Libya/Ghadaffi: free electricity, free great medical care, interest free loans, govt. paid 50% for purchase of a car, govt gave newly married couples $50,000 to buy a house, the lists goes on and on in how well the Libyan people have/had it. The problem was Libya had an independent state bank, not part of BIS (Rothschild's banks) and wanted to switch trading oil from dollars to gold:
"Gaddafi supplied to Libyans free college education, healthcare, housing assistance and other social benefits. NATO wants it privatized to make it costly or unaffordable henceforth, along with charging for everything formerly gotten free. Plus the 'rebels' already set-up a Rothschild-owned central bank."
~ Carla Elaine
Lies, War, and Empire: NATO's "Humanitarian" Imperialism in Libya
Now let me pick one of the evening news liars, CBS, but they're all the same propaganda, and show you how they are reporting Ghadaffi & Libya. Watch how they will not report on OUR filthy rich because that's "class warfare", but watch how they report on Ghadaffi's "lavish lifestyle" with no mention of Libya's free health care, free education, etc... Ghadaffi's "jet skis & hot tubs & he even has a piano & liquor", and he has a private jet! you know, like ALL of OUR POLITICIANS & CEO's and rich here! Watch how the "news guy" holds up a plate at the end and says "the end of Ghadaffi's gilded age"...yeah, and the beginning of OURS! I wish CBS (and the rest of the evening news liars) would report like this on OUR rich & wealthy! But that's "class warfare" if they reported on OUR rich & wealthy like this, and watch for CBS reporting on Libya's FREE health care, FREE education (NOT!) and keep in mind they're all the same - ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX, CNN - they only want you to "think" they're different, but they have all the same stories in the same order every night. In the following CBS "new" on Ghadaffi, just replace Ghadaffi with the Bush family, the Rockefeller family, the Koch brothers, the CEO of Exxon, the CEO of Bank of America, etc...but subtract free health care, free education, etc...:
America's #1 enemy: the mainstream media -
BREAKING NEWS: NATO Destroyed Libya - Hugo Chavez
The Libyan crisis: spontaneous revolution or coup in progress?
Libya all about oil, or central banking?
Rebel Assassins Terrorizing Libyans
The Real Reason for NATO Attacking Libya EXPOSED
Can you handle the TRUTH about Libya & the UN bombing?
Media Manipulation: 'NATO in a hurry to wrap up war in Libya'
WikiLeaks cables expose Washington’s close ties to Gaddafi
The West Wants to take Control of Libya's Oil Wealth
When you contemplate the impending collapse of the dollar (indeed all paper "money"), and the need to replace fiat with real money - backed by something other than empty promises and debt, and you note that the banksters don't want that something to be gold or silver - you can picture a scenario whereby they select oil as the commodity that backs all "currency." The US actually has abundant oil reserves - including newly drilled and capped wells across west-Texas and huge discoveries (Alaska) that the oil/banking cartel simply refuse to allow to come onto the market. They limit refining capacity for one reason only - to constrain supply and keep prices high.
If you assume that the plan is to back a one-world currency with oil, then it makes perfect sense that the empire with the dying "petro-dollar" go out and acquire (at the tip of a spear), all of the oil it can - regardless of cost. It also explains why this same oil/banking cartel has kept every alternative to the internal combustion engine and alternative fuel sources out of automobiles - despite innovations that can replace gasoline to power cars. They simply require that oil remain "precious." Just like gold - OIL IS MONEY.
The end of the US fiat "currency" has been planned for thirty years. If they are replacing it with a form of money said to be backed by oil, that would explain why they chose to implement 9/11 as the pretext and the cover story for acquiring the majority of the world's oil supply. Those with the inside knowledge (and a copy of the script) are behaving just as you would expect them to, when insider trading is free to occur on a global scale without restriction or penalty.
What else explains it? - plunger
If there's a "HUMANITARIAN CRISIS", then WE caused it by an unprovoked attack on Libya:
Libya: on brink of humanitarian disaster
General Wesley Clark on 9/11 n Libya, Libya was already planned, Iran next..
Gaddafi's Stolen Billions: Max Keiser Explains 'Financial Terrorism'
How FASCISM is sold to the American public (especially people on the RIGHT who listen to RUSH LIMBAUGH) as "shrinking the government".
Open proposal for US revolution
Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, parasitic economics. 1 of 4
Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, all from known lies. 2 of 4
Open proposal for US revolution: end parasitic and criminal economics. 3 of 4
The Police State Road Map: Three Hundred Trillion Dollars and Counting
CFAP Report: $42 Million From Seven Foundations Helped Fuel The Rise Of Islamophobia In America
Obama once again, like Bush, sides with the elites & banksters against us with the foreclosure scandal:
Obama Goes All Out For Dirty Banker Deal
Wikileaks: Obama Administration Secretly Worked To Prevent Prosecution of War Crimes By The Bush Administration
Bush AND Obama LIE about 9/11 and tell you not to dig too deep (or what? you'll find out the truth?):
The Election March of the Trolls, The only commodity the troll state offers is fear.
First Federal Reserve Audit Reveals Trillions in Secret Bailouts
Wall Street Aristocracy Got $1.2 Trillion in Secret Loans
Salon.com columnist Glenn Greenwald on Thursday blasted President Barack Obama’s mantra that the nation should “look forward, not backward” regarding alleged crimes committed by the Bush administration.
“Imagine if, for example, we decided to announce tomorrow that we were no longer going to prosecute murder or rape or child abductions because we didn’t want to ‘keep looking backwards,’” he said on MSNBC’s The Last Word. “What do you think would happen? Obviously there would be a lot more people engaging in murder, rape, and child abduction.”
Greenwald added that American political culture had “decided our highest political officials are free to break the law without consequences” and Obama had continued the “evisceration of the rule of law for political elites.”
You're watching our government and their "news" trick you about Libya in real time, now go back and take a look at how they tricked you on 9/11:
NOTE: The term 'National Security" does not mean what you think it means. As in Orwell's 1984 - the term has been hijacked. It now means: "protect the guilty Shadow Government co-conspirators"Whenever you hear the term "national security" - just think "Cover-Up"...Ellsberg seemed hardly surprised that today’s American mainstream broadcast media has so far failed to take [former FBI translator and 9/11 whistleblower Sibel] Edmonds up on her offer, despite the blockbuster nature of her allegations [which Ellsberg calls "far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers"]. As Edmonds has also alluded, Ellsberg pointed to the New York Times, who "sat on the NSA spying story for over a year" when they "could have put it out before the 2004 election, which might have changed the outcome." "There will be phone calls going out to the media saying ‘don’t even think of touching it, you will be prosecuted for violating national security,’" he told us.
* * *
"I am confident that there is conversation inside the Government as to ‘How do we deal with Sibel?’" contends Ellsberg. "The first line of defense is to ensure that she doesn’t get into the media. I think any outlet that thought of using her materials would go to to the government and they would be told ‘don’t touch this . . . .‘"
The TRUTH is "anti-American": Pentagon Papers Whistleblower Ellsberg Says Government Has ORDERED the Media Not to Cover 9/11(Article)
There was no "Underwear Bomber" - as there was never any "Bomb."
There was no "Portland Bomber" - as there was no "Bomb."
There was no "Shoe Bomber" - as there was no Bomb."
These are total FBI/CIA/Media inventions - psyops.
Watch this video of eyewitnesses to "the underwear bomber":
Truly a Bizarre Passenger list for Flight 77 that Crashed into the Pentagon (Article)
Shanksville Resident Speaks Out About 9-11
Recent developments among supporters of the US government’s version of events indicate that they plan to begin blaming Saudi Arabia for the attacks of September 11, 2001.
Big Dan's famous 9/11 post
The first of many 9/11 propaganda pieces pushing the official government 9/11 LIE: National Geographic -
News Corp. owned National Geographic’s 9/11 documentary more interested in feelings than facts
THE ENEMY OF THE "AGENDA"
TRUTH
THIS MUSHY DEFINITION IS WHAT THEY WOULD HAVE YOU BELIEVE ABOUT THE CONCEPT FORMERLY KNOWN AS TRUTH:
Language and words are essentially "tools" by which humans convey information to one another. As such, "truth" must have a beneficial use in order to be retained within language. Defining this potency and applicability can be looked upon as "criteria", and the method used to recognize a "truth" is termed a criterion of truth. Since there is no single accepted criterion, they can all be considered "theories".
WITH NO ABSOLUTE, DISCERNIBLE TRUTH - ANY LIE MAY BE CALLED "TRUTH"
INDEED, THE LAST REFUGE OF THE SCOUNDREL, IS THE LIE, SWORN TO BE TRUTHFUL.
THE DEATH OF THE AMERICAN IDEAL OCCURS WHEN EACH SINGLE INDIVIDUAL THE MEDIA, KNOWING THE LIE TO BE ONE - PRESENTS IT AS THE TRUTH, NONETHELESS.
WITH THOSE IN THE MEDIA BEHOLDEN TO LIARS TO PAY THEIR BILLS, THE CONCEPT OF THE FREE PRESS HAS ENTIRELY DISAPPEARED...YET IS CALLED THAT NONETHELESS - BY THE LIARS WHO PAY, THEIR LIARS TO SAY - THAT WHICH YOU WISH WERE
TRUTH.
The coherence theory of TRUTH
The main contender to the semantic theory of Tarski is the coherence theory. In general terms, the theory says that a proposition is true if it coheres (or agrees) with other propositions we already hold to be true.
The easiest way to appreciate what this means is to consider an example: suppose a person drops an expensive vase when browsing in an antique shop and is asked to pay for it. Instead, the person offers the explanation or proposition "I dropped it because an African elephant knocked it from my grasp, since we were arguing over who should buy it".
Why might we not accept this story?
African elephants are not known to talk.African elephants are not known to be patrons of antique shops. African elephants are not found in this part of the world.No elephant was known to be within a certain number of kilometres of the shop.No-one else in the shop saw the elephant. And so on. Each item in the list is some other proposition we already hold to be true, or approximately so. Given, then, that the person's claim conflicts (or fails to cohere) with the set of propositions we have previously accepted, we reject it and call it false.
Note that this is much the same way as we usually come by knowledge,especially on a day-to-day basis. Moreover, this has nothing at all todo with Ockham's Razor or the likelihood of different explanations; indeed, it seems that when people appeal to Ockham they are usually employing a coherence theory instead.
http://www.galilean-library.org/manuscript.php?postid=43788
SEE WHERE YOU CAN SPOT DONALD RUMFELD IN THIS MORASS:
Ockham’s Razor is a principle; that is, it does not tell us that the simplest explanation is true (or what there is); but instead that we ought to prefer it on methodological grounds. We are counseled to adopt theories which are minimallyefficient, insofar as they can do the same with less. Note that there is apparently no reason why we should do so: a direct route to a destination is neither better nor worse than a diversion unless we include the criterion that we wish to get there by the most direct route (and even then it may not be, so we will return to this analogy later.) Nevertheless, it seems plain enough that we are inclined to favor the simpler explanation, other things being equal. It is this assumption that we shall now examine.
http://www.galilean-library.org/site/index.php?/page/index.html/_/essays/philosophyofscience/ockhams-razor-r55
So you see, as long as the likes of Rumsfeld and Rove can blind us to the true meaning of the word TRUTH itself - they need never fear that it will come to been widely accepted and agreed upon. In truth - for all you know - fully 80% of Americans may already believe that 9/11 was an inside job. As Rove is fully aware - and counts on - unless and until the media informs the citizens of a truth - it never exists - as without the media to confirm its truthfulness - we are all left to look at our neighbors, friends and loved ones - and wonder what they consider to be true...all while having been brainwashed and programmed not to ask them directly.
Behold the individuals, awaiting development of the herd - while the essential rallying cry - the truth - is left unsaid - by the only medium capable of broadcasting it with credibility - the formerly free press.
I hold this truth to be self-evident.
BILL MOYERS: Let me get to the blunt conclusion you reach in your book. You say that two years after the devastating financial crisis of '08 our country is still at the mercy of an oligarchy that is bigger, more profitable, and more resistant to regulation than ever. Correct?
SIMON JOHNSON: Absolutely correct, Bill. The big banks became stronger as a result of the bailout. That may seem extraordinary, but it's really true. They're turning that increased economic clout into more political power. And they're using that political power to go out and take the same sort of risks that got us into disaster in September 2008.
BILL MOYERS: And your definition of oligarchy is?
SIMON JOHNSON: Oligarchy is just- it's a very simple, straightforward idea from Aristotle. It's political power based on economic power. And it's the rise of the banks in economic terms, which we document at length, that it'd turn into political power. And they then feed that back into more deregulation, more opportunities to go out and take reckless risks and-- and capture huge amounts of money….The American democracy was not given to us on a platter. It is not ours for all time, irrespective of our efforts. Either people organize and they find political leadership to take this on, or we are going to be in big trouble, okay?... That's absolutely the heart of the problem. I would also say and tell you, and emphasize, these people will not come out and debate with us. The heads of these companies or their representatives, they will not come out. They're afraid. They don't have the substance. They don't have the arguments. We have the evidence. They have the lobbyists. And that's all they have.
BILL MOYERS: They've got the power, the muscle, the money.
SIMON JOHNSON: They have money.
BILL MOYERS: You just have the arguments. You just have the facts. On your side.
SIMON JOHNSON: Absolutely. That's exactly what it comes down to.
ALL WE HAVE IS THE TRUTH TAKE BACK CONTROL OF THE AIRWAVES TAKE BACK THE FCC
FOR AS LONG AS THE MEDIA CAN BE CONTROLLED - PREVENTED FROM REVEALING THE TRUTH - THE LIARS WILL REMAIN IN CHARGE OF DISCERNIBLE REALITY - THE UNTRUTH - WHICH YOU HAVE COME TO BELIEVE AS TRUTH. THE GREATEST TRAITORS IN AMERICA ARE THE TALKING HEADS IN THE MEDIA - WILLING WHORES, KNOWINGLY LYING IN RETURN FOR A PAYCHECK.
EVEN RACHEL MADDOW KNOWS SHE IS PROHIBITED FROM REVEALING THE TRUTH. SHE IS ASTUTE ENOUGH TO KNOW THE RICHARD ENGEL IS A CIA MOUTHPIECE. HOW DO YOU PRODUCE AN ENTIRE SPECIAL ON THE DECADE AFTER 9/11 - WITHOUT REVEALING THE TRUTH OF 9/11? IS SHE ONE TOO?
Reality-based community is an informal term in the United States. In the fall of 2004, the phrase "proud member of the reality-based community" was first used to suggest the commentator's opinions are based more on observation than on faith, assumption, or ideology. The term has been defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from judicious study of discernible reality." Some commentators have gone as far as to suggest that there is an overarching conflict in society between the reality-based community and the "faith-based community" as a whole. It can be seen as an example of political framing.
The source of the term is a quotation in an October 17, 2004, The New York Times Magazine article by writer Ron Suskind, quoting an unnamed aide to George W. Bush (later attributed to Karl Rove[1]):
The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." ... "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
-- William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting, 1981)
Hey Rachel:
What is the truth of 9/11?
Imagine that question going viral across the internet - everywhere - every day.
- plunger
When you contemplate the impending collapse of the dollar (indeed all paper "money"), and the need to replace fiat with real money - backed by something other than empty promises and debt, and you note that the banksters don't want that something to be gold or silver - you can picture a scenario whereby they select oil as the commodity that backs all "currency." The US actually has abundant oil reserves - including newly drilled and capped wells across west-Texas and huge discoveries (Alaska) that the oil/banking cartel simply refuse to allow to come onto the market. They limit refining capacity for one reason only - to constrain supply and keep prices high.
ReplyDeleteIf you assume that the plan is to back a one-world currency with oil, then it makes perfect sense that the empire with the dying "petro-dollar" go out and acquire (at the tip of a spear), all of the oil it can - regardless of cost. It also explains why this same oil/banking cartel has kept every alternative to the internal combustion engine and alternative fuel sources out of automobiles - despite innovations that can replace gasoline to power cars. They simply require that oil remain "precious." Just like gold - OIL IS MONEY.
The end of the US fiat "currency" has been planned for thirty years. If they are replacing it with a form of money said to be backed by oil, that would explain why they chose to implement 9/11 as the pretext and the cover story for acquiring the majority of the world's oil supply. Those with the inside knowledge (and a copy of the script) are behaving just as you would expect them to, when insider trading is free to occur on a global scale without restriction or penalty.
What else explains it?
BD:
ReplyDeleteYou named the individual who posted the UFO videos to your attention. He is an Israeli. It is possible that he is part of the HASBARA and GIYRUS (Megaphone) program to discredit 9/11 truthers by compelling them to conflate UFO stories with 9/11 truth. This is his name:
Leon Yoseph Leiner
Here is an article that he "likes" on facebook:
http://www.israelbehindthenews.com/bin/content.cgi?ID=4410&q=1
There was no "Underwear Bomber" - as there was never any "Bomb."
ReplyDeleteThere was no "Portland Bomber" - as there was no "Bomb."
There was no "Shoe Bomber" - as there was no Bomb."
These are total FBI/CIA/Media inventions - psyops.
The Truth is "anti-American"
ReplyDeletehttp://www.factoverfiction.com/article/673
NOTE: The term 'National Security" does not mean what you think it means. As in Orwell's 1984 - the term has been hijacked. It now means: "protect the guilty Shadow Government co-conspirators"Whenever you hear the term "national security" - just think "Cover-Up"...Ellsberg seemed hardly surprised
ReplyDeletethat today’s American mainstream broadcast media has so far failed to
take [former FBI translator and 9/11 whistleblower Sibel] Edmonds up on
her offer, despite the blockbuster nature of her allegations [which
Ellsberg calls "far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers"].
As Edmonds has also alluded, Ellsberg pointed to the New York Times,
who "sat on the NSA spying story for over a year" when they "could have
put it out before the 2004 election, which might have changed the
outcome."
"There will be phone calls going
out to the media saying ‘don’t even think of touching it, you will be
prosecuted for violating national security,’" he told us.
* * *
"I am confident that there is conversation inside the Government as to ‘How do we deal with Sibel?’" contends Ellsberg. "The
first line of defense is to ensure that she doesn’t get into the media.
I think any outlet that thought of using her materials would go to to
the government and they would be told ‘don’t touch this . . . .‘"
What would it take for Disqus to actually function properly? Is it really so difficult to allow formatting to be maintained when items are posted?
ReplyDeleteFrom yesterday... In reply to my comment on how disqus wasn't linking my blog...
ReplyDeleteSo IE: "BB2" should be able to mouse over it and get to your site, right?
Yes, that's right.
Yesterday I was at some other website that used discus. It would only let me post a comment if I used one of a list of identities consisting of Facebook, MySpace, and several others including Google. I click on the Google option and posted my comment to find I had been posted with my real name. My Google ID is Bluebear2, not my real name. WTF?
When I came here this morning I again found my real name ready to be posted. Somehow I was logged into Disqus with my real name. There was link to log out so we will see next what happens when I post this comment.
OK, It let me decide what name to use AND it now links my blog!
ReplyDeleteBut it didn't remember me - I had to fill out "Post As..." boxes again.
ReplyDeleteAnd again, and again, and again!
ReplyDeleteJust a CIA-controlled coincidence.
ReplyDeleteDoesn't that figure?
ReplyDeleteWell how about I have EVERYTHING clicked for "free form" no checks commenting!
ReplyDeleteIs there ANY system out there that REALLY has no holds barred free form commenting? Let me know.
What Did You Learn in School Today? (The Texas Version)
ReplyDeletehttps://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/08/25-5#.TlkrdW0WfVE.facebook
Did anyone read this yet?
ReplyDeleteOpen proposal for revolution:
http://www.examiner.com/la-county-nonpartisan-in-los-angeles/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end-unlawful-wars-criminal-economics-1-of-4
Open proposal for US revolution: end parasitic and criminal economics. 3 of 4
ReplyDeletehttp://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2011/08/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end_29.html
Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, all from known lies. 2 of 4
ReplyDeletehttp://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2011/08/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end_28.html
Open proposal for US revolution: end unlawful wars, parasitic economics. 1 of 4
ReplyDeletehttp://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2011/08/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-end.html
I was merely pointing out their inability to allow for simple comment formatting. You copy paste something and post it - and inevitably it requires editing to reformat it. That's just basic/lame on their behalf. It cannot be that complex to correct if they actually cared to impress anyone
ReplyDeleteUS Federal debt increases by U.S Presidents:Reagan -----186%Bush I -----54%Clinton ---41%Bush II------72%Obama --23%Source: Congressional Budget Office
ReplyDeleteNote - the actual reason for the fake terror attacks and blatant lies above are directly tied (in a straight line) to the funding of this mess:
ReplyDelete9/11: A Decade After
Is Homeland Security spending paying off?
A Decade After The Sept. 11 Attacks, Federal
And State Governments Are Doling Out About $75 Billion A Year On
Domestic Security. Whether The Spending Spree Has Been Worth It Is The
Subject Of Increasing Debate.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-911-homeland-money-20110828,0,162046.story
THE ENEMY OF THE "AGENDA"
ReplyDeleteTRUTH
THIS MUSHY DEFINITION IS WHAT THEY WOULD HAVE YOU BELIEVE ABOUT THE CONCEPT FORMERLY KNOWN AS TRUTH:
Language and words are essentially "tools" by which humans convey information
to one another. As such, "truth" must have a beneficial use in order to
be retained within language. Defining this potency and applicability
can be looked upon as "criteria", and the method used to recognize a
"truth" is termed a criterion of truth. Since there is no single accepted criterion, they can all be considered "theories".
WITH NO ABSOLUTE, DISCERNIBLE TRUTH - ANY LIE MAY BE CALLED "TRUTH"
INDEED, THE LAST REFUGE OF THE SCOUNDREL, IS THE LIE, SWORN TO BE TRUTHFUL.
THE DEATH OF THE AMERICAN IDEAL OCCURS WHEN EACH SINGLE INDIVIDUAL THE MEDIA, KNOWING THE LIE TO BE ONE - PRESENTS IT AS THE TRUTH, NONETHELESS.
WITH THOSE IN THE MEDIA BEHOLDEN TO LIARS TO PAY THEIR BILLS, THE CONCEPT OF THE FREE PRESS HAS ENTIRELY DISAPPEARED...YET IS CALLED THAT NONETHELESS - BY THE LIARS WHO PAY, THEIR LIARS TO SAY - THAT WHICH YOU WISH WERE
TRUTH.
The coherence theory of TRUTH
ReplyDeleteThe main contender to the semantic theory of Tarski is the coherence theory. In general terms, the theory says that a proposition is true if it coheres (or agrees) with other propositions we already hold to be true.
The easiest way to appreciate what this means is to consider an example:
suppose a person drops an expensive vase when browsing in an antique
shop and is asked to pay for it. Instead, the person offers the
explanation or proposition "I dropped it because an African elephant
knocked it from my grasp, since we were arguing over who should buy it".
Why might we not accept this story?
African elephants are not known to talk.African elephants are not known to be patrons of antique shops.African elephants are not found in this part of the world.No elephant was known to be within a certain number of kilometres of the shop.No-one else in the shop saw the elephant.
And so on. Each item in the list is some other proposition we already hold to be true, or approximately so. Given, then, that the person's claim conflicts (or fails to cohere) with the set of propositions we have previously accepted, we reject it and call it false.
Note that this is much the same way as we usually come by knowledge,
especially on a day-to-day basis. Moreover, this has nothing at all to
do with Ockham's Razor
or the likelihood of different explanations; indeed, it seems that when
people appeal to Ockham they are usually employing a coherence theory
instead.
http://www.galilean-library.org/manuscript.php?postid=43788
SEE WHERE YOU CAN SPOT DONALD RUMFELD IN THIS MORASS:
Ockham’s Razor is a principle; that is, it does not tell us that the simplest explanation is true (or what there is); but instead that we ought to prefer it on methodological
grounds. We are counseled to adopt theories which are minimally
efficient, insofar as they can do the same with less. Note that there is
apparently no reason why we should do so: a direct route to a
destination is neither better nor worse than a diversion unless
we include the criterion that we wish to get there by the most direct
route (and even then it may not be, so we will return to this analogy
later.) Nevertheless, it seems plain enough that we are inclined to favor the simpler explanation, other things being equal. It is this
assumption that we shall now examine.
http://www.galilean-library.org/site/index.php?/page/index.html/_/essays/philosophyofscience/ockhams-razor-r55
So you see, as long as the likes of Rumsfeld and Rove can blind us to the true meaning of the word TRUTH itself - they need never fear that it will come to been widely accepted and agreed upon. In truth - for all you know - fully 80% of Americans may already believe that 9/11 was an inside job. As Rove is fully aware - and counts on - unless and until the media informs the citizens of a truth - it never exists - as without the media to confirm its truthfulness - we are all left to look at our neighbors, friends and loved ones - and wonder what they consider to be true...all while having been brainwashed and programmed not to ask them directly.
ReplyDeleteBehold the individuals, awaiting development of the herd - while the essential rallying cry - the truth - is left unsaid - by the only medium capable of broadcasting it with credibility - the formerly free press.
I hold this truth to be self-evident.
BILL MOYERS: Let
ReplyDeleteme get to the blunt conclusion you reach in your book. You say that two
years after the devastating financial crisis of '08 our country is
still at the mercy of an oligarchy that is bigger, more profitable, and
more resistant to regulation than ever. Correct?
SIMON JOHNSON: Absolutely
correct, Bill. The big banks became stronger as a result of the
bailout. That may seem extraordinary, but it's really true. They're
turning that increased economic clout into more political power. And
they're using that political power to go out and take the same sort of
risks that got us into disaster in September 2008.
BILL MOYERS: And your definition of oligarchy is?
SIMON JOHNSON: Oligarchy
is just- it's a very simple, straightforward idea from Aristotle. It's
political power based on economic power. And it's the rise of the banks
in economic terms, which we document at length, that it'd turn into
political power. And they then feed that back into more deregulation,
more opportunities to go out and take reckless risks and-- and capture
huge amounts of money….The American democracy was not given to us on a
platter. It is not ours for all time, irrespective of our efforts.
Either people organize and they find political leadership to take this
on, or we are going to be in big trouble, okay?... That's absolutely the
heart of the problem. I would also say and tell you, and emphasize,
these people will not come out and debate with us. The heads of these
companies or their representatives, they will not come out. They're
afraid. They don't have the substance. They don't have the arguments. We
have the evidence. They have the lobbyists. And that's all they have.
BILL MOYERS: They've got the power, the muscle, the money.
SIMON JOHNSON: They have money.
BILL MOYERS: You just have the arguments. You just have the facts. On your side.
SIMON JOHNSON: Absolutely. That's exactly what it comes down to.
ALL WE HAVE IS THE TRUTH
TAKE BACK CONTROL OF THE AIRWAVES
TAKE BACK THE FCC
REMEMBER THE TALKING HEAD GENERALS - PAID TO APPEAR ON THE MEDIA TO IMPART THE DOD'S BLOOD-THIRSTY AND AGGRESSIVE VERSION OF THE TRUTH (SUBSEQUENTLY PROVEN TO BE A LIE)? REMEMBER THAT PROPAGANDA IS ILLEGAL IN THE UNITED STATES?
ReplyDeletePostmodern perspectives
Later in this series we'll look at postmodernism, so-called, but for now
we may consider one of the points made on the subject of truth by
thinkers associated with this area that has since become known as
postmodern.
It has bothered some people that the notion of truth tends to have a kind of power to it, insofar as it could be interpreted as saying "this
is true; your ideas are not". That is to say, truth is power just as
much as knowledge is. This would be important politically and socially
if one or more groups intended to supplant the ideas of another, or
force their own on them; the sanction of truth being applied to them may
make this easier, or at the least give the groups a justification for
their actions that may convince them to be less than scrupulous.
Alternatively, the ideas of certain experts or people of influence may
have a prestige attached to them that may not be due to their merits.
Thus the acceptance of what is true depends on many social and other
factors; moreover, what we accept and hence becomes the consensus is
what is true: if everyone believes that we are and always have been at
war with Eurasia then who cares if an omnipotent being would know
otherwise?
FOR AS LONG AS THE MEDIA CAN BE CONTROLLED - PREVENTED FROM REVEALING THE TRUTH - THE LIARS WILL REMAIN IN CHARGE OF DISCERNIBLE REALITY - THE UNTRUTH - WHICH YOU HAVE COME TO BELIEVE AS TRUTH. THE GREATEST TRAITORS IN AMERICA ARE THE TALKING HEADS IN THE MEDIA - WILLING WHORES, KNOWINGLY LYING IN RETURN FOR A PAYCHECK.
ReplyDeleteEVEN RACHEL MADDOW KNOWS SHE IS PROHIBITED FROM REVEALING THE TRUTH. SHE IS ASTUTE ENOUGH TO KNOW THE RICHARD ENGEL IS A CIA MOUTHPIECE. HOW DO YOU PRODUCE AN ENTIRE SPECIAL ON THE DECADE AFTER 9/11 - WITHOUT REVEALING THE TRUTH OF 9/11? IS SHE ONE TOO?
Reality-based community is an informal term in the United
States. In the fall of 2004, the phrase "proud member of the
reality-based community" was first used to suggest the commentator's
opinions are based more on observation
than on faith, assumption, or ideology. The term has been defined as
people who "believe that solutions emerge from judicious study of
discernible reality." Some commentators have gone as far as to suggest
that there is an overarching conflict in society between the
reality-based community and the "faith-based community" as a whole. It can be seen as an example of political framing.
The source of the term is a quotation in an October 17, 2004, The New York Times Magazine article by writer Ron Suskind, quoting an unnamed aide to George W. Bush (later attributed to Karl Rove[1]):
The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the
reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that
solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." ...
"That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued.
"We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And
while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act
again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's
how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you,
will be left to just study what we do."
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when
everything the American public believes is false."
-- William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting, 1981)
Hey Rachel:
ReplyDeleteWhat is the truth of 9/11?
Imagine that question going viral across the internet - everywhere - every day.
ReplyDeleteNINE DEPLOYMENTS IS TORTURE
ReplyDeletehttp://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/08/army-rangers-widow-booted-from-rumsfelds-book-signing/
Will a media darling put their career on the line like this NASA Scientist just did?
ReplyDeleteOne of the nation's foremost experts on climate change was arrested
outside the White House on Monday morning after he joined a protest
against a planned Canadian tar sands pipeline.
Dr. James Hansen (pictured), who runs NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies,
was arrested along with 139 other protesters taking part in a series of
demonstrations against the planned $7-billion Keystone XL pipeline,
which would transport 500,000 barrels of crude per day from America's
neighbor to the north all the way to the Gulf coast of Texas.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/08/29/top-nasa-climate-scientist-arrested-at-white-house/
Here comes the next UN (Rockefeller) bird flu hoax - just in time for the big crack down:
ReplyDeleteUN warns of mutant strain of bird flu virus
Food agency says new strain of H5N1 avian flu is spreading in Asia and may breach defenses of existing vaccines.
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2011/08/2011829165436251177.html
The Election March of the Trolls
ReplyDeletehttp://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_election_march_of_the_trolls_20110829/
For those, usually liberals, still rooted
in a reality-based world, one that believes in evolutionary science, the
corporate trolls offer a more refined, fear-based message of impending
doom: If you abandon the Democrats we will be governed by Bible-thumping
idiots who will make us chant the Pledge of Allegiance in mass rallies
and teach the account of Genesis as historical and biological fact in
our nation’s schools.
And underneath it all runs the mantra
chanted in unison by all the trolls—terror, terror, terror. The troll
establishment spins us like windup dolls and laughs all the way to the
bank. What idiots, they think. And every election cycle we prove them
right.
“The only people who grasp the distinction
between reality and appearance, who grasp the laws of conduct and
society, are the ruling groups and those who do their bidding;
scientific, technical elites who elucidate the laws of behavior and the
functions of society so that people might be more effectively, albeit
unconsciously, governed,” wrote James W. Carey in “Communication as Culture.”
They are destroying all legal impediments to corporate exploitation and
profit, as well as dismantling the regulatory agencies that once
protected the citizen. They defend torture, offshore penal colonies,
black sites and kidnapping (they call it “extraordinary rendition”) of
state enemies. They protect and abet financial fraud. They wage
pre-emptive war. They refuse to restore habeas corpus. Without warrants,
they monitor, eavesdrop on and wiretap tens of millions of citizens.
They order the assassination of U.S. citizens. They deny due process.
They give corporations the status of persons. They ignore the suffering
of the unemployed and the poor, slashing basic social service programs
while doling out hundreds of billions in taxpayer funds to corporations.
On these key issues, the only ones that really matter, there is no
disagreement among trolls from either the self-identified left or the
self-identified right. All their public disputes in the election cycle
are a carnival act.
This is it in a nutshell, plunger, THE MEDIA:
ReplyDelete"unless and until the media informs the citizens of a truth - it never
exists - as without the media to confirm its truthfulness - we are all
left to look at our neighbors, friends and loved ones - and wonder what
they consider to be true...all while having been brainwashed and
programmed not to ask them directly.
Behold the individuals,
awaiting development of the herd - while the essential rallying cry -
the truth - is left unsaid - by the only medium capable of broadcasting
it with credibility - the formerly free press."
I was watching the "news", the major network "news", which I rarely do, and we were clicking around and we saw:
- Colin Powell on at least TWO of CBS/ABC/NBC
- same with Dick Cheney
- Libya: CBS showed some "reporter" holding up gold plated plates, saying how Ghadaffi had "the best" of everything, even gold lined dinner plates. CBS said nothing of free health care, education, 14 cent gas, etc... in Libya. It's like CBS is simply the CIA only with the front of being a major "news" network. They showed a plane of Ghadaffi's, and were noting how expensive the plane was etc...the theme was that Ghadaffi led a privileged existence. Then they showed "poor" Libyans, they're starving, etc...still no mention of free health care, education, etc...
This is in this post.
ReplyDeleteLook at this "friend" request in FB(I), this person wants to be "friends" with me, now keep in mind we have NO MUTUAL FRIENDS:
ReplyDeleteShella Machamon Respond to Friend Request
Studied at New York Film AcademyLives in New York, New YorkFrom Miami, Florida
And here's a picture of her, and she has only 95 "friends" probably all fake friends or idiots who responded to her "friend" request:
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-ash2/274797_100002644216545_8146463_n.jpg
Let me know if you can see the picture of her.
Now think about that: we have NO COMMON FRIENDS. Where did she get my name? Why does she want to "friend" me on FaceBook?
ReplyDeleteHere's another one, NO COMMON FRIENDS again:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=104862709615586&set=a.104858092949381.4987.100002755725173&type=1&theater
Her name is Fati Abdalai and she has 23 friends. Now think about that: 23 friends, no mutual friends with me, and she want's to be my "friend" on FB.
And why is the same picture coming up for both Shelly and Fati in DISCUS?
ReplyDeleteHere's the CBS "news" report my wife and I saw, as I mentioned above:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7378843n&tag=contentMain;contentBody
Now remember how our "news" wants us to report on OUR filthy rich: they DON'T! They say it's "class warfare", right?
ReplyDeleteMichele Bachmann: GOD made the earthquake & hurricane for her political purposes -
ReplyDeletehttp://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-bachmann-hurricane-god-20110829,0,6553701.story
Dylan Ratigan - The Cost Of Corporate Communism
ReplyDeletehttp://dailybail.com/home/dylan-ratigan-the-cost-of-corporate-communism.html
Notice "the harley guy" in here:
ReplyDeletehttp://americansjourney.blogspot.com/2008/12/911-truth-reason-vs-crowd.html
Cutter Charges in the North Tower of the World Trade Center
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoAD8HlrLZg&feature=player_embedded
Missing Links
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YResfXTXd1c
Hmmmm.....check this out:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMZRugHOQKg
9/11 Eyewitness - FEMA At Towers, FBI Prior Knowledge Of Collapse, Bomb Squad, And Explosion
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hc_5LgCl5Mk
I would suspect a phishing scam!
ReplyDeleteCoreOfCorruption.com - 4 Suspects in World Trade Center Before 9/11 Doing Construction
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnFAwg2T_94
Hey BD - want to get famous?
ReplyDeletepinochetcheney.com
Is available...grab it! You know how many sets of eyeballs you could suddenly attract / refer if you make it THE repository for Cheney War Crimes Truth?
Former Bush official promises to testify if someone will ‘Pinochet’ Cheney
The former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell pledged
Tuesday to testify against former Vice President Dick Cheney if he is
ever tried for war crimes.
Col. Lawrence Wilkerson told Democracy Now‘s Amy Goodman that he would participate in a trial even if it meant personal repercussions.
“I, unfortunately — and I’ve admitted to this a number of times,
publicly and privately — was the person who put together Colin Powell’s
presentation at the United Nations Security Council on 5 February,
2003,” Wilkerson said. “It was probably the biggest mistake of my life. I
regret it to this day. I regret not having resigned over it.”
“Colonel Wilkerson, do you think the Bush administration officials
should be held accountable in the way that Glenn Greenwald is talking
about?” Goodman asked.
“I certainly do,” Wilkerson replied. “And I’d be willing to testify,
and I’d be willing to take any punishment I’m due. And I have to say, I
agree with almost everything [Greenwald] just said. And I think that
explains the aggressiveness, to a large extent, of the Cheney attack and
of the words like ‘exploding heads all over Washington.’ This is a book
written out of fear, fear that one day someone will ‘Pinochet’ Dick
Cheney.”
http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/08/former-bush-official-promises-to-testify-if-someone-will-pinochet-cheney/
"Don't taze me bro!"
ReplyDeletehttp://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/08/uniformed-new-mexico-officer-photographed-having-sex-on-car-hood/
Talk about well researched! Check out the footnotes...
ReplyDeletehttp://andrewgavinmarshall.com/2011/08/26/lies-war-and-empire-nato%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Chumanitarian-imperialism%E2%80%9D-in-libya/
'Inside Job' is the first film to provide a comprehensive analysis of
ReplyDeletethe global financial crisis of 2008, which at a cost over $20 trillion,
caused millions of people to lose their jobs and homes in the worst
recession since the Great Depression, and nearly resulted in a global
financial collapse. Through exhaustive research and extensive interviews
with key financial insiders, politicians, journalists, and academics,
the film traces the rise of a rogue industry which has corrupted
politics, regulation, and academia. It was made on location in the
United States, Iceland, England, France, Singapore, and China.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4egTybH-TE&sns=fb
Army Ranger Widow Confronts Rumsfeld over His Lies that Convinced Her Husband to Join the Military
ReplyDeleteWe speak with the widow of a U.S. Army Ranger who confronted
former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld about her husband’s suicide
on Saturday. Ashley Joppa-Hagemann introduced herself to Rumsfeld during
a book signing by handing him a copy of her husband’s funeral program
at a base south of Tacoma, Washington. She says Rumsfeld inspired her
husband to join the Army after 9/11, but he later became disillusioned
with the reasons for the war. Her husband, 25-year-old Staff Sergeant
Jared Hagemann, killed himself ahead of what his wife says was his
eighth deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan. His body was found on June
28, 2011, at the Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington State. More than
18,000 soldiers returned to the Joint Base Lewis-McChord from combat
tours last year. And while the Army says it is trying to shore up mental
health services there, Joppa-Hagemann questions its success. "I want to
confront the man whose lies led my husband to join the military, and so
many other soldiers," says Joppa-Hagemann. "That’s what I wanted to do,
and that’s what I did."
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/8/30/army_ranger_widow_confronts_rumsfeld_over
Ex-Bush Official Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: "I am Willing to Testify" If Dick Cheney is Put on Trial
ReplyDeleteShare1727
As former Vice President Dick Cheney publishes
his long-awaited memoir, we speak to Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former
chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell. "This is a book
written out of fear, fear that one day someone will 'Pinochet' Dick
Cheney," says Wilkerson, alluding to the former Chilean dictator Augusto
Pinochet, who was arrested for war crimes. Wilkerson also calls for
George W. Bush and Cheney to be held accountable for their crimes in
office. "I’d be willing to testify, and I’d be willing to take any
punishment I’m due," Wilkerson said. We also speak to Salon.com
political and legal blogger Glenn Greenwald about his recent article on
Cheney, "The Fruits of Elite Immunity." "Dick Cheney goes around the
country profiting off of this sleazy, sensationalistic, self-serving
book, basically profiting from his crimes, and at the same time
normalizing the idea that these kind of policies…are perfectly
legitimate choices to make. And I think that’s the really damaging
legacy from all of this," says Greenwald.
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/8/30/ex_bush_official_col_lawrence_wilkerson
The only purpose of "Politics" is to enrich the media cartel and control (divide) the people.
ReplyDeleteIt serves no useful purpose for we the people.
If money were divorced from politics, the subsequent nightly newscasts would be unrecognizable - as the truths that journalists would be free to portray would be contrary to every popular perception.
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE TACTIC OF PRESENTING A "PIED PIPER" AS AN AGENT OF "CHANGE" - SUCCEEDS:
ReplyDeletefrom the comments here:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/08/30/obamas-former-email-fundraising-author-among-those-arrested-at-white-house/
Daniel R Cobb Yesterday 10:21 PM
I think it is incredibly telling that key people who worked for
Presdent Obama are now being arrested, protesting his decisions. He
has discarded so many of the legitimate hopes and dreams that many of us
had about a more Progressive American government, a government that
would lead in areas, like environmental responsibility, American dignity,
the threat in the rise of corporatism/fascism and the apparent demise
of the middle class. Who carries our banner now? In this new Grapes of
Wrath debacle, who will preserve the dignity of the American middle
class?
WATCH THIS!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrPpBUSBA5E
Regardless of your take on the specific content, this guy made a very compelling pitch for Ron Paul - one that the media owners will never allow to be heard:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iH75aZcoMJQ&feature=player_embedded#!
Eighty-one members of the House of Representatives have just completed a trip to Israel, all expenses paid by an American Israel
ReplyDeletePublic Affairs Committee offshoot, the American Israel Education
Foundation. Even by the usually craven standards of Congress, which
applauds any and all Israeli actions, this particular junket featured an
unusually high number of participants. And it's at a time when domestic
considerations, such as the crumbling economy, are surely worthy of the
undivided attention of our elected representatives.
Among the 81 who went on this "Magical Mystery Tour" was Illinois Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.
While there, the Democratic congressman met with Israeli and
Palestinian leaders but clearly deemed it unnecessary to undertake any
real fact-finding, choosing instead to stick to the scripted tours laid
out by lobbyists for Israel.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/ct-oped-0831-israel-20110831,0,3860799.story
House Democratic Whip Steny H. Hoyer served as the delegation's
ReplyDeletesenior member and said in a written statement prepared by his office,
"I'm pleased members of Congress have this opportunity to study American
interests in the Middle East and gain a deeper understanding of the
issues involved in increasing stability in the region."
Wilson
said that her district is home to a significant Jewish population and
that she looks forward to deepening the relationship between the U.S.
and Israel and bringing her trip experiences back to her work in South
Florida and in Congress. She also discussed her learning experience.
"I learned how difficult it has been for the people of Israel and how
the Jewish people have persevered and how they've stood up for their
rights and their homeland," she said. "Even though they all may have
differences on how to stand up for your rights and homeland, they all
have one common goal — the protection and security of Israel."
Wilson said that other trip highlights included meeting local people and
going to a neighborhood that borders the Gaza Strip, where she learned
that people have been attacked and that they have to run to shelter when
they hear a siren, an experience she felt was traumatizing for the
children there.
"One of the things I plan to do when I go back to
Congress is try to make sure that these children have access to proper
treatment therapy for traumatized youngsters," she added.
http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2011-08-30/news/fl-jjdc-trip-0824-20110830_1_holy-land-president-shimon-peres-gaza-strip
ATF - like the SEC, FCC and every other hijacked federal agency - proven to be part of the huge shadow government protection racket - enabling lawlessness:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.emptywheel.net/2011/08/30/obama-and-holder-push-dennis-burke-out-over-their/
Got RACKETEERING?
To facilitate whose agenda?
Got ROCKEFELLER?
Great stuff! I always post these things on FB(I). And get GREAT response in comments.
ReplyDeleteI know. Ghost Writer Of The Purple Sage
ReplyDeleteSee why they refuse to declare "war?"
ReplyDeleteBlatant "War Crimes" - to include the coverup...
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/09/01/wikileaks-cable-u-s-troops-handcuffed-shot-iraqi-children-in-raid/
The GOP War on Voting
ReplyDeleteIn a campaign supported by the Koch brothers, Republicans are working to prevent millions of Democrats from voting next year
http://www.readersupportednews.org/off-site-news-section/69-69/7261-inside-the-gops-war-on-voting
Israel did 9/11 - US Army War College Dr. Alan Sabrosky Former Director of Studies
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MbjQK61bj8
My letter to journalists covering 9/11
ReplyDeleteI have sent the letter below to many dozens of journalists who have
requested interviews with 9/11 family members, and copied it to those
organizing 9/11 remembrance events. I have also taken to posting a short
version as a comment on offending articles (example here).
Dear (name of journalist),
One of the approximately 50% of 9/11 family members who rejects the
official story of 9/11 informs me that you are a journalist who is
covering the 10th anniversary of 9/11.
http://truthjihad.blogspot.com/2011/09/my-letter-to-journalists-covering-911.html
Full list of PNAC signators:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.publiceye.org/pnac_chart/pnac.html
9/11 2011 - TEN YEAR ANNIVERSARY
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9a9xXlmTHBY
Meria With the News
ReplyDelete9/1/11 Meria’s take on the news: Lt. Dan Choi -vindictive prosecution;earthquake reports; National Guard air lifts supplies to Vermont; 19th century infrastructure
in US; Notting Hill riots; UK to arrest 30,000, busting you on hearsay
(see: V for Vendetta); Russia’s space program failure; German
prostitutes pay taxes; Fukishima schools unsafe; Tripoli’s humanitarian
crisis; New Japanese PM-austerity cuts; fuel poverty in UK; Exxon’s
Russian deal; Michele Bachmann says Irene a message from “god”; $30
billion wasted,$720 million lost in Iraq/Afghanistan; UK bans street
protests; worse flood in 83 yrs for Vermont; fires in US; 66 U.S. troops
killed in August; NJ floods; 9/11 coloring book; Roundup chemicals in
air and water in Miss.,& Iowa; Andre Carson vs. tea party; drug
tests for welfare -unconstitutional; Republican John Perzel guilty of
conspiracy; NY’s stop and frisk challenged;Underinsured homes; insurance
companies and Irene; AT&T merger stopped; can the Euro survive?
hottest August ever in Phoenix; and more “stuff”.
http://meria.net/2011/09/meria-with-the-news-116/
Truly a Bizarre Passenger list for Flight 77 that Crashed into the Pentagon (Article)
ReplyDeletehttp://www.factoverfiction.com/article/3032
My area:
ReplyDeleteDallas Twp. residents unnerved as work starts on pipeline
Read more: http://citizensvoice.com/news/dallas-twp-residents-unnerved-as-work-starts-on-pipeline-1.1196336#ixzz1WjAxaaKN
That link plunger posted above:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrPpBUSBA5E&feature=share
I put it on FB(I) and it caught on as I saw two other people combined with me to post it as a shared link. When I first looked at it, it had 188 views. NOW it has 189 when I looked at it AFTER I know more than 1 person looked at it. Did you ever see that article I posted on youtube "gaming" the view counts?
From Mike Rivero:
ReplyDelete9/11 Building 7 - Martin Noakes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMq1PiUbf-M&feature=youtu.be
Danny Jowenko, 1955-2011: How a Demolition Expert Brought Explosive Attention to 9/11 Truth
ReplyDeletehttp://ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/550-jowenko.html
LOL! That's really good!
ReplyDeleteRon Paul Supports 9/11 Families Calling for New 9/11 Probe
ReplyDelete(and is soon to die in a small plane crash and/or suicide)
http://world911truth.org/ron-paul-supports-911-families-calling-for-new-911-probe/
North Tower Exploding
ReplyDeleteThis is a narration of a video clip of the North Tower of the World
Trade Center which focuses on explosive ejections progressing in waves
down the faces of the building under the canopy of falling debris.
Observation is the foundation of science.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSApOavkHg8&sns=fb
CREDO mobile execs arrested at White House (maybe we should switch our cell phones to CREDO, huh?)
ReplyDeletehttp://www.credoaction.com/pages/pipeline_arrests/
neocon Wolfowitz, PNAC & 911
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVqd78phm0M&sns=fb
John Heinz.High School: Phillips Exeter Academy, Exeter, NH (1956) -http://www.nndb.com/edu/572/000068368/ -Skull and Bones - http://www.nndb.com/org/723/000041600/ - Senator Henry John Heinz IIIchaired
ReplyDeletethe three-man presidential review board that probed the Iran-contra
affair. He died in a plane crash in April 1991 - The Bushy Knoll - http://www.lizmichael.com/bushykno.htm -
CIA rendition flights exposed in mundane billing lawsuit
ReplyDeletehttp://news.yahoo.com/blogs/upshot/cia-rendition-flights-exposed-mundane-billing-lawsuit-162614626.html
The Top 10 Reasons Why Dr. Ron Paul Is the Only Rational Choice
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/laura-trice/ron-paul-elections_b_939004.html?ref=fb&src=sp
Regulatory capture by industry concerns so that federal oversight agencies no longer act to the benefit of the interest's of "we the people" but rather these federal agencies watch and rule to the benefit of corporate interests and concerns - helping to enhance their income and bottom-line profits. Greed is good - regulation is needlessly cumbersome, only then can we remain vivacious and be able to compete in a free trade/free enterprise international marketplace environment unhampered by government intrusions. The race to the bottom can not and should not be hampered by detours, roadblocks, and speed limits. The Amerikan middle class is needless and useless and should be done away with and dispatched forthwith - as soon as practically possible. Socialism is for pinko girlie whoosies - rampant hyper capitalism is where real men hang their hats and reside.
ReplyDeleteIs this an oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico,.. AGAIN ? No - it is just a rainbow oil sheen in the Gulf of Mexico courtesy Of British Petrol. Thank goodness Maggie Thatcher privatized British Petroleum at the insistence of the Rothschilds - so that they could gobble up the former government enterprise and further enrich themselves via this free market privatization and rape the citizenry of these resources held in common for the benefit of "we the people".
ReplyDeletePrivate enterprise is so much more efficient and trustworthy - for the magic hand of free market capitalism forces corporations to act in the public interests absent any government regulation or controls of any kind or sort.
Date of this Deepwater Horizon oil slick video : August 30, 2011,.. here we go again,..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlWKptW74CY
Can't we just squirt the Correctz-it petroleum dispersant in the Gulf of Mexico and make the oil slick sink to the bottom - out of sight - out of mind - magic hand of free market Rothschild hyper capitalism approach - that worked so marvelously is the resent past ?
ReplyDeleteWater and oil mix rather nicely - if enough Correctzzzzzzzzzzz-it is infused into the eco-system. The fisheries and shrimp - well that's another story - that we would rather not detail, divulge or discuss.
UN vehicles in the U.S.?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYthUkfszV4
How about this tactic by journalists to divert attention from an Israeli crime:
ReplyDeleteHere's the skeleton sentence, I see it a lot:
A journalist leads off a column with: "Now the 'blame Israel for everything' crowd is at it again with blaming Israel for (fill in the blank for any Israeli crime)."
questionable what they are. read the comments. serious over reach in the guy's interpretation - without backup.
ReplyDeleteI have no doubt the images are real - but it may be tied to a massive shipment of vehicles coming in at a time when credit froze and there were no buyers.
ReplyDeleteApparently Martin Noakes is capable of doing what no former famous American musician/activist is. Don't tell me that the socially conscious musicians of the seventies aren't somewhat ashamed when they view this - and admit to themselves they could be doing the same - but aren't.
ReplyDeleteNote that Ron Paul's support of further investigation is still tied to the cover story of incompetence and "ineptness" - which is what the government would have us believe every time they implement a false flag attack. It's wise for Paul to use that as the reason for his choice - in order to remain alive - but just pointing out that he is tying his demand strictly to laying blame for incompetence - not identifying who else actually did the deed.
ReplyDeleteWhen you are caught red-handed - the FBI/CIA/GHW Bush/David Rockefeller Shadow Government has the option to give you a get out of jail free card...and become a talking head mouthpiece for the Racketeers (see also Jim Cramer and Larry Kudlow of CNBS - among others):
ReplyDeleteLori Klausutis, age 28, was found dead behind a desk in
the offices of US Representative Joe Scarborough of
Florida, a Republican, on July 20, 2001. Death was
apparently due to a blow on the head. Claims that a heart
condition precipitated an accidental fall are tenuous at
best; Lori was a marathon runner, and one would think
that a heart condition would already have become
apparent. At the time of her death, she was treasurer of
her chapter of the Florida Federation of Young
Republicans. Tim Klausitus, Lori's husband, worked on
targeting technology for missiles. Rep. Scarborough sat
on both the Military Construction and the Research and
Development Subcommittees. Scarborough resigned from
Congress and now hosts a Cable TV show on MSNBC.
If you tied everything you ever posted back to GHW Bush, you'd be right more often than not.
ReplyDeleteNot revealed is where the money came from to pay for the rendition flights. See GHW Bush / CIA Colombian drug running operation.
ReplyDeleteAT&T bought more than 700 copies of Rick Perry’s book
ReplyDeleteComment below the article:
This is the same crime that pretty much got Newt removed. Corporations
bought like 15,000 copies of his fake book in a backend way of funneling
money to him illegally.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/09/01/att-bought-more-than-700-copies-of-rick-perrys-book/
BD - get Karen Kwiatkowski to review the above and comment - she's on FB
ReplyDeleteCheck this out, and remember what I posted above about good looking women who want to "friend" you on FaceBook, but have hardly any friends and NO mutual friends with you:
ReplyDeleteRevealed: Fake Facebook Identity Used By Military Contractors Plotting To Hack Progressive Organizations
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/08/18/298081/hbgary-federal-us-chamber-persona/
To be honest with you, the guy who posted that on FB is kind of nutty. I just posted it here to see what anyone thinks.
ReplyDeleteHere we go: Sibel's post about Bruce Fein:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2011/09/02/countdown-day-4-nervous-fein-publicists-hard-at-work%E2%80%A6/
I've got to chop it down into smaller sections, I couldn't post it on her FB wall OR email it to her in FB.
ReplyDeleteYour link here appears to be bad:
ReplyDeletehttp://indepth.news.sky.com/InDepth/topic/Michael_Ledeen_And_Rick_Perry
Showed that to you on purpose - note the headline - and explain why the related content was scrubbed?
ReplyDeleteWhat used to be there? Who wrote the headline? Why?
She knows everything about the OSP. She saw first-hand Israeli Generals coming and going to advise the Pentagon in how best to overthrow the Muslim nations - and Feith ensuring their visits remained unrecorded - a total violation of security procedures.
ReplyDeleteMR. PAUL - DOES IT GET ANY MORE TRAITOROUS THAN THIS? EITHER YOU ASPIRE TO REPRESENT WE THE PEOPLE, OR YOU ASPIRE TO REPRESENT GHW BUSH, THE CIA, AND ISRAEL. FEIN'S OWN ACTIONS TO COVER-UP HIS PAST ARE THEMSELVES, INCRIMINATING.
ReplyDeleteThe Lichfield Group
features unrivalled government, media, and business experience.
Exemplary is the Group’s high level connections with the Department of
Justice, the Department of State, and the Central Intelligence Agency,
on the one hand, to The New York Times, The Washington Times, The Wall
Street Journal, and nationwide broadcast or cable networks on the other.
Whether a client is a giant
corporation handcuffed by ill-conceived United States government
policies or a foreign government anxious to influence the decisions of
Congress, the President, agencies, the judiciary, or State governments,
The Lichfield Group is armed with the skills and contacts indispensable
for success.
As you can see the Fein couple is
not selling good ole boring attorney appeal here. They say they are
close to the CIA and State Department and Congress, and willing to
influence them for foreign entities if the right dollar amount is paid.
Also, it is very interesting to see
how twisting and misrepresenting facts in a not very ethical manner,
apparently a ‘Fein’ trademark, shows itself in his representation of
his marital status! The Fein publicists, since my article exposing the
couple’s ‘Israel Lobby’ agenda, have begun advertising the Feins as divorced, and concluding that ‘so Mattie Fein’s activities and associations do not in any way apply to Bruce; they are divorced!’
I did check my facts, and I did talk with credible sources: They did
file for divorce a few years back, but with all sorts of business
partnerships and strategic benefits in politics at stake they changed
their mind, and nullified their filings. They are legally married. They
are business partners. They have businesses together, and Fein has been
his wife’s supporter in every single meaning of the word ‘support.’
I fell for this type of scheme when I was younger. Long story about that one. Basically, the "Fembot" ended up then targeting someone else I knew who was in a predicament similar to mine. She wasn't only trying for cyber relations, she was attempting to bet up close and personal. In that case her identity was confirmed, still a shill, but a real person nonetheless.
ReplyDeleteI've now experienced two of these that I am aware of.
Open proposal for US revolution: expose corporate media as propaganda. 4 of 4.
ReplyDeleteWe have verified history of official
government propaganda having infiltrated corporate media. The Church
Senate Committee hearings had the cooperation of CIA Director William
Colby’s testimony that over 400 CIA operatives were controlling US corporate media
reporting on specific issues of national interest in what they called
Operation Mockingbird. This stunning testimony was then confirmed by
Pulitzer Prize reporter Carl Bernstein’s research and reporting. Of course, corporate media refused to publish Bernstein’s article and it became the cover-story for Rolling Stone. Bernstein provides additional information of CIA control in the Senate report and corporate media subsequent reporting:http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2011/08/open-proposal-for-us-revolution-expose.html
Insider Tells Why Obama Chose Not to Prosecute Torture
ReplyDeleteBy: David Swanson Friday September 2, 2011 6:08 pm
“Then Dean Chris Edley volunteered that
he’d been party to very high level discussions during Obama’s
transition about prosecuting the criminals. He said they decided
against it. I asked why. Two reasons: 1) it was thought that the CIA,
NSA, and military would revolt, and 2) it was thought the Repugnants
would retaliate by blocking every piece of legislation they tried to
move (which, of course, they’ve done anyhow).
“Afterwards I told him that CIA friends confirmed that Obama would
have been in danger, but I added that he bent over backwards to protect
the criminals, and gave as an example the DoJ’s defense (state secrets)
of Jeppesen (the rendition arm of Boeing) a few days after his
inauguration.
“He shrugged and said they will never be prosecuted, and that sometimes politics trumps rule of law.
“It must not, I said.
“It shouldn’t, he said, and walked off.
“This is the Dean of the Berkeley School of Law.”
Another approach was taken to the divergence of official conduct from
clear demands of morality by an activist at Berkeley in 1964 named
Mario Savio, who said,
“There’s a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious —
makes you so sick at heart — that you can’t take part. You can’t even
passively take part. And you’ve got to put your bodies upon the gears
and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and
you’ve got to make it stop. And you’ve got to indicate to the people who
run it, to the people who own it, that unless you’re free, the machine
will be prevented from working at all.”
http://my.firedoglake.com/davidswanson/2011/09/02/insider-tells-why-obama-chose-not-to-prosecute-torture/
More than likely, Obama was made aware that the CIA would have him killed if he pursued prosecutions for torture. It's not about "politics," it's about GHW Bush, his control of the CIA, and willingness to kill those who cross him.
ReplyDeleteIs anyone's comments being intercepted? Now blogger (not discus) is saying they have enabled spam detection, and it has 3000 comments bogged down in blogger. I don't understand this, because I don't use blogger's comments, I use discus. And I look in blogger spam and ALL comments are in there...yet they're actually in discus. I don't understand this. Why is blogger even fucking around with anything like that?
ReplyDeleteCYA by CIA
ReplyDeleteISLAMOPHOBIA
ReplyDeletehttp://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/09/02/310779/meet-an-islamophobia-network-funder-the-varet-and-rosenwald-family/
Next up: "suicide bombers" (wink wink) in Turkey. Or a mass shooting by a "lone gunman".Or "civil unrest" in Turkey..."spontaneous", of course......Then
ReplyDeletewe will send in "humanitarian aid" (troops). Then "the rebels" will
find "atrocities" by the current Turkish regime that expelled the
ambassador from Israel. Shall I go on? Oh, wait! Then we'll send in "peacekeepers"...I forgot that one.
Turkey expels Israel ambassador over flotilla raid
http://ph.news.yahoo.com/turkey-expels-israel-ambassador-over-flotilla-raid-122327948.html