!
You: What is your explanation for freely moving money from 4590 to 2482 NOW, but not back in Sep/Oct???
Katrina: If only I can return back the money for you today Dan, I would have done that right away to help you prevent the check to bounce from your account.
Katrina: I can refer you to our Customer Service department for further assistance on that regard.
You: Not back in Sep/Oct, when they could've moved $5.29 from 4590 to 2482 and saved $105.00 worth of fines on only $5.29 overdrawn?
You: Furthermore, I thought there was a new law that a transaction causing a negative balance could not be made without the positive consent of the customer.
You: I don't want to get the "runaround" of you referring me to Customer Service, I would like this resolved NOW.
You: You CANNOT take $75.29 from 4590 for 2482 WITHOUT CONSENT. What is your explanation for this?
You: on 12/30, you took WITHOUT CONSENT $75.29 from 4590 and put it in 2482!!!!!!!!!!
You: What is your explanation for this?
Katrina: Dan, we have dedicated department who handles this kind of concern and as much as I would like to help you today transferring back the money of $75.29 to the account ending in 4590, I do not have access via this channel.
Katrina: If there would have been a way to help you out I would have certainly done that for you because I can understand how you feel right now.
Katrina: I really wish I could be of your help.
You: Can you answer this question: what gave you the authority to move $75.29 from 4590 to 2482 WITHOUT CONSENT?
You: Can you answer that question?
You: I'm not asking for HELP, I would like to to ANSWER A QUESTION. Can you do that? Simply answer that question?
You: So YOU are not Customer Service, and only Customer Service can help me? Is that what you are saying?
You: Can you put someone on from Customer Service right now?
Katrina: I apologize for the delay. I'll be with you shortly.
You: I want to chat with someone who can HELP ME. Now.
You: You said you couldn't help me, after all this time!
Katrina: Okay Dan, I can transfer this chat session to our senior chat specialist for further assistance.
You: I want to chat with someone who can HELP ME. Now.
You: You said you couldn't help me, after all this time!
Katrina: Okay Dan, I can transfer this chat session to our senior chat specialist for further assistance.
Katrina: Please give me a moment while I transfer the chat.
You: DO IT!
You: Transfer me to someone who can actually help.
Katrina: Please give me a moment to transfer the chat.
Last text message received
Please wait while I transfer the chat to the best suited Bank of America Specialist.
![Chat Information](file:///C:/Users/Dan/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image001.gif)
Current Transcript of the Chat Session
Screen Reader Tips
In this window hotkeys have been activated to allow for quick navigation between the chat transcript and the chat text edit areas. Alt + Arrow Up will set focus on the last text message in the chat transcript and Alt + Arrow Down will set focus on the chat text edit. An audible alert will be played when a chat agent has posted a new response.
![Chat Information](file:///C:/Users/Dan/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image001.gif)
![Chat Information](file:///C:/Users/Dan/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image001.gif)
Jana: Hello! Thank you for being a valued Bank of America customer! My name is Jana. May I know your full name and last four digits of your account number?
You: Dan 4590
You: I need to talk to a senior chat specialist.
Jana: Hi, a pleasant evening to you Dan!
Jana: I certainly understand that you wish to talk to our Senior specialist.
You: I was on an extremely long chat with Katrina, and I think I got cut off. Katrina was transferring me to a senior chat specialist
Jana: I am sorry about that.
Jana: I can read the chat transcript.
You: Can you see the transcript with Katrina?
Jana: Yes, I can see it Dan.
Jana: Please allow me sometime to read it completely and I will try my best to help you.
Jana: I apologize for the inconvenience if your chat was disconnected.
You: it's very long
Jana: Yes, I can see that.
You: the bottom line is: BOA just transferred $75.29 from acct 4590 to 2482 "transfer to overdrawn RELATED account"
You: So, on 9/30 thru 10/7, account 2482 was overdrawn by only $5.29.
You: So, if they're "RELATED", then on 9/30 - 10/7 time period, 4590 should've transferred $5.29 to "RELATED" account 2482, and 2482 should NOT have had all those fines.
You: So I would like BOA to reverse the $70 worth of fines in acct 2482, then transfer that $70 from 2482 to 4590, and shut down 2482, which is what I wanted in the first place months ago, and I argued about this at the time back then to no avail. That is why I proceeded to start shutting down all my BOA accounts and move them to credit unions.
Jana: I can understand your concern regarding the overdraft fees on your MyAccess Checking 2044.
Jana: I apologize for the typo error.
You: Which acct ends in 2044?
Jana: I meant to say MyAccess Checking 2482.
You: If the accounts are "RELATED", as the 12/30 transfer from 4590 to 2482 says, then a $5.29 transfer should've occurred from 4590 to 2482 on 9/30, preventing those two $35 fines.
Jana: Dan, you might be referring to the overdraft protection where this MyAccess Checking 2482 is linked to your savings account 2044. With overdraft protection, whenever your account is overdrawn, an overdraft protection transfer will happen.
You: 4590 and 2482 are "related", correct?
You: because when 2482 was -$75.29, BOA transferred $75.29 from 4590 to 2482.
Jana: Please allow me to clarify this transfer of $75.29 from your related account 4590.
You: BOA transaction in 4590 states: "transfer to overdrawn RELATED account 2482" of $75.29.
You: Now when 2482 was overdrawn by $5.29 on 9/30, therefore there should've been "transfer to overdrawn RELATED account 2482" of $5.29, and 2482 should NOT have gotten those two $35 fines, which I want reversed.
Jana: If your checking account is overdrawn and there is another checking account on your profile, bank will transfer funds automatically on the overdrawn checking account.
You: GREAT!!!!!!!!
You: Then on 9/30, 4590 should have transferred $5.29 to 2482!!! That's my point!
Jana: The overdraft fees on your MyAccess Checking 2482 is another issue.
Jana: Please allow me to explain that to you.
You: So will you reverse the two $35 fines in 2482?
Jana: Your account has been overdrawn by negative $0.01 on 09/29 for the paypal transaction.
You: Wow, one cent.
Jana: This MyAccess Checking 2482 has an overdraft protection service linked on your savings account 2044.
You: Just like right now?
Jana: The funds should have been transferred from the savings account 2044 where the overdraft protection is linked however there is no funds on your savings account at that time.
Jana: Due to which, the overdraft fee has been assessed.
Jana: I certainly understand your point Dan.
Jana: The overdraft fee will be assessed if you overdrawn your account regardless of the transaction amount.
You: Why wasn't $5.29 transferred from "RELATED" acct 4590? Like it was for the SAME SITUATION on 12/30?
Jana: The transferred happened on 12/30 is a different case.
You: Really?
You: How so?
Jana: Your account has been overdrawn since September.
You: And we asked to shut it down, and BOA would not shut it down.
Jana: In order for us not to refer this account to a collection agency, we will collect the overdrawn balance from your checking account.
Jana: I apologize for the inconvenience if your request was not processed.
You: The accounts are "RELATED", therefore you should've taken $5.29 from 4590 for 2482 on 9/30, they are EXACTLY THE SAME CASE.
You: You are making things up to benefit BOA, that is exactly why people are leaving BOA.
You: You "made up" a rule to transfer from 4590 to 2482...WHEN IT BENEFITS BOA, but not when it benefits the customer.
You: Don't try and dazzle me. It's the same exact case on 9/30 as 12/30.
You: You "made up" a rule to make it seem like it wasn't.
Jana: Should you wish me to transfer this chat right away to the senior chat specialist to properly explain the process to you Dan?
You: the acct 4590 will BOUNCE RENT if you do not put that money back into that account.
You: the last time you did this, I got hung out to dry
You: DIDN'T I ASK YOU AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS CHAT IS YOU WERE A SENIOR CHAT SPECIALIST???
Jana: I will make sure that this time you will be connected Dan.
You: YES, transfer me to a senior chat specialist.
You: right
Jana: Sure, no problem.
Jana: Please hold while I transfer this chat.
You: We did not give permission for the 12/30 transaction.
Jana: I certainly understand that.
Jana: I will be transferring you to a senior chat specialist who will assist you further. I have explained the reason for you contacting us today. He will be online with you in just a moment. Thank you for your patience.
You: Let me recap: you will make an UNAUTHORIZED transfer from 4590 to 2482 so you don't have to send 2482 to a collection agency, but you will NOT transfer a measly $5.29 from 4590 to 2482 to prevent $105 worth of fines.
You: You say 4590 are "RELATED" when BOA makes $$$ off the transaction, but 4590 are NOT "RELATED" when it is to save the customer $105 of fines.
You: Got it!!!!!!!!!
![Chat Information](file:///C:/Users/Dan/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image001.gif)
![Chat Information](file:///C:/Users/Dan/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image001.gif)
Abegail : Hello Dan.
Abegail : My name is Abegail and I am a Chat Manager.
Abegail : Please give me a minute or two to take a look at the previous chat.
You: The bottom line here is that I would like the $70 in fines in acct 2482 reversed, because I would like to put that $70 back into acct 4590. There was an unauthorized transfer of $75.29 from 4590 to 2482 stating they were "RELATED". Now, if BOA would like to think they are "RELATED", then on 9/30 BOA should've transferred $5.29 from 4590 to 2482 to prevent all those fines in 2482.
You: Also, acct 4590 will BOUNCE RENT due to the unauthorized $75.29 transfer on 12/30 from 4590 to 2482.
You: Another aspect of this, is that I thought transactions causing negative balances are not to be done without explicit consent of customers.
You: Isn't that a recent law?
Abegail : Dan, thank you for the recap.
Abegail : I understand the issue and hear where you are coming from.
You: Are you a senior chat analyst?
Abegail : I'm a manager.
You: good
You: All these quirky little "rules" benefit BOA and not the customer, and that's why people are leaving BOA, and that is why I myself have started shutting my BOA accts for this exact thing that is happening
Abegail : The transfer fro 4590 to 2482 did not happen because they are not linked hence, the OD fee was assessed.
You: Well then the 12/30 transaction which stated "TRANSFER TO OVERDRAWN RELATED ACCOUNT 2482" of $75.29 should not have occurred.
You: If they are not related.
You: Now don't "INVENT" some rule where THAT one is OK!!!
You: but the other one isn't!
You: This is exactly what I'm talking about!
Abegail : As for the $75.29 transferred from 4590 to 2482, this was legal.
You: Oh, really?
You: Why?
You: Where did I authorize BOA to do that?
You: You KNOW...this is exactly why people are leaving BOA in droves. You understand that, right? Because of what is happening exactly right now, what you are doing to me?
Abegail : It is within the purview of the bank to collectible funds and this was part of the disclosure when you opened the account with us.
You: You DO realize that.
You: Right?
You: Can you show me where it says this?
You: Do you know that these two accts are not known to each other?
You: it is David and Deanna
You: and I am Dan
You: And BOA can just take $75.29 from David acct and put it in Deanna acct? That's stealing!!!!!!
You: David cannot pay his rent, he is on unemployment and needs every penny.
You: do you think this is right, that BOA does an unforseen transfer like this, and David is not able to take this into account?
You: Where did BOA notify us of this in advance?
You: You think this is RIGHT doing this?
Abegail : I don't have access to David and Deanna's account.
You: I don't care WHAT the "rules" are you have "made up".
You: I would like the $75.29 put back in the 4590 account, and the $70 in fines in 2482 reversed, leaving a negative $5.29 balance in 2482, and then transfer $5.29 from 4590 to 2482 and close out 2482.
You: BOA does not understand the ILL WILL they have created in the United States with actions like this.
You: Taking $70 from people who can't afford it.
You: BOA got bailed out BILLIONS by taxpayers. Do you understand all the ILL WILL toward BOA, when you spout out ridiculous "rules" like you are?
Abegail : Thank you for waiting. I'll be with you in just a moment.
You: BOA is so out of touch with what customers think of them, this is a prime example. After getting bailed out BILLIONS of dollars, you take $70 off people who can't afford it.
You: BOA has totally lost touch with the average American customers.
You: How much is that worth to BOA, $70???
You: When my son David can't pay his rent from acct 4590, is that worth the publicity to BOA? I have a very popular internet site, and I will put this up on it.
You: Is that worth $70?
Abegail : The OD fee on 2482 was not caused by the $75.29 but several PayPal transactions.
Abegail : Dan, I'm unable to refund the fees since these are not due to bank error.
You: Look: it's pretty obvious that you are more worried about reversing $70 than all the bad will it will cause and make BOA look even worse than they already look.
You: You certainly are able to reverse the $70, that's baloney.
You: I will put up on the internet, that my son cannot pay his rent because of this, and that's the truth.
Abegail : I respect your opinion.
Abegail : But the issue here is that the fee was assessed correctly.
You: The "big bank" that got bailed out BILLIONS of taxpayer money, takes $70 fees and kid can't pay his rent.
You: THAT is the issue. You're attitude is the issue. BOA's attitude is the issue.
You: You DON'T respect my opinion, or you'd reverse the $70 OR put back the $75.29 in 4590.
Abegail : I have reviewed your account but I'm sorry that the fee will have to remain on the account
You: And there goes the great BOA again, cares about their customers (who are leaving in droves).
You: You still haven't shown me where you are authorized to make that 12/30 transaction.
You: Can you show me what gives you authority to do that transaction without consent?
You: Do BOA superiors tell them to fight their customers for every penny of fines?
You: At all costs, even them leaving by the millions?
You: So will you do this: shut down account 2482, or will you REFUSE to shut it down like you did before, so it can keep accruing penalties?
You: Do you still REFUSE to shut down acct 2482, like I asked months ago?
You: So it can keep going negative so you can keep STEALING money from 4590 to pay for the fines you generate?
Abegail : I can close 2482 since it shows a zero balance
You: Now that you've STOLEN $75.29 from 4590 to put in 2482, you can now close 2482, right?
You: Also shut down 000000002044 before you GENERATE some fines from that one for BOA, also.
You: Did you notify the acct holder 4590 that you took $75.29 without authorization and he may have things bounce?
Abegail : Please give me a minute or two to close both accounts?
You: How does BOA feel, making $70 in fines on an account overdrawn by $5.29?
right now.
Abegail : I apologize for the delay. I'll be with you shortly.
Abegail : Your account closure request for -2044 has been submitted. Please take note of the Service Request 1281-537026127 and Expected Resolution Date is 01/06/2012.
You: So did you close 2482 and 2044?
Abegail : Thank you for your patience, I will be right with you.
Abegail : Your account closure request for -20482 has been submitted. Please take note of the Service Request 1281-537026152 and Expected Resolution Date is 01/06/2012.
Abegail : No further action is required on your part to remove the account from your Online Banking list of accounts. Once the request is complete, the account will automatically drop from your Online Banking profile.
Abegail : Please be aware that the closing of your account will not be completed if any outstanding items post to the account. Please note that all outstanding or recurring transactions are your responsibility. You should contact any third party that you have authorized to initiate debits or credits to your account and instruct them to discontinue those transactions.
You: will there be more fines between now and 1/6???
You: And payment stolen from acct 4590 to cover them?
You: Can you prevent any transactions on accts 2482 & 2044, so there are no fines between now and 1/6???
Abegail : The fee that can potentially apply are transfer fees if you decide to transfer funds within the resolution date.
You: So you closed accts 2482 and 2044, correct?
Abegail : Yes I did.
Abegail : Apart from this, would there be anything else I can look up for you today?
You: And you can't guarantee me prevention of all transactions from now until 1/6, that would cause any fines?
Abegail : If there are automatic transfers set up, you need to stop them so the account closure goes through.
You: I would like to know if you understand why people hate BOA, case in point $70 in fines on $5.29 overdrawn. I would like to know if you think $70 is EXCESSIVE for $5.29 overdrawn. Do you think that's excessive?
You: The reason I'm telling you, is because I don't this BOA understands why so many people are leaving BOA. I'm telling you why. I really don't think BOA cares why, though.
You: BOA isn't listening to what customers are saying, about excessive fines. Their only recourse is to leave BOA. I really don't think BOA cares, though. But I wonder if THEY wonder why people are leaving them. Don't they care?
Abegail : I know how you feel about our overdraft policy.
You: But does BOA CARE? That is my question.
Abegail : Yes we care and we listen to our customers, case in point is the Debit Card Fee.
You: BOA does NOT care. The evidence is that they aren't doing anything to keep customers, such as stopping $70 fees on FIVE DOLLARS OVERDRAWN! That is unbelievably excessive. ANYONE would agree.
You: Do you think $70 is excessive on $5 overdrawn?
Abegail : No.
You: And the debit card fee: BOA stated that they would "make that up in some other way".
You: I am up on all of this.
You: So, they might've stopped the debit card fee, but why did they even try it, that's #1. #2 is the ominous statement: "we will make it up some other way".
You: That tells me more charges are coming down the pike to "make up for it", as BOA said in their own words.
You: You still haven't answered my question: is $70 fees excessive for $5 overdrawn?
Abegail : It can also mean that the bank will work on the cost side rather than the revenue side.
You: I take it your answer is "YES", or you would've answered it. I'll assume "YES".
Abegail : I said no earlier.
Abegail : If we are to manage our accounts then the fees will certainly not apply.
Abegail : And our overdraft policy is pretty much the same as other banks.
You: You DON'T think $70 is excessive for $5 overdrawn? LOL! You just proved why people hate BOA and they are losing customers. You think, what is it, 12x fine of the cost, what is that, 1,200% fine, is not excessive! LOL!!!!!!!!!
You: BOA tricks people by approving a $1 purchase so they get a $35 fine.
You: they'll approve someone buying a bottle of water for $1 without explicit consent of the customer
You: what customer would want to pay $36 for a bottle of water? Who are you kidding???
Abegail : The bank doesn't charge an overdraft fee for debit card purchases.
You: AND...BOA was caught and pleaded guilty to sorting transactions to INCREASE FINES.
You: BOA sorts transactions to INCREASE fines.
You: They'll put the largest transaction first, so the smaller ones bounce, creating more fines.
You: instead of paying all the smaller ones first.
You: Banks made BILLIONS off of fines, and had to change their ways. But they said they will "make up for the lost revenue". That doesn't sound good to me.
Abegail : I respect your opinion.
Abegail : Would there be anything else I can look up for you today, Dan?
You: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db_P0wHsSz0
You: swat team in stl protects BOA, from customers closing their accounts
You: why BOA fired me:
You: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5E0WNO7e_Q
You: you're defending a BAD company
You: no, I guess that's all, I'll be putting this whole thing up on my internet site, though
Abegail : Have a godo evening.
Abegail : To safeguard any personal information, please close this window by clicking the "Close" button in the upper right corner of this chat window.
Isn't it incredible that these entities NEVER make any billing "mistake" to their financial detriment? This is systemic fraud - which is now legal in the Fascist States Of America - if you're a bank.
Who are the Conspirators To Commit Systemic Fraud? there are real people with real names in planning meetings dreaming these illegal schemes up. It's called Conspiracy To Commit Fraud.
The public-facing agents such as these chat room lackeys are simply doing what they were instructed to do by the co-conspirators. - plunger
Remember above in the "chat", the Bank of America "chatter" said when they let a transaction go through when there wasn't enough in the account, NOT EXPLICITELY AUTHORIZED BY US BTW, it's was a "COURTESY"??? Read this:
Banks' 'courtesy' loans at soaring rates irk consumers
Remember above when I accused Bank of America of sorting our transactions to maximize penalties? Read this:
Bank Of America Paying Out $410 Million For Reordering Your Transactions To Maximize Overdraft Fees
THANKS FOR NOT CHARGING US $5 FOR USING OUR OWN MONEY, BANK OF AMERICA: NO HARM, NO FOUL!!!
FED audit: the FED secretly bailed out FOREIGN & domestic banks and corporations for $16 TRILLION DOLLARS.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi_tNDfjdP6gel4Zxy45RptImJfm6ToCTuWRtv79LLmvMYJNn2iiliVI0lbcIA3MXbFUnPjiRRADh0RJOyaGfratkQgNksU_VmTks6RWsJq4qekuA6YZ6xeTJA0yARqgr054S3IMD0zjhWu/s640/big+dan.jpg)
Isn't it incredible that these entities NEVER make any billing "mistake" to their financial detriment? This is systemic fraud - which is now legal in the Fascist States Of America - if you're a bank.
ReplyDeleteWho are the Conspirators To Commit Systemic Fraud? there are real people with real names in planning meetings dreaming these illegal schemes up. It's called Conspiracy To Commit Fraud.
The public-facing agents such as these chat room lackeys are simply doing what they were instructed to do by the co-conspirators.
And they know the whole while they're not going to "help" you, and they know you'll eventually give up trying to get back the money they stole off of you.
ReplyDeleteI posted this video on facebook:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFmkwmc1xKY
And Charlene Tilden posted this:
Charlene Linden: Does the Holocaust upset you? or do you just believe it never happened?23 hours ago · LikeCharlene Linden: Oh wait now I remember! You and the others think that all of the Jews who run the media are out to get sympathy for Israel! Yup that's always it. One big Zionist plot!
Charlene Linden: Dan you and your wife are anti-Semites. Anything about the Holocaust annoys you. For the record folks, I am not even Jewish. I am a practicing Lutheran of partially German heritage.
Thanks, Bank of America!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTjLHO4T6H4
This is how DUMB BOA thinks people are: they invent a $5 monthly charge for you to use your own money. Then, only after massive protests and huge $$$ losses for BOA, they revoke it and say: "WE VALUE AND LISTEN TO OUR CUSTOMERS".
ReplyDeleteThat's a genius video, because they point out that it's like torturing someone, then when you stop torturing them because the police found out, they valued you and listened to you and stopped the torture! lol!
NOTE TO BIG DAN'S BIG BLOG FANS: I VALUE YOU SO MUCH, I WAS GOING TO START CHARGING YOU FOR COMING HERE...BUT THEN I DIDN'T WHEN YOU STOPPED COMING HERE WHEN I SAID THAT.
ReplyDeleteSo I SAVED ALL MY FANS $5/MONTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What other blog has done this?
Scratch that...I saved you $100/month! I was going to charge you $100/month...and I didn't! So I saved all my readers $100/month! What other blog has done that for their readers?
ReplyDeleteThat's like, years ago, my wife and I (the anti-semites) were in JCPenney's and I said: "Did you notice every single thing is on 'sale'???"
ReplyDeleteThey make a FAKE high price, cross it out, and say EVERYTHING'S ON SALE! So ANYTHING you buy, you're SAVING MONEY! And if you DON'T BUY ANYTHING, you're NOT SAVING ANY MONEY!
See: you SAVE money by SPENDING money!
You KNOW, when Bank of America revoked their arbitrary $5 debit card fee, they DID say the ominous statement: "WE'LL MAKE IT UP SOME OTHER WAY". Does anyone remember that?
ReplyDeleteHmmmm....Norway again. Remember the Norway shooter?
ReplyDeleteMystery of the DEAD herring: What made 20 TONNES of fish wash up on Norwegian beach?Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2081346/Mystery-20-TONNES-fish-wash-Kvaenes-beach-Norway.html#ixzz1iPgalzME
While America shuts down fire houses, cuts infant nutrition, US subsidizes Israel army sushi courses
ReplyDeletehttp://electronicintifada.net/blog/ali-abunimah/while-america-shuts-down-fire-houses-cuts-infant-nutrition-us-subsidizes-israel
How many people have done what I've done here: documented on the internet entire conversations with Bank of America screwing a customer?
ReplyDeleteI know I feel richer just being here. I thought I only felt $5 richer, until you explained to me that I'm actually $100 richer. Thank you the the $100 BD! I'm going to leave,
ReplyDeletethen come back,
repeatedly,
in order to enrich myself even more!
Let me know if you ever decide to save me $1,000 per visit! Then I'll REALLY love you!
Note: I updated this post. I learned how to save and edit a screen shot from BOA. If you click on it, it will enlarge in another window. Let me know how it works.
ReplyDeleteChris Hedges "Brace Yourself! The American Empire Is Over & The Descent Is Going To Be HORRIFYING:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zotYU21qcU
LOL! You thought you were only saving $5, until I explained it!
ReplyDeleteDoug from the last thread:
ReplyDeleteU.S. troop arrested for bringing explosives to Texas airport
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/01/01/u-s-troop-arrested-for-bringing-explosives-to-texas-airport/
more to this than meets the eye???
"he didn't see explosives while packing" (LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! right)
ReplyDeletehttp://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_AIRPORT_EXPLOSIVES?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Faking It: How the Media Manipulates the World into War
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=y4P2O8UjQeU#!
From now on … Our Biggest Mistake is Believing We Are Free
ReplyDeletehttp://www.tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/news/editorials/22094-from-now-on-our-biggest-mistake-is-believing-we-are-free.html
How fracking might have led to an Ohio earthquake
ReplyDeleteThe 4.0 Ohio earthquake this weekend was a reminder that activities related to hydraulic fracturing, or 'fracking,' can cause seismic faults to shift if not carried out carefully.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2012/0102/How-fracking-might-have-led-to-an-Ohio-earthquake
No 'Military' Mission Accomplished... Destroy America Accomplished
ReplyDeletehttp://rense.com/general95/dessy.htm
9/11 - Eyewitnesses Reported Multiple Explosions
ReplyDeletehttp://www.opednews.com/Diary/9-11--Eyewitnesses-Report-by-Lance-Ciepiela-111011-885.html
End of the pro-democracy pretense
ReplyDeleteBY GLENN GREENWALD
http://www.salon.com/2012/01/02/end_of_the_pro_democracy_pretense/singleton/
OR - to put it the OPPOSITE WAY:
ReplyDelete"'fracking,' can cause seismic faults to shift if carried out carefully."
IF YOU'RE A NEW WORLD ORDER LUNATIC, AND YOUR GOAL IS TO FOMENT FEAR AND CAUSE DESTRUCTION, ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION AND MAYHEM - YOU CAN CAUSE EARTHQUAKES VIA FRACKING - IF YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE DOING - AND FOCUS CAREFULLY!
"I intended to pack some C-2 and some C-5, but grabbed the C-4 by mistake."
ReplyDeleteShall we just begin referring too this TRAITOR as Joe Netanyahu, or Benjamin Lieberman?
ReplyDeleteEvery single act taken by Joe Lieberman is in the employ and at the behest of Benjamin Netanyahu.
Greenwald goes to great lengths to avoid the ugliest truth...that America's leadership is ONLY focused on providing Israel what it not only wants, but demands - via the Blackmail and Extortion of Israel's 9/11 co-conspirators - America's Shadow Government.
ReplyDeletefrom the article:
ReplyDelete"Florida Democratic representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz says she’ll
be working with other Democrats to repeal the Homeland Battlefield
provisions as soon as Congress reconvenes."
That might as well read "Benjamin Netanyahu will claim to wish it hadn't passed, and act like he will do something to reverse it - while secretly laughing his ass off that Israel pulled this off."
Wasserman Schultz = Lieberman
The NDAA is ISRAEL's Legislation. What else explains all the votes for repealing the US Constitution and Bill of Rights?
Could it be any more obvious?
Got Blackmail?
Psychopaths Caused the Financial Crisis … And They Will Do It Again and Again Unless They Are Removed From Power
ReplyDeletehttp://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/01/psychopaths-caused-the-financial-crisis-and-they-will-do-it-again-and-again-unless-they-are-removed-from-power.html
An excerpt from
ReplyDeleteThey Thought They Were Free
The Germans, 1933-45
Milton Mayer
But Then It Was Too Late
http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/511928.html
Why are the media doing "Entrance Polls" as opposed to EXIT Polls? So they can explain that a lot of people must have changed their mind when they voted - and that's why Romney or Santorum beat Paul (if they happen to steal the results from Paul).
ReplyDeleteNothing will explain away the Santorum meteoric rise in recent days. It's totally fake.
http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/01/03/what-to-expect-tonight/
Here come the lies - Chuck Todd on MSNBS just said that apparently Ron Paul was overstated in the entrance poll and both Romney and Santorum were understated in the entrance poll - and that's why you see the actual data changing and Paul falling back a bit while Romney and Santorum are advancing.
ReplyDeleteTOTAL FUCKING LIES - PREDICTABLY SO!
WHY ELSE WOULD THEY CONSPIRE TO DO ENTRANCE POLLS INSTEAD OF EXIT POLLS? THEY NEEDED THE SHADOW-OF-A-DOUBT TO EXPLAIN AWAY THE THEFT OF THE VOTE.
Look at this absurd chart - and note the purple line over the last three weeks. Sure - totally normal - you bet...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/03/iowa-caucus-final-poll-sn_n_1180402.html
The mark of Karl Rove.
ReplyDeleteCNN reporter "WORRIED" Ron Paul might win:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keDL9_Pxh20&feature=youtu.be&noredirect=1
Are they going to ALSO have "exit polls"? That will entail asking the same people they asked coming in, and see if they changed their vote? wtf? How about "booth polls", they ask people WHILE they're voting, who they're voting for. Then they can look at the screen and see if they're lying.
ReplyDeleteDavid Ray Griffin rips apart people like Glenn Greenwald, Bill Moyers, etc...for being great truthers except for 9/11. He calls them out in his new book.
ReplyDeleteHow does Chuck Todd know all this???
ReplyDeleteLOL! The purple line!
ReplyDeleteCNN Feed "Drops" as US Soldier Praises Ron Paul's Foreign Policy
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_AQnegSXMw&feature=share
the word "FUCK"
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26UA578yQ5g&feature=share
He read the Rove-Produced script that clearly went out to the entire MSM, who curiously ALL only conducted "entrance polls" (colluded).
ReplyDeleteThe Great MSM Conspiracy
You know what this is evidence of? The 5-7 second delay built into every network's broadcast. The Israeli censor in the control room knew to pull the plug on that feed, and was able to do so quickly, because they build in the opportunity to via time-delay. The reporter had already informed the control room of the 9/11 tattoo on the soldiers neck before the interview started, and they were ready to end the interview if it went against Israel's interests - and/or mentioned 9/11 truth.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.infiniteunknown.net/2012/01/03/cnn-presstitute-dana-bash-worried-that-ron-pauls-candidacy-will-continue-video/
ReplyDeleteCharles David “Chuck” Todd (born April 8, 1972 in Miami, Fla.)[2] is an American journalist, Chief White House Correspondent and political director for NBC News, and contributing editor to Meet the Press.[3] He is an occasional contributor to other news outlets, including The Atlantic.
ReplyDeleteChuck Todd was in a friendly argument with Chris Mathews and Richard
Stengel about the pronunciation of the Yiddish word "Chutzpah" during
Mathew's 2011-year-end wrap-up show. It was at that moment that Todd
correctly pronounced the word, and also revealing that he was Jewish on
his mother's side ("his good side" is what Todd claims his mother says).
GOT CONSPIRACY - AT THE BEHEST OF ISRAEL?
What would a coordinated American Zionist Media campaign look like?
http://sherriequestioningall.blogspot.com/2011/12/wtf-today-show-122811-chuck-todd-who.html
WTF?! Video - Today Show 12/28/11 - Chuck Todd
"Who ever Comes in Second and not named Ron Paul in Iowa is the REAL
Winner" MSNBC site - has "Paul Bearers" under Ron Paul's profile to
subliminally affect people's thoughts of Paul.
A seriously WTF statement! I watched some of the Today Show on this
morning 12/28/11 when they began talking about the Iowa Caucus. Chuck Todd was on and Matt Lauer asked him what is Ron Paul's chances after Iowa?
Chuck Todd
replied "Ron Paul has no chance and who ever comes in second in Iowa is
the REAL Winner. Ron Paul is not a real candidate, he has no real
backing from the GOP, he is a fringe candidate who ever wins second not
named Ron Paul is the winner."
I went to MSNBC's site to see if I will be able to get the video
of the Today show. There I found the politics page has a profile for
each GOP candidate.
I am appalled at what MSNBC has under Ron Paul's profile. I took a screen shot of it: (10:10
AM est - they have changed what I screen captured earlier today with
"Paul Bearers". They have a picture of Newt up on Ron Paul's page now -
latest screen shot of Ron Paul's Profile page on MSNBC is at bottom)
For them to have "Paul Bearers" under Ron Paul's picture is outrageous!
This is about the most horrendous thing I have seen from MSM regarding
Ron Paul and their smear campaign against him. They are implying he is
too old and will be dead soon, in my opinion! It is disgusting and
shows how bias they are. Not one MSM site is unbias towards Ron Paul,
it is so obvious. Now they are even trying to subliminally influence people and their thoughts of Ron Paul, as if people are 'carrying' the dead.
Anonymous
said...
What CNN, MSNBC - and all the other defense and AIPAC controlled outlets
- promote are contrary indicators for the American public. If we could
vote out some of the seemingly permanent treasonous congressional
fixtures and elect Paul, it would portend the end of the tyranny of the
American-Israeli PUBLIC Action Committee, a foreign lobby many have
tried to bring under control. Clearly AIPAC is winning so far, and both
parties are continuing to vie for its money and television support
without concern for their 9% approval rating from the people they are
supposed to serve.
December 28, 2011 4:00 PM
Anonymous
said...
If the elections and entire system were actually real, Ron could make a
difference. But unfortunately it is an illusion created to make people
think they have a choice. They do not and neither does Ron Paul. There
will be no change. Period. The agenda is underway and will not be
stopped. They are going for broke this time. Beware.
December 28, 2011 8:32 PM
Not a single MSM network conducted an exit poll. Probably just a vast right wing zionist coincidence.
ReplyDeleteTell me that wouldn't have been HUGE, to have a FULL clip of a US soldier voting for Ron Paul saying: "ISRAEL IS CAPABLE OF TAKING CARE OF THEMSELVES", and they realized that, and cut it right in the middle!
ReplyDeleteWHEN CORRUPT LEADERS SEEK TO STEAL THE VOTE, THE GREATEST DANGER IS AN EXIT POLL
ReplyDeletehttp://www.hindu.com/2011/03/18/stories/2011031861570100.htm
Man arrested for conducting exit poll
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/17/us-singapore-arrest-idUSTRE79G2ZY20111017
AMERICAN ZIONIST/FASCISTS SEEM TO HAVE BANNED EXIT POLLS - AS THEY REVEAL TOO MUCH TRUTH - AND REQUIRE TOO MUCH EXPLANATION
Is RFK, Jr. Right About Exit Polls?
http://www.mysterypollster.com/main/2006/07/is_rfk_jr_right.html
http://www.mysterypollster.com/main/exit_polls/
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:F4RCdMBlKxkJ:www.appliedresearch.us/sf/Documents/ExitPoll.pdf+%22exit+poll%22&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgdd-yLQTJ-0u8U_JCP_AFcm2Y3pyhcQx8_9vtQbbZS9jenR0nBmap1ui4UVKt7DJhnweiqffxawvQdMV7IYh-PmZzipgWeTfk_cF5PVCSXqCzmnnbods3_tTZXv5OBHyHQJ6Fq&sig=AHIEtbTSJYANUGKQjQcbTRSVV6i9BTV2Qw
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exit_poll
Some countries, such as the United Kingdom or Germany, have made it a criminal offence to release exit poll figures before the polling stations have closed, while others, such as New Zealand and Singapore, have banned them altogether.[5]
In some instances, problems with exit polls have encouraged polling
groups to pool data in hopes of increased accuracy. This proved
successful during the 2005 UK General Election, when the BBC and ITV merged their data to show an exit poll giving Labour a majority of 66 seats, which turned out to be the exact figure. This method was also successful in the 2007 Australian Federal Election, where the collaboration of Sky News, Channel 7 and Auspoll provided an almost exact 53 percent two party-preferred victory to Labor over the ruling Coalition.
Widespread criticism of exit polling has occurred in cases, especially in the United States,
where exit-poll results have appeared and/or have provided a basis for
projecting winners before all real polls have closed, thereby possibly
influencing election results.[citation needed] In the 1980 U.S. presidential election,
NBC predicted a victory for Ronald Reagan at 8:15 pm EST, based on exit
polls of 20,000 voters. It was 5:15 pm on the West Coast, and the polls
were still open. There was speculation that voters stayed away after
hearing the results.[4]
Thereafter, television networks have voluntarily adopted the policy of
not projecting any victor within a state until all polls have closed for
that state.[citation needed] In the 2000 U.S. Presidential election it was alleged that media organizations released exit poll results for Florida before the polls closed in the Florida panhandle.
What is the name of the person who pulled the plug? On whose orders? These people have names.
ReplyDelete"CNN PULLS PLUG"
ReplyDeletehttp://www.google.com/search?tbm=blg&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1398&bih=751&q=cnn+pulls+plug&btnG=Search&gbv=2
THANK YOU CNN!
ReplyDeleteTHANK YOU FOR MAKING IT SO BLINDINGLY-OBVIOUS THAT YOU - JUST LIKE PALESTINE - ARE "ISRAELI OCCUPIED TERRITORY"
THANK YOU!
THANK YOU!
THANK YOU!
Mitt Romney 7,425 23.3% 0
ReplyDeleteRon Paul 7,375 23.2% 0
Rick Santorum 7,358 23.1% 0
Newt Gingrich 4,248 13.4% 0
Rick Perry 3,315 10.4% 0
Michele Bachmann 1,852 5.8% 0
Jon Huntsman 207 0.7% 0
Herman Cain 11 0% 0
Buddy Roemer 9 0%
Funny Ron Paul wins EVERYTHING ALL THE TIME...except the "official" vote. What's that proof of?
ReplyDeleteDRUDGE READERS FROM IOWA VOTE:PAUL 33.67%SANTORUM 20.89%ROMNEY 20.39%GINGRICH 10.28%PERRY 7.45%
Does anyone think this is dehumanizing: daily, an alarm clock goes off, you get up, scrape the ice off your car, warm it up, go someplace you don't want to go for 10 hours, have a "lunch time" yippee!!!, sit in a cubicle for 8 hours staring at a computer screen and typing (or whatever you do), have a 10 minute "smoke break", then get home after 10 hours totally with no energy, after chasing fiat currency of which you don't have any anyway even though you're doing this daily?
ReplyDeleteVote Count? What does that matter? This is all that matters...
ReplyDeleteIowa caucus results: Romney edges Santorum; Paul finishes third
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2012-iowa-caucus-primary-campaign-ends-with-candidate-attacks/2012/01/03/gIQAN2taYP_story.html?hpid=z1
ROVE ACTUALLY WROTE THAT HEADLINE A MONTH AGO - AND THEN MADE IT HAPPEN.
Check this out:
ReplyDeletehttp://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-FALSE-FLAG-U-S-Israel-sink-a-U-S-carrier-in-the-Straights-of-Hormuz-and-blame-Iran
Actually, it's very "humanizing." This is the existence of the top end of the 99%. Many others around the world have it much worse. We are just now realizing that it was done to us on purpose - whereas the rest of the world has known it their entire lives.
ReplyDeleteCONFESSIONS OF AN ECONOMIC HITMAN
Give me liberty, or give me death: 2012 NDAA
ReplyDeletehttp://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/01/give-me-liberty-or-give-me-death-2012-ndaa.html
What do the parents say, when their kids say: "IF YOU GUYS ARE DOING THIS EVERY DAY, HOW COME WE STILL HAVE NO MONEY???"
ReplyDeleteChina set to frack in America:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2012/01/03/china-set-to-frack-america-in-shale-deal-with-devon/
China will be able to do it in the Grand Canyon, Yellowstone, Yosemite - anywhere they choose. Don't think for a moment they didn't demand the National Parks as collateral for their loans. They'll start with fracking, but don't rule out strip mining down the road. At what point will Americans become outraged enough to arrest those who created this mess?
ReplyDeleteI took screen shots of "301 views" on both those videos. I love this new google chrome screen shot tool, I just learned how to use it yesterday when I put up in this post the Bank of America screen shot of my daugher's account.
ReplyDeleteWhen you search "Ron Paul soldier" in youtube, the "drops" video say 12,000+, but when you click on it, it says 301 views:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ron+paul+soldier&oq=ron+paul+soldier&aq=f&aqi=g1&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=390296l392898l0l393187l16l15l0l6l6l0l264l1341l1.5.2l8l0
Wait, this is incredible: two exact videos uploaded by two different people, of the SAME EXACT Ron Paul video, both exactly have 301 views:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_AQnegSXMw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Br5I3UcB5-A
Quakes halt Ohio ‘fracking’ waste water well
ReplyDelete“My view is you cannot predict what is going to happen when you start
operating one of these injection wells, because the earthquakes that are
happening are earthquakes you are triggering, sitting, waiting to
happen and you’ve given these earthquakes a slight extra push,”
Armbruster said.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/01/03/quakes-halt-ohio-fracking-waste-water-well/
Of course Santorum is only the most recent stalking horse...they've used many...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/04/jon-stewart-rick-santorum_n_1183070.html?ref=politics&ir=Politics
The entire US Political System is a media-enabled farce.
Billions are sent to Israel, then repatriated via AIPAC, funneled into the US political system, which in turn funnels it to the Zionist-owned/controlled media networks where political advertising is paid for.
Corporations are "people."
These "people" donate whatever they want to the farcical reality show called "politics."
The money provided by these "people" is funneled through the paid actors (politicians) to the media networks.
The media-employed actors (all Zionist puppets), then dutifully read from the script provided on behalf of the interests that own/control the US Government, airwaves, and policies.
POLITICS IS THE PROBLEM - NOT THE SOLUTION.
Here's the lead video on youtube, which miraculously has 305 views
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TSxm2V8aVQ&feature=g-logo&context=G2bb2a83FOAAAAAAAAAA
I have everyone on those videos talking about the "301 views". One guy put" thumbs up this comment if your 301", and it's got over 25 already.
ReplyDeleteRemember this one? Ron Paul walks off set exactly when Gloria Borger asks him about saying ISRAEL is behind the 1993 WTC bombings:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLonnC_ZWQ0
And now I can't make a new comment in DISCUS, only a reply.
ReplyDeleteRemember that blogger posted all the newspaper articles over YEARS where exactly "30" people died in "suicide bombings"? Do you know I looked for that article, and could never find it again?
ReplyDeleteIn one of those videos, JohntheGuerilla said it's "conspiracy" and "anomaly" that the view count is stuck at 301.
ReplyDeleteLook at the 3rd video down here, before you go into it, it says over 35,000 "views". When you go into it, it says "305 views":
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ron+paul+soldier+cnn+drops&oq=ron+paul+soldier+cnn+drops&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=38966l40624l0l40791l10l10l0l9l0l0l143l143l0.1l1l0
Here's the bottom line: they beyond a doubt manipulate "counts" in things like youtube.
ReplyDeleteJust another form of fake polling - brought to you by the Fascists and their Israeli client.
ReplyDeleteSimplest explanation for cause of WWIII...
ReplyDelete"If you don't favor war - you have no penis"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMatlG76skc&feature=player_embedded
303 views:
ReplyDeleteIowa GOP Vote Fraud & Electioneering • January 2nd, 2012
Iowa radio stream captured with Faux News Republican Strategist Dee Dee Benkie; affirming that the Iowa GOP is planning to manipulate the vote by whatever means necessary in order to prevent a first place win for Ron Paul on January 3rd, 2012. Paul likely to be forced into a 'margin of error' against Flip-Flop Mittens & Rick Fecal Matter for plausible deniability of Election Fraud.From her is disclosure of the Iowa GOP's definitive *plans* to inhibit a first-place win by Congressman Paul, not just by shoulder-persuation at the county caucus locations, but via behind-the-scenes trickery. Such as their 'secret vote' count announced *just minutes* following Occupy's plan to disrupt the caucuses. Continuity of agenda, controlled opposition (Occupy) & using that as pretense.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4WcysL7VeCw
Bev Harris of http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
ReplyDeleteBev Harris on facebook:
I just saw quite a dodgy response in Iowa. Des Moines, biggest area. In most locations they hand count in public and announce the result publicly. In this large Des Moines caucus, the guy, when asked about the winner, dodged the question, dodged it again, then said "we'll call it in to the state and they'll report it", and never did answer who won.
So, it looks like the BIGGEST area in Iowa, the Des Moines area, was the ONLY one in Iowa that DID NOT ANNOUNCE THEIR RESULT PUBLICLY! Surprise!
ReplyDeletePaul had a huge lead there half way through the night. On the live coverage, the talking head kept clicking on that precinct, and Paul was way up. The entire result is a fabrication. Santorum didn't win anywhere.
ReplyDeleteThe total absurdity of the political Bread & Circuses Theater comes shining through:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/04/anderson-cooper-cnn-team-election-coverage_n_1183005.html
Much Ado About Nothing.
BD - YOU NEED TO GET ALL OVER THE COMMENTS IN THIS ONE - WITH A LINK TO YOUR BLOG
ReplyDeleteBANK OF AMERICA STRIKES AGAIN...
"I did everything they told me to," Mudie said. "I wrote the check
for 80 cents, as crazy as that sounds. I included it with my next
payment. They cashed it."
But the next month, Bank of America sent back the 80 cents — plus the
next payment he had made. Then a letter from the bank arrived bearing
bad news:
"Your loan is not eligible for the Fannie Mae modification program
because you did not make all the required trial period plan payments by
the end of the trial period."
It goes on to say the foreclosure is back on track. Then other alarming paperwork arrived.
"This home transition guide is through the United Way," read one pamphlet.
"When you start seeing that," Mudie said, "you start thinking charities and stuff. So I knew that I am in trouble."
Bank of America spokeswoman Jumana Bauwens said it all boils down to
the computer glitch. Just like Mudie, she said, the bank made an error
when it booted him from the program.
http://www2.tbo.com/business/business/2012/jan/04/typo-involving-80-cents-nearly-cost-man-his-home-ar-343362/
Is Wolf Blitzer SENILE? wtf?
ReplyDeleteHere's what I get when I put my post there:
ReplyDeleteWe've detected that your submission contains words which violate our Terms and Conditions. Please remove them and resubmit.
Does this work? I made a "tiny url" out of it, with nothing possibly offensive in the url:
ReplyDeletehttp://tinyurl.com/7zjl9pl
How about this: in google, you just type in "Big Dan", and my blog comes up!
ReplyDeleteI put: "Go to Big Dan's Big Blog" and look the first post about Bank of America. (lol)
ReplyDeleteso there's something offensive in this sentence:
ReplyDeleteEXTORTION, THEFT, & SYSTEMATIC FRAUD: Bank of America fines my daughter $70 ($105 originally) for negative FIVE BUCKS (-$5.29) balance, refuses to close her account until it's paid (-$75.29), then STEALS $75.29 from her brother's UNRELATED account to pay it !!!
It is to me!
ReplyDeletePENILE
ReplyDeleteAnomaly implies "random" out of the ordinary.
ReplyDeleteWhat has become exceptionally ordinary is for videos opposed by Israel to have 300 views, plus or minus a couple.
GOD changed his mind: Michele Bachmann drops out of race:
ReplyDeletehttp://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/michele-bachmann-expected-quit-presidential-race-following-poor-161724564.html
ELRON - VOXEO: The Israeli Defense Firm That Tallies the Iowa Caucus
ReplyDeleteBy Christopher Bollyn
31 December 2007
http://www.bollyn.com/elron-voxeo-the-israeli-defense-firm-that-tallies-the-iowa-caucus
This is now on WHATREALLYHAPPENED, STILL 305 views:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=3TSxm2V8aVQ
My friend was telling me about this, Iowa is a WIN for Ron Paul because of the DELEGATES he will get:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.prisonplanet.com/ron-paul-doubles-vote-tally-captures-equal-number-of-delegates-as-romney-santorum.html
THIS is how that video should be worded:
ReplyDeleteU.S. Soldier & Ron Paul Supporter Begins Talking About Israel & CNN Loses Satellite Signal
http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=17172
Not "talk about foreign policy", talk about ISRAEL!!! That's exactly what happened.
People are catching on.
ReplyDeleteComment on under video:
Search"BLATANT Ron Paul CENSORSHIP by CNN of Soldier Supporting Ron Paul's Foreign Policy"Over 300,000 viewsClick video, 305 views. This has been purposely glitched so it doesn't go on home page of youtube allowing more people to see it..emanuelcako 1 hour ago
Did you ever see this before? I was on one of those youtube Ron Paul videos, and this screen came up, I'll cut/paste it, now this is a youtube video link, I should simply see the Ron Paul video, and I see this:
ReplyDelete500 Internal Server ErrorSorry, something went wrong.A team of highly trained monkeys has been dispatched to deal with this situation.If you see them, show them this information:nvVGaIuLTFtanZJaSCQFXPsU1rLa1VpAAG0qiCWfqMdZlJLAR33kIFSNd6JDSVnWgMTx6Ddaagp547UAs92AqhY1Bkk8RWS5DrT7vEplo9H1QZGhLrPquG-E9rOoUwqvHrrzaUvkZg584UgYqeNw8KlF4ZZvkBf3aIJdofEsJINiTojW3McTjhcr1hJ6iTrHL-PC75-X4U8cJu3DkxorBiJQojqlp7NBSwcap8AcmruYayFNWVMSFk73ci_yTlujmnZzPtn_n0LsfVWO4enI-EMDNBpkWGTG35IDx2dyrhXpGQVWXhExUSXq0hPtPFIdFYRB7hM9gGuhSxfapoAnJ69bC07hKX9ht48QDCGIRPJogjn2DH4fk8zMKsWH9NS1V9ZosYOpnsjuQ3-_QyWyCi9x5Ix4g_9jhMEerum5SyhxC_iRMJh5obul-N01QS2Br7fWsB8ivnJUgBpHa3N6M-pQcLyDU_yUoBL_doRsbFGC0pZ0wu48dLp-
(I cut some of it off, but that mumbo jumbo keeps going on)
Posted on Wednesday, January 4, 2012 - 6:15 am:
ReplyDeleteProbably worth noting, or at least a good chuckle:
http://cnn.com/video/?/video/politics/2012/01/04/natpkg-iowa-caucus-night.cnn
At around 2:00 into the video:
CNN: What's the total for Clinton County, Romney, Santorum, Paul?}
CC: Ohh. Are they correct? I haven't [double or done them]. I added them up. I ADDED THEM UP, UHH, A COUPLE TIMES. Ohh man.
CC: I show Romney coming up with a total of 437 votes for Clinton County. Santorum had 354.
CNN: This is what's missing and we need the state's central committiee to clear this up. But, the numbers we're receiving for the state do not match the numbers we just received from the chair-woman, right here in Clinton County. If these are the final numbers...
CC: What do you mean the numbers don't match?
CNN: Well, I'll explain it.. [Laughter]
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/143/81800.html?1325687871
Check out all of these - soldier now being threatened for being political.
ReplyDeletehttp://news.google.com/news/more?hl=en&gl=us&q=cnn+soldier&gs_upl=36482l40686l0l40799l17l16l0l0l0l3l259l2569l1.9.5l15l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&biw=1322&bih=1010&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ncl=deh9H_S1-PSctuM5BGSQ5f49nIX2M&ei=xeYET4ihLaH4sQLcvaCRCg&sa=X&oi=news_result&ct=more-results&resnum=1&ved=0CDEQqgIwAA
From way up above...
ReplyDeleteThey make a FAKE high price, cross it out, and say EVERYTHING'S ON SALE!
So ANYTHING you buy, you're SAVING MONEY! And if you DON'T BUY
ANYTHING, you're NOT SAVING ANY MONEY!
Years ago when KMart was closing a bunch of stores I went to the one near my house which was closing for their 50% off going out of business sale.
I bought a number of items at some good prices and thought I'd made a steal.
When I got home I started to unwrap or open things and got curious. I peeled of the red 50% off sale sticker off of one of the packages. It was listed at $15.95 and with 50% off - now $7.95, but underneath the sticker was another sticker that priced the item at retail $11.95.
I proceeded to do the same with the other items and for the most part the deductions were closer to 30% off.
There goes discus again - forgetting who I am!
ReplyDeleteHe acts like a senile old bastard, he should get fired, but I'm sure he won't.
ReplyDeleteHere's another "anomaly" or "conspiracy": google "red shift". They even have a term for ALL ELECTION EXIT POLLS shifting one way towards the final "count": towards Republicans (in general elections). They actually have a term for it: the red shift. This is the propagandized nation we live in: media characters casually say: "AND NOW AFTER WE ADJUST FOR THE RED SHIFT"...as if that's "normal" and "OK" and don't question it. It just "IS", and accept it. The "random" "anomaly" "conspiracy" that ALL elections do "THE RED SHIFT". Just accept it, and don't question it, or you're a nutty conspiracy theorist.
ReplyDeleteUS commander visits Israel to finalize missile drill
ReplyDeleteBy YAAKOV KATZ
12/20/2011 18:04
Israel, US to hold largest ever missile defense exercise this spring; thousands of US soldiers will be deployed in Israel.
http://www.jpost.com/Defense/Article.aspx?id=250249
Look at this video @12:40, this time FOX cuts off Ron Paul exactly as he's introducing that SAME SOLDIER about to come to the podium to speak. Do you know there are actually people who explain away this stuff every single time?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeggPSL3gQs
I know Ron Paul could not be what he appears to be, like any of them. But there's a lot of direct and indirect evidence that the news networks are on the same page with censoring Ron Paul. Which tells me I should vote for Ron Paul. Out of all of them. Plus the simple fact that he's the only NOT MASS MURDERER (ie: he's against the wars). That one simple fact is enough for me to vote for Ron Paul. I'm voting for the ONE candidate, including Obama, who's against the wars. It's that simple. Also, the networks and establishment seem to hate a guy who has voted straight for the Constitution for over 30 years. They're afraid of a guy with a track record like that, that he can't be compromised. He's not going to switch his voting style after more than 30 years. He's going to do the same thing. He has a very long track record of doing the same exact thing.
ReplyDeleteWrong video linked here?
ReplyDeleteWhoops, I fixed it.
ReplyDeleteHere was that other video I accidentally posted:
ReplyDeletePt.1 PROOF Rigged Election - Watch the Vote 2012 - Iowa Caucus
Notice the guy says there's PHONY POLLS leading up to stolen elections:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeggPSL3gQs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GxqWqKH8fg&feature=related
Election official on CNN:
ReplyDeleteWHADDYA MEAN THE NUMBERS DON'T MATCH?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YH8DWF2G5_g&feature=player_embedded
Exactly. All these things that are TRUE, they say you're "NUTS" when you point it out. I don't care what they say, if it's true, it's true.
ReplyDeletehttp://watchthevote2012.com/
ReplyDeleteDan, a quick response to your BOFA chat: learn what the "right of offset" means. Please do. If the children's accounts both had you as a co-signer, then BOFA has the right to "offset" an unpaid/uncollectible balance from one account to another. This is different than an "overdraft transfer."
ReplyDeleteWow, that's what I was searching for, what a information! existing here at this weblog, thanks admin of this site.
ReplyDeleteReview my web page venapro